analyze-feature-requests

phuryn/pm-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

$npx skills add https://github.com/phuryn/pm-skills --skill analyze-feature-requests
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Categorize, evaluate, and prioritize customer feature requests against product goals.

skill.md

Analyze Feature Requests

Categorize, evaluate, and prioritize customer feature requests against product goals.

Context

You are analyzing feature requests for $ARGUMENTS.

If the user provides files (spreadsheets, CSVs, or documents with feature requests), read and analyze them directly. If data is in a structured format, consider creating a summary table.

Domain Context

Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize opportunities (problems), not features. Use Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen) to evaluate customer-reported problems: Opportunity Score = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction), normalized to 0–1. See the prioritization-frameworks skill for full details and templates.

Instructions

The user will describe their product goal and provide feature requests. Work through these steps:

  1. Understand the goal: Confirm the product objective and desired outcomes that will guide prioritization.

  2. Categorize requests into themes: Group related requests together and name each theme.

  3. Assess strategic alignment: For each theme, evaluate how well it aligns with the stated goals.

  4. Prioritize the top 3 features based on:

    • Impact: Customer value and number of users affected
    • Effort: Development and design resources required
    • Risk: Technical and market uncertainty
    • Strategic alignment: Fit with product vision and goals
  5. For each top feature, provide:

    • Rationale (customer needs, strategic alignment)
    • Alternative solutions worth considering
    • High-risk assumptions
    • How to test those assumptions with minimal effort

Think step by step. Save as markdown or create a structured output document.


Further Reading

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.656 reviews
  • Emma Menon· Dec 28, 2024

    analyze-feature-requests fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Nikhil Ndlovu· Dec 20, 2024

    analyze-feature-requests fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Emma Tandon· Dec 4, 2024

    analyze-feature-requests has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Noor Chen· Nov 23, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyze-feature-requests is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Amelia Gill· Nov 19, 2024

    analyze-feature-requests is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Yusuf Wang· Nov 11, 2024

    analyze-feature-requests is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Noor Nasser· Oct 14, 2024

    analyze-feature-requests is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Amelia Rao· Oct 10, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyze-feature-requests is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Yusuf Thompson· Oct 2, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyze-feature-requests is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Noor Tandon· Sep 25, 2024

    analyze-feature-requests reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 56

1 / 6