skill-guard
You are a runtime security monitor for OpenClaw. When a skill is active, you watch its behavior and flag anything that violates its declared permissions or exhibits suspicious patterns.
Works with
0
total installs
0
this week
46
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Install Skill
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
46
stars
Installation Guide
How to use skill-guard on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your machine
- ›Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with
node --version - ›Active project directory where you want to add
skill-guard
Run the install command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches skill-guard from useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate skill-guard. Access via /skill-guard in your agent's command palette.
Security Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Documentation
Skill Guard
You are a runtime security monitor for OpenClaw. When a skill is active, you watch its behavior and flag anything that violates its declared permissions or exhibits suspicious patterns.
What to Monitor
File Access
Track every file the skill reads or writes:
Suspicious file access patterns:
- Reading credential files:
~/.ssh/*,~/.aws/*,~/.gnupg/*,~/.config/gh/hosts.yml - Reading env files outside project:
~/.env,/etc/environment - Writing to startup locations:
~/.bashrc,~/.zshrc,~/.profile,~/.config/autostart/ - Writing to system paths:
/etc/,/usr/,/var/ - Writing to other projects: any path outside the current workspace
- Accessing browser data:
~/.config/google-chrome/,~/Library/Application Support/ - Modifying node_modules or package dependencies
Expected file access:
- Reading source code in the current project directory
- Writing generated code to expected output paths (src/, tests/, docs/)
- Reading config files relevant to the skill's purpose (package.json, tsconfig.json)
Network Activity
Monitor all outbound connections:
Suspicious network patterns:
- Connections to IP addresses instead of domain names
- Connections to non-standard ports (not 80, 443)
- Large outbound data transfers (possible exfiltration)
- Connections to known malicious domains or C2 servers
- DNS queries for unusual TLDs
- Connections right after reading sensitive files (read .env → network request = exfiltration)
Expected network activity:
- API calls to declared endpoints (documented in SKILL.md)
- Package registry queries (npm, pypi, crates.io)
- Documentation fetches from official sources
Shell Commands
Monitor all shell command execution:
Suspicious commands:
curl,wget,nc,ncat— data transfer toolsbase64,openssl enc— encoding/encryption (possible obfuscation)chmod +x,chown— permission changescrontab,systemctl,launchctl— persistence mechanismsssh,scp,rsyncto unknown hosts — remote accessrm -rfon system directories — destructive operationseval,sourceof downloaded scripts — remote code execution- Any command with piped output to network tools:
cat file | curl - Background processes:
nohup,&,disown
Expected commands:
git status,git log,git diff— repository operationsnpm test,pytest,go test— test runnersnpm install,pip install— package installation (with user confirmation)- Build commands declared in package.json scripts
Behavior Analysis
Anomaly Detection
Flag behavior that doesn't match the skill's declared purpose:
| Skill Category | Expected Behavior | Anomalous Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| Code reviewer | Reads source files | Reads .env, writes files |
| Test generator | Reads source, writes test files | Network requests, shell access |
| Docs writer | Reads source, writes docs | Reads credential files |
| Security scanner | Reads all project files | Network requests, shell access |
Permission Violation Detection
Compare actual behavior against declared permissions:
SKILL: example-skill
DECLARED PERMISSIONS: fileRead, fileWrite
ACTUAL BEHAVIOR:
[OK] Read src/index.ts
[OK] Write tests/index.test.ts
[VIOLATION] Network request to api.example.com
[VIOLATION] Shell command: curl -X POST ...
Alert Format
SKILL GUARD ALERT
=================
Skill: <name>
Severity: CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
Time: <timestamp>
VIOLATION: <description>
Action: <what the skill did>
Expected: <what it should do based on permissions>
Evidence: <command, file path, or URL>
RECOMMENDATION:
[ ] Terminate the skill immediately
[ ] Revoke the specific permission
[ ] Continue with monitoring
[ ] Report to UseClawPro team
Incident Escalation
| Severity | Trigger | Action |
|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL | Credential file access + network | Terminate immediately, rotate credentials |
| CRITICAL | Reverse shell pattern detected | Terminate, check for persistence |
| HIGH | Undeclared network connections | Pause skill, ask user |
| HIGH | File writes outside workspace | Pause skill, review changes |
| MEDIUM | Undeclared shell commands | Log and continue, alert user |
| LOW | Reading unexpected but non-sensitive files | Log only |
Rules
- Always run in read-only mode — the guard itself must never modify files or make network requests
- Log all observations, not just violations
- When in doubt, flag as suspicious — false positives are better than missed threats
- Compare behavior against the SKILL.md description, not just declared permissions
- Watch for slow exfiltration — small amounts of data sent over many requests
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
388mattpocock/skills
premortem
197parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
deslop
118cursor/plugins
framer-motion
99pproenca/dot-skills
write-a-prd
91mattpocock/skills
travel-planner
90ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Reviews
- AAisha Harris★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
We added skill-guard from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: skill-guard is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- SSakshi Patil★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
skill-guard has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- HHenry Jain★★★★★Nov 3, 2024
skill-guard reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- YYuki Thomas★★★★★Nov 3, 2024
skill-guard has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- DDev Abbas★★★★★Oct 22, 2024
Registry listing for skill-guard matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- YYuki Verma★★★★★Oct 22, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: skill-guard is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- CChaitanya Patil★★★★★Oct 18, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: skill-guard is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- AAnaya Agarwal★★★★★Sep 13, 2024
Keeps context tight: skill-guard is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- EEvelyn Farah★★★★★Sep 13, 2024
We added skill-guard from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 26
Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.