polish

pbakaus/impeccable · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable --skill polish
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Final quality pass catching alignment, spacing, consistency, and interaction details before shipping.

  • Systematically reviews visual alignment, spacing, typography hierarchy, color contrast, and interaction states across all breakpoints and device types
  • Identifies and fixes micro-interaction gaps, transition smoothness, edge cases, error states, and loading feedback to ensure polished user experience
  • Requires frontend-design skill context and functional completeness before starting; i
skill.md

MANDATORY PREPARATION

Invoke /frontend-design — it contains design principles, anti-patterns, and the Context Gathering Protocol. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no design context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-impeccable first. Additionally gather: quality bar (MVP vs flagship).


Perform a meticulous final pass to catch all the small details that separate good work from great work. The difference between shipped and polished.

Pre-Polish Assessment

Understand the current state and goals:

  1. Review completeness:

    • Is it functionally complete?
    • Are there known issues to preserve (mark with TODOs)?
    • What's the quality bar? (MVP vs flagship feature?)
    • When does it ship? (How much time for polish?)
  2. Identify polish areas:

    • Visual inconsistencies
    • Spacing and alignment issues
    • Interaction state gaps
    • Copy inconsistencies
    • Edge cases and error states
    • Loading and transition smoothness

CRITICAL: Polish is the last step, not the first. Don't polish work that's not functionally complete.

Polish Systematically

Work through these dimensions methodically:

Visual Alignment & Spacing

  • Pixel-perfect alignment: Everything lines up to grid
  • Consistent spacing: All gaps use spacing scale (no random 13px gaps)
  • Optical alignment: Adjust for visual weight (icons may need offset for optical centering)
  • Responsive consistency: Spacing and alignment work at all breakpoints
  • Grid adherence: Elements snap to baseline grid

Check:

  • Enable grid overlay and verify alignment
  • Check spacing with browser inspector
  • Test at multiple viewport sizes
  • Look for elements that "feel" off

Typography Refinement

  • Hierarchy consistency: Same elements use same sizes/weights throughout
  • Line length: 45-75 characters for body text
  • Line height: Appropriate for font size and context
  • Widows & orphans: No single words on last line
  • Hyphenation: Appropriate for language and column width
  • Kerning: Adjust letter spacing where needed (especially headlines)
  • Font loading: No FOUT/FOIT flashes

Color & Contrast

  • Contrast ratios: All text meets WCAG standards
  • Consistent token usage: No hard-coded colors, all use design tokens
  • Theme consistency: Works in all theme variants
  • Color meaning: Same colors mean same things throughout
  • Accessible focus: Focus indicators visible with sufficient contrast
  • Tinted neutrals: No pure gray or pure black—add subtle color tint (0.01 chroma)
  • Gray on color: Never put gray text on colored backgrounds—use a shade of that color or transparency

Interaction States

Every interactive element needs all states:

  • Default: Resting state
  • Hover: Subtle feedback (color, scale, shadow)
  • Focus: Keyboard focus indicator (never remove without replacement)
  • Active: Click/tap feedback
  • Disabled: Clearly non-interactive
  • Loading: Async action feedback
  • Error: Validation or error state
  • Success: Successful completion

Missing states create confusion and broken experiences.

Micro-interactions & Transitions

  • Smooth transitions: All state changes animated appropriately (150-300ms)
  • Consistent easing: Use ease-out-quart/quint/expo for natural deceleration. Never bounce or elastic—they feel dated.
  • No jank: 60fps animations, only animate transform and opacity
  • Appropriate motion: Motion serves purpose, not decoration
  • Reduced motion: Respects prefers-reduced-motion

Content & Copy

  • Consistent terminology: Same things called same names throughout
  • Consistent capitalization: Title Case vs Sentence case applied consistently
  • Grammar & spelling: No typos
  • Appropriate length: Not too wordy, not too terse
  • Punctuation consistency: Periods on sentences, not on labels (unless all labels have them)

Icons & Images

  • Consistent style: All icons from same family or matching style
  • Appropriate sizing: Icons sized consistently for context
  • Proper alignment: Icons align with adjacent text optically
  • Alt text: All images have descriptive alt text
  • Loading states: Images don't cause layout shift, proper aspect ratios
  • Retina support: 2x assets for high-DPI screens

