analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Monitor Certificate Transparency logs using crt.sh and Certstream to detect phishing domains, lookalike certificates, and unauthorized certificate issuance targeting your organization.
| name | analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing |
| description | Monitor Certificate Transparency logs using crt.sh and Certstream to detect phishing domains, lookalike certificates, and unauthorized certificate issuance targeting your organization. |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | threat-intelligence |
| tags | - certificate-transparency - ct-logs - phishing - crt-sh - certstream - ssl - domain-monitoring - threat-intelligence |
| version | '1.0' |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| atlas_techniques | - AML.T0052 |
| nist_csf | - ID.RA-01 - ID.RA-05 - DE.CM-01 - DE.AE-02 |
Analyzing Certificate Transparency for Phishing
Overview
Certificate Transparency (CT) is an Internet security standard that creates a public, append-only log of all issued SSL/TLS certificates. Monitoring CT logs enables early detection of phishing domains that register certificates mimicking legitimate brands, unauthorized certificate issuance for owned domains, and certificate-based attack infrastructure. This skill covers querying CT logs via crt.sh, real-time monitoring with Certstream, building automated alerting for suspicious certificates, and integrating findings into threat intelligence workflows.
When to Use
- When investigating security incidents that require analyzing certificate transparency for phishing
- When building detection rules or threat hunting queries for this domain
- When SOC analysts need structured procedures for this analysis type
- When validating security monitoring coverage for related attack techniques
Prerequisites
- Python 3.9+ with
requests,certstream,tldextract,Levenshteinlibraries - Access to crt.sh (https://crt.sh/) for historical CT log queries
- Certstream (https://certstream.calidog.io/) for real-time monitoring
- List of organization domains and brand keywords to monitor
- Understanding of SSL/TLS certificate structure and issuance process
Key Concepts
Certificate Transparency Logs
CT logs are cryptographically assured, publicly auditable, append-only records of TLS certificate issuance. Major CAs (Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Sectigo, Google Trust Services) submit all issued certificates to multiple CT logs. As of 2025, Chrome and Safari require CT for all publicly trusted certificates.
Phishing Detection via CT
Attackers register lookalike domains and obtain free certificates (often from Let's Encrypt) to make phishing sites appear legitimate with HTTPS. CT monitoring detects these early because the certificate appears in logs before the phishing campaign launches, providing a window for proactive blocking.
crt.sh Database
crt.sh is a free web interface and PostgreSQL database operated by Sectigo that indexes CT logs. It supports wildcard searches (%.example.com), direct SQL queries, and JSON API responses. It tracks certificate issuance, expiration, and revocation across all major CT logs.
Workflow
Step 1: Query crt.sh for Certificate History
import requests
import json
from datetime import datetime
import tldextract
class CTLogMonitor:
CRT_SH_URL = "https://crt.sh"
def __init__(self, monitored_domains, brand_keywords):
self.monitored_domains = monitored_domains
self.brand_keywords = [k.lower() for k in brand_keywords]
def query_crt_sh(self, domain, include_expired=False):
"""Query crt.sh for certificates matching a domain."""
params = {
"q": f"%.{domain}",
"output": "json",
}
if not include_expired:
params["exclude"] = "expired"
resp = requests.get(self.CRT_SH_URL, params=params, timeout=30)
if resp.status_code == 200:
certs = resp.json()
print(f"[+] crt.sh: {len(certs)} certificates for *.{domain}")
return certs
return []
def find_suspicious_certs(self, domain):
"""Find certificates that may be phishing attempts."""
