building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Builds a structured vulnerability scanning workflow using tools like Nessus, Qualys, and OpenVAS to discover, prioritize, and track remediation of security vulnerabilities across infrastructure. Use when SOC teams need to establish recurring vulnerability assessment processes, integrate scan results with SIEM alerting, and build remediation tracking dashboards.
| name | building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow |
| description | 'Builds a structured vulnerability scanning workflow using tools like Nessus, Qualys, and OpenVAS to discover, prioritize, and track remediation of security vulnerabilities across infrastructure. Use when SOC teams need to establish recurring vulnerability assessment processes, integrate scan results with SIEM alerting, and build remediation tracking dashboards. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | soc-operations |
| tags | - soc - vulnerability-scanning - nessus - qualys - openvas - cvss - remediation - patch-management |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 - RS.MA-01 - DE.AE-06 |
Building Vulnerability Scanning Workflow
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- SOC teams need to establish or improve recurring vulnerability scanning programs
- Scan results require prioritization beyond raw CVSS scores using asset context and threat intelligence
- Vulnerability data must be integrated into SIEM for correlation with exploitation attempts
- Remediation tracking needs formalization with SLA-based dashboards and reporting
Do not use for penetration testing or active exploitation — vulnerability scanning identifies weaknesses, penetration testing validates exploitability.
Prerequisites
- Vulnerability scanner (Tenable Nessus Professional, Qualys VMDR, or OpenVAS/Greenbone)
- Asset inventory with criticality classifications (business-critical, standard, development)
- Network access from scanner to all target segments (agent-based or network scan)
- SIEM integration for scan result ingestion and correlation
- Patch management system (WSUS, SCCM, Intune) for remediation tracking
Workflow
Step 1: Define Scan Scope and Scheduling
Create scan policies covering all asset types:
Nessus Scan Configuration (API):
import requests
nessus_url = "https://nessus.company.com:8834"
headers = {"X-ApiKeys": f"accessKey={access_key};secretKey={secret_key}"}
# Create scan policy
policy = {
"uuid": "advanced",
"settings": {
"name": "SOC Weekly Infrastructure Scan",
"description": "Weekly credentialed scan of all server and workstation segments",
"scanner_id": 1,
"policy_id": 0,
"text_targets": "10.0.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/12",
"launch": "WEEKLY",
"starttime": "20240315T020000",
"rrules": "FREQ=WEEKLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=SA",
"enabled": True
},
"credentials": {
"add": {
"Host": {
"Windows": [{
"domain": "company.local",
"username": "nessus_svc",
"password": "SCAN_SERVICE_PASSWORD",
"auth_method": "Password"
}],
"SSH": [{
"username": "nessus_svc",
"private_key": "/path/to/nessus_key",
"auth_method": "public key"
}]
}
}
}
}
response = requests.post(f"{nessus_url}/scans", headers=headers, json=policy,
verify=not os.environ.get("SKIP_TLS_VERIFY", "").lower() == "true") # Set SKIP_TLS_VERIFY=true for self-signed certs in lab environments
scan_id = response.json()["scan"]["id"]
print(f"Scan created: ID {scan_id}")
Qualys VMDR Scan via API:
import qualysapi
conn = qualysapi.connect(
hostname="qualysapi.qualys.com",
username="api_user",
password="API_PASSWORD"
)
# Launch vulnerability scan
params = {
"action": "launch",
"scan_title": "Weekly_Infrastructure_Scan",
"ip": "10.0.0.0/16",
"option_id": "123456", # Scan profile ID
"iscanner_name": "Internal_Scanner_01",
"priority": "0"
}
response = conn.request("/api/2.0/fo/scan/", params)
print(f"Scan launched: {response}")
Step 2: Process and Prioritize Scan Results
Download results and apply risk-based prioritization:
import requests
import csv
# Export Nessus results
response = requests.get(
f"{nessus_url}/scans/{scan_id}/export",
headers=headers,
params={"format": "csv"},
verify=not os.environ.get("SKIP_TLS_VERIFY", "").lower() == "true", # Set SKIP_TLS_VERIFY=true for self-signed certs in lab environments
)
# Parse and prioritize
vulns = []
reader = csv.DictReader(response.text.splitlines())
for row in reader:
cvss = float(row.get("CVSS v3.0 Base Score", 0))
asset_criticality = get_asset_criticality(row["Host"]) # From asset inventory
# Risk-based priority calculation
risk_score = cvss * asset_criticality_multiplier(asset_criticality)
# Boost score if actively exploited (check CISA KEV)
if row.get("CVE") in cisa_kev_list:
risk_score *= 1.5
vulns.append({
"host": row["Host"],
"plugin_name": row["Name"],
"severity": row["Risk"],
"cvss": cvss,
"cve": row.get("CVE", "N/A"),
"risk_score": round(risk_score, 1),
"asset_criticality": asset_criticality,
"kev": row.get("CVE") in cisa_kev_list
})
# Sort by risk score
vulns.sort(key=lambda x: x["risk_score"], reverse=True)
CISA KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) Check:
import requests
kev_response = requests.get(
"https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/feeds/known_exploited_vulnerabilities.json"
)
kev_data = kev_response.json()
cisa_kev_list = {v["cveID"] for v in kev_data["vulnerabilities"]}
# Check if vulnerability is actively exploited
def is_actively_exploited(cve_id):
return cve_id in cisa_kev_list
Step 3: Define Remediation SLAs
Apply SLA-based remediation timelines:
| Priority | CVSS Range | Asset Type | SLA | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 Critical | 9.0-10.0 + KEV | All assets | 24 hours | Log4Shell, EternalBlue on prod servers |
| P2 High | 7.0-8.9 or 9.0+ non-KEV | Business-critical | 7 days | RCE without known exploit |
| P3 Medium | 4.0-6.9 | Business-critical | 30 days | Authenticated privilege escalation |
| P4 Low | 0.1-3.9 | Standard | 90 days | Information disclosure, low-impact DoS |
| P5 Informational | 0.0 | Development | Next cycle | Best practice findings, config hardening |
Step 4: Integrate with SIEM for Exploitation Detection
Correlate vulnerability scan data with SIEM alerts to detect active exploitation:
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan"
| eval vuln_key = Host.":".CVE
| join vuln_key type=left [
search index=ids_ips sourcetype="snort" OR sourcetype="suricata"
| eval vuln_key = dest_ip.":".cve_id
| stats count AS exploit_attempts, latest(_time) AS last_exploit_attempt by vuln_key
]
| where isnotnull(exploit_attempts)
| eval risk = "CRITICAL — Vulnerability being actively exploited"
| sort - exploit_attempts
| table Host, CVE, plugin_name, cvss_score, exploit_attempts, last_exploit_attempt, risk
Alert when KEV vulnerabilities are detected on critical assets:
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" severity="Critical"
| lookup cisa_kev_lookup.csv cve_id AS CVE OUTPUT kev_status, due_date
| where kev_status="active"
| lookup asset_criticality_lookup.csv ip AS Host OUTPUT criticality
| where criticality IN ("business-critical", "mission-critical")
| table Host, CVE, plugin_name, cvss_score, kev_status, due_date, criticality
Step 5: Build Remediation Tracking Dashboard
Splunk Dashboard for Vulnerability Metrics:
-- Open vulnerabilities by severity
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" status="open"
| stats count by severity
| eval order = case(severity="Critical", 1, severity="High", 2, severity="Medium", 3,
severity="Low", 4, 1=1, 5)
| sort order
-- SLA compliance tracking
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan" status="open"
| eval sla_days = case(
severity="Critical", 1,
severity="High", 7,
severity="Medium", 30,
severity="Low", 90
)
| eval days_open = round((now() - first_detected) / 86400)
| eval sla_status = if(days_open > sla_days, "OVERDUE", "Within SLA")
| stats count by severity, sla_status
-- Remediation trend over 90 days
index=vulnerability sourcetype="nessus:scan"
| eval is_open = if(status="open", 1, 0)
| eval is_closed = if(status="fixed", 1, 0)
| timechart span=1w sum(is_open) AS opened, sum(is_closed) AS remediated
Step 6: Automate Remediation Ticketing
Create tickets automatically for high-priority findings:
import requests
servicenow_url = "https://company.service-now.com/api/now/table/incident"
headers = {
"Content-Type": "application/json",
"Authorization": f"Bearer {snow_token}"
}
for vuln in vulns:
if vuln["risk_score"] >= 8.0:
ticket = {
"short_description": f"[VULN] {vuln['cve']} — {vuln['plugin_name']} on {vuln['host']}",
"description": (
f"Vulnerability: {vuln['plugin_name']}\n"
f"CVE: {vuln['cve']}\n"
f"CVSS: {vuln['cvss']}\n"
f"Host: {vuln['host']}\n"
f"Asset Criticality: {vuln['asset_criticality']}\n"
f"CISA KEV: {'YES' if vuln['kev'] else 'NO'}\n"
f"Risk Score: {vuln['risk_score']}\n"
f"Remediation SLA: {'24 hours' if vuln['kev'] else '7 days'}"
),
"urgency": "1" if vuln["kev"] else "2",
"impact": "1" if vuln["asset_criticality"] == "business-critical" else "2",
"assignment_group": "IT Infrastructure",
"category": "Vulnerability"
}
response = requests.post(servicenow_url, headers=headers, json=ticket)
print(f"Ticket created: {response.json()['result']['number']}")
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| CVSS | Common Vulnerability Scoring System — standardized severity rating (0-10) for vulnerabilities |
| CISA KEV | Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog — CISA-maintained list of vulnerabilities with confirmed active exploitation |
| Credentialed Scan | Vulnerability scan using authenticated access for deeper detection than network-only scanning |
| Asset Criticality | Business impact classification determining remediation priority (mission-critical, business-critical, standard) |
| Remediation SLA | Service Level Agreement defining maximum time allowed to patch vulnerabilities by severity |
| EPSS | Exploit Prediction Scoring System — ML-based probability score predicting likelihood of exploitation |
Tools & Systems
- Tenable Nessus / Tenable.io: Enterprise vulnerability scanner with 200,000+ plugin checks and compliance auditing
- Qualys VMDR: Cloud-based vulnerability management with asset discovery, prioritization, and patching integration
- OpenVAS (Greenbone): Open-source vulnerability scanner with community-maintained vulnerability feed
- CISA KEV Catalog: US government maintained list of actively exploited vulnerabilities requiring mandatory remediation
- Rapid7 InsightVM: Vulnerability management platform with live dashboards and remediation project tracking
Common Scenarios
- Zero-Day Response: New CVE published — run targeted scan for affected software, cross-reference with KEV and exploit databases
- Compliance Audit Prep: Generate PCI DSS or HIPAA vulnerability report showing scan coverage and remediation status
- Post-Patch Verification: Rescan patched systems to confirm vulnerability closure and update tracking dashboard
- Network Expansion: New subnet added to infrastructure — onboard to scan scope with appropriate policy
- Third-Party Risk: Scan externally-facing assets to validate vendor patch compliance before integration
Output Format
VULNERABILITY SCAN REPORT — Weekly Summary
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Scan Date: 2024-03-16 02:00 UTC
Scan Scope: 10.0.0.0/16 (1,247 hosts scanned)
Duration: 4h 23m
Coverage: 98.7% (16 hosts unreachable)
Findings:
Severity Count New CISA KEV
Critical 23 5 3
High 187 34 12
Medium 892 78 0
Low 1,456 112 0
Info 3,891 201 0
Top Priority (P1 — 24hr SLA):
CVE-2024-21762 FortiOS RCE 3 hosts KEV: YES
CVE-2024-1709 ConnectWise RCE 1 host KEV: YES
CVE-2024-3400 Palo Alto PAN-OS RCE 2 hosts KEV: YES
SLA Compliance:
Critical: 82% within SLA (4 overdue)
High: 91% within SLA (17 overdue)
Medium: 88% within SLA (107 overdue)
Tickets Created: 39 (ServiceNow)
How to use building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★32 reviews- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Meera Rao· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Aisha Perez· Dec 16, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Sofia Wang· Dec 4, 2024
building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Sofia Patel· Nov 23, 2024
building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 19, 2024
We added building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Aisha White· Nov 7, 2024
We added building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Mei Menon· Oct 26, 2024
building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Dev Verma· Oct 14, 2024
We added building-vulnerability-scanning-workflow from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 32