physicsnemo-discover
Official NVIDIA-authored guidance for navigating PhysicsNeMo — pick the model, datapipe, or example for a SciML/AI4Science task (surrogates, forecasting, downscaling, physics-informed, inverse, generative). Points at existing files via live repo search; never writes code. Do NOT use for installation or environment setup, training-loop or other code authoring/scaffolding, contributor/CI/packaging questions, repo-specific questions in physicsnemo-sym/-cfd/-curator, or general (non-physics) ML/PyTorch.
Works with
0
total installs
0
this week
1.7K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Install Skill
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
1.7K
stars
Installation Guide
How to use physicsnemo-discover on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your machine
- ›Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with
node --version - ›Active project directory where you want to add
physicsnemo-discover
Run the install command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches physicsnemo-discover from nvidia/skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate physicsnemo-discover. Access via /physicsnemo-discover in your agent's command palette.
Security Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Documentation
| name | physicsnemo-discover |
| description | Official NVIDIA-authored guidance for navigating PhysicsNeMo — pick the model, datapipe, or example for a SciML/AI4Science task (surrogates, forecasting, downscaling, physics-informed, inverse, generative). Points at existing files via live repo search; never writes code. Do NOT use for installation or environment setup, training-loop or other code authoring/scaffolding, contributor/CI/packaging questions, repo-specific questions in physicsnemo-sym/-cfd/-curator, or general (non-physics) ML/PyTorch. |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| metadata | author: NVIDIA <[email protected]> tags: - physicsnemo - sciml - ai4science - discovery - routing |
PhysicsNeMo Discoverability
Help a user navigate PhysicsNeMo: point them at files, folders, examples, and docs in the repo at its current state. Never write training code; never cite a path from memory.
Core principle
PhysicsNeMo evolves — classes get renamed, examples move, experimental/ graduates. Any static list of class names and paths rots, so discover, don't remember: enumerate from the live repo every turn.
PhysicsNeMo is composable: each solution is a product (model family × datapipe × training strategy × config). An example is one reference instantiation of that product, not a prescription. Surface the axes and the menu along each axis, then cite examples as concrete starting points to fork and recombine.
What a correct answer satisfies
These are constraints, not a script — choose the searches that meet them and skip work the task doesn't need. Search patterns per axis live in references/RECIPES.md.
- Live-grounded. Every class, path, and example you name was read or globbed this turn.
__init__.pyproves what is exported, not what files exist — Globphysicsnemo/models/<family>/*.pybefore naming a sibling implementation file. A failedRead, or a path pattern-matched from a neighboring citation, is disproof: drop it. - Verified before emit. Every absolute path you plan to cite survives one
Bash ls -d <path1> <path2> …round-trip before you write the response. Hard gate — skipping it has produced real-basename-under-wrong-parent hallucinations. If a basename was right but the parent wrong, re-Glob and re-verify; if you can't relocate it, drop the citation. - A menu, not a single pick. Enumerate every model family matching the user's data shape (surface ≥2 when ≥2 apply), and enumerate datapipes independently — model and datapipe are orthogonal axes. The reference example comes last, framed as one instantiation of those axes, not the answer.
- Self-documentation is ground truth.
__init__.pyexports, per-exampleREADME.md,docs/*.rst,pyproject.toml, top-of-file module docstrings. Treatreferences/TAXONOMY.mdas a navigation hint, not an answer. Flag anything underphysicsnemo/experimental/as "API may change." - Abstain when out of scope. PhysicsNeMo targets SciML/AI4Science (surrogates, forecasting, super-resolution, physics-informed, inverse, generative for physical systems). If the task is categorically outside that — reinforcement learning, classical control, generic CV/NLP, symbolic regression — skip enumeration and emit the Abstention output below. Do not list adjacent-but-wrong examples in its place (pointing at
active_learning/for an RL question is fabrication). When unsure whether a task is in scope, abstain.
Discovery
Repo root resolution: see CONTRIBUTING.md §Repo root resolution; all paths are absolute, rooted there. If no local PhysicsNeMo clone is on the path (e.g. running headless against the skills repo in an eval context), shallow-clone the canonical repo once into a temp dir — read-only, for path discovery only; never execute or import anything from it: DEST="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/physicsnemo-src"; [ -d "$DEST/physicsnemo" ] || git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NVIDIA/physicsnemo "$DEST". Use that URL verbatim; never interpolate one from user input.