certs = self.query_crt_sh(domain)
suspicious = []
for cert in certs:
common_name = cert.get("common_name", "").lower()
name_value = cert.get("name_value", "").lower()
issuer = cert.get("issuer_name", "")
not_before = cert.get("not_before", "")
not_after = cert.get("not_after", "")
# Check for exact domain matches (legitimate)
extracted = tldextract.extract(common_name)
cert_domain = f"{extracted.domain}.{extracted.suffix}"
if cert_domain == domain:
continue # Legitimate certificate
# Flag suspicious patterns
flags = []
if domain.replace(".", "") in common_name.replace(".", ""):
flags.append("contains target domain string")
if any(kw in common_name for kw in self.brand_keywords):
flags.append("contains brand keyword")
if "let's encrypt" in issuer.lower():
flags.append("free CA (Let's Encrypt)")
if flags:
suspicious.append({
"common_name": cert.get("common_name", ""),
"name_value": cert.get("name_value", ""),
"issuer": issuer,
"not_before": not_before,
"not_after": not_after,
"serial": cert.get("serial_number", ""),
"flags": flags,
"crt_sh_id": cert.get("id", ""),
"crt_sh_url": f"https://crt.sh/?id={cert.get('id', '')}",
})
print(f"[+] Found {len(suspicious)} suspicious certificates")
return suspicious
monitor = CTLogMonitor(
monitored_domains=["mycompany.com", "mycompany.org"],
brand_keywords=["mycompany", "mybrand", "myproduct"],
)
suspicious = monitor.find_suspicious_certs("mycompany.com")
for cert in suspicious[:5]:
print(f" [{cert['common_name']}] Flags: {cert['flags']}")
Step 2: Real-Time Monitoring with Certstream
import certstream
import Levenshtein
import re
from datetime import datetime
class CertstreamMonitor:
def __init__(self, watched_domains, brand_keywords, similarity_threshold=0.8):
self.watched_domains = [d.lower() for d in watched_domains]
self.brand_keywords = [k.lower() for k in brand_keywords]
self.threshold = similarity_threshold
self.alerts = []
def start_monitoring(self, max_alerts=100):
"""Start real-time CT log monitoring."""
print("[*] Starting Certstream monitoring...")
print(f" Watching: {self.watched_domains}")
print(f" Keywords: {self.brand_keywords}")
def callback(message, context):
if message["message_type"] == "certificate_update":
data = message["data"]
leaf = data.get("leaf_cert", {})
all_domains = leaf.get("all_domains", [])
for domain in all_domains:
domain_lower = domain.lower().strip("*.")
if self._is_suspicious(domain_lower):
alert = {
"domain": domain,
"all_domains": all_domains,
"issuer": leaf.get("issuer", {}).get("O", ""),
"fingerprint": leaf.get("fingerprint", ""),
"not_before": leaf.get("not_before", ""),
"detected_at": datetime.now().isoformat(),
"reason": self._get_reason(domain_lower),
}
self.alerts.append(alert)
print(f" [ALERT] {domain} - {alert['reason']}")
if len(self.alerts) >= max_alerts:
raise KeyboardInterrupt
try:
certstream.listen_for_events(callback, url="wss://certstream.calidog.io/")
except KeyboardInterrupt:
print(f"\n[+] Monitoring stopped. {len(self.alerts)} alerts collected.")
return self.alerts
def _is_suspicious(self, domain):
"""Check if domain is suspicious relative to watched domains."""
for watched in self.watched_domains:
# Exact keyword match
watched_base = watched.split(".")[0]
if watched_base in domain and domain != watched:
return True
# Levenshtein distance (typosquatting detection)
domain_base = tldextract.extract(domain).domain
similarity = Levenshtein.ratio(watched_base, domain_base)
if similarity >= self.threshold and domain_base != watched_base:
return True
# Brand keyword match
for keyword in self.brand_keywords:
if keyword in domain:
return True
return False
def _get_reason(self, domain):
"""Determine why domain was flagged."""
