github-automation▌
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Automate GitHub repository management, issue tracking, pull request workflows, branch operations, and CI/CD through Composio's GitHub toolkit.
GitHub Automation via Rube MCP
Automate GitHub repository management, issue tracking, pull request workflows, branch operations, and CI/CD through Composio's GitHub toolkit.
Prerequisites
- Rube MCP must be connected (RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLS available)
- Active GitHub connection via
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONSwith toolkitgithub - Always call
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLSfirst to get current tool schemas
Setup
Get Rube MCP: Add https://rube.app/mcp as an MCP server in your client configuration. No API keys needed — just add the endpoint and it works.
- Verify Rube MCP is available by confirming
RUBE_SEARCH_TOOLSresponds - Call
RUBE_MANAGE_CONNECTIONSwith toolkitgithub - If connection is not ACTIVE, follow the returned auth link to complete GitHub OAuth
- Confirm connection status shows ACTIVE before running any workflows
Core Workflows
1. Create and Manage Issues
When to use: User wants to create, list, or manage GitHub issues
Tool sequence:
GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORIES_FOR_THE_AUTHENTICATED_USER- Find target repo if unknown [Prerequisite]GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORY_ISSUES- List existing issues (includes PRs) [Required]GITHUB_CREATE_AN_ISSUE- Create a new issue [Required]GITHUB_CREATE_AN_ISSUE_COMMENT- Add comments to an issue [Optional]GITHUB_SEARCH_ISSUES_AND_PULL_REQUESTS- Search across repos by keyword [Optional]
Key parameters:
owner: Repository owner (username or org), case-insensitiverepo: Repository name without .git extensiontitle: Issue title (required for creation)body: Issue description (supports Markdown)labels: Array of label namesassignees: Array of GitHub usernamesstate: 'open', 'closed', or 'all' for filtering
Pitfalls:
GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORY_ISSUESreturns both issues AND pull requests; checkpull_requestfield to distinguish- Only users with push access can set assignees, labels, and milestones; they are silently dropped otherwise
- Pagination:
per_pagemax 100; iterate pages until empty
2. Manage Pull Requests
When to use: User wants to create, review, or merge pull requests
Tool sequence:
GITHUB_FIND_PULL_REQUESTS- Search and filter PRs [Required]GITHUB_GET_A_PULL_REQUEST- Get detailed PR info including mergeable status [Required]GITHUB_LIST_PULL_REQUESTS_FILES- Review changed files [Optional]GITHUB_CREATE_A_PULL_REQUEST- Create a new PR [Required]GITHUB_CREATE_AN_ISSUE_COMMENT- Post review comments [Optional]GITHUB_LIST_CHECK_RUNS_FOR_A_REF- Verify CI status before merge [Optional]GITHUB_MERGE_A_PULL_REQUEST- Merge after explicit user approval [Required]
Key parameters:
head: Source branch with changes (must exist; for cross-repo: 'username:branch')base: Target branch to merge into (e.g., 'main')title: PR title (required unlessissuenumber provided)merge_method: 'merge', 'squash', or 'rebase'state: 'open', 'closed', or 'all'
Pitfalls:
GITHUB_CREATE_A_PULL_REQUESTfails with 422 if base/head are invalid, identical, or already mergedGITHUB_MERGE_A_PULL_REQUESTcan be rejected if PR is draft, closed, or branch protection applies- Always verify mergeable status with
GITHUB_GET_A_PULL_REQUESTimmediately before merging - Require explicit user confirmation before calling MERGE
3. Manage Repositories and Branches
When to use: User wants to create repos, manage branches, or update repo settings
Tool sequence:
GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORIES_FOR_THE_AUTHENTICATED_USER- List user's repos [Required]GITHUB_GET_A_REPOSITORY- Get detailed repo info [Optional]GITHUB_CREATE_A_REPOSITORY_FOR_THE_AUTHENTICATED_USER- Create personal repo [Required]GITHUB_CREATE_AN_ORGANIZATION_REPOSITORY- Create org repo [Alternative]GITHUB_LIST_BRANCHES- List branches [Required]GITHUB_CREATE_A_REFERENCE- Create new branch from SHA [Required]GITHUB_UPDATE_A_REPOSITORY- Update repo settings [Optional]
