academic-writing-style

shining319/claude-code-single-person-workflow · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/shining319/claude-code-single-person-workflow --skill academic-writing-style
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Transform provided information into well-written academic assignments that match the user's natural writing style, avoiding obvious AI patterns while maintaining professional quality.

skill.md

Academic Writing Style

Transform provided information into well-written academic assignments that match the user's natural writing style, avoiding obvious AI patterns while maintaining professional quality.

Core Approach

Generate content that reads naturally and fluently, with:

  • Clear chapter organization using descriptive headings
  • Natural topic progression without rigid "firstly...secondly...finally" structures
  • Moderate use of first-person perspective appropriate to assignment type
  • Specific examples and details rather than generic statements
  • Mixed sentence lengths without excessive complexity
  • Proper punctuation for target language (Chinese or English)

Before Writing

  1. Clarify assignment requirements:

    • Assignment type (technical analysis, research review, case study, etc.)
    • Target language (Chinese, English, or both)
    • Expected length or scope
    • Specific topics or concepts to cover
    • Any special requirements
  2. Load appropriate references:

    • For Chinese assignments: read references/chinese-examples.md
    • For English assignments: read references/english-examples.md
    • Always read references/writing-guidelines.md for core principles
  3. Assess personalization level:

    • Technical analyses: More objective, minimal first-person
    • Research reviews: Moderate personal voice
    • Case studies: Higher personalization appropriate with reflections

Writing Process

Structure Development

Create descriptive chapter headings that preview content rather than generic labels:

  • Instead of "Introduction" → "Docker and the Container Revolution: A Practical Perspective"
  • Instead of "Analysis" → "从繁琐到简洁:Spring Boot如何改变Java开发"
  • Instead of "Conclusion" → "Migrating a Production Database: Lessons from a Zero-Downtime PostgreSQL Switch"

Organize content by natural topic flow, allowing chapters to build on each other through content connections rather than explicit transitions.

Paragraph Construction

Integrate information into flowing paragraphs instead of lists. When information naturally forms a list, embed it in prose:

Avoid: The key advantages include:

  • Performance improvement
  • Cost reduction
  • Scalability enhancement

Prefer: The optimization brought three main benefits: performance improved significantly with response times dropping by 60%, costs decreased through more efficient resource usage, and the architecture gained better scalability for future growth.

Transitions and Flow

Connect paragraphs through:

  • Topic extension: Last concept of previous paragraph continues in next
  • Natural contrast: Present contrasting ideas without heavy transition words
  • Implicit questions: Address unstated questions the content raises
  • Chapter breaks: Use chapter divisions to signal major topic shifts

Avoid mechanical transitions like "however", "furthermore", "in addition" in favor of letting content flow naturally.

Incorporating Examples and Details

Make writing concrete through:

  • Specific metrics: "response time dropped from 8 seconds to 2 seconds"
  • Real cases: "Netflix split their monolith into hundreds of microservices over several years"
  • Technical details: "the query involved 7 table joins and generated N+1 query problems"
  • Personal observations: "in my experience, this approach works well for..." (use sparingly)

Language Calibration

For Chinese writing:

  • Use proper Chinese punctuation: ,。:""
  • Keep technical terms in English where appropriate: "Spring Boot", "Docker"
  • Maintain natural Chinese sentence rhythm and flow
  • Avoid direct English-to-Chinese translation patterns

For English writing (IELTS 6.0 level):

  • Prefer common over complex vocabulary: "use" instead of "utilize"
  • Keep sentences under 30 words typically
  • Use clear, direct constructions
  • Define acronyms on first use: "Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)"
  • Mix sentence lengths for readability

First-Person Usage

Use first-person perspective strategically:

  • Describing practical experience: "笔者在项目中遇到过..." / "from my experience..."
  • Expressing informed opinions: "我认为..." / "I found that..."
  • Case study reflections: "如果重新设计,我会..." / "looking back, I would..."