Forms & Inputs

  • Label consistency: All inputs properly labeled
  • Required indicators: Clear and consistent
  • Error messages: Helpful and consistent
  • Tab order: Logical keyboard navigation
  • Auto-focus: Appropriate (don't overuse)
  • Validation timing: Consistent (on blur vs on submit)

Edge Cases & Error States

  • Loading states: All async actions have loading feedback
  • Empty states: Helpful empty states, not just blank space
  • Error states: Clear error messages with recovery paths
  • Success states: Confirmation of successful actions
  • Long content: Handles very long names, descriptions, etc.
  • No content: Handles missing data gracefully
  • Offline: Appropriate offline handling (if applicable)

Responsiveness

  • All breakpoints: Test mobile, tablet, desktop
  • Touch targets: 44x44px minimum on touch devices
  • Readable text: No text smaller than 14px on mobile
  • No horizontal scroll: Content fits viewport
  • Appropriate reflow: Content adapts logically

Performance

  • Fast initial load: Optimize critical path
  • No layout shift: Elements don't jump after load (CLS)
  • Smooth interactions: No lag or jank
  • Optimized images: Appropriate formats and sizes
  • Lazy loading: Off-screen content loads lazily

Code Quality

  • Remove console logs: No debug logging in production
  • Remove commented code: Clean up dead code
  • Remove unused imports: Clean up unused dependencies
  • Consistent naming: Variables and functions follow conventions
  • Type safety: No TypeScript any or ignored errors
  • Accessibility: Proper ARIA labels and semantic HTML

Polish Checklist

Go through systematically:

  • Visual alignment perfect at all breakpoints
  • Spacing uses design tokens consistently
  • Typography hierarchy consistent
  • All interactive states implemented
  • All transitions smooth (60fps)
  • Copy is consistent and polished
  • Icons are consistent and properly sized
  • All forms properly labeled and validated
  • Error states are helpful
  • Loading states are clear
  • Empty states are welcoming
  • Touch targets are 44x44px minimum
  • Contrast ratios meet WCAG AA
  • Keyboard navigation works
  • Focus indicators visible
  • No console errors or warnings
  • No layout shift on load
  • Works in all supported browsers
  • Respects reduced motion preference
  • Code is clean (no TODOs, console.logs, commented code)

IMPORTANT: Polish is about details. Zoom in. Squint at it. Use it yourself. The little things add up.

NEVER:

  • Polish before it's functionally complete
  • Spend hours on polish if it ships in 30 minutes (triage)
  • Introduce bugs while polishing (test thoroughly)
  • Ignore systematic issues (if spacing is off everywhere, fix the system)
  • Perfect one thing while leaving others rough (consistent quality level)

Final Verification

Before marking as done:

  • Use it yourself: Actually interact with the feature
  • Test on real devices: Not just browser DevTools
  • Ask someone else to review: Fresh eyes catch things
  • Compare to design: Match intended design
  • Check all states: Don't just test happy path

Remember: You have impeccable attention to detail and exquisite taste. Polish until it feels effortless, looks intentional, and works flawlessly. Sweat the details - they matter.

how to use polish

How to use polish on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add polish
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/pbakaus/impeccable --skill polish

The skills CLI fetches polish from GitHub repository pbakaus/impeccable and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/polish

Reload or restart Cursor to activate polish. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /polish) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.633 reviews
  • Isabella Torres· Dec 4, 2024

    polish has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Noah Liu· Nov 27, 2024

    polish fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Omar Abbas· Oct 18, 2024

    We added polish from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Naina Brown· Oct 2, 2024

    Registry listing for polish matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Ren Reddy· Sep 21, 2024

    I recommend polish for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Rahul Santra· Sep 17, 2024

    polish has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sakshi Patil· Sep 9, 2024

    I recommend polish for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Layla Khanna· Sep 9, 2024

    Useful defaults in polish — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Noah Taylor· Sep 1, 2024

    polish has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Aug 28, 2024

    Useful defaults in polish — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 33

1 / 4