push

odysseus0/symphony · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/odysseus0/symphony --skill push
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Identify current branch and confirm remote state.

skill.md

Push

Prerequisites

  • gh CLI is installed and available in PATH.
  • gh auth status succeeds for GitHub operations in this repo.

Goals

  • Push current branch changes to origin safely.
  • Create a PR if none exists for the branch, otherwise update the existing PR.
  • Keep branch history clean when remote has moved.

Related Skills

  • pull: use this when push is rejected or sync is not clean (non-fast-forward, merge conflict risk, or stale branch).

Steps

  1. Identify current branch and confirm remote state.

  2. Run local validation (make -C elixir all) before pushing.

  3. Push branch to origin with upstream tracking if needed, using whatever remote URL is already configured.

  4. If push is not clean/rejected:

    • If the failure is a non-fast-forward or sync problem, run the pull skill to merge origin/main, resolve conflicts, and rerun validation.
    • Push again; use --force-with-lease only when history was rewritten.
    • If the failure is due to auth, permissions, or workflow restrictions on the configured remote, stop and surface the exact error instead of rewriting remotes or switching protocols as a workaround.
  5. Ensure a PR exists for the branch:

    • If no PR exists, create one.
    • If a PR exists and is open, update it.
    • If branch is tied to a closed/merged PR, create a new branch + PR.
    • Write a proper PR title that clearly describes the change outcome
    • For branch updates, explicitly reconsider whether current PR title still matches the latest scope; update it if it no longer does.
  6. Write/update PR body explicitly using .github/pull_request_template.md:

    • Fill every section with concrete content for this change.
    • Replace all placeholder comments (<!-- ... -->).
    • Keep bullets/checkboxes where template expects them.
    • If PR already exists, refresh body content so it reflects the total PR scope (all intended work on the branch), not just the newest commits, including newly added work, removed work, or changed approach.
    • Do not reuse stale description text from earlier iterations.
  7. Validate PR body with mix pr_body.check and fix all reported issues.

  8. Reply with the PR URL from gh pr view.

Commands

# Identify branch
branch=$(git branch --show-current)

# Minimal validation gate
make -C elixir all

# Initial push: respect the current origin remote.
git push -u origin HEAD

# If that failed because the remote moved, use the pull skill. After
# pull-skill resolution and re-validation, retry the normal push:
git push -u origin HEAD

# If the configured remote rejects the push for auth, permissions, or workflow
# restrictions, stop and surface the exact error.

# Only if history was rewritten locally:
git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD

# Ensure a PR exists (create only if missing)
pr_state=$(gh pr view --json state -q .state 2>/dev/null || true)
if [ "$pr_state" = "MERGED" ] || [ "$pr_state" = "CLOSED" ]; then
  echo "Current branch is tied to a closed PR; create a new branch + PR." >&2
  exit 1
fi

# Write a clear, human-friendly title that summarizes the shipped change.
pr_title="<clear PR title written for this change>"
if [ -z "$pr_state" ]; then
  gh pr create --title "$pr_title"
else
  # Reconsider title on every branch update; edit if scope shifted.
  gh pr edit --title "$pr_title"
fi

# Write/edit PR body to match .github/pull_request_template.md before validation.
# Example workflow:
# 1) open the template and draft body content for this PR
# 2) gh pr edit --body-file /tmp/pr_body.md
# 3) for branch updates, re-check that title/body still match current diff

tmp_pr_body=$(mktemp)
gh pr view --json body -q .body > "$tmp_pr_body"
(cd elixir && mix pr_body.check --file "$tmp_pr_body")
rm -f "$tmp_pr_body"

# Show PR URL for the reply
gh pr view --json url -q .url

Notes

  • Do not use --force; only use --force-with-lease as the last resort.
  • Distinguish sync problems from remote auth/permission problems:
    • Use the pull skill for non-fast-forward or stale-branch issues.
    • Surface auth, permissions, or workflow restrictions directly instead of changing remotes or protocols.
how to use push

How to use push on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add push
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/odysseus0/symphony --skill push

The skills CLI fetches push from GitHub repository odysseus0/symphony and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/push

Reload or restart Cursor to activate push. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /push) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.859 reviews
  • Hana Ndlovu· Dec 24, 2024

    push is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Anaya Park· Dec 20, 2024

    Keeps context tight: push is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 8, 2024

    Registry listing for push matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Charlotte Brown· Dec 8, 2024

    push fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Hana Gonzalez· Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in push — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Dhruvi Jain· Dec 4, 2024

    We added push from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Olivia Park· Nov 27, 2024

    We added push from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Soo Jain· Nov 27, 2024

    I recommend push for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Oshnikdeep· Nov 23, 2024

    push fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Anaya Choi· Nov 15, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: push is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 59

1 / 6