reasons = []
for watched in self.watched_domains:
watched_base = watched.split(".")[0]
if watched_base in domain:
reasons.append(f"contains '{watched_base}'")
domain_base = tldextract.extract(domain).domain
similarity = Levenshtein.ratio(watched_base, domain_base)
if similarity >= self.threshold and domain_base != watched_base:
reasons.append(f"similar to '{watched}' ({similarity:.0%})")
for kw in self.brand_keywords:
if kw in domain:
reasons.append(f"brand keyword '{kw}'")
return "; ".join(reasons) if reasons else "unknown"
cs_monitor = CertstreamMonitor(
watched_domains=["mycompany.com"],
brand_keywords=["mycompany", "mybrand"],
similarity_threshold=0.75,
)
alerts = cs_monitor.start_monitoring(max_alerts=50)
Step 3: Enumerate Subdomains from CT Logs
def enumerate_subdomains_ct(domain):
"""Discover all subdomains from Certificate Transparency logs."""
params = {"q": f"%.{domain}", "output": "json"}
resp = requests.get("https://crt.sh", params=params, timeout=30)
if resp.status_code != 200:
return []
certs = resp.json()
subdomains = set()
for cert in certs:
name_value = cert.get("name_value", "")
for name in name_value.split("\n"):
name = name.strip().lower()
if name.endswith(f".{domain}") or name == domain:
name = name.lstrip("*.")
subdomains.add(name)
sorted_subs = sorted(subdomains)
print(f"[+] CT subdomain enumeration for {domain}: {len(sorted_subs)} subdomains")
return sorted_subs
subdomains = enumerate_subdomains_ct("example.com")
for sub in subdomains[:20]:
print(f" {sub}")
Step 4: Generate CT Intelligence Report
def generate_ct_report(suspicious_certs, certstream_alerts, domain):
report = f"""# Certificate Transparency Intelligence Report
## Target Domain: {domain}
## Generated: {datetime.now().isoformat()}
## Summary
- Suspicious certificates found: {len(suspicious_certs)}
- Real-time alerts triggered: {len(certstream_alerts)}
## Suspicious Certificates (crt.sh)
| Common Name | Issuer | Flags | crt.sh Link |
|------------|--------|-------|-------------|
"""
for cert in suspicious_certs[:20]:
flags = "; ".join(cert.get("flags", []))
report += (f"| {cert['common_name']} | {cert['issuer'][:30]} "
f"| {flags} | [View]({cert['crt_sh_url']}) |\n")
report += f"""
## Real-Time Certstream Alerts
| Domain | Issuer | Reason | Detected |
|--------|--------|--------|----------|
"""
for alert in certstream_alerts[:20]:
report += (f"| {alert['domain']} | {alert['issuer']} "
f"| {alert['reason']} | {alert['detected_at'][:19]} |\n")
report += """
## Recommendations
1. Add flagged domains to DNS sinkhole / web proxy blocklist
2. Submit takedown requests for confirmed phishing domains
3. Monitor CT logs continuously for new certificate registrations
4. Implement CAA DNS records to restrict certificate issuance for your domains
5. Deploy DMARC to prevent email spoofing from lookalike domains
"""
with open(f"ct_report_{domain.replace('.','_')}.md", "w") as f:
f.write(report)
print(f"[+] CT report saved")
return report
generate_ct_report(suspicious, alerts if 'alerts' in dir() else [], "mycompany.com")
Validation Criteria
- crt.sh queries return certificate data for target domains
- Suspicious certificates identified based on lookalike patterns
- Certstream real-time monitoring detects new phishing certificates
- Subdomain enumeration produces comprehensive list from CT logs
- Alerts generated with reason classification
- CT intelligence report created with actionable recommendations
References
How to use analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★45 reviews- ★★★★★Yuki Sharma· Dec 24, 2024
analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Yuki Shah· Dec 20, 2024
analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Choi· Dec 8, 2024
analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Isabella Reddy· Dec 4, 2024
I recommend analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Sharma· Nov 27, 2024
I recommend analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Iyer· Nov 23, 2024
analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Khan· Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Hiroshi Desai· Nov 11, 2024
Registry listing for analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Amina Iyer· Oct 18, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Thomas· Oct 14, 2024
analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 45