expo-architect▌
shipshitdev/library · updated May 16, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Create production-ready Expo React Native apps with:
Expo Architect
Create production-ready Expo React Native apps with:
- Framework: Expo SDK 54 + React Native 0.83 + TypeScript
- Navigation: Expo Router (file-based routing)
- Auth: Clerk authentication (optional)
- UI: NativeWind (Tailwind for RN) or StyleSheet
- Quality: Biome linting + TypeScript strict mode
- Package Manager: bun
What Makes This Different
Generates working mobile apps, not empty scaffolds:
- Complete navigation structure with working screens
- Optional Clerk authentication flow
- Real UI components with proper styling
- API client integration ready
- Runs immediately with
bun start
Workflow Summary
- PRD Brief Intake - Extract app type, screens, features, auth needs
- Auth Setup (if requested) - Clerk provider, sign-in/sign-up screens
- Screen Generation - Tab or stack-based navigation
- Component Generation - UI components, entity components, layouts
- Quality Setup - Biome, TypeScript strict, path aliases
- Verification - Run quality gate, report results
Usage
# Create app with PRD-style prompt
python3 ~/.claude/skills/expo-architect/scripts/init-expo.py \
--root ~/www/myapp \
--name "My App" \
--brief "A fitness tracker where users can log workouts"
# With specific options
python3 ~/.claude/skills/expo-architect/scripts/init-expo.py \
--root ~/www/myapp \
--name "My App" \
--tabs "Home,Workouts,Profile" \
--auth
Generated Structure
myapp/
├── app/
│ ├── _layout.tsx # Root layout
│ ├── (tabs)/ # Tab navigator
│ │ ├── _layout.tsx
│ │ ├── index.tsx
│ │ └── ...
│ └── (auth)/ # Auth screens (if enabled)
├── components/
│ ├── ui/ # Base UI components
│ ├── [entity]/ # Feature components
│ └── layout/ # Layout components
├── lib/
│ ├── api.ts # API client
│ └── auth.ts # Auth utilities
├── providers/ # Context providers
├── types/ # TypeScript types
├── app.json # Expo config
├── package.json
├── tsconfig.json
└── biome.json
Development Commands
bun start # Start Expo dev server
bun run ios # iOS simulator
bun run android # Android emulator
bun run lint # Check code style
bun run typecheck # Type checking
Environment Variables
EXPO_PUBLIC_CLERK_PUBLISHABLE_KEY=pk_test_...
EXPO_PUBLIC_API_URL=http://localhost:3001
For detailed patterns, code templates, and complete examples: references/full-guide.md
How to use expo-architect on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add expo-architect
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches expo-architect from GitHub repository shipshitdev/library and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate expo-architect. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /expo-architect) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★58 reviews- ★★★★★Diego Khan· Dec 28, 2024
I recommend expo-architect for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 16, 2024
I recommend expo-architect for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Soo Zhang· Dec 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: expo-architect is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Ren Sanchez· Dec 12, 2024
expo-architect fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Kwame Reddy· Dec 12, 2024
expo-architect reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Soo Robinson· Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: expo-architect is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 7, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: expo-architect is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Omar Singh· Nov 3, 2024
I recommend expo-architect for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Jin Torres· Nov 3, 2024
We added expo-architect from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Kaira Tandon· Nov 3, 2024
expo-architect has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 58