performing-purple-team-exercise

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/performing-purple-team-exercise
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Performs purple team exercises by coordinating red team adversary emulation with blue team detection validation using MITRE ATT&CK-mapped attack scenarios, real-time detection testing, and collaborative gap remediation. Use when SOC teams need to validate detection capabilities, improve analyst skills, and close detection gaps through structured offensive-defensive collaboration.

skill.md
name
performing-purple-team-exercise
description
'Performs purple team exercises by coordinating red team adversary emulation with blue team detection validation using MITRE ATT&CK-mapped attack scenarios, real-time detection testing, and collaborative gap remediation. Use when SOC teams need to validate detection capabilities, improve analyst skills, and close detection gaps through structured offensive-defensive collaboration. '
domain
cybersecurity
subdomain
soc-operations
tags
- soc - purple-team - red-team - blue-team - mitre-attack - adversary-emulation - detection-validation
version
'1.0'
author
mahipal
license
Apache-2.0
d3fend_techniques
- File Metadata Consistency Validation - Application Protocol Command Analysis - Identifier Analysis - Content Format Conversion - Message Analysis
nist_csf
- DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 - RS.MA-01 - DE.AE-06

Performing Purple Team Exercise

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • SOC teams need to validate that detection rules actually fire for the threats they target
  • Red team assessments produced findings that need translation into detection improvements
  • New detection tools or SIEM migrations require validation of detection coverage
  • Analyst training requires hands-on experience with real attack techniques and SIEM responses
  • Quarterly or semi-annual detection validation cycles are scheduled

Do not use for unannounced red team engagements — purple team exercises require explicit coordination between offensive and defensive teams with real-time collaboration.

Prerequisites

  • Red team capability: internal team or contracted purple team operator
  • Attack simulation tools: Atomic Red Team, MITRE Caldera, or C2 framework (authorized)
  • SIEM access for real-time alert monitoring during exercise
  • ATT&CK-mapped detection rule inventory with expected alert names
  • Isolated test environment or approved production scope with change management approval
  • Communication channel (Slack/Teams) for real-time red-blue coordination

Workflow

Step 1: Define Exercise Scope and Objectives

Document exercise parameters:

purple_team_exercise:
  exercise_id: PT-2024-Q1
  date: 2024-03-20
  duration: 8 hours (09:00-17:00 UTC)
  scope:
    environment: Production (Finance VLAN, 10.0.5.0/24)
    systems_in_scope:
      - WORKSTATION-TEST01 (10.0.5.100)  Test endpoint
      - DC-TEST (10.0.5.200)  Test domain controller
      - FILESERVER-TEST (10.0.5.201)  Test file server
    systems_excluded:
      - All production domain controllers
      - Customer-facing systems
  objectives:
    - Validate 15 detection rules mapped to FIN7 TTPs
    - Test SOC analyst response to real attack indicators
    - Identify detection gaps for credential access and lateral movement
    - Measure detection latency for each technique
  threat_scenario: FIN7 campaign targeting financial data via spearphishing
  authorization: Approved by CISO, Change Request CR-2024-0567
  communication: #purple-team-2024q1 Slack channel

Step 2: Build ATT&CK-Mapped Test Plan

Create technique-by-technique test matrix:

#ATT&CK IDTechniqueTest ToolExpected DetectionBlue Team Metric
1T1566.001Spearphishing AttachmentManual emailEmail gateway alertDetection Y/N, latency
2T1204.002User ExecutionMacro documentSysmon process creationDetection Y/N, latency
3T1059.001PowerShellAtomic RT #1-3PowerShell execution alertDetection Y/N, latency
4T1053.005Scheduled TaskAtomic RTScheduled task creation alertDetection Y/N, latency
5T1547.001Registry Run KeysAtomic RTRegistry modification alertDetection Y/N, latency
6T1003.001LSASS MemoryMimikatzCredential dumping alertDetection Y/N, latency
7T1550.002Pass-the-HashMimikatzNTLM anomaly detectionDetection Y/N, latency
8T1021.002SMB/PsExecPsExecPsExec service creation alertDetection Y/N, latency
9T1047WMIwmic /nodeWMI remote execution alertDetection Y/N, latency
10T1021.001RDPxfreerdpRDP lateral movement alertDetection Y/N, latency
11T1071.001Web C2Cobalt StrikeC2 beacon detectionDetection Y/N, latency
12T1041Exfiltration C2RcloneData exfiltration alertDetection Y/N, latency
13T1490Inhibit RecoveryvssadminShadow copy deletion alertDetection Y/N, latency
14T1486Data EncryptedTest encryptionMass encryption detectionDetection Y/N, latency
15T1070.001Clear LogswevtutilLog clearing detectionDetection Y/N, latency

Step 3: Execute Red Team Techniques

Run each technique with Atomic Red Team (or manual execution):

