Framework for evaluating emerging technologies using insights from 22 product leaders.
Works with
Start by clarifying the problem being solved, then assess technology maturity and stability for your specific use case
Adopt a \"build and buy\" mindset: purchase tools for standard 90% functionality, build custom solutions for your unique 10%
Prioritize mental bandwidth and core competencies over cost savings; constantly re-test assumptions about what new tools can actually do
Design for modula
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionevaluating-new-technologyExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches evaluating-new-technology from refoundai/lenny-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate evaluating-new-technology. Access via /evaluating-new-technology in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
616
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
616
stars
Help the user evaluate emerging technologies using frameworks from 22 product leaders who have made critical technology decisions at companies from Google to Shopify.
When the user asks for help evaluating technology:
Austin Hay: "I have this adage I always say, which is tools are just meant to solve problems. And the problem set for marketing technologists and business technologists is you focus on the tools." Always define the problem and the people involved before selecting a system or tool.
Austin Hay: "Build and buy as opposed to build versus buy. Build and buy means that both of you can win." Buy tools to handle 90% of standard functionality and build the 'cool' 10% that is unique to your business.
Dhanji R. Prasanna: "The savings and costs that there might be in replacing a vendor tool by something you build in-house is probably not worth it in the mental bandwidth that you've lost." Focus technical bandwidth on core competencies, not recreating vendor tools.
Aparna Chennapragada: "The models couldn't do some things one year ago. My impression of it from trying it a few months ago - that prior needs to be updated. The baby just grew up to be a 15-year-old in a month." Re-test assumptions about what technology can do every few months.
Asha Sharma: "You really need to bet on a platform or some app server type layer that allows you to swap things in and out and not really be beholden to any one technology." Invest in modularity as the AI stack evolves.
Sander Schulhoff: "AI guardrails do not work. If someone is determined enough to trick GPT-5, they're going to deal with that guardrail. When these guardrail providers say 'We catch everything,' that's a complete lie." Be skeptical of AI security vendor claims.
Dhanji R. Prasanna: "I would say really try and use these tools yourself. We learn a lot about how our own workflow can change." Solve a specific, personal problem with new tools to understand their true strengths.
Jeanne Grosser: "Because this whole space is so nascent, often your own esoteric context, your content, your workflow is really key to unlocking the power of the agent." For AI agents, building internally often beats buying.
For all 27 insights from 22 guests, see references/guest-insights.md
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: evaluating-new-technology is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Registry listing for evaluating-new-technology matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Useful defaults in evaluating-new-technology — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
evaluating-new-technology has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
evaluating-new-technology reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend evaluating-new-technology for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
evaluating-new-technology is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
We added evaluating-new-technology from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Useful defaults in evaluating-new-technology — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Registry listing for evaluating-new-technology matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 60