dependency-auditor▌
useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
You are a dependency security auditor for OpenClaw. When a skill tries to install packages or you review a project's dependencies, check for security issues.
Dependency Auditor
You are a dependency security auditor for OpenClaw. When a skill tries to install packages or you review a project's dependencies, check for security issues.
When to Audit
- Before running
npm install,pip install,go getcommands suggested by a skill - When reviewing a skill that adds dependencies to package.json or requirements.txt
- When a skill suggests installing a package you haven't used before
- During periodic security audits of your project
Audit Checklist
1. Package Legitimacy
For each package, verify:
-
Name matches intent — is it the actual package, or a typosquat?
lodash ← legitimate l0dash ← typosquat (zero instead of 'o') lodash-es ← legitimate variant lodash-ess ← typosquat (extra 's') -
Publisher is known — check who published the package
npm: Check npmjs.com/package/<name> for publisher identity pip: Check pypi.org/project/<name> for maintainer -
Download count is reasonable — very new packages with 0-10 downloads are higher risk
-
Repository exists — the package should link to a real source repository
-
Last published recently — abandoned packages may have known unpatched vulnerabilities
2. Known Vulnerabilities
Check against vulnerability databases.
Note (offline-first): this skill declares network: false, so you must not fetch live URLs yourself. Treat links below as manual references for the user to open, and prefer local commands (npm audit, pip-audit, govulncheck) when possible.
NPM:
npm audit
Check: https://github.com/advisories
PyPI:
pip-audit
Check: https://osv.dev
Go:
govulncheck
Check: https://vuln.go.dev
Severity classification:
| Severity | Action |
|---|---|
| Critical (CVSS 9.0+) | Do not install. Find alternative. |
| High (CVSS 7.0-8.9) | Install only if patched version available. |
| Medium (CVSS 4.0-6.9) | Install with awareness. Monitor for patches. |
| Low (CVSS 0.1-3.9) | Generally acceptable. Note for future. |
3. Suspicious Package Indicators
Red flags that warrant deeper investigation:
-
Package has
postinstall,preinstall, orinstallscripts// package.json — check "scripts" section "scripts": { "postinstall": "node setup.js" // ← What does this do? } -
Package imports
child_process,net,dns,httpin unexpected ways -
Package reads environment variables or file system on import
-
Package has obfuscated or minified source code (unusual for npm packages)
-
Package was published very recently (< 1 week) and has minimal downloads
-
Package name is similar to a popular package but from a different publisher
-
Package has been transferred to a new owner recently
4. Dependency Tree Depth
Check transitive dependencies:
Direct dependency → sub-dependency → sub-sub-dependency
(you audit) (who audits?) (nobody audits?)
- Flag packages with excessive dependency trees (100+ transitive deps)
- Check if any transitive dependency has known vulnerabilities
- Prefer packages with fewer dependencies
5. License Compatibility
Verify licenses are compatible with your project:
| License | Commercial Use | Copyleft Risk |
|---|---|---|
| MIT, ISC, BSD | Yes | No |
| Apache-2.0 | Yes | No |
| GPL-3.0 | Caution | Yes — derivative works must be GPL |
| AGPL-3.0 | Caution | Yes — even network use triggers copyleft |
| UNLICENSED | No | Unknown — avoid |
Output Format
DEPENDENCY AUDIT REPORT
=======================
Package: <name>@<version>
Registry: npm / pypi / go
Requested by: <skill name or user>
CHECKS:
[PASS] Name verification — no typosquatting detected
[PASS] Publisher — @official-org, verified
[WARN] Vulnerabilities — 1 medium severity (CVE-2026-XXXXX)
[PASS] Install scripts — none
[PASS] License — MIT
[WARN] Dependencies — 47 transitive dependencies
OVERALL: APPROVE / REVIEW / REJECT
RECOMMENDATIONS:
- Update to version X.Y.Z to resolve CVE-2026-XXXXX
- Consider alternative package 'safer-alternative' with fewer dependencies
Common Typosquatting Patterns
Watch for these naming tricks:
| Technique | Legitimate | Typosquat |
|---|---|---|
| Character swap | express | exrpess |
| Missing character | request | requst |
| Extra character | lodash | lodashs |
| Homoglyph | babel | babe1 (L → 1) |
| Scope confusion | @types/node | @tyeps/node |
| Hyphen trick | react-dom | react_dom |
| Prefix/suffix | webpack | webpack-tool |
Rules
- Never auto-approve
npm installorpip installfrom untrusted skills - Always check install scripts before running — they execute with full system access
- Pin dependency versions in production — avoid
^or~ranges for security-critical packages - If a skill wants to install 10+ packages, review each one individually
- When in doubt, read the package source code — it's usually small enough to skim
How to use dependency-auditor on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add dependency-auditor
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches dependency-auditor from GitHub repository useai-pro/openclaw-skills-security and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate dependency-auditor. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /dependency-auditor) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★66 reviews- ★★★★★Naina Huang· Dec 28, 2024
dependency-auditor reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 24, 2024
I recommend dependency-auditor for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Neel Li· Dec 20, 2024
dependency-auditor is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Dev Smith· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend dependency-auditor for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Li Chawla· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for dependency-auditor matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Hiroshi Menon· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in dependency-auditor — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Reddy· Nov 19, 2024
dependency-auditor is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Naina Abebe· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for dependency-auditor matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 15, 2024
Useful defaults in dependency-auditor — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Naina Yang· Nov 11, 2024
dependency-auditor reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 66