analyze-feature-requests▌
phuryn/pm-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
Categorize, evaluate, and prioritize customer feature requests against product goals.
Analyze Feature Requests
Categorize, evaluate, and prioritize customer feature requests against product goals.
Context
You are analyzing feature requests for $ARGUMENTS.
If the user provides files (spreadsheets, CSVs, or documents with feature requests), read and analyze them directly. If data is in a structured format, consider creating a summary table.
Domain Context
Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize opportunities (problems), not features. Use Opportunity Score (Dan Olsen) to evaluate customer-reported problems: Opportunity Score = Importance × (1 − Satisfaction), normalized to 0–1. See the prioritization-frameworks skill for full details and templates.
Instructions
The user will describe their product goal and provide feature requests. Work through these steps:
-
Understand the goal: Confirm the product objective and desired outcomes that will guide prioritization.
-
Categorize requests into themes: Group related requests together and name each theme.
-
Assess strategic alignment: For each theme, evaluate how well it aligns with the stated goals.
-
Prioritize the top 3 features based on:
- Impact: Customer value and number of users affected
- Effort: Development and design resources required
- Risk: Technical and market uncertainty
- Strategic alignment: Fit with product vision and goals
-
For each top feature, provide:
- Rationale (customer needs, strategic alignment)
- Alternative solutions worth considering
- High-risk assumptions
- How to test those assumptions with minimal effort
Think step by step. Save as markdown or create a structured output document.
Further Reading
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★56 reviews- ★★★★★Emma Menon· Dec 28, 2024
analyze-feature-requests fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Ndlovu· Dec 20, 2024
analyze-feature-requests fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Emma Tandon· Dec 4, 2024
analyze-feature-requests has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Noor Chen· Nov 23, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyze-feature-requests is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Amelia Gill· Nov 19, 2024
analyze-feature-requests is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Wang· Nov 11, 2024
analyze-feature-requests is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Noor Nasser· Oct 14, 2024
analyze-feature-requests is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Amelia Rao· Oct 10, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyze-feature-requests is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Thompson· Oct 2, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyze-feature-requests is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Noor Tandon· Sep 25, 2024
analyze-feature-requests reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 56