Builds a structured vulnerability scanning workflow using tools like Nessus, Qualys, and OpenVAS to discover, prioritize, and track remediation of security vulnerabilities across infrastructure. Use when SOC teams need to establish recurring vulnerability assessment processes, integrate scan results with SIEM alerting, and build remediation tracking dashboards.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionbuilding-vulnerability-scanning-workflowExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow. Access via /building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow |
| description | 'Builds a structured vulnerability scanning workflow using tools like Nessus, Qualys, and OpenVAS to discover, prioritize, and track remediation of security vulnerabilities across infrastructure. Use when SOC teams need to establish recurring vulnerability assessment processes, integrate scan results with SIEM alerting, and build remediation tracking dashboards. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | soc-operations |
| tags | - soc - vulnerability-scanning - nessus - qualys - openvas - cvss - remediation - patch-management |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 - RS.MA-01 - DE.AE-06 |
Use this skill when:
Do not use for penetration testing or active exploitation — vulnerability scanning identifies weaknesses, penetration testing validates exploitability.
Create scan policies covering all asset types:
Nessus Scan Configuration (API):
import requests
nessus_url = "https://nessus.company.com:8834"
headers = {"X-ApiKeys": f"accessKey={access_key};secretKey={secret_key}"}
# Create scan policy
policy = {
"uuid": "advanced",
"settings": {
"name": "SOC Weekly Infrastructure Scan",
"description": "Weekly credentialed scan of all server and workstation segments",
"scanner_id": 1,
"policy_id": 0,
"text_targets": "10.0.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/12",
"launch": "WEEKLY",
"starttime": "20240315T020000",
"rrules": "FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=SA",
"enabled": True
},
"credentials": {
"add": {
"Host": {
"Windows": [{
"domain": "company.local",
"username": "nessus_svc",
"password": "SCAN_SERVICE_PASSWORD",
"auth_method": "Password"
}],
"SSH": [{
"username": "nessus_svc",
"private_key": "/path/to/nessus_key",
"auth_method": "public key"
}]
}
}
}
}
response = requests.post(f"{nessus_url}/scans", headers=headers, json=policy,
verify=not os.environ.get("SKIP_TLS_VERIFY", "").lower() == "true") # Set SKIP_TLS_VERIFY=true for self-signed certs in lab environments
scan_id = response.json()["scan"]["id"]
print(f"Scan created: ID {scan_id}")
Qualys VMDR Scan via API:
import qualysapi
conn = qualysapi.connect(
hostname="qualysapi.qualys.com",
username="api_user",
password="API_PASSWORD"
)
# Launch vulnerability scan
params = {
"action": "launch",
"scan_title": "Weekly_Infrastructure_Scan",
"ip": "10.0.0.0/16",
"option_id": "123456", # Scan profile ID
"iscanner_name": "Internal_Scanner_01",
"priority": "0"
}
response = conn.request("/api/2.0/fo/scan/", params)
print(f"Scan launched: {response}")
Download results and apply risk-based prioritization:
import requests
import csv
# Export Nessus results
response = requests.get(
f"{nessus_url}/scans/{scan_id}/export",
headers=headers,
params={"format": "csv"},
verify=not os.environ.get("SKIP_TLS_VERIFY", "").lower() == "true", # Set SKIP_TLS_VERIFY=true for self-signed certs in lab environments
)
# Parse and prioritize
vulns = []
reader = csv.DictReader(response.text.splitlines())
for row in reader:
cvss = float(row.get("CVSS v3.0 Base Score", 0))
asset_criticality = get_asset_criticality(row["Host"]) # From asset inventory
# Risk-based priority calculation
risk_score = cvss * asset_criticality_multiplier(asset_criticality)
# Boost score if actively exploited (check CISA KEV)
if row.get("CVE") in cisa_kev_list:
risk_score *= 1.5
vulns.append({
"host": row["Host"],
"plugin_name": row["Name"],
"severity": row["Risk"],
"cvss": cvss,
"cve": row.get("CVE", "N/A"),
"risk_score": round(risk_score, 1),
"asset_criticality": asset_criticality,
"kev": row.get("CVE") in cisa_kev_list
})
# Sort by risk score
vulns.sort(key=lambda x: x["risk_score"], reverse=True)
CISA KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) Check:
import requests
kev_response = requests.get(
"https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json"
)
kev_data = kev_response.json()
cisa_kev_list = {v["cveID"] for v in kev_data["vulnerabilities"]}
# Check if vulnerability is actively exploited
def is_actively_exploited(cve_id):
return cve_id in cisa_kev_list
Apply SLA-based remediation timelines:
| Priority | CVSS Range | Asset Type | SLA | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 Critical | 9.0-10.0 + KEV | All assets | 24 hours | Log4Shell, EternalBlue on prod servers |
| P2 High | 7.0-8.9 or 9.0+ non-KEV | Business-critical | 7 days | RCE without known exploit |
| P3 Medium | 4.0-6.9 | Business-critical | 30 days | Authenticated privilege escalation |
