sop-creator

ognjengt/founder-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/ognjengt/founder-skills --skill sop-creator
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Transform unstructured process descriptions into clear, actionable Standard Operating Procedures written at a 5th-grade reading level.

skill.md

SOP Creator

Purpose

Transform unstructured process descriptions into clear, actionable Standard Operating Procedures written at a 5th-grade reading level.


Execution Logic

Check $ARGUMENTS first to determine execution mode:

If $ARGUMENTS is empty or not provided:

Respond with: "sop-creator loaded, describe the process you want to document"

Then wait for the user to provide their process description in the next message.

If $ARGUMENTS contains content:

Proceed immediately to Task Execution (skip the "loaded" message).


Task Execution

When process description is available (either from initial $ARGUMENTS or follow-up message):

1. Check for Business Context

Check if FOUNDER_CONTEXT.md exists in the project root.

  • If it exists: Read it and use the business context to personalize your output (company name, brand voice, industry specifics, audience, tools used).
  • If it doesn't exist: Proceed using defaults from "Defaults & Assumptions".

2. Analyze Initial Input

From the user's initial description, extract what's available:

  • Process name or title
  • Who performs this process (role/skill level)
  • Tools or systems involved
  • Expected outcome or end state
  • Any compliance or quality requirements
  • Critical steps mentioned

3. Ask Clarifying Questions (If Needed)

Use AskUserQuestion tool to gather missing critical information. Ask a maximum of 5 questions, but fewer is better — stop as soon as you have enough to create a complete SOP.

Question Bank (priority order):

# Question Why it matters Skip if...
1 What is the exact process you want documented? Defines the scope and title Process is clearly described
2 Who will be performing this process? (role, skill level, experience) Determines language complexity and detail level User already specified the audience
3 What tools or systems are involved in this process? Identifies prerequisites and access requirements Tools are already listed
4 What is the successful end result? How do you know the process is done correctly? Defines quality check criteria and success metrics Outcome is clearly stated
5 Are there any compliance requirements, safety concerns, or critical warnings? Ensures important cautions are included No regulatory or safety concerns

Question strategy:

  • Ask 2-3 questions per batch using AskUserQuestion
  • If the first batch answers provide enough detail, stop asking
  • Never ask more than 5 questions total
  • Only ask questions that block correct execution

4. Generate the SOP

Using the information gathered, create a complete SOP following the structure in Output Format:

  1. Write at 5th-grade reading level — short sentences, simple words
  2. One action per step — no compound instructions
  3. Start each step with action verbs — "Click", "Open", "Verify", "Enter"
  4. Include expected results — tell users what they should see
  5. Add warnings for critical steps — prevent common mistakes
  6. Create quality checks — define "done" explicitly

5. Format and Verify

  • Structure output according to Output Format section
  • Complete Quality Checklist self-verification before presenting output
  • Ensure the SOP can be followed by someone unfamiliar with the process

Writing Rules

Hard constraints. No interpretation.

Core Rules

  • Write at a 5th-grade reading level
  • Use short sentences (10-15 words maximum)
  • Use simple, common words — avoid jargon or explain it immediately
  • One action per step — never combine multiple actions
  • Start each step with an action verb (Click, Open, Enter, Verify, Check)
  • Include the expected result after each critical step
  • Never invent steps — only document what was described or confirmed

SOP-Specific Rules

  • Title format: "SOP: [Process Name]" (clear and searchable)
  • Version info is mandatory — SOPs must be version-controlled
  • Prerequisites must be explicit — no hidden requirements
  • Quality checks must be measurable — avoid subjective criteria
  • Common problems section is required — capture known failure modes
  • Tools section must include access/permissions needed

Audience Rules

  • Assume zero prior knowledge unless specified otherwise
  • Define acronyms on first use
  • Explain "why" for non-obvious steps
  • Include screenshots placeholders where visual guidance helps
  • Add warnings before destructive or irreversible actions

Output Format

The SOP follows this exact structure:

# SOP: [Process Name]

**Version:** 1.0
**Last Updated:** [Current Date]
**Owner:** [Role/Name from context or "Process Owner"]
**Audience:** [Who uses this SOP]

