User can provide to focus on specific tests or modules:
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiontdd:fix-testsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches tdd:fix-tests from neolabhq/context-engineering-kit and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate tdd:fix-tests. Access via /tdd:fix-tests in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
765
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
765
stars
User can provide to focus on specific tests or modules:
$ARGUMENTS
If nothing is provided, focus on all tests.
After business logic changes, refactoring, or dependency updates, tests may fail because they no longer match the current behavior or implementation. This command orchestrates automated fixing of all failing tests using specialized agents.
Fix all failing tests to match current business logic and implementation.
Read sadd skill if available
Discover test infrastructure
Run all tests
Identify all failing test files
Launch developer agents (parallel)
Verify all fixes
Iterate if needed
When launching agents, use this template:
The business logic has changed and test file {FILE_PATH} is now failing.
Your task:
1. Read the test file and understand what it's testing
2. Read TDD skill (if available) for best practices on writing tests.
3. Read @README.md for project context
4. Run the test: {TEST_COMMAND}
5. Analyze the failure - is it:
- Test expectations outdated? → Fix test assertions
- Test setup broken? → Fix test setup/mocks
- Business logic bug? → Fix logic (rare case)
6. Fix the test and verify it passes
7. Iterate until test passes
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
neolabhq/context-engineering-kit
cexll/myclaude
github/awesome-copilot
aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts
microsoft/playwright-cli
github/awesome-copilot
Keeps context tight: tdd:fix-tests is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
I recommend tdd:fix-tests for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
tdd:fix-tests is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in tdd:fix-tests — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
tdd:fix-tests reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
tdd:fix-tests reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
tdd:fix-tests has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
tdd:fix-tests is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
tdd:fix-tests fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Registry listing for tdd:fix-tests matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 50