# Install Atomic Red Team
IEX (IWR 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redcanaryco/invoke-atomicredteam/master/install-atomicredteam.ps1' -UseBasicParsing)
Install-AtomicRedTeam -getAtomics

# Test 1: T1059.001 — PowerShell Execution
Write-Host "[$(Get-Date -Format 'HH:mm:ss')] Executing T1059.001 - PowerShell"
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -TestNumbers 1
# Notify blue team: "T1059.001 executed at $(Get-Date)"

# Test 2: T1053.005 — Scheduled Task Creation
Write-Host "[$(Get-Date -Format 'HH:mm:ss')] Executing T1053.005 - Scheduled Task"
Invoke-AtomicTest T1053.005 -TestNumbers 1

# Test 3: T1547.001 — Registry Run Key
Write-Host "[$(Get-Date -Format 'HH:mm:ss')] Executing T1547.001 - Registry Persistence"
Invoke-AtomicTest T1547.001 -TestNumbers 1,2

# Test 4: T1003.001 — Credential Dumping
Write-Host "[$(Get-Date -Format 'HH:mm:ss')] Executing T1003.001 - LSASS Access"
Invoke-AtomicTest T1003.001 -TestNumbers 1,2

# Test 5: T1490 — Shadow Copy Deletion
Write-Host "[$(Get-Date -Format 'HH:mm:ss')] Executing T1490 - Inhibit Recovery"
Invoke-AtomicTest T1490 -TestNumbers 1

# Cleanup after each test
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -TestNumbers 1 -Cleanup
Invoke-AtomicTest T1053.005 -TestNumbers 1 -Cleanup
Invoke-AtomicTest T1547.001 -TestNumbers 1,2 -Cleanup

Step 4: Monitor Blue Team Detection in Real-Time

Blue team monitors SIEM during execution:

--- Real-time purple team monitoring dashboard
index=notable earliest=-1h
| where Computer IN ("WORKSTATION-TEST01", "DC-TEST", "FILESERVER-TEST")
  OR src IN ("10.0.5.100", "10.0.5.200", "10.0.5.201")
| eval detection_latency = _time - orig_time
| eval latency_seconds = round(detection_latency, 0)
| sort _time
| table _time, rule_name, urgency, src, dest, user, latency_seconds

--- Check specific technique detection
index=sysmon Computer="WORKSTATION-TEST01" earliest=-15m
(EventCode=1 OR EventCode=3 OR EventCode=10 OR EventCode=11 OR EventCode=13)
| sort _time
| table _time, EventCode, Image, CommandLine, TargetFilename, TargetObject

Record results in real-time:

exercise_results = {
    "exercise_id": "PT-2024-Q1",
    "results": [
        {
            "technique": "T1059.001",
            "name": "PowerShell Execution",
            "execution_time": "09:15:00",
            "detected": True,
            "alert_name": "Suspicious PowerShell Encoded Command",
            "detection_time": "09:15:47",
            "latency_seconds": 47,
            "notes": "Detected via Sysmon EventCode 1 with encoded command pattern"
        },
        {
            "technique": "T1003.001",
            "name": "LSASS Memory Access",
            "execution_time": "10:30:00",
            "detected": False,
            "alert_name": None,
            "detection_time": None,
            "latency_seconds": None,
            "notes": "GAP: No detection rule for LSASS access. Sysmon EventCode 10 present but no correlation rule."
        }
    ]
}

Step 5: Collaborative Gap Remediation

For each gap, the blue team builds detection rules immediately:

--- Gap: T1003.001 — No LSASS access detection
--- Build rule during exercise
index=sysmon EventCode=10 TargetImage="*\\lsass.exe"
GrantedAccess IN ("0x1010", "0x1038", "0x1fffff", "0x40")
NOT SourceImage IN ("*\\svchost.exe", "*\\csrss.exe", "*\\MsMpEng.exe")
| stats count by Computer, SourceImage, SourceUser, GrantedAccess
| where count > 0

After building, re-test:

Red Team: "Re-executing T1003.001 at 11:45"
Blue Team: "Confirmed — alert 'LSASS Memory Access Detected' fired at 11:45:32 (32s latency)"
Result: GAP CLOSED

Step 6: Generate Exercise Report

def generate_purple_team_report(results):
    total = len(results["results"])
    detected = sum(1 for r in results["results"] if r["detected"])
    gaps = sum(1 for r in results["results"] if not r["detected"])
    avg_latency = sum(r["latency_seconds"] for r in results["results"]
                      if r["latency_seconds"]) / max(detected, 1)

    report = f"""
PURPLE TEAM EXERCISE REPORT — {results['exercise_id']}
{'=' * 60}

SUMMARY:
  Techniques Tested:     {total}
  Detected:              {detected} ({detected/total*100:.0f}%)
  Gaps Identified:       {gaps} ({gaps/total*100:.0f}%)
  Avg Detection Latency: {avg_latency:.0f} seconds

