analyzing-linux-elf-malware▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x86_64 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving Linux malware analysis, ELF binary investigation, Linux server compromise assessment, or container malware analysis.
| name | analyzing-linux-elf-malware |
| description | 'Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x86_64 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving Linux malware analysis, ELF binary investigation, Linux server compromise assessment, or container malware analysis. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | malware-analysis |
| tags | - malware - Linux - ELF - reverse-engineering - server-malware |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - DE.AE-02 - RS.AN-03 - ID.RA-01 - DE.CM-01 |
Analyzing Linux ELF Malware
When to Use
- A Linux server or container has been compromised and suspicious ELF binaries are found
- Analyzing Linux botnets (Mirai, Gafgyt, XorDDoS), cryptominers, or ransomware
- Investigating malware targeting cloud infrastructure, Docker containers, or Kubernetes pods
- Reverse engineering Linux rootkits and kernel modules
- Analyzing cross-platform malware compiled for Linux x86_64, ARM, or MIPS architectures
Do not use for Windows PE binary analysis; use PEStudio, Ghidra, or IDA for Windows malware.
Prerequisites
- Ghidra or IDA with Linux ELF support for disassembly and decompilation
- Linux analysis VM (Ubuntu 22.04 recommended) with development tools installed
- strace, ltrace, and GDB for dynamic analysis and debugging
- readelf, objdump, and nm from GNU binutils for static inspection
- Radare2 for quick binary triage and scripted analysis
- Docker for isolated container-based malware execution
Workflow
Step 1: Identify ELF Binary Properties
Examine the ELF header and basic properties:
# File type identification
file suspect_binary
# Detailed ELF header analysis
readelf -h suspect_binary
# Section headers
readelf -S suspect_binary
# Program headers (segments)
readelf -l suspect_binary
# Symbol table (if not stripped)
readelf -s suspect_binary
nm suspect_binary 2>/dev/null
# Dynamic linking information
readelf -d suspect_binary
ldd suspect_binary 2>/dev/null # Only on matching architecture!
# Compute hashes
md5sum suspect_binary
sha256sum suspect_binary
# Check for packing/UPX
upx -t suspect_binary
# Python-based ELF analysis
from elftools.elf.elffile import ELFFile
import hashlib
with open("suspect_binary", "rb") as f:
data = f.read()
sha256 = hashlib.sha256(data).hexdigest()
with open("suspect_binary", "rb") as f:
elf = ELFFile(f)
print(f"SHA-256: {sha256}")
print(f"Class: {elf.elfclass}-bit")
print(f"Endian: {elf.little_endian and 'Little' or 'Big'}")
print(f"Machine: {elf.header.e_machine}")
print(f"Type: {elf.header.e_type}")
print(f"Entry Point: 0x{elf.header.e_entry:X}")
# Check if stripped
symtab = elf.get_section_by_name('.symtab')
print(f"Stripped: {'Yes' if symtab is None else 'No'}")
# Section entropy analysis
import math
from collections import Counter
for section in elf.iter_sections():
data = section.data()
if len(data) > 0:
entropy = -sum((c/len(data)) * math.log2(c/len(data))
for c in Counter(data).values() if c > 0)
if entropy > 7.0:
print(f" [!] High entropy section: {section.name} ({entropy:.2f})")
Step 2: Extract Strings and Indicators
Search for embedded IOCs and functionality clues:
# ASCII strings
strings suspect_binary > strings_output.txt
# Search for network indicators
grep -iE "(http|https|ftp)://" strings_output.txt
grep -iE "([0-9]{1,3}\.){3}[0-9]{1,3}" strings_output.txt
grep -iE "[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.(com|net|org|io|ru|cn)" strings_output.txt
# Search for shell commands
grep -iE "(bash|sh|wget|curl|chmod|/tmp/|/dev/)" strings_output.txt
# Search for crypto mining indicators
grep -iE "(stratum|xmr|monero|pool\.|mining)" strings_output.txt
# Search for SSH/credential theft
grep -iE "(ssh|authorized_keys|id_rsa|shadow|passwd)" strings_output.txt
# Search for persistence mechanisms
grep -iE "(crontab|systemd|init\.d|rc\.local|ld\.so\.preload)" strings_output.txt
# FLOSS for obfuscated strings (if available)
floss suspect_binary
Step 3: Analyze System Calls and Library Usage
Identify what system calls and libraries the malware uses:
# List imported functions (dynamically linked)
readelf -r suspect_binary | grep -E "socket|connect|exec|fork|open|write|bind|listen"
# Trace system calls during execution (in isolated VM only)
strace -f -e trace=network,process,file -o strace_output.txt ./suspect_binary
# Trace library calls
ltrace -f -o ltrace_output.txt ./suspect_binary
# Key system calls to watch:
# Network: socket, connect, bind, listen, accept, sendto, recvfrom
# Process: fork, execve, clone, kill, ptrace
# File: open, read, write, unlink, rename, chmod
# Persistence: inotify_add_watch (file monitoring)
Step 4: Dynamic Analysis with GDB
Debug the malware to observe runtime behavior:
# Start GDB with the binary
gdb ./suspect_binary
# Set breakpoints on key functions
(gdb) break main
(gdb) break socket
(gdb) break connect
(gdb) break execve
(gdb) break fork
# Run and analyze
(gdb) run
(gdb) info registers # View register state
(gdb) x/20s $rdi # Examine string argument
(gdb) bt # Backtrace
(gdb) continue
# For stripped binaries, break on entry point
(gdb) break *0x400580 # Entry point from readelf
(gdb) run
# Monitor network connections during execution
# In another terminal:
ss -tlnp # List listening sockets
ss -tnp # List established connections
Step 5: Reverse Engineer with Ghidra
Perform deep code analysis on the ELF binary:
Ghidra Analysis for Linux ELF:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Import: File -> Import -> Select ELF binary
- Ghidra auto-detects ELF format and architecture
- Accept default analysis options
2. Key analysis targets:
- main() function (or entry point if stripped)
- Socket creation and connection functions
- Command dispatch logic (switch/case on received data)
- Encryption/encoding routines
- Persistence installation code
- Self-propagation/scanning functions
3. For Mirai-like botnets, look for:
- Credential list for brute-forcing (telnet/SSH)
- Attack module selection (UDP flood, SYN flood, ACK flood)
- Scanner module (port scanning for vulnerable devices)
- Killer module (killing competing botnets)
4. For cryptominers, look for:
- Mining pool connection (stratum protocol)
- Wallet address strings
- CPU/GPU utilization functions
- Process hiding techniques
Step 6: Analyze Linux-Specific Persistence
Check for persistence mechanisms:
# Check for LD_PRELOAD rootkit
strings suspect_binary | grep "ld.so.preload"
# Malware writing to /etc/ld.so.preload can hook all dynamic library calls
# Check for crontab persistence
strings suspect_binary | grep -i "cron"
# Check for systemd service creation
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "systemd|\.service|systemctl"
# Check for init script creation
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "init\.d|rc\.local|update-rc"
# Check for SSH key injection
strings suspect_binary | grep -i "authorized_keys"
# Check for kernel module (rootkit) loading
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "insmod|modprobe|init_module"
# Check for process hiding
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "proc|readdir|getdents"
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) | Standard binary format for Linux executables, shared libraries, and core dumps containing headers, sections, and segments |
| Stripped Binary | ELF binary with debug symbols removed, making reverse engineering more difficult as function names are lost |
| LD_PRELOAD | Linux environment variable specifying shared libraries to load before all others; abused by rootkits to intercept system library calls |
| strace | Linux system call tracer that logs all system calls and signals made by a process, revealing file, network, and process operations |
| GOT/PLT | Global Offset Table and Procedure Linkage Table; ELF structures for dynamic linking that can be hijacked for function hooking |
| Statically Linked | Binary compiled with all library code included; common in IoT malware to run on systems without matching shared libraries |
| Mirai | Prolific Linux botnet targeting IoT devices via telnet brute-force; source code leaked, leading to many variants |
Tools & Systems
- Ghidra: NSA reverse engineering tool with full ELF support for x86, x86_64, ARM, MIPS, and other Linux architectures
- Radare2: Open-source reverse engineering framework with command-line interface for quick binary analysis and scripting
- strace: Linux system call tracing tool for observing binary behavior including file, network, and process operations
- GDB: GNU Debugger for setting breakpoints, examining memory, and stepping through Linux binary execution
- pyelftools: Python library for parsing ELF files programmatically for automated analysis pipelines
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Analyzing a Cryptominer Found on a Compromised Linux Server
Context: A cloud server shows 100% CPU usage. Investigation reveals an unknown binary running from /tmp with a suspicious name. The binary needs analysis to confirm it is a cryptominer and identify the attacker's wallet and pool.
