Identify current branch and confirm remote state.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionpushExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches push from odysseus0/symphony and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate push. Access via /push in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
56
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
56
stars
gh CLI is installed and available in PATH.gh auth status succeeds for GitHub operations in this repo.origin safely.pull: use this when push is rejected or sync is not clean (non-fast-forward,
merge conflict risk, or stale branch).Identify current branch and confirm remote state.
Run local validation (make -C elixir all) before pushing.
Push branch to origin with upstream tracking if needed, using whatever
remote URL is already configured.
If push is not clean/rejected:
pull
skill to merge origin/main, resolve conflicts, and rerun validation.--force-with-lease only when history was rewritten.Ensure a PR exists for the branch:
Write/update PR body explicitly using .github/pull_request_template.md:
<!-- ... -->).Validate PR body with mix pr_body.check and fix all reported issues.
Reply with the PR URL from gh pr view.
# Identify branch
branch=$(git branch --show-current)
# Minimal validation gate
make -C elixir all
# Initial push: respect the current origin remote.
git push -u origin HEAD
# If that failed because the remote moved, use the pull skill. After
# pull-skill resolution and re-validation, retry the normal push:
git push -u origin HEAD
# If the configured remote rejects the push for auth, permissions, or workflow
# restrictions, stop and surface the exact error.
# Only if history was rewritten locally:
git push --force-with-lease origin HEAD
# Ensure a PR exists (create only if missing)
pr_state=$(gh pr view --json state -q .state 2>/dev/null || true)
if [ "$pr_state" = "MERGED" ] || [ "$pr_state" = "CLOSED" ]; then
echo "Current branch is tied to a closed PR; create a new branch + PR." >&2
exit 1
fi
# Write a clear, human-friendly title that summarizes the shipped change.
pr_title="<clear PR title written for this change>"
if [ -z "$pr_state" ]; then
gh pr create --title "$pr_title"
else
# Reconsider title on every branch update; edit if scope shifted.
gh pr edit --title "$pr_title"
fi
# Write/edit PR body to match .github/pull_request_template.md before validation.
# Example workflow:
# 1) open the template and draft body content for this PR
# 2) gh pr edit --body-file /tmp/pr_body.md
# 3) for branch updates, re-check that title/body still match current diff
tmp_pr_body=$(mktemp)
gh pr view --json body -q .body > "$tmp_pr_body"
(cd elixir && mix pr_body.check --file "$tmp_pr_body")
rm -f "$tmp_pr_body"
# Show PR URL for the reply
gh pr view --json url -q .url
--force; only use --force-with-lease as the last resort.pull skill for non-fast-forward or stale-branch issues.Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
push is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Keeps context tight: push is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for push matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
push fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Useful defaults in push — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
We added push from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
We added push from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
I recommend push for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
push fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: push is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
showing 1-10 of 59