performing-purple-team-atomic-testing

mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/performing-purple-team-atomic-testing
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Executes Atomic Red Team tests mapped to MITRE ATT&CK techniques, performs coverage gap analysis across the ATT&CK matrix, and runs detection validation loops to measure blue team visibility. Covers Invoke-AtomicRedTeam PowerShell execution, ATT&CK Navigator layer generation for heatmaps, Sigma rule correlation, and continuous atomic testing pipelines. Activates for requests involving purple team exercises, atomic test execution, ATT&CK coverage assessment, detection engineering validation, or adversary emulation testing.

skill.md
name
performing-purple-team-atomic-testing
description
'Executes Atomic Red Team tests mapped to MITRE ATT&CK techniques, performs coverage gap analysis across the ATT&CK matrix, and runs detection validation loops to measure blue team visibility. Covers Invoke-AtomicRedTeam PowerShell execution, ATT&CK Navigator layer generation for heatmaps, Sigma rule correlation, and continuous atomic testing pipelines. Activates for requests involving purple team exercises, atomic test execution, ATT&CK coverage assessment, detection engineering validation, or adversary emulation testing. '
domain
cybersecurity
subdomain
purple-team
tags
- purple-team - atomic-red-team - mitre-attack - detection-engineering - adversary-emulation
version
1.0.0
author
mukul975
license
Apache-2.0
nist_ai_rmf
- MEASURE-2.7 - MAP-5.1 - MANAGE-2.4
atlas_techniques
- AML.T0070 - AML.T0066 - AML.T0082
d3fend_techniques
- Executable Denylisting - Execution Isolation - File Metadata Consistency Validation - Content Format Conversion - File Content Analysis
nist_csf
- ID.RA-01 - DE.AE-07 - GV.OV-02

Performing Purple Team Atomic Testing

When to Use

  • Validating detection coverage against specific MITRE ATT&CK techniques
  • Running purple team exercises using Atomic Red Team test library
  • Performing ATT&CK coverage gap analysis to identify blind spots in SIEM/EDR
  • Building a detection validation loop: execute atomic test, check SIEM, tune rule, retest
  • Generating ATT&CK Navigator heatmap layers for executive reporting
  • Automating continuous atomic testing in CI/CD or scheduled pipelines
  • Mapping threat intelligence reports to executable atomic tests

Do not use for full-scope red team engagements requiring custom implants or live adversary simulation beyond atomic tests; use Caldera, SCYTHE, or Cobalt Strike for advanced adversary emulation.

DISCLAIMER: Atomic Red Team tests execute real attack techniques. Run only on systems you own or have explicit written authorization to test. Many tests modify system state, create artifacts, or trigger security alerts. Always execute cleanup commands after testing. Never run atomic tests in production without risk acceptance from stakeholders.

Prerequisites

  • Windows host with PowerShell 5.1+ or PowerShell Core 7+ (Linux/macOS supported for cross-platform atomics)
  • Invoke-AtomicRedTeam PowerShell module installed from PSGallery
  • Atomic Red Team atomics repository cloned locally
  • SIEM/EDR with log ingestion from test endpoints (Splunk, Elastic, Microsoft Sentinel, CrowdStrike)
  • MITRE ATT&CK Navigator (web-based or local instance) for layer visualization
  • Python 3.9+ with mitreattack-python, pyyaml, and requests for automation scripts
  • Sigma rules repository for detection correlation
  • Administrative/root access on test endpoints
  • Isolated test environment (lab, sandbox, or dedicated test range)

Workflow

Step 1: Install and Configure Invoke-AtomicRedTeam

Set up the execution framework and download the atomics library:

# Install the PowerShell execution module
Install-Module -Name invoke-atomicredteam -Scope CurrentUser -Force
Install-Module -Name powershell-yaml -Scope CurrentUser -Force

# Import the module
Import-Module invoke-atomicredteam

# Install atomics to default location (C:\AtomicRedTeam\atomics)
IEX (IEX (New-Object System.Net.WebClient).DownloadString(
    'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/redcanaryco/invoke-atomicredteam/master/install-atomicredteam.ps1'
)); Install-AtomicRedTeam -getAtomics -Force

# Verify installation - list available techniques
$atomicsPath = "C:\AtomicRedTeam\atomics"
$techniques = Get-ChildItem $atomicsPath -Directory | Where-Object { $_.Name -match '^T\d{4}' }
Write-Host "Available techniques: $($techniques.Count)"

# Configure execution logging
$env:ARTLOG = "C:\AtomicRedTeam\logs"
if (-not (Test-Path $env:ARTLOG)) { New-Item -Path $env:ARTLOG -ItemType Directory }

Step 2: Enumerate and Select Atomic Tests

Inventory available tests and select targets based on threat intelligence or gap analysis:

# List all tests for a specific technique
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -ShowDetailsBrief

# Show full details including attack commands and cleanup
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -ShowDetails

# List tests for a tactic (e.g., Persistence)
$persistenceTechniques = @(
    "T1547.001",  # Boot or Logon Autostart - Registry Run Keys
    "T1053.005",  # Scheduled Task
    "T1136.001",  # Create Account - Local Account
    "T1543.003",  # Create or Modify System Process - Windows Service
    "T1546.001",  # Event Triggered Execution - Change Default File Association
    "T1574.001",  # Hijack Execution Flow - DLL Search Order Hijacking
    "T1197"       # BITS Jobs
)

foreach ($tech in $persistenceTechniques) {
    Write-Host "`n=== $tech ===" -ForegroundColor Cyan
    try {
        Invoke-AtomicTest $tech -ShowDetailsBrief
    } catch {
        Write-Host "  No tests available" -ForegroundColor Yellow
    }
}

# Get all atomic techniques from YAML files programmatically
$allAtomics = Get-ChildItem "$atomicsPath\T*\T*.yaml" -Recurse |
    ForEach-Object {
        $yaml = Get-Content $_.FullName -Raw | ConvertFrom-Yaml
        [PSCustomObject]@{
            TechniqueId   = $yaml.attack_technique
            TechniqueName = $yaml.display_name
            TestCount     = $yaml.atomic_tests.Count
            Platforms     = ($yaml.atomic_tests.supported_platforms | Sort-Object -Unique) -join ", "
        }
    }

$allAtomics | Sort-Object TechniqueId | Format-Table -AutoSize
Write-Host "Total techniques with tests: $($allAtomics.Count)"
Write-Host "Total individual tests: $(($allAtomics | Measure-Object -Property TestCount -Sum).Sum)"

Step 3: Execute Atomic Tests with Logging

Run tests with pre/post logging for detection validation:

# Execute a single test by technique ID (runs all tests for that technique)
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001

# Execute a specific test by number
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -TestNumbers 1

# Execute by test name
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -TestNames "Mimikatz - Cradled Invoke Expression"

# Execute by GUID
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -TestGuids "2e803f96-4e33-4c2c-b0c8-1c10cbb3945f"

# Execute with prerequisite check and installation
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -TestNumbers 1 -CheckPrereqs
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -TestNumbers 1 -GetPrereqs
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -TestNumbers 1

# Execute with timeout (seconds)
Invoke-AtomicTest T1003.001 -TimeoutSeconds 120

# Cleanup after testing
Invoke-AtomicTest T1059.001 -TestNumbers 1 -Cleanup

# Execute with full logging wrapper
function Invoke-AtomicWithLogging {
    param(
        [string]$TechniqueId,
        [int[]]$TestNumbers,
        [string]$LogPath = "C:\AtomicRedTeam\logs"
    )

    $timestamp = Get-Date -Format "yyyyMMdd_HHmmss"
    $logFile = Join-Path $LogPath "${TechniqueId}_${timestamp}.json"

    $result = @{
        technique_id  = $TechniqueId
        test_numbers  = $TestNumbers
        start_time    = (Get-Date).ToString("o")
        hostname      = $env:COMPUTERNAME
        username      = $env:USERNAME
        results       = @()
    }

    foreach ($testNum in $TestNumbers) {
        $testResult = @{
            test_number = $testNum
            status      = "unknown"
            start_time  = (Get-Date).ToString("o")
        }

        try {
            # Show what will execute
            $details = Invoke-AtomicTest $TechniqueId -TestNumbers $testNum -ShowDetails 2>&1
            $testResult["details"] = $details | Out-String

            # Execute the test
            Invoke-AtomicTest $TechniqueId -TestNumbers $testNum -Confirm:$false
            $testResult["status"] = "executed"
        } catch {
            $testResult["status"] = "failed"
            $testResult["error"] = $_.Exception.Message
        }

        $testResult["end_time"] = (Get-Date).ToString("o")
        $result.results += $testResult

        # Wait for SIEM ingestion
        Start-Sleep -Seconds 30
    }

    $result["end_time"] = (Get-Date).ToString("o")
    $result | ConvertTo-Json -Depth 10 | Set-Content $logFile
    Write-Host "Log written to: $logFile" -ForegroundColor Green
    return $result
}

# Usage
Invoke-AtomicWithLogging -TechniqueId "T1059.001" -TestNumbers @(1, 2, 3)

Step 4: Validate Detections in SIEM

Query your SIEM to confirm whether atomic tests generated alerts:

Splunk SPL Queries for Detection Validation:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

-- T1059.001: PowerShell Execution
index=windows sourcetype="WinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-PowerShell/Operational"
  EventCode=4104
  | eval script_block=ScriptBlockText
  | where len(script_block) > 500
  | stats count by host, script_block
  | sort -count

-- T1003.001: LSASS Memory Credential Dumping
index=windows sourcetype="WinEventLog:Security" EventCode=4663
  ObjectName="*lsass*"
  | stats count by host, SubjectUserName, ProcessName
  | where count > 0

-- T1547.001: Registry Run Key Persistence
index=windows sourcetype="WinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational"
  EventCode=13
  TargetObject="*\\CurrentVersion\\Run*"
  | stats count by host, Image, TargetObject, Details

-- T1053.005: Scheduled Task Creation
index=windows sourcetype="WinEventLog:Security" EventCode=4698
  | stats count by host, SubjectUserName, TaskName, TaskContent
  | sort -count

-- Generic: Hunt for Atomic Red Team artifacts
index=windows (sourcetype="WinEventLog:Microsoft-Windows-Sysmon/Operational"
  OR sourcetype="WinEventLog:Security")
  | search "*AtomicRedTeam*" OR "*atomic*" OR "*Invoke-AtomicTest*"
  | stats count by sourcetype, EventCode, host
Elastic / KQL Queries:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

-- PowerShell script block logging
event.code: "4104" and powershell.file.script_block_text: *

-- Sysmon process creation from AtomicRedTeam paths
event.code: "1" and process.executable: *AtomicRedTeam*

-- Registry modification (persistence)
event.code: "13" and registry.path: *CurrentVersion\\Run*

-- Credential access indicators
event.code: "10" and winlog.event_data.TargetImage: *lsass.exe*

Step 5: ATT&CK Coverage Gap Analysis

Generate a coverage matrix comparing tested vs. detected techniques:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""ATT&CK coverage gap analysis - compares atomic test results against SIEM detections."""

import json
import os
import yaml
from pathlib import Path
from datetime import datetime


def load_atomics_inventory(atomics_path):
    """Parse all atomic test YAML files to build technique inventory."""
    inventory = {}
    atomics_dir = Path(atomics_path)

    for yaml_file in atomics_dir.glob("T*/T*.yaml"):
        try:
            with open(yaml_file, "r", encoding="utf-8") as f:
                data = yaml.safe_load(f)

            tech_id = data.get("attack_technique", "")
            if not tech_id:
                continue

            tests = data.get("atomic_tests", [])
            inventory[tech_id] = {
                "name": data.get("display_name", "Unknown"),
                "test_count": len(tests),
                "platforms": list(set(
                    p for t in tests
                    for p in t.get("supported_platforms", [])
                )),
                "tests": [
                    {
                        "name": t.get("name", "Unnamed"),
                        "description": t.get("description", ""),
                        "platforms": t.get("supported_platforms", []),
                        "executor": t.get("executor", {}).get("name", "unknown"),
                    }
                    for t in tests
                ],
            }
        except Exception as e:
            print(f"[WARN] Failed to parse {yaml_file}: {e}")

    return inventory


def load_execution_logs(log_dir):
    """Load atomic test execution logs."""
    executed = {}
    log_path = Path(log_dir)

    if not log_path.exists():
        return executed

    for log_file in log_path.glob("T*_*.json"):
        try:
            with open(log_file, "r") as f:
                data = json.load(f)
            tech_id = data.get("technique_id", "")
            if tech_id:
                if tech_id not in executed:
                    executed[tech_id] = {
                        "executions": [],
                        "last_executed": data.get("end_time", ""),
                    }
                executed[tech_id]["executions"].append({
                    "timestamp": data.get("start_time", ""),
                    "results": data.get("results", []),
                })
        except Exception as e:
            print(f"[WARN] Failed to parse {log_file}: {e}")

    return executed


def load_detection_results(detection_file):
    """Load SIEM detection validation results (JSON export from SIEM queries)."""
    if not os.path.exists(detection_file):
        return {}

    with open(detection_file, "r") as f:
        data = json.load(f)

    detections = {}
    for entry in data:
        tech_id = entry.get("technique_id", "")
        if tech_id:
            detections[tech_id] = {
                "detected": entry.get("detected", False),
                "alert_count": entry.get("alert_count", 0),
                "rule_name": entry.get("rule_name", ""),
                "confidence": entry.get("confidence", "unknown"),
                "data_sources": entry.get("data_sources", []),
            }

    return detections


# MITRE ATT&CK tactic ordering for structured output
TACTIC_ORDER = [
    "reconnaissance", "resource-development", "initial-access",
    "execution", "persistence", "privilege-escalation",
    "defense-evasion", "credential-access", "discovery",
    "lateral-movement", "collection", "command-and-control",
    "exfiltration", "impact",
]

# Tactic-to-technique mapping for common techniques (subset for illustration)
TACTIC_TECHNIQUE_MAP = {
    "execution": [
        "T1059", "T1059.001", "T1059.003", "T1059.004", "T1059.005",
        "T1059.006", "T1059.007", "T1047", "T1053", "T1053.005",
        "T1129", "T1203", "T1569", "T1569.002",
    ],
    "persistence": [
        "T1547", "T1547.001", "T1547.004", "T1547.009",
        "T1053.005", "T1136", "T1136.001", "T1543", "T1543.003",
        "T1546", "T1546.001", "T1546.003", "T1574", "T1574.001",
        "T1197", "T1505", "T1505.003",
    ],
    "credential-access": [
        "T1003", "T1003.001", "T1003.002", "T1003.003",
        "T1003.004", "T1003.005", "T1003.006",
        "T1110", "T1110.001", "T1110.003",
        "T1555", "T1555.003", "T1552", "T1552.001",
        "T1558", "T1558.003",
    ],
    "defense-evasion": [
        "T1070", "T1070.001", "T1070.004",
        "T1218", "T1218.001", "T1218.003", "T1218.005",
        "T1218.010", "T1218.011",
        "T1027", "T1140", "T1562", "T1562.001",
        "T1036", "T1036.005",
    ],
    "discovery": [
        "T1082", "T1083", "T1087", "T1087.001", "T1087.002",
        "T1016", "T1049", "T1057", "T1069", "T1069.001",
        "T1069.002", "T1518", "T1518.001",
    ],
    "lateral-movement": [
        "T1021", "T1021.001", "T1021.002", "T1021.003",
        "T1021.004", "T1021.006", "T1570",
    ],
    "command-and-control": [
        "T1071", "T1071.001", "T1071.004",
        "T1105", "T1132", "T1573", "T1573.001",
        "T1219", "T1090",
    ],
    "exfiltration": [
        "T1041", "T1048", "T1048.003", "T1567",
    ],
    "impact": [
        "T1485", "T1486", "T1489", "T1490", "T1491",
    ],
}


def generate_coverage_report(atomics_inventory, execution_logs, detection_results):
    """Generate comprehensive coverage gap analysis."""
    report = {
        "generated_at": datetime.utcnow().isoformat() + "Z",
        "summary": {},
        "tactics": {},
        "gaps": [],
        "recommendations": [],
    }

    total_available = len(atomics_inventory)
    total_executed = len(execution_logs)
    total_detected = sum(1 for d in detection_results.values() if d.get("detected"))

    report["summary"] = {
        "total_techniques_with_atomics": total_available,
        "total_techniques_executed": total_executed,
        "total_techniques_detected": total_detected,
        "execution_coverage_pct": round(
            (total_executed / total_available * 100) if total_available else 0, 1
        ),
        "detection_coverage_pct": round(
            (total_detected / total_executed * 100) if total_executed else 0, 1
        ),
    }

    # Per-tactic analysis
    for tactic, technique_ids in TACTIC_TECHNIQUE_MAP.items():
        tactic_data = {
            "techniques_available": 0,
            "techniques_executed": 0,
            "techniques_detected": 0,
            "gaps": [],
        }

        for tech_id in technique_ids:
            if tech_id in atomics_inventory:
                tactic_data["techniques_available"] += 1

                executed = tech_id in execution_logs
                detected = detection_results.get(tech_id, {}).get("detected", False)

                if executed:
                    tactic_data["techniques_executed"] += 1
                if detected:
                    tactic_data["techniques_detected"] += 1

                if executed and not detected:
                    gap = {
                        "technique_id": tech_id,
                        "technique_name": atomics_inventory[tech_id]["name"],
                        "tactic": tactic,
                        "status": "BLIND_SPOT",
                        "detail": "Test executed but no detection triggered",
                    }
                    tactic_data["gaps"].append(gap)
                    report["gaps"].append(gap)
                elif not executed and tech_id in atomics_inventory:
                    gap = {
                        "technique_id": tech_id,
                        "technique_name": atomics_inventory[tech_id]["name"],
                        "tactic": tactic,
                        "status": "NOT_TESTED",
                        "detail": "Atomic test available but not yet executed",
                    }
                    tactic_data["gaps"].append(gap)

        avail = tactic_data["techniques_available"]
        tactic_data["coverage_pct"] = round(
            (tactic_data["techniques_detected"] / avail * 100) if avail else 0, 1
        )
        report["tactics"][tactic] = tactic_data

    # Generate prioritized recommendations
    blind_spots = [g for g in report["gaps"] if g["status"] == "BLIND_SPOT"]
    if blind_spots:
        report["recommendations"].append({
            "priority": "CRITICAL",
            "action": f"Write detection rules for {len(blind_spots)} blind spot techniques",
            "techniques": [g["technique_id"] for g in blind_spots],
        })

    low_coverage_tactics = [
        t for t, d in report["tactics"].items() if d["coverage_pct"] < 30
    ]
    if low_coverage_tactics:
        report["recommendations"].append({
            "priority": "HIGH",
            "action": f"Expand testing in low-coverage tactics: {', '.join(low_coverage_tactics)}",
            "detail": "These tactics have less than 30% detection coverage",
        })

    return report


def generate_navigator_layer(atomics_inventory, execution_logs, detection_results,
                             layer_name="Purple Team Coverage"):
    """Generate ATT&CK Navigator layer JSON for heatmap visualization."""
    layer = {
        "name": layer_name,
        "versions": {
            "attack": "15",
            "navigator": "5.1",
            "layer": "4.5",
        },
        "domain": "enterprise-attack",
        "description": f"Purple team atomic testing coverage - Generated {datetime.utcnow().isoformat()}Z",
        "filters": {"platforms": ["Windows", "Linux", "macOS"]},
        "sorting": 0,
        "layout": {
            "layout": "side",
            "aggregateFunction": "average",
            "showID": True,
            "showName": True,
        },
        "hideDisabled": False,
        "techniques": [],
        "gradient": {
            "colors": ["#ff6666", "#ffeb3b", "#66bb6a"],
            "minValue": 0,
            "maxValue": 100,
        },
        "legendItems": [
            {"label": "No Coverage (Blind Spot)", "color": "#ff6666"},
            {"label": "Logged Only (Partial)", "color": "#ffeb3b"},
            {"label": "Alert/Detection Active", "color": "#66bb6a"},
            {"label": "Not Tested", "color": "#d3d3d3"},
        ],
        "metadata": [],
        "links": [],
        "showTacticRowBackground": True,
        "tacticRowBackground": "#dddddd",
        "selectTechniquesAcrossTactics": True,
        "selectSubtechniquesWithParent": False,
    }

    for tech_id, tech_data in atomics_inventory.items():
        executed = tech_id in execution_logs
        detection = detection_results.get(tech_id, {})
        detected = detection.get("detected", False)
        confidence = detection.get("confidence", "none")