Approach:
- Copy the binary to an analysis VM and compute SHA-256 hash
- Run
fileandreadelfto identify architecture and linking type - Extract strings and search for mining pool addresses (stratum+tcp://) and wallet addresses
- Run with strace in a sandbox to observe network connections (mining pool connection)
- Import into Ghidra to identify the mining algorithm and configuration extraction
- Check for persistence mechanisms (crontab, systemd service, SSH keys)
- Document all IOCs including pool address, wallet, C2 for updates, and persistence artifacts
Pitfalls:
- Running
lddon malware outside a sandbox (ldd can execute code in the binary) - Not checking for ARM/MIPS architecture before attempting x86_64 execution
- Missing companion scripts (.sh files) that may handle persistence and cleanup
- Ignoring the initial access vector (how the miner was deployed: SSH brute force, web exploit, container escape)
Output Format
LINUX ELF MALWARE ANALYSIS REPORT
====================================
File: /tmp/.X11-unix/.rsync
SHA-256: e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb924...
Type: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64
Linking: Statically linked (all libraries embedded)
Stripped: Yes
Size: 2,847,232 bytes
Packer: UPX 3.96 (unpacked for analysis)
CLASSIFICATION
Family: XMRig Cryptominer (modified)
Variant: Custom build with C2 update mechanism
FUNCTIONALITY
[*] XMR (Monero) mining via RandomX algorithm
[*] Stratum pool connection for work submission
[*] C2 check-in for configuration updates
[*] Process name masquerading (argv[0] = "[kworker/0:0]")
[*] Competitor process killing (kills other miners)
[*] SSH key injection for re-access
NETWORK INDICATORS
Mining Pool: stratum+tcp://pool.minexmr[.]com:4444
C2 Server: hxxp://update.malicious[.]com/config
Wallet: 49jZ5Q3b...Monero_Wallet_Address...
PERSISTENCE
[1] Crontab entry: */5 * * * * /tmp/.X11-unix/.rsync
[2] SSH key added to /root/.ssh/authorized_keys
[3] Systemd service: /etc/systemd/system/rsync-daemon.service
[4] Modified /etc/ld.so.preload for process hiding
PROCESS HIDING
LD_PRELOAD: /usr/lib/.libsystem.so
Hook: readdir() to hide /tmp/.X11-unix/.rsync from ls
Hook: fopen() to hide from /proc/*/maps reading
How to use analyzing-linux-elf-malware on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add analyzing-linux-elf-malware
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches analyzing-linux-elf-malware from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate analyzing-linux-elf-malware. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /analyzing-linux-elf-malware) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.4★★★★★40 reviews- ★★★★★Maya Verma· Dec 28, 2024
analyzing-linux-elf-malware fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Ama Rao· Dec 24, 2024
I recommend analyzing-linux-elf-malware for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 16, 2024
analyzing-linux-elf-malware fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Soo Shah· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for analyzing-linux-elf-malware matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Kwame Haddad· Nov 15, 2024
Keeps context tight: analyzing-linux-elf-malware is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 7, 2024
Registry listing for analyzing-linux-elf-malware matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Anaya Chawla· Nov 3, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyzing-linux-elf-malware is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Oct 26, 2024
analyzing-linux-elf-malware reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Anaya Johnson· Oct 22, 2024
analyzing-linux-elf-malware has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Meera Kapoor· Oct 10, 2024
analyzing-linux-elf-malware reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 40