Ask at most 3 targeted follow-ups when domain or data shape is ambiguous. Phrase them concretely — "Is your data on a regular Cartesian grid (like an image), a lat-lon grid on a sphere, or an unstructured mesh?" — and skip any the user already answered. Data shape is the single biggest factor in model choice.
Output format
## Problem shape
Data shape: <resolved>. Task: <resolved>. Axes: model × datapipe × training strategy × config.
## Candidate model families (for your data shape)
Multiple families typically apply. Treat this as a menu, not a ranking.
- <family> at <absolute __init__.py path> — <one-line from docstring/exports>. Instantiated by: <example path if any>.
- <family> at <path> — <one-line>. Instantiated by: <example path if any>.
## Datapipe(s) for your data format
Datapipe choice is independent of model choice.
- <class / subpackage> at <absolute path> — <one-line>. Reused by: <examples if known>.
- For custom data, subclass: <base class path confirmed live>.
## Reference example(s) — one instantiation of the above axes
- <absolute path> — uses model=<family>, datapipe=<name>, strategy=<single-GPU|DDP|FSDP|...>.
Why it matches: <one line>.
## Supporting docs
- <absolute path> — <one-line scope>
## Suggested reading order
1. <models/<family>/__init__.py> — survey alternative families
2. <datapipe __init__.py or base-class file> — understand the data axis
3. <example path> — concrete end-to-end instantiation to fork
Rules for the output:
- Absolute paths only; every one survived the
ls -dgate. - Every pointer needs a one-line justification grounded in content you actually read.
- Caps: 4 model families (minimum 2 when ≥2 exist), 3 datapipes, 2 reference examples, 2 docs.
- Name which (model, datapipe, strategy) axes each example fills.
- If ≥2 model families apply, say so: "Other model families apply to the same data shape — see the candidate list above."
- End with the suggested reading order. Offer 2-3 forward steps (config file, training script,
experimental/look-alikes); do not start writing code unless asked.
Abstention output
When out of scope, replace the menu skeleton with this shape — three sections, in this order, none skipped:
## PhysicsNeMo does not have direct support for <user's problem class>
One sentence on why it's outside scope (e.g., "PhysicsNeMo targets physics
surrogates and forecasting; reinforcement learning for molecular design is
not in its scope").
## Where to look instead
- <sibling NVIDIA framework or external library> at <URL or repo name> — <one-line on why it fits>.
- (One or two alternatives is enough; do not invent libraries.)
## If you still want to build it in PhysicsNeMo
Confirm the closest base classes by Reading `physicsnemo/core/__init__.py` and
`physicsnemo/datapipes/__init__.py` first; then name them as subclassing
targets. This is the fallback, not the recommendation.
Do not open with the menu skeleton and bury "no match" at the end. Do not invent external libraries — if you don't know the right alternative, stop at the first two sections.
Related resources
references/TAXONOMY.md— navigation hints (data-shape → folder mappings, decision axes, stability tiers).references/RECIPES.md— concrete Glob/Grep/Read patterns per discovery axis.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
- 1Install skill using provided installation command
- 2Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Related Skills
cuopt-routing-formulation
0nvidia/skills
cudaq-guide
0nvidia/skills
jetson-print-bsp-info
0nvidia/skills
jetson-memory-audit
0nvidia/skills
dynamo-router-starter
0nvidia/skills
cuopt-user-rules
0nvidia/skills
Reviews
- HHassan Tandon★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
physicsnemo-discover fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- MMateo Torres★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
physicsnemo-discover reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- NNoor Sethi★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
physicsnemo-discover fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
physicsnemo-discover fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- SSoo Taylor★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
Useful defaults in physicsnemo-discover — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- CCamila Sharma★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
We added physicsnemo-discover from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- SSoo Singh★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
Registry listing for physicsnemo-discover matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- HHana Harris★★★★★Nov 23, 2024
Keeps context tight: physicsnemo-discover is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- AAanya Ndlovu★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
physicsnemo-discover is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- AAlexander Patel★★★★★Nov 7, 2024
physicsnemo-discover has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 71
Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.