---

## 1. Purpose
[One clear sentence describing what this process achieves and why it matters.]

## 2. Who Does This
[Role or skill level of person performing this process]

## 3. Tools You Need
- [Tool 1]
- [Tool 2]
- [Access/permissions required]

## 4. Starting Requirements
Before you start, make sure:
- [ ] [Requirement 1]
- [ ] [Requirement 2]
- [ ] [Everything you need is ready]

## 5. Step-by-Step Instructions

### Step 1: [Action Title]
1. [Do this specific action]
2. [Do this specific action]

**What you should see:** [Expected result or outcome]

### Step 2: [Action Title]
1. [Do this specific action]
   - [If needed, add a sub-step for clarity]
   - [If needed, add another sub-step]

**Warning:** [Important thing that could go wrong or caution]

### Step 3: [Action Title]
1. [Do this specific action]

**What you should see:** [Expected result]

[Continue with numbered steps until process completion...]

## 6. Quality Check
After finishing, verify:
- [ ] [Verification item 1 — specific and measurable]
- [ ] [Verification item 2 — specific and measurable]
- [ ] [Final outcome achieved]

## 7. Common Problems and Fixes

| Problem | Why It Happens | How to Fix |
|---------|---------------|------------|
| [Specific problem] | [Root cause] | [Clear solution] |
| [Specific problem] | [Root cause] | [Clear solution] |

## 8. Notes
**Assumptions made:**
- [List any assumptions about user knowledge, tools, or environment]

**Who to ask for help:** [Role or person]

## 9. Version History

| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---------|------|--------|---------|
| 1.0 | [Date] | [Author] | Initial version |

Quality Checklist (Self-Verification)

Before finalizing output, verify ALL of the following:

Pre-Execution Check

  • I checked for FOUNDER_CONTEXT.md and applied business context if available
  • I asked clarifying questions only for genuinely missing information
  • I asked 5 or fewer questions total

Content Check

  • Process title is clear and specific
  • Purpose statement is one clear sentence
  • All tools and access requirements are listed
  • Prerequisites are explicit and checkable
  • Every step starts with an action verb
  • No step assumes hidden knowledge
  • Expected results are included for critical steps
  • Warnings are placed before risky actions

Writing Check

  • Language is at 5th-grade reading level
  • Sentences are short (10-15 words)
  • No jargon without explanation
  • Each step contains one action only
  • Steps are in correct sequential order

Output Check

  • Quality checks are specific and measurable
  • Common problems section includes likely issues
  • Success state is explicitly defined
  • The SOP can be followed without additional context
  • Version info is complete

If ANY check fails → revise before presenting.


Defaults & Assumptions

Use these unless the user specifies otherwise:

  • Audience: Beginner with no prior knowledge of this specific process
  • Reading level: 5th grade (simple words, short sentences)
  • Version: 1.0
  • Author: From FOUNDER_CONTEXT.md if available, otherwise "Process Owner"
  • Last Updated: Current date
  • Process type: Repeatable business process (not one-time task)
  • Completion time: Not specified unless mentioned
  • Permissions: Standard user access unless specified otherwise

Document all assumptions made in the Notes section of the SOP.


how to use sop-creator

How to use sop-creator on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add sop-creator
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/ognjengt/founder-skills --skill sop-creator

The skills CLI fetches sop-creator from GitHub repository ognjengt/founder-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/sop-creator

Reload or restart Cursor to activate sop-creator. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /sop-creator) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.638 reviews
  • Olivia Flores· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sop-creator is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Zaid Shah· Dec 16, 2024

    sop-creator has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Kofi Jackson· Nov 15, 2024

    Registry listing for sop-creator matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Kofi Kim· Nov 7, 2024

    Useful defaults in sop-creator — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Kofi White· Oct 26, 2024

    sop-creator is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Noah Perez· Oct 6, 2024

    sop-creator fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Chinedu Kim· Sep 13, 2024

    sop-creator has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Yash Thakker· Sep 9, 2024

    Useful defaults in sop-creator — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Aug 28, 2024

    sop-creator is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Ama Abbas· Aug 4, 2024

    Keeps context tight: sop-creator is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

showing 1-10 of 38

1 / 4