analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples▌
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills · updated May 25, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware that infects the Master Boot Record (MBR), Volume Boot Record (VBR), or UEFI firmware to gain persistence below the operating system. Covers boot sector analysis, UEFI module inspection, and anti-rootkit detection techniques. Activates for requests involving bootkit analysis, MBR malware investigation, UEFI persistence analysis, or pre-OS malware detection.
| name | analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples |
| description | 'Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware that infects the Master Boot Record (MBR), Volume Boot Record (VBR), or UEFI firmware to gain persistence below the operating system. Covers boot sector analysis, UEFI module inspection, and anti-rootkit detection techniques. Activates for requests involving bootkit analysis, MBR malware investigation, UEFI persistence analysis, or pre-OS malware detection. ' |
| domain | cybersecurity |
| subdomain | malware-analysis |
| tags | - malware - bootkit - rootkit - UEFI - MBR-analysis |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | mahipal |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| nist_csf | - DE.AE-02 - RS.AN-03 - ID.RA-01 - DE.CM-01 |
Analyzing Bootkit and Rootkit Samples
When to Use
- A system shows signs of compromise that persist through OS reinstallation
- Antivirus and EDR are unable to detect malware despite clear evidence of compromise
- UEFI Secure Boot has been disabled or shows integrity violations
- Memory forensics reveals rootkit behavior (hidden processes, hooked system calls)
- Investigating nation-state level threats known to deploy bootkits (APT28, APT41, Equation Group)
Do not use for standard user-mode malware; bootkits and rootkits operate at a fundamentally different level requiring specialized analysis techniques.
Prerequisites
- Disk imaging tools (dd, FTK Imager) for acquiring MBR/VBR sectors
- UEFITool for UEFI firmware volume analysis and module extraction
- chipsec for hardware-level firmware security assessment
- Ghidra with x86 real-mode and 16-bit support for MBR code analysis
- Volatility 3 for kernel-level rootkit artifact detection
- Bootable Linux live USB for offline system analysis
Workflow
Step 1: Acquire Boot Sectors and Firmware
Extract MBR, VBR, and UEFI firmware for offline analysis:
# Acquire MBR (first 512 bytes of disk)
dd if=/dev/sda of=mbr.bin bs=512 count=1
# Acquire first track (usually contains bootkit code beyond MBR)
dd if=/dev/sda of=first_track.bin bs=512 count=63
# Acquire VBR (Volume Boot Record - first sector of partition)
dd if=/dev/sda1 of=vbr.bin bs=512 count=1
# Acquire UEFI System Partition
mkdir /mnt/efi
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/efi
cp -r /mnt/efi/EFI /analysis/efi_backup/
# Dump UEFI firmware (requires chipsec or flashrom)
# Using chipsec:
python chipsec_util.py spi dump firmware.rom
# Using flashrom:
flashrom -p internal -r firmware.rom
# Verify firmware dump integrity
sha256sum firmware.rom
Step 2: Analyze MBR/VBR for Bootkit Code
Examine boot sector code for malicious modifications:
# Disassemble MBR code (16-bit real mode)
ndisasm -b16 mbr.bin > mbr_disasm.txt
# Compare MBR with known-good Windows MBR
# Standard Windows MBR begins with: EB 5A 90 (JMP 0x5C, NOP)
# Standard Windows 10 MBR: 33 C0 8E D0 BC 00 7C (XOR AX,AX; MOV SS,AX; MOV SP,7C00h)
python3 << 'PYEOF'
