tooluniverse-drug-research▌
mims-harvard/tooluniverse · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Comprehensive drug investigation using 50+ ToolUniverse tools across chemical databases, clinical trials, adverse events, pharmacogenomics, and literature.
Drug Research Strategy
Comprehensive drug investigation using 50+ ToolUniverse tools across chemical databases, clinical trials, adverse events, pharmacogenomics, and literature.
KEY PRINCIPLES:
- Report-first approach - Create report file FIRST, then populate progressively
- Compound disambiguation FIRST - Resolve identifiers before research
- Citation requirements - Every fact must have inline source attribution
- Evidence grading - Grade claims by evidence strength (T1-T4)
- Mandatory completeness - All sections must exist, even if "data unavailable"
- English-first queries - Always use English drug/compound names in tool calls, even if the user writes in another language. Only try original-language terms as a fallback. Respond in the user's language
LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS
When asked about a drug, query ChEMBL/PubChem/DailyMed FIRST. Don't guess at mechