debug▌
odysseus0/symphony · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
elixir/docs/logging.md requires these fields for issue/session lifecycle logs. Use
- ›them as your join keys during debugging.
Debug
Goals
- Find why a run is stuck, retrying, or failing.
- Correlate Linear issue identity to a Codex session quickly.
- Read the right logs in the right order to isolate root cause.
Log Sources
- Primary runtime log:
log/symphony.log- Default comes from
SymphonyElixir.LogFile(log/symphony.log). - Includes orchestrator, agent runner, and Codex app-server lifecycle logs.
- Default comes from
- Rotated runtime logs:
log/symphony.log*- Check these when the relevant run is older.
Correlation Keys
issue_identifier: human ticket key (example:MT-625)issue_id: Linear UUID (stable internal ID)session_id: Codex thread-turn pair (<thread_id>-<turn_id>)
elixir/docs/logging.md requires these fields for issue/session lifecycle logs. Use
them as your join keys during debugging.
Quick Triage (Stuck Run)
- Confirm scheduler/worker symptoms for the ticket.
- Find recent lines for the ticket (
issue_identifierfirst). - Extract
session_idfrom matching lines. - Trace that
session_idacross start, stream, completion/failure, and stall handling logs. - Decide class of failure: timeout/stall, app-server startup failure, turn failure, or orchestrator retry loop.
Commands
# 1) Narrow by ticket key (fastest entry point)
rg -n "issue_identifier=MT-625" log/symphony.log*
# 2) If needed, narrow by Linear UUID
rg -n "issue_id=<linear-uuid>" log/symphony.log*
# 3) Pull session IDs seen for that ticket
rg -o "session_id=[^ ;]+" log/symphony.log* | sort -u
# 4) Trace one session end-to-end
rg -n "session_id=<thread>-<turn>" log/symphony.log*
# 5) Focus on stuck/retry signals
rg -n "Issue stalled|scheduling retry|turn_timeout|turn_failed|Codex session failed|Codex session ended with error" log/symphony.log*
Investigation Flow
- Locate the ticket slice:
- Search by
issue_identifier=<KEY>. - If noise is high, add
issue_id=<UUID>.
- Search by
- Establish timeline:
- Identify first
Codex session started ... session_id=.... - Follow with
Codex session completed,ended with error, or worker exit lines.
- Identify first
- Classify the problem:
- Stall loop:
Issue stalled ... restarting with backoff. - App-server startup:
Codex session failed .... - Turn execution failure:
turn_failed,turn_cancelled,turn_timeout, orended with error. - Worker crash:
Agent task exited ... reason=....
- Stall loop:
- Validate scope:
- Check whether failures are isolated to one issue/session or repeating across multiple tickets.
- Capture evidence:
- Save key log lines with timestamps,
issue_identifier,issue_id, andsession_id. - Record probable root cause and the exact failing stage.
- Save key log lines with timestamps,
Reading Codex Session Logs
In Symphony, Codex session diagnostics are emitted into log/symphony.log and
keyed by session_id. Read them as a lifecycle:
Codex session started ... session_id=...- Session stream/lifecycle events for the same
session_id - Terminal event:
Codex session completed ..., orCodex session ended with error ..., orIssue stalled ... restarting with backoff
For one specific session investigation, keep the trace narrow:
- Capture one
session_idfor the ticket. - Build a timestamped slice for only that session:
rg -n "session_id=<thread>-<turn>" log/symphony.log*
- Mark the exact failing stage:
- Startup failure before stream events (
Codex session failed ...). - Turn/runtime failure after stream events (
turn_*/ended with error). - Stall recovery (
Issue stalled ... restarting with backoff).
- Startup failure before stream events (
- Pair findings with
issue_identifierandissue_idfrom nearby lines to confirm you are not mixing concurrent retries.
Always pair session findings with issue_identifier/issue_id to avoid mixing
concurrent runs.
Notes
- Prefer
rgovergrepfor speed on large logs. - Check rotated logs (
log/symphony.log*) before concluding data is missing. - If required context fields are missing in new log statements, align with
elixir/docs/logging.mdconventions.
How to use debug on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add debug
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches debug from GitHub repository odysseus0/symphony and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate debug. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /debug) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★25 reviews- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 20, 2024
debug is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 11, 2024
Keeps context tight: debug is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Oct 2, 2024
debug has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★James Anderson· Sep 13, 2024
debug reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Sep 9, 2024
debug fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Sakura Lopez· Sep 1, 2024
debug has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Aug 28, 2024
Registry listing for debug matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ishan Diallo· Aug 20, 2024
Keeps context tight: debug is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Fatima Kim· Aug 4, 2024
I recommend debug for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Kabir Martinez· Jul 23, 2024
debug fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 25