with open("mbr.bin", "rb") as f:
mbr = f.read()
# Check MBR signature (bytes 510-511 should be 0x55AA)
if mbr[510:512] == b'\x55\xAA':
print("[*] Valid MBR signature (0x55AA)")
else:
print("[!] Invalid MBR signature")
# Check for known bootkit signatures
bootkit_sigs = {
b'\xE8\x00\x00\x5E\x81\xEE': "TDL4/Alureon bootkit",
b'\xFA\x33\xC0\x8E\xD0\xBC\x00\x7C\x8B\xF4\x50\x07': "Standard Windows MBR (clean)",
b'\xEB\x5A\x90\x4E\x54\x46\x53': "Standard NTFS VBR (clean)",
}
for sig, name in bootkit_sigs.items():
if sig in mbr:
print(f"[{'!' if 'clean' not in name else '*'}] Signature match: {name}")
# Check partition table entries
print("\nPartition Table:")
for i in range(4):
offset = 446 + (i * 16)
entry = mbr[offset:offset+16]
if entry != b'\x00' * 16:
boot_flag = "Active" if entry[0] == 0x80 else "Inactive"
part_type = entry[4]
start_lba = int.from_bytes(entry[8:12], 'little')
size_lba = int.from_bytes(entry[12:16], 'little')
print(f" Partition {i+1}: Type=0x{part_type:02X} {boot_flag} Start=LBA {start_lba} Size={size_lba} sectors")
PYEOF
Step 3: Analyze UEFI Firmware for Implants
Inspect UEFI firmware volumes for unauthorized modules:
# Extract UEFI firmware components with UEFITool
# GUI: Open firmware.rom -> Inspect firmware volumes
# CLI:
UEFIExtract firmware.rom all
# List all DXE drivers (most common target for UEFI implants)
find firmware.rom.dump -name "*.efi" -exec file {} \;
# Compare against known-good firmware module list
# Each UEFI module has a GUID - compare against vendor baseline
# Verify Secure Boot configuration
python chipsec_main.py -m common.secureboot.variables
# Check SPI flash write protection
python chipsec_main.py -m common.bios_wp
# Check for known UEFI malware patterns
yara -r uefi_malware.yar firmware.rom
Known UEFI Bootkit Detection Points:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
LoJax (APT28):
- Modified SPI flash
- Added DXE driver that drops agent to Windows
- Persists through OS reinstall and disk replacement
BlackLotus:
- Exploits CVE-2022-21894 to bypass Secure Boot
- Modifies EFI System Partition bootloader
- Installs kernel driver during boot
CosmicStrand:
- Modifies CORE_DXE firmware module
- Hooks kernel initialization during boot
- Drops shellcode into Windows kernel memory
MoonBounce:
- SPI flash implant in CORE_DXE module
- Modified GetVariable() function
- Deploys user-mode implant through boot chain
ESPecter:
- Modifies Windows Boot Manager on ESP
- Patches winload.efi to disable DSE
- Loads unsigned kernel driver
Step 4: Detect Kernel-Level Rootkit Behavior
Analyze the running system for rootkit artifacts:
# Memory forensics for rootkit detection
# SSDT hook detection
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.ssdt | grep -v "ntoskrnl\|win32k"
# Hidden processes (DKOM)
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.psscan > psscan.txt
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.pslist > pslist.txt
# Diff to find hidden processes
# Kernel callback registration (rootkits register callbacks for filtering)
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.callbacks
# Driver analysis
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.driverscan
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.modules
# Check for unsigned drivers
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.driverscan | while read line; do
driver_path=$(echo "$line" | awk '{print $NF}')
if [ -f "$driver_path" ]; then
sigcheck -nobanner "$driver_path" 2>/dev/null | grep "Unsigned"
fi
done
# IDT hook detection
vol3 -f memory.dmp windows.idt
Step 5: Boot Process Integrity Verification
Verify the integrity of the entire boot chain:
# Verify Windows Boot Manager signature
sigcheck -a C:\Windows\Boot\EFI\bootmgfw.efi
# Verify winload.efi
sigcheck -a C:\Windows\System32\winload.efi
# Verify ntoskrnl.exe
sigcheck -a C:\Windows\System32\ntoskrnl.exe
# Check Measured Boot logs (if TPM is available)
# Windows: BCDEdit /enum firmware
bcdedit /enum firmware
# Verify Secure Boot state
Confirm-SecureBootUEFI # PowerShell cmdlet
# Check boot configuration for tampering
bcdedit /v
# Look for boot configuration changes
# testsigning: should be No
# nointegritychecks: should be No
# debug: should be No
bcdedit | findstr /i "testsigning nointegritychecks debug"
Step 6: Document Bootkit/Rootkit Analysis
Compile comprehensive analysis findings:
Analysis should document:
- Boot sector (MBR/VBR) integrity status with hex comparison
- UEFI firmware module inventory and integrity verification
- Secure Boot status and any bypass mechanisms detected
- Kernel-level hooks (SSDT, IDT, IRP, inline) identified
- Hidden processes, drivers, and files discovered
- Persistence mechanism (SPI flash, ESP, MBR, kernel driver)
- Boot chain integrity verification results
- Attribution to known bootkit families if possible
- Remediation steps (reflash firmware, rebuild MBR, replace hardware)
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Bootkit | Malware that infects the boot process (MBR, VBR, UEFI) to execute before the operating system loads, gaining persistent low-level control |
| MBR (Master Boot Record) | First 512 bytes of a disk containing bootstrap code and partition table; MBR bootkits replace this code with malicious loaders |
| UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) | Modern firmware interface replacing BIOS; UEFI bootkits implant malicious modules in firmware volumes or modify the ESP |
| Secure Boot | UEFI security feature verifying digital signatures of boot components; bootkits like BlackLotus exploit vulnerabilities to bypass it |
| SPI Flash | Flash memory chip storing UEFI firmware; advanced bootkits like LoJax and MoonBounce modify SPI flash for firmware-level persistence |
| DKOM (Direct Kernel Object Manipulation) | Rootkit technique modifying kernel structures to hide processes, files, and network connections without hooking functions |
| Driver Signature Enforcement (DSE) | Windows security feature requiring kernel drivers to be digitally signed; bootkits disable DSE during boot to load unsigned rootkit drivers |
Tools & Systems
- UEFITool: Open-source UEFI firmware image editor and parser for inspecting firmware volumes, drivers, and modules
- chipsec: Intel hardware security assessment framework for verifying SPI flash protection, Secure Boot, and UEFI configuration
- Volatility: Memory forensics framework with SSDT, IDT, callback, and driver analysis plugins for kernel rootkit detection
- GMER: Windows rootkit detection tool scanning for SSDT hooks, IDT hooks, hidden processes, and modified kernel modules
- Bootkits Analyzer: Specialized tool for analyzing MBR/VBR code including disassembly and comparison against known-good baselines
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Investigating Persistent Compromise Surviving OS Reinstallation
Context: An organization reimaged a compromised workstation, but the same C2 beaconing resumed within hours. Standard disk forensics finds no malware. UEFI bootkit is suspected.