Key parameters:
name: Repository nameprivate: Boolean for visibilityref: Full reference path (e.g., 'refs/heads/new-branch')sha: Commit SHA to point the new reference todefault_branch: Default branch name
Pitfalls:
GITHUB_CREATE_A_REFERENCEonly creates NEW references; useGITHUB_UPDATE_A_REFERENCEfor existing onesrefmust start with 'refs/' and contain at least two slashesGITHUB_LIST_BRANCHESpaginates viapage/per_page; iterate until empty pageGITHUB_DELETE_A_REPOSITORYis permanent and irreversible; requires admin privileges
4. Search Code and Commits
When to use: User wants to find code, files, or commits across repositories
Tool sequence:
GITHUB_SEARCH_CODE- Search file contents and paths [Required]GITHUB_SEARCH_CODE_ALL_PAGES- Multi-page code search [Alternative]GITHUB_SEARCH_COMMITS_BY_AUTHOR- Search commits by author/date/org [Required]GITHUB_LIST_COMMITS- List commits for a specific repo [Alternative]GITHUB_GET_A_COMMIT- Get detailed commit info [Optional]GITHUB_GET_REPOSITORY_CONTENT- Get file content [Optional]
Key parameters:
q: Search query with qualifiers (language:python,repo:owner/repo,extension:js)owner/repo: For repo-specific commit listingauthor: Filter by commit authorsince/until: ISO 8601 date range for commits
Pitfalls:
- Code search only indexes files under 384KB on default branch
- Maximum 1000 results returned from code search
GITHUB_SEARCH_COMMITS_BY_AUTHORrequires keywords in addition to qualifiers; qualifier-only queries are not allowedGITHUB_LIST_COMMITSreturns 409 on empty repos
5. Manage CI/CD and Deployments
When to use: User wants to view workflows, check CI status, or manage deployments
Tool sequence:
GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORY_WORKFLOWS- List GitHub Actions workflows [Required]GITHUB_GET_A_WORKFLOW- Get workflow details by ID or filename [Optional]GITHUB_CREATE_A_WORKFLOW_DISPATCH_EVENT- Manually trigger a workflow [Required]GITHUB_LIST_CHECK_RUNS_FOR_A_REF- Check CI status for a commit/branch [Required]GITHUB_LIST_DEPLOYMENTS- List deployments [Optional]GITHUB_GET_A_DEPLOYMENT_STATUS- Get deployment status [Optional]
Key parameters:
workflow_id: Numeric ID or filename (e.g., 'ci.yml')ref: Git reference (branch/tag) for workflow dispatchinputs: JSON string of workflow inputs matchingon.workflow_dispatch.inputsenvironment: Filter deployments by environment name
Pitfalls:
GITHUB_CREATE_A_WORKFLOW_DISPATCH_EVENTrequires the workflow to haveworkflow_dispatchtrigger configured- Full path
.github/workflows/main.ymlis auto-stripped to justmain.yml - Inputs max 10 key-value pairs; must match workflow's
on.workflow_dispatch.inputsdefinitions
6. Manage Users and Permissions
When to use: User wants to check collaborators, permissions, or branch protection
Tool sequence:
GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORY_COLLABORATORS- List repo collaborators [Required]GITHUB_GET_REPOSITORY_PERMISSIONS_FOR_A_USER- Check specific user's access [Optional]GITHUB_GET_BRANCH_PROTECTION- Inspect branch protection rules [Required]GITHUB_UPDATE_BRANCH_PROTECTION- Update protection settings [Optional]GITHUB_ADD_A_REPOSITORY_COLLABORATOR- Add/update collaborator [Optional]
Key parameters:
affiliation: 'outside', 'direct', or 'all' for collaborator filteringpermission: Filter by 'pull', 'triage', 'push', 'maintain', 'admin'branch: Branch name for protection rulesenforce_admins: Whether protection applies to admins
Pitfalls:
GITHUB_GET_BRANCH_PROTECTIONreturns 404 for unprotected branches; treat as no protection rules- Determine push ability from
permissions.pushorrole_name, not display labels GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORY_COLLABORATORSpaginates; iterate all pagesGITHUB_GET_REPOSITORY_PERMISSIONS_FOR_A_USERmay be inconclusive for non-collaborators
Common Patterns
ID Resolution
- Repo name -> owner/repo:
GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORIES_FOR_THE_AUTHENTICATED_USER - PR number -> PR details:
GITHUB_FIND_PULL_REQUESTSthenGITHUB_GET_A_PULL_REQUEST - Branch name -> SHA:
GITHUB_GET_A_BRANCH - Workflow name -> ID:
GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORY_WORKFLOWS
Pagination
All list endpoints use page-based pagination:
page: Page number (starts at 1)per_page: Results per page (max 100)- Iterate until response returns fewer results than
per_page
Safety
- Always verify PR mergeable status before merge
- Require explicit user confirmation for destructive operations (merge, delete)
- Check CI status with
GITHUB_LIST_CHECK_RUNS_FOR_A_REFbefore merging
Known Pitfalls
- Issues vs PRs:
GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORY_ISSUESreturns both; checkpull_requestfield - Pagination limits:
per_pagemax 100; always iterate pages until empty - Branch creation:
GITHUB_CREATE_A_REFERENCEfails with 422 if reference already exists - Merge guards: Merge can fail due to branch protection, failing checks, or draft status
- Code search limits: Only files <384KB on default branch; max 1000 results
- Commit search: Requires search text keywords alongside qualifiers
- Destructive actions: Repo deletion is irreversible; merge cannot be undone
- Silent permission drops: Labels, assignees, milestones silently dropped without push access
Quick Reference
| Task | Tool Slug | Key Params |
|---|---|---|
| List repos | GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORIES_FOR_THE_AUTHENTICATED_USER |
type, sort, per_page |
| Get repo | GITHUB_GET_A_REPOSITORY |
owner, repo |
| Create issue | GITHUB_CREATE_AN_ISSUE |
owner, repo, title, body |
| List issues | GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORY_ISSUES |
owner, repo, state |
| Find PRs | GITHUB_FIND_PULL_REQUESTS |
repo, state, author |
| Create PR | GITHUB_CREATE_A_PULL_REQUEST |
owner, repo, head, base, title |
| Merge PR | GITHUB_MERGE_A_PULL_REQUEST |
owner, repo, pull_number, merge_method |
| List branches | GITHUB_LIST_BRANCHES |
owner, repo |
| Create branch | GITHUB_CREATE_A_REFERENCE |
owner, repo, ref, sha |
| Search code | GITHUB_SEARCH_CODE |
q |
| List commits | GITHUB_LIST_COMMITS |
owner, repo, author, since |
| Search commits | GITHUB_SEARCH_COMMITS_BY_AUTHOR |
q |
| List workflows | GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORY_WORKFLOWS |
owner, repo |
| Trigger workflow | GITHUB_CREATE_A_WORKFLOW_DISPATCH_EVENT |
owner, repo, workflow_id, ref |
| Check CI | GITHUB_LIST_CHECK_RUNS_FOR_A_REF |
owner, repo, ref |
| List collaborators | GITHUB_LIST_REPOSITORY_COLLABORATORS |
owner, repo |
| Branch protection | GITHUB_GET_BRANCH_PROTECTION |
owner, repo, branch |
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
How to use github-automation on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add github-automation
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches github-automation from GitHub repository sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate github-automation. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /github-automation) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★43 reviews- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 24, 2024
github-automation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Nia Rao· Dec 24, 2024
Registry listing for github-automation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 20, 2024
We added github-automation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Tariq Ramirez· Dec 20, 2024
github-automation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Kofi Okafor· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: github-automation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Daniel Jain· Nov 23, 2024
github-automation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 15, 2024
Keeps context tight: github-automation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Chen Bansal· Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: github-automation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Dev Garcia· Nov 15, 2024
github-automation reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Benjamin Sharma· Nov 11, 2024
I recommend github-automation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 43