Maintain objectivity for:

  • Technical explanations of principles
  • Literature review content
  • Pure technical analysis

Quality Verification

Before finalizing, verify:

  • No "firstly...secondly...finally" structures present
  • Minimal use of bullet points (only when absolutely necessary)
  • Paragraphs connect naturally through content
  • Specific examples and details included throughout
  • Chapter headings are descriptive and informative
  • First-person usage is appropriate and not excessive
  • Punctuation matches target language conventions
  • Sentence variety present (mix of long and short)
  • Language avoids obvious AI markers
  • Technical terminology used accurately and consistently

Special Considerations

For bilingual assignments (both Chinese and English versions needed):

  • Write each version independently, not as direct translation
  • Adapt examples and phrasing to each language's natural patterns
  • Maintain consistent technical accuracy across both versions
  • Adjust formality level appropriately for each language context

For technical analysis:

  • Reduce personal voice, increase objectivity
  • Focus on technical accuracy and detailed explanation
  • Use concrete examples from real systems or projects
  • Balance accessibility with technical precision

For research reviews:

  • Synthesize sources into narrative rather than listing them
  • Show connections and evolution of ideas
  • Acknowledge debates and different perspectives
  • Maintain critical but balanced tone

For case studies:

  • Provide rich contextual details
  • Include specific challenges encountered
  • Reflect on lessons learned (appropriate place for first-person)
  • Balance description with analysis

File Output Convention

Output Directory Convention

Recommended Approach (Following Claude Code Official Standards):

Save all academic writing outputs to outputs/<project-name>/writing/:

outputs/
└── <project-name>/              # Project name (e.g., cloud-computing-analysis)
    └── writing/
        ├── technical-analysis.md    # Technical analysis report
        ├── research-review.md       # Research review document
        ├── case-study.md            # Case study report
        └── project-documentation.md # Project documentation

Example:

outputs/
├── cloud-computing-analysis/
│   └── writing/
│       └── technical-analysis.md
├── ai-ethics-research/
│   └── writing/
│       └── research-review.md
└── database-optimization-case/
    └── writing/
        └── case-study.md

Alternative Approach (Traditional Project Structure):

If your project has an existing directory structure, you can also use:

project-root/
└── docs/
    ├── technical-analysis.md
    ├── research-review.md
    └── case-study.md

Output File List

Generate documents based on assignment type:

Technical Analysis:

  • technical-analysis.md - Technical analysis report

Research Review:

  • research-review.md - Research review document

Case Study:

  • case-study.md - Case study report

Project Documentation:

  • project-documentation.md - Project documentation

File Naming Convention

  • Use kebab-case: cloud-computing-technical-analysis.md
  • Include version/date when needed: research-review-v1.0.md
  • Use descriptive names: database-optimization-case-study.md
  • Specify language if bilingual: technical-analysis-en.md, technical-analysis-zh.md

Delivery Summary

After generating the document, provide a brief summary:

  • Document type and target language
  • Word count and chapter structure
  • Key topics covered
  • Writing style characteristics applied
  • File save location confirmation

References

Detailed examples and guidelines available in:

  • references/chinese-examples.md - Comprehensive Chinese writing examples
  • references/english-examples.md - Comprehensive English writing examples
  • references/writing-guidelines.md - Core writing principles and techniques
how to use academic-writing-style

How to use academic-writing-style on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add academic-writing-style
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/shining319/claude-code-single-person-workflow --skill academic-writing-style

The skills CLI fetches academic-writing-style from GitHub repository shining319/claude-code-single-person-workflow and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/academic-writing-style

Reload or restart Cursor to activate academic-writing-style. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /academic-writing-style) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.570 reviews
  • Mateo Khan· Dec 24, 2024

    Registry listing for academic-writing-style matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Luis Verma· Dec 16, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: academic-writing-style is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 12, 2024

    academic-writing-style is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • William Martinez· Dec 8, 2024

    academic-writing-style reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Naina Chen· Dec 8, 2024

    I recommend academic-writing-style for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Luis Martin· Nov 27, 2024

    academic-writing-style has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Neel Khanna· Nov 27, 2024

    Useful defaults in academic-writing-style — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Luis Tandon· Nov 23, 2024

    We added academic-writing-style from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Fatima White· Nov 15, 2024

    academic-writing-style fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Michael Diallo· Nov 7, 2024

    We added academic-writing-style from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 70

1 / 7