tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor

sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Refactor code with confidence using comprehensive test safety net:

skill.md

Use this skill when

  • Working on tdd workflows tdd refactor tasks or workflows
  • Needing guidance, best practices, or checklists for tdd workflows tdd refactor

Do not use this skill when

  • The task is unrelated to tdd workflows tdd refactor
  • You need a different domain or tool outside this scope

Instructions

  • Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
  • Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
  • Provide actionable steps and verification.
  • If detailed examples are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.

Refactor code with confidence using comprehensive test safety net:

[Extended thinking: This tool uses the tdd-orchestrator agent (opus model) for sophisticated refactoring while maintaining all tests green. It applies design patterns, improves code quality, and optimizes performance with the safety of comprehensive test coverage.]

Usage

Use Task tool with subagent_type="tdd-orchestrator" to perform safe refactoring.

Prompt: "Refactor this code while keeping all tests green: $ARGUMENTS. Apply TDD refactor phase:

Core Process

1. Pre-Assessment

  • Run tests to establish green baseline
  • Analyze code smells and test coverage
  • Document current performance metrics
  • Create incremental refactoring plan

2. Code Smell Detection

  • Duplicated code → Extract methods/classes
  • Long methods → Decompose into focused functions
  • Large classes → Split responsibilities
  • Long parameter lists → Parameter objects
  • Feature Envy → Move methods to appropriate classes
  • Primitive Obsession → Value objects
  • Switch statements → Polymorphism
  • Dead code → Remove

3. Design Patterns

  • Apply Creational (Factory, Builder, Singleton)
  • Apply Structural (Adapter, Facade, Decorator)
  • Apply Behavioral (Strategy, Observer, Command)
  • Apply Domain (Repository, Service, Value Objects)
  • Use patterns only where they add clear value

4. SOLID Principles

  • Single Responsibility: One reason to change
  • Open/Closed: Open for extension, closed for modification
  • Liskov Substitution: Subtypes substitutable
  • Interface Segregation: Small, focused interfaces
  • Dependency Inversion: Depend on abstractions

5. Refactoring Techniques

  • Extract Method/Variable/Interface
  • Inline unnecessary indirection
  • Rename for clarity
  • Move Method/Field to appropriate classes
  • Replace Magic Numbers with constants
  • Encapsulate fields
  • Replace Conditional with Polymorphism
  • Introduce Null Object

6. Performance Optimization

  • Profile to identify bottlenecks
  • Optimize algorithms and data structures
  • Implement caching where beneficial
  • Reduce database queries (N+1 elimination)
  • Lazy loading and pagination
  • Always measure before and after

7. Incremental Steps

  • Make small, atomic changes
  • Run tests after each modification
  • Commit after each successful refactoring
  • Keep refactoring separate from behavior changes
  • Use scaffolding when needed

8. Architecture Evolution

  • Layer separation and dependency management
  • Module boundaries and interface definition
  • Event-driven patterns for decoupling
  • Database access pattern optimization

9. Safety Verification

  • Run full test suite after each change
  • Performance regression testing
  • Mutation testing for test effectiveness
  • Rollback plan for major changes

10. Advanced Patterns

  • Strangler Fig: Gradual legacy replacement
  • Branch by Abstraction: Large-scale changes
  • Parallel Change: Expand-contract pattern
  • Mikado Method: Dependency graph navigation

Output Requirements

  • Refactored code with improvements applied
  • Test results (all green)
  • Before/after metrics comparison
  • Applied refactoring techniques list
  • Performance improvement measurements
  • Remaining technical debt assessment

Safety Checklist

Before committing:

  • ✓ All tests pass (100% green)
  • ✓ No functionality regression
  • ✓ Performance metrics acceptable
  • ✓ Code coverage maintained/improved
  • ✓ Documentation updated

Recovery Protocol

If tests fail:

  • Immediately revert last change
  • Identify breaking refactoring
  • Apply smaller incremental changes
  • Use version control for safe experimentation

Example: Extract Method Pattern

Before:

class OrderProcessor {
  processOrder(order: Order): ProcessResult {
    // Validation
    if (!order.customerId || order.items.length === 0) {
      return { success: false, error: "Invalid order" };
    }

    // Calculate totals
    let subtotal = 0;
    for (const item of order.items) {
      subtotal += item.price * item.quantity;
    }
    let total = subtotal + (subtotal * 0.08) + (subtotal > 100 ? 0 : 15);

    // Process payment...
    // Update inventory...
    // Send confirmation...
  }
}

After:

class OrderProcessor {
  async processOrder(order: Order): Promise<ProcessResult> {
    const validation = this.validateOrder(order);
    if (!validation.isValid) return ProcessResult.failure(validation.error);

    const orderTotal = OrderTotal.calculate(order);
    const inventoryCheck = await this.inventoryService.checkAvailability(order.items);
    if (!inventoryCheck.available) return ProcessResult.failure(inventoryCheck.reason);

    await this.paymentService.processPayment(order.paymentMethod, orderTotal.total);
    await this.inventoryService.reserveItems(order.items);
    await this.notificationService.sendOrderConfirmation(order, orderTotal);

    return ProcessResult.success(order.id, orderTotal.total);
  }

  private validateOrder(order: Order): ValidationResult {
    if (!order.customerId) return ValidationResult.invalid("Customer ID required");
    if (order.items.length === 0) return ValidationResult.invalid("Order must contain items");
    return ValidationResult.valid();
  }
}

Applied: Extract Method, Value Objects, Dependency Injection, Async patterns

Code to refactor: $ARGUMENTS"

how to use tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor

How to use tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor

The skills CLI fetches tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor

Reload or restart Cursor to activate tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.660 reviews
  • Mateo Kim· Dec 20, 2024

    Useful defaults in tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 16, 2024

    We added tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Harper Srinivasan· Dec 12, 2024

    tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Harper Abbas· Dec 12, 2024

    Keeps context tight: tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Hassan Garcia· Dec 8, 2024

    Registry listing for tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Olivia Chen· Dec 8, 2024

    tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Daniel Flores· Nov 27, 2024

    tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Rahul Santra· Nov 15, 2024

    tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Soo Kapoor· Nov 11, 2024

    We added tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 7, 2024

    Useful defaults in tdd-workflows-tdd-refactor — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 60

1 / 6