        if detected and confidence in ("high", "medium"):
            score = 100
            color = "#66bb6a"  # Green - high confidence detection
            comment = f"DETECTED - {detection.get('rule_name', 'Alert active')}"
        elif detected:
            score = 50
            color = "#ffeb3b"  # Yellow - logged/partial
            comment = "PARTIAL - Detection exists but low confidence"
        elif executed:
            score = 0
            color = "#ff6666"  # Red - blind spot
            comment = "BLIND SPOT - Test executed, no detection"
        else:
            score = 0
            color = "#d3d3d3"  # Gray - not tested
            comment = f"NOT TESTED - {tech_data['test_count']} atomic tests available"

        technique_entry = {
            "techniqueID": tech_id,
            "tactic": "",
            "color": color,
            "comment": comment,
            "score": score,
            "enabled": True,
            "metadata": [
                {"name": "tests_available", "value": str(tech_data["test_count"])},
                {"name": "executed", "value": str(executed)},
                {"name": "detected", "value": str(detected)},
            ],
            "links": [],
            "showSubtechniques": False,
        }
        layer["techniques"].append(technique_entry)

    return layer


def print_coverage_report(report):
    """Print formatted coverage report to console."""
    print("=" * 72)
    print("PURPLE TEAM ATOMIC TESTING - COVERAGE GAP ANALYSIS")
    print("=" * 72)
    print(f"Generated: {report['generated_at']}")
    print()

    s = report["summary"]
    print("EXECUTIVE SUMMARY")
    print("-" * 40)
    print(f"  Techniques with atomics:  {s['total_techniques_with_atomics']}")
    print(f"  Techniques executed:      {s['total_techniques_executed']}")
    print(f"  Techniques detected:      {s['total_techniques_detected']}")
    print(f"  Execution coverage:       {s['execution_coverage_pct']}%")
    print(f"  Detection coverage:       {s['detection_coverage_pct']}%")
    print()

    print("PER-TACTIC COVERAGE")
    print("-" * 72)
    print(f"{'Tactic':<25} {'Available':>9} {'Executed':>9} {'Detected':>9} {'Coverage':>9}")
    print("-" * 72)
    for tactic in TACTIC_ORDER:
        if tactic in report["tactics"]:
            t = report["tactics"][tactic]
            bar = "#" * int(t["coverage_pct"] / 5) + "." * (20 - int(t["coverage_pct"] / 5))
            print(
                f"  {tactic:<23} {t['techniques_available']:>9} "
                f"{t['techniques_executed']:>9} {t['techniques_detected']:>9} "
                f"{t['coverage_pct']:>8.1f}%"
            )
    print()

    blind_spots = [g for g in report["gaps"] if g["status"] == "BLIND_SPOT"]
    if blind_spots:
        print("CRITICAL BLIND SPOTS (executed but not detected)")
        print("-" * 72)
        for gap in blind_spots:
            print(f"  [!] {gap['technique_id']} - {gap['technique_name']}")
how to use performing-purple-team-atomic-testing

How to use performing-purple-team-atomic-testing on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add performing-purple-team-atomic-testing
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills install mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/performing-purple-team-atomic-testing

The skills CLI fetches performing-purple-team-atomic-testing from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/performing-purple-team-atomic-testing

Reload or restart Cursor to activate performing-purple-team-atomic-testing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /performing-purple-team-atomic-testing) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.549 reviews
  • Henry Verma· Dec 28, 2024

    Keeps context tight: performing-purple-team-atomic-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Kaira Jain· Dec 28, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-purple-team-atomic-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Henry Robinson· Dec 20, 2024

    I recommend performing-purple-team-atomic-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 16, 2024

    performing-purple-team-atomic-testing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Jin Jackson· Dec 12, 2024

    We added performing-purple-team-atomic-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • James Anderson· Dec 12, 2024

    Useful defaults in performing-purple-team-atomic-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Nia Sharma· Nov 19, 2024

    performing-purple-team-atomic-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Henry Tandon· Nov 19, 2024

    performing-purple-team-atomic-testing is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Piyush G· Nov 7, 2024

    Registry listing for performing-purple-team-atomic-testing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Min Nasser· Nov 3, 2024

    performing-purple-team-atomic-testing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

showing 1-10 of 49

1 / 5