Approach:
- Boot from a Linux live USB to avoid executing any compromised OS components
- Dump the SPI flash firmware using chipsec or flashrom for offline analysis
- Dump the MBR and VBR sectors with dd for boot sector analysis
- Copy the EFI System Partition for bootloader integrity verification
- Open the SPI dump in UEFITool and compare module GUIDs against vendor-provided firmware
- Look for additional or modified DXE drivers that should not be present
- Analyze any suspicious modules with Ghidra (x86_64 UEFI module format)
- Verify Secure Boot configuration and check for exploit-based bypasses
Pitfalls:
- Analyzing the system while the compromised OS is running (rootkit may hide from live analysis)
- Not checking SPI flash (only analyzing disk-based boot components misses firmware-level implants)
- Assuming Secure Boot prevents all bootkits (known bypasses exist, e.g., CVE-2022-21894)
- Not preserving the original firmware dump before reflashing (critical evidence for attribution)
Output Format
BOOTKIT / ROOTKIT ANALYSIS REPORT
====================================
System: Dell OptiPlex 7090 (UEFI, TPM 2.0)
Firmware Version: 1.15.0 (Dell)
Secure Boot: ENABLED (but bypassed)
Capture Method: Linux Live USB + chipsec SPI dump
MBR/VBR ANALYSIS
MBR Signature: Valid (0x55AA)
MBR Code: MATCHES standard Windows 10 MBR (clean)
VBR Code: MATCHES standard NTFS VBR (clean)
UEFI FIRMWARE ANALYSIS
Total Modules: 287
Vendor Expected: 285
Extra Modules: 2 UNAUTHORIZED
[!] DXE Driver GUID: {ABCD1234-...} "SmmAccessDxe_mod" (MODIFIED)
Original Size: 12,288 bytes
Current Size: 45,056 bytes (32KB ADDED)
Entropy: 7.82 (HIGH - encrypted payload)
[!] DXE Driver GUID: {EFGH5678-...} "UefiPayloadDxe" (NEW - not in vendor firmware)
Size: 28,672 bytes
Function: Drops persistence agent during boot
BOOT CHAIN INTEGRITY
bootmgfw.efi: MODIFIED (hash mismatch, Secure Boot bypass via CVE-2022-21894)
winload.efi: MODIFIED (DSE disabled at load time)
ntoskrnl.exe: CLEAN (but unsigned driver loaded after boot)
KERNEL ROOTKIT COMPONENTS
Driver: C:\Windows\System32\drivers\null_mod.sys (unsigned, hidden)
SSDT Hooks: 3 (NtQuerySystemInformation, NtQueryDirectoryFile, NtDeviceIoControlFile)
Hidden Processes: 2 (PID 6784: beacon.exe, PID 6812: keylog.exe)
Hidden Files: C:\Windows\System32\drivers\null_mod.sys
ATTRIBUTION
Family: BlackLotus variant
Confidence: HIGH (CVE-2022-21894 exploit, ESP modification pattern matches)
REMEDIATION
1. Reflash SPI firmware with clean vendor image via hardware programmer
2. Rebuild EFI System Partition from clean Windows installation media
3. Reinstall OS from verified media
4. Enable all firmware write protections
5. Update firmware to latest version (patches CVE-2022-21894)
How to use analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples from GitHub repository mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
Task Automation & Efficiency
Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort
Example
Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications
Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks
Knowledge Enhancement
Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance
Example
Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources
Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x
Quality Improvement
Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements
Example
Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors
Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
- ›Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
- ›Willingness to iterate and refine outputs
Time Estimate
15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity
Installation Steps
- 1.Install skill using provided installation command
- 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
- 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
- 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
- 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Expecting perfect results without iteration
- ⚠Not providing enough context in prompts
- ⚠Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
- ⚠Accepting outputs without review and validation
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Start with clear, specific prompts
- +Provide relevant context and constraints
- +Review and refine all outputs before using
- +Iterate to improve output quality
- +Document successful prompt patterns
✗ Don't
- −Don't use without understanding skill limitations
- −Don't skip validation of outputs
- −Don't share sensitive information in prompts
- −Don't expect skill to replace human judgment
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Be specific about desired format and style
- ★Ask for multiple options to choose from
- ★Request explanations to understand reasoning
- ★Combine AI efficiency with human expertise
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.
Learning Path▌
- 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
- 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
- 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
- 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★43 reviews- ★★★★★Kaira Jain· Dec 28, 2024
analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Hana Jain· Dec 4, 2024
analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Zara Jain· Nov 23, 2024
We added analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Hiroshi Gonzalez· Nov 19, 2024
Keeps context tight: analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 11, 2024
Useful defaults in analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Mei Chawla· Nov 3, 2024
analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Valentina Flores· Oct 22, 2024
We added analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Anaya Desai· Oct 14, 2024
analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Chinedu Martinez· Oct 10, 2024
I recommend analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Oct 2, 2024
Registry listing for analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 43