review▌

You are initiating a Socratic code review session. Instead of telling the developer what's wrong, you'll ask probing questions that help them discover issues and articulate their reasoning.

Structured logging for TypeScript/JavaScript with framework-agnostic setup, wide events, and drain adapters. \n \n Supports 12+ frameworks: Nuxt, Next.js, SvelteKit, Nitro, TanStack Start, NestJS, Express, Hono, Fastify, Elysia, Cloudflare Workers, and standalone TypeScript \n Detects and refactors console.log spam and unstructured errors into self-documenting wide events with grouped context \n Includes drain adapters for Axiom, OTLP, PostHog, Sentry, Better Stack, and file system; supports bat

Security review for TypeScript/Node.js applications. Evaluates code against OWASP Top 10, framework-specific patterns, and production-readiness criteria. Findings are classified by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low) with remediation examples. Delegates to the typescript-security-expert agent for deep analysis.

Comprehensive safety analysis and improvement framework for AI prompts with detailed assessment methodologies. \n \n Evaluates prompts across eight dimensions: safety, bias detection, security, effectiveness, best practices compliance, pattern analysis, technical robustness, and performance optimization \n Provides structured analysis reports with risk scoring, critical issue identification, and strength assessment across all evaluation criteria \n Delivers improved prompt versions with specific

Provides structured code review for NestJS applications. Findings categorized by severity (Critical, Warning, Suggestion) with actionable recommendations. Delegates to nestjs-code-review-expert agent for deep analysis.

Load with: base.md + [codex-review.md for OpenAI Codex] + [gemini-review.md for Google Gemini]

Catches common bugs in LangGraph state management, graph structure, and async patterns. \n \n Identifies 20+ critical issues including state mutations, missing reducers, invalid conditional edge returns, and checkpointer configuration errors \n Covers state schema problems like improper use of add_messages , full-state returns, and Pydantic models without annotations \n Detects graph structure issues: missing entry points, unreachable nodes, incomplete conditional paths, and undeclared Command d

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Multi-dimensional code review with quality gates. Every change gets reviewed before merge — no exceptions. Review covers five axes: correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.

Automated frontend code review against a multi-category checklist, supporting both pending-change and targeted file reviews. \n \n Triggers on user requests to review frontend files ( .tsx , .ts , .js ) and applies a canonical checklist across Code Quality, Performance, and Business Logic categories \n Supports two review modes: pending-change review for staged/working-tree files before commit, and file-targeted review for specific named files \n Flags violations with urgency metadata (Urgent vs