| P4 Low | 0.1-3.9 | Standard | 90 days | Information disclosure, low-impact DoS |
| P5 Informational | 0.0 | Development | Next cycle | Best practice findings, config hardening |
Correlate vulnerability scan data with SIEM alerts to detect active exploitation:
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan"
| eval vuln_key = Host.":".CVE
| join vuln_key type=left [
search index=ids_ips sourcetype="snort" OR sourcetype="suricata"
| eval vuln_key = dest_ip.":".cve_id
| stats count AS exploit_attempts, latest(_time) AS last_exploit_attempt by vuln_key
]
| where isnotnull(exploit_attempts)
| eval risk = "CRITICAL — Vulnerability being actively exploited"
| sort - exploit_attempts
| table Host, CVE, plugin_name, cvss_score, exploit_attempts, last_exploit_attempt, risk
Alert when KEV vulnerabilities are detected on critical assets:
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" severity="Critical"
| lookup cisa_kev_lookup.csv cve_id AS CVE OUTPUT kev_status, due_date
| where kev_status="active"
| lookup asset_criticality_lookup.csv ip AS Host OUTPUT criticality
| where criticality IN ("business-critical", "mission-critical")
| table Host, CVE, plugin_name, cvss_score, kev_status, due_date, criticality
Splunk Dashboard for Vulnerability Metrics:
-- Open vulnerabilities by severity
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" status="open"
| stats count by severity
| eval order = case(severity="Critical", 1, severity="High", 2, severity="Medium", 3,
severity="Low", 4, 1=1, 5)
| sort order
-- SLA compliance tracking
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" status="open"
| eval sla_days = case(
severity="Critical", 1,
severity="High", 7,
severity="Medium", 30,
severity="Low", 90
)
| eval days_open = round((now() - first_detected) / 86400)
| eval sla_status = if(days_open > sla_days, "OVERDUE", "Within SLA")
| stats count by severity, sla_status
-- Remediation trend over 90 days
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan"
| eval is_open = if(status="open", 1, 0)
| eval is_closed = if(status="fixed", 1, 0)
| timechart span=1w sum(is_open) AS opened, sum(is_closed) AS remediated
Create tickets automatically for high-priority findings:
import requests
servicenow_url = "https://company.service-now.com/api/now/table/incident"
headers = {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Authorization": f"Bearer {snow_token}"
}
for vuln in vulns:
if vuln["risk_score"] >= 8.0:
ticket = {
"short_description": f"[VULN] {vuln['cve']} — {vuln['plugin_name']} on {vuln['host']}",
"description": (
f"Vulnerability: {vuln['plugin_name']}\n"
f"CVE: {vuln['cve']}\n"
f"CVSS: {vuln['cvss']}\n"
f"Host: {vuln['host']}\n"
f"Asset Criticality: {vuln['asset_criticality']}\n"
f"CISA KEV: {'YES' if vuln['kev'] else 'NO'}\n"
f"Risk Score: {vuln['risk_score']}\n"
f"Remediation SLA: {'24 hours' if vuln['kev'] else '7 days'}"
),
"urgency": "1" if vuln["kev"] else "2",
"impact": "1" if vuln["asset_criticality"] == "business-critical" else "2",
"assignment_group": "IT Infrastructure",
"category": "Vulnerability"
}
response = requests.post(servicenow_url, headers=headers, json=ticket)
print(f"Ticket created: {response.json()['result']['number']}")
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| CVSS | Common Vulnerability Scoring System — standardized severity rating (0-10) for vulnerabilities |
| CISA KEV | Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog — CISA-maintained list of vulnerabilities with confirmed active exploitation |
| Credentialed Scan | Vulnerability scan using authenticated access for deeper detection than network-only scanning |
| Asset Criticality | Business impact classification determining remediation priority (mission-critical, business-critical, standard) |
| Remediation SLA | Service Level Agreement defining maximum time allowed to patch vulnerabilities by severity |
| EPSS | Exploit Prediction Scoring System — ML-based probability score predicting likelihood of exploitation |
VULNERABILITY SCAN REPORT — Weekly Summary
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Scan Date: 2024-03-16 02:00 UTC
Scan Scope: 10.0.0.0/16 (1,247 hosts scanned)
Duration: 4h 23m
Coverage: 98.7% (16 hosts unreachable)
Findings:
Severity Count New CISA KEV
Critical 23 5 3
High 187 34 12
Medium 892 78 0
Low 1,456 112 0
Info 3,891 201 0
Top Priority (P1 — 24hr SLA):
CVE-2024-21762 FortiOS RCE 3 hosts KEV: YES
CVE-2024-1709 ConnectWise RCE 1 host KEV: YES
CVE-2024-3400 Palo Alto PAN-OS RCE 2 hosts KEV: YES
SLA Compliance:
Critical: 82% within SLA (4 overdue)
High: 91% within SLA (17 overdue)
Medium: 88% within SLA (107 overdue)
Tickets Created: 39 (ServiceNow)
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Keeps context tight: building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Keeps context tight: building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
We added building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
We added building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 32