DETAILED RESULTS:
"""
    for r in results["results"]:
        status = "DETECTED" if r["detected"] else "GAP"
        latency = f"{r['latency_seconds']}s" if r["latency_seconds"] else "N/A"
        report += f"  [{status}] {r['technique']}{r['name']} (Latency: {latency})\n"
        if not r["detected"]:
            report += f"          Action: {r['notes']}\n"

    return report

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Purple TeamCollaborative exercise where red (offensive) and blue (defensive) teams work together to validate and improve detection
Adversary EmulationStructured simulation of specific threat actor TTPs for testing defensive capabilities
Detection ValidationProcess of confirming that detection rules fire correctly when the targeted technique is executed
Detection LatencyTime between technique execution and SIEM alert generation — measured during purple team exercises
Gap RemediationImmediate creation or tuning of detection rules for techniques that were not detected during testing
Atomic Red TeamOpen-source library of small, focused tests for individual ATT&CK techniques

Tools & Systems

  • Atomic Red Team: Open-source attack test library from Red Canary for technique-by-technique validation
  • MITRE Caldera: Automated adversary emulation platform supporting ATT&CK-mapped attack chains
  • Vectr: Purple team management platform for tracking exercise results and detection coverage improvements
  • Prelude Operator: Adversary emulation tool supporting automated multi-step attack scenarios
  • AttackIQ: Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) platform for continuous detection validation

Common Scenarios

  • Quarterly Validation: Test top 20 detection rules against ATT&CK techniques to ensure continued effectiveness
  • New Tool Validation: After deploying new EDR, validate detection coverage against baseline techniques
  • Analyst Training: Junior analysts observe real attacks in real-time with expert guidance on SIEM investigation
  • Post-Incident Validation: After a real incident, emulate the attack chain to verify detection improvements
  • Compliance Evidence: Document detection validation results for SOC 2, ISO 27001, or PCI DSS audits

Output Format

PURPLE TEAM EXERCISE REPORT — PT-2024-Q1
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Date:         2024-03-20 (09:00-17:00 UTC)
Scenario:     FIN7 Financial Sector Campaign
Scope:        Finance VLAN (10.0.5.0/24)

RESULTS:
  Techniques Tested:     15
  Detected:              11 (73%)
  Gaps Identified:       4 (27%)
  Gaps Remediated Same Day: 3
  Avg Detection Latency: 38 seconds

DETAILED RESULTS:
  [PASS]  T1566.001 Spearphishing Attachment      — 12s latency
  [PASS]  T1204.002 User Execution (Macro)         — 8s latency
  [PASS]  T1059.001 PowerShell Execution            — 47s latency
  [PASS]  T1053.005 Scheduled Task                  — 23s latency
  [PASS]  T1547.001 Registry Run Keys               — 31s latency
  [FAIL]  T1003.001 LSASS Memory Access             — REMEDIATED during exercise
  [FAIL]  T1550.002 Pass-the-Hash                   — REMEDIATED during exercise
  [PASS]  T1021.002 PsExec                          — 15s latency
  [PASS]  T1047 WMI Remote Execution                — 42s latency
  [PASS]  T1021.001 RDP Lateral Movement            — 28s latency
  [FAIL]  T1071.001 Web C2 Beaconing                — REMEDIATED during exercise
  [PASS]  T1041 Exfiltration over C2                — 67s latency
  [PASS]  T1490 Shadow Copy Deletion                — 5s latency
  [FAIL]  T1486 Data Encryption for Impact          — OPEN — requires endpoint telemetry
  [PASS]  T1070.001 Event Log Clearing              — 11s latency

POST-EXERCISE COVERAGE: 93% (14/15) — up from 73% at start
REMAINING GAP: T1486 requires EDR file monitoring enhancement
how to use performing-purple-team-exercise

How to use performing-purple-team-exercise on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add performing-purple-team-exercise
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/performing-purple-team-exercise

The skills CLI fetches performing-purple-team-exercise from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/performing-purple-team-exercise

Reload or restart Cursor to activate performing-purple-team-exercise. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /performing-purple-team-exercise) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.726 reviews
  • Kwame Sharma· Dec 8, 2024

    Useful defaults in performing-purple-team-exercise — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Dev Torres· Nov 27, 2024

    I recommend performing-purple-team-exercise for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Dev Gonzalez· Oct 18, 2024

    performing-purple-team-exercise reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Alexander Khanna· Sep 25, 2024

    Registry listing for performing-purple-team-exercise matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Piyush G· Sep 5, 2024

    performing-purple-team-exercise reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Oshnikdeep· Sep 1, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-purple-team-exercise is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Min Rao· Sep 1, 2024

    Keeps context tight: performing-purple-team-exercise is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Shikha Mishra· Aug 24, 2024

    I recommend performing-purple-team-exercise for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Aug 20, 2024

    We added performing-purple-team-exercise from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Meera Yang· Aug 20, 2024

    Registry listing for performing-purple-team-exercise matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 26

1 / 3