api-testing-patterns

proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill api-testing-patterns
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

<default_to_action>

  • When testing APIs or designing API test strategy:
skill.md

API Testing Patterns

<default_to_action> When testing APIs or designing API test strategy:

  1. IDENTIFY testing level: contract, integration, or component
  2. TEST the contract, not implementation (consumer perspective)
  3. VALIDATE auth, input, errors, idempotency, concurrency
  4. AUTOMATE in CI/CD with schema validation
  5. MONITOR production APIs for contract drift

Quick Pattern Selection:

  • Microservices → Consumer-driven contracts (Pact)
  • REST APIs → CRUD + pagination + filtering tests
  • GraphQL → Query validation + complexity limits
  • External deps → Mock with component testing
  • Performance → Load test critical endpoints

Critical Success Factors:

  • APIs are contracts - test from consumer perspective
  • Always test error scenarios, not just happy paths
  • Version your API tests to prevent breaking changes </default_to_action>

Quick Reference Card

When to Use

  • Testing REST or GraphQL APIs
  • Validating microservice contracts
  • Designing API test strategies
  • Preventing breaking API changes

Testing Levels

Level Purpose Dependencies Speed
Contract Provider-consumer agreement None Fast
Component API in isolation Mocked Fast
Integration Real dependencies Database, services Slower

Critical Test Scenarios

Scenario Must Test Example
Auth 401/403 handling Expired token, wrong user
Input 400 validation Missing fields, wrong types
Errors 500 graceful handling DB down, timeout
Idempotency Duplicate prevention Same idempotency key
Concurrency Race conditions Parallel checkout

Tools

  • Contract: Pact, Spring Cloud Contract
  • REST: Supertest, REST-assured, Playwright
  • Load: k6, Artillery, JMeter

Agent Coordination

  • qe-api-contract-validator: Validate contracts, detect breaking changes
  • qe-test-generator: Generate tests from OpenAPI spec
  • qe-performance-tester: Load test endpoints
  • qe-security-scanner: API security testing

Contract Testing

Pattern: Consumer-Driven Contracts

// Consumer defines expectations
const contract = {
  request: { method: 'POST', path: '/orders', body: { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 } },
  response: { status: 201, body: { orderId: 'string', total: 'number' } }
};

// Provider must fulfill
test('order API meets contract', async () => {
  const response = await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 });

  expect(response.status).toBe(201);
  expect(response.body).toMatchSchema({
    orderId: expect.any(String),
    total: expect.any(Number)
  });
});

When: Microservices, distributed systems, third-party integrations


Critical Test Patterns

Authentication & Authorization

describe('Auth', () => {
  it('rejects without token', async () => {
    expect((await api.get('/orders')).status).toBe(401);
  });

  it('rejects expired token', async () => {
    const expired = generateExpiredToken();
    expect((await api.get('/orders', { headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${expired}` } })).status).toBe(401);
  });

  it('blocks cross-user access', async () => {
    const userAToken = generateToken({ userId: 'A' });
    expect((await api.get('/orders/user-B-order', { headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userAToken}` } })).status).toBe(403);
  });
});

Input Validation

describe('Validation', () => {
  it('validates required fields', async () => {
    const response = await api.post('/orders', { quantity: 2 }); // Missing productId
    expect(response.status).toBe(400);
    expect(response.body.errors).toContain('productId is required');
  });

  it('validates types', async () => {
    expect((await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 'two' })).status).toBe(400);
  });

  it('validates ranges', async () => {
    expect((await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: -5 })).status).toBe(400);
  });
});

Idempotency

it('prevents duplicates with idempotency key', async () => {
  
how to use api-testing-patterns

How to use api-testing-patterns on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add api-testing-patterns
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe --skill api-testing-patterns

The skills CLI fetches api-testing-patterns from GitHub repository proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/api-testing-patterns

Reload or restart Cursor to activate api-testing-patterns. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /api-testing-patterns) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.829 reviews
  • Ira Thomas· Dec 28, 2024

    I recommend api-testing-patterns for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Fatima Haddad· Dec 20, 2024

    Useful defaults in api-testing-patterns — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 8, 2024

    api-testing-patterns fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 4, 2024

    Useful defaults in api-testing-patterns — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Chen Li· Dec 4, 2024

    We added api-testing-patterns from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Piyush G· Nov 27, 2024

    Registry listing for api-testing-patterns matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Xiao Chawla· Nov 23, 2024

    api-testing-patterns reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Shikha Mishra· Oct 18, 2024

    api-testing-patterns reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Li Chawla· Oct 14, 2024

    Registry listing for api-testing-patterns matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Ira Choi· Sep 17, 2024

    api-testing-patterns is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

showing 1-10 of 29

1 / 3