Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x86_64 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving Linux malware analysis, ELF binary investigation, Linux server compromise assessment, or container malware analysis.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionanalyzing-linux-elf-malwareExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches analyzing-linux-elf-malware from mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate analyzing-linux-elf-malware. Access via /analyzing-linux-elf-malware in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
0
total installs
0
this week
8.6K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
8.6K
stars
| name | analyzing-linux-elf-malware |
| description | 'Analyzes malicious Linux ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) binaries including botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure. Covers static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x86_64 and ARM ELF samples. Activates for requests involving Linux malware analysis, ELF binary investigation, Linux server compromise assessment, or container malware analysis. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | malware-analysis |
| tags | - malware - Linux - ELF - reverse-engineering - server-malware |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - DE.AE-02 - RS.AN-03 - ID.RA-01 - DE.CM-01 |
Do not use for Windows PE binary analysis; use PEStudio, Ghidra, or IDA for Windows malware.
Examine the ELF header and basic properties:
# File type identification
file suspect_binary
# Detailed ELF header analysis
readelf -h suspect_binary
# Section headers
readelf -S suspect_binary
# Program headers (segments)
readelf -l suspect_binary
# Symbol table (if not stripped)
readelf -s suspect_binary
nm suspect_binary 2>/dev/null
# Dynamic linking information
readelf -d suspect_binary
ldd suspect_binary 2>/dev/null # Only on matching architecture!
# Compute hashes
md5sum suspect_binary
sha256sum suspect_binary
# Check for packing/UPX
upx -t suspect_binary
# Python-based ELF analysis
from elftools.elf.elffile import ELFFile
import hashlib
with open("suspect_binary", "rb") as f:
data = f.read()
sha256 = hashlib.sha256(data).hexdigest()
with open("suspect_binary", "rb") as f:
elf = ELFFile(f)
print(f"SHA-256: {sha256}")
print(f"Class: {elf.elfclass}-bit")
print(f"Endian: {elf.little_endian and 'Little' or 'Big'}")
print(f"Machine: {elf.header.e_machine}")
print(f"Type: {elf.header.e_type}")
print(f"Entry Point: 0x{elf.header.e_entry:X}")
# Check if stripped
symtab = elf.get_section_by_name('.symtab')
print(f"Stripped: {'Yes' if symtab is None else 'No'}")
# Section entropy analysis
import math
from collections import Counter
for section in elf.iter_sections():
data = section.data()
if len(data) > 0:
entropy = -sum((c/len(data)) * math.log2(c/len(data))
for c in Counter(data).values() if c > 0)
if entropy > 7.0:
print(f" [!] High entropy section: {section.name} ({entropy:.2f})")
Search for embedded IOCs and functionality clues:
# ASCII strings
strings suspect_binary > strings_output.txt
# Search for network indicators
grep -iE "(http|https|ftp)://" strings_output.txt
grep -iE "([0-9]{1,3}\.){3}[0-9]{1,3}" strings_output.txt
grep -iE "[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.(com|net|org|io|ru|cn)" strings_output.txt
# Search for shell commands
grep -iE "(bash|sh|wget|curl|chmod|/tmp/|/dev/)" strings_output.txt
# Search for crypto mining indicators
grep -iE "(stratum|xmr|monero|pool\.|mining)" strings_output.txt
# Search for SSH/credential theft
grep -iE "(ssh|authorized_keys|id_rsa|shadow|passwd)" strings_output.txt
# Search for persistence mechanisms
grep -iE "(crontab|systemd|init\.d|rc\.local|ld\.so\.preload)" strings_output.txt
# FLOSS for obfuscated strings (if available)
floss suspect_binary
Identify what system calls and libraries the malware uses:
# List imported functions (dynamically linked)
readelf -r suspect_binary | grep -E "socket|connect|exec|fork|open|write|bind|listen"
# Trace system calls during execution (in isolated VM only)
strace -f -e trace=network,process,file -o strace_output.txt ./suspect_binary
# Trace library calls
ltrace -f -o ltrace_output.txt ./suspect_binary
# Key system calls to watch:
# Network: socket, connect, bind, listen, accept, sendto, recvfrom
# Process: fork, execve, clone, kill, ptrace
# File: open, read, write, unlink, rename, chmod
# Persistence: inotify_add_watch (file monitoring)
Debug the malware to observe runtime behavior:
# Start GDB with the binary
gdb ./suspect_binary
# Set breakpoints on key functions
(gdb) break main
(gdb) break socket
(gdb) break connect
(gdb) break execve
(gdb) break fork
# Run and analyze
(gdb) run
(gdb) info registers # View register state
(gdb) x/20s $rdi # Examine string argument
(gdb) bt # Backtrace
(gdb) continue
# For stripped binaries, break on entry point
(gdb) break *0x400580 # Entry point from readelf
(gdb) run
# Monitor network connections during execution
# In another terminal:
ss -tlnp # List listening sockets
ss -tnp # List established connections
Perform deep code analysis on the ELF binary:
Ghidra Analysis for Linux ELF:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Import: File -> Import -> Select ELF binary
- Ghidra auto-detects ELF format and architecture
- Accept default analysis options
2. Key analysis targets:
- main() function (or entry point if stripped)
- Socket creation and connection functions
- Command dispatch logic (switch/case on received data)
- Encryption/encoding routines
- Persistence installation code
- Self-propagation/scanning functions
3. For Mirai-like botnets, look for:
- Credential list for brute-forcing (telnet/SSH)
- Attack module selection (UDP flood, SYN flood, ACK flood)
- Scanner module (port scanning for vulnerable devices)
- Killer module (killing competing botnets)
4. For cryptominers, look for:
- Mining pool connection (stratum protocol)
- Wallet address strings
- CPU/GPU utilization functions
- Process hiding techniques
Check for persistence mechanisms:
# Check for LD_PRELOAD rootkit
strings suspect_binary | grep "ld.so.preload"
# Malware writing to /etc/ld.so.preload can hook all dynamic library calls
# Check for crontab persistence
strings suspect_binary | grep -i "cron"
# Check for systemd service creation
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "systemd|\.service|systemctl"
# Check for init script creation
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "init\.d|rc\.local|update-rc"
# Check for SSH key injection
strings suspect_binary | grep -i "authorized_keys"
# Check for kernel module (rootkit) loading
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "insmod|modprobe|init_module"
# Check for process hiding
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "proc|readdir|getdents"
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) | Standard binary format for Linux executables, shared libraries, and core dumps containing headers, sections, and segments |
| Stripped Binary | ELF binary with debug symbols removed, making reverse engineering more difficult as function names are lost |
| LD_PRELOAD | Linux environment variable specifying shared libraries to load before all others; abused by rootkits to intercept system library calls |
| strace | Linux system call tracer that logs all system calls and signals made by a process, revealing file, network, and process operations |
| GOT/PLT | Global Offset Table and Procedure Linkage Table; ELF structures for dynamic linking that can be hijacked for function hooking |
| Statically Linked | Binary compiled with all library code included; common in IoT malware to run on systems without matching shared libraries |
| Mirai | Prolific Linux botnet targeting IoT devices via telnet brute-force; source code leaked, leading to many variants |
Context: A cloud server shows 100% CPU usage. Investigation reveals an unknown binary running from /tmp with a suspicious name. The binary needs analysis to confirm it is a cryptominer and identify the attacker's wallet and pool.
Approach:
file and readelf to identify architecture and linking typePitfalls:
ldd on malware outside a sandbox (ldd can execute code in the binary)LINUX ELF MALWARE ANALYSIS REPORT
====================================
File: /tmp/.X11-unix/.rsync
SHA-256: e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb924...
Type: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64
Linking: Statically linked (all libraries embedded)
Stripped: Yes
Size: 2,847,232 bytes
Packer: UPX 3.96 (unpacked for analysis)
CLASSIFICATION
Family: XMRig Cryptominer (modified)
Variant: Custom build with C2 update mechanism
FUNCTIONALITY
[*] XMR (Monero) mining via RandomX algorithm
[*] Stratum pool connection for work submission
[*] C2 check-in for configuration updates
[*] Process name masquerading (argv[0] = "[kworker/0:0]")
[*] Competitor process killing (kills other miners)
[*] SSH key injection for re-access
NETWORK INDICATORS
Mining Pool: stratum+tcp://pool.minexmr[.]com:4444
C2 Server: hxxp://update.malicious[.]com/config
Wallet: 49jZ5Q3b...Monero_Wallet_Address...
PERSISTENCE
[1] Crontab entry: */5 * * * * /tmp/.X11-unix/.rsync
[2] SSH key added to /root/.ssh/authorized_keys
[3] Systemd service: /etc/systemd/system/rsync-daemon.service
[4] Modified /etc/ld.so.preload for process hiding
PROCESS HIDING
LD_PRELOAD: /usr/lib/.libsystem.so
Hook: readdir() to hide /tmp/.X11-unix/.rsync from ls
Hook: fopen() to hide from /proc/*/maps reading
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
analyzing-linux-elf-malware fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend analyzing-linux-elf-malware for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
analyzing-linux-elf-malware fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Registry listing for analyzing-linux-elf-malware matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Keeps context tight: analyzing-linux-elf-malware is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for analyzing-linux-elf-malware matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyzing-linux-elf-malware is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
analyzing-linux-elf-malware reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
analyzing-linux-elf-malware has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
analyzing-linux-elf-malware reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
showing 1-10 of 40