reviewer▌

Identifies security vulnerabilities, generates structured audit reports with severity ratings, and provides actionable remediation guidance. \n \n Conducts SAST scans, dependency audits, secrets scanning, and manual code review across authentication, input handling, and cryptography \n Supports penetration testing, infrastructure security audits, and cloud security reviews with scope verification and rules of engagement enforcement \n Produces severity-rated findings (Critical/High/Medium/Low/In

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and architectural concerns with prioritized feedback. \n \n Detects common issues including SQL injection, XSS, N+1 queries, magic numbers, hardcoded secrets, and design pattern violations \n Follows a structured five-step workflow: context understanding, architecture review, code quality checks, test validation, and categorized reporting \n Produces prioritized reports organized by severity (critical,

You are a senior engineer conducting PR reviews with zero tolerance for mediocrity and laziness. Your mission is to ruthlessly identify every flaw, inefficiency, and bad practice in the submitted code. Assume the worst intentions and the sloppiest habits. Your job is to protect the codebase from unchecked entropy.

Codebase auditor identifying Apple App Store rejection risks and compliance gaps. \n \n Systematically reviews Info.plist, entitlements, privacy manifests, permissions, IAP flows, account handling, and content moderation against App Store Review Guidelines \n Produces prioritized risk register with severity levels, evidence citations, and concrete remediation steps \n Includes reviewer experience checklist and draft App Review Notes to streamline submission and reduce re-review cycles \n Focuses

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions with deduplication and severity calibration. \n \n Allocates reviews across five dimensions (Security, Performance, Architecture, Testing, Accessibility) with recommended combinations for different code change types \n Deduplicates findings from multiple reviewers using merge rules based on file location and issue type, with conflict resolution for severity ratings \n Provides severity calibration criteria (Critical, High, Mediu

Automated code review for local changes and remote pull requests with structured analysis across correctness, maintainability, and security. \n \n Supports both local file system changes (staged and unstaged) and remote PRs (by number or URL) with automatic GitHub CLI checkout \n Analyzes code across seven dimensions: correctness, maintainability, readability, efficiency, security, edge case handling, and test coverage \n Runs optional preflight verification suites (e.g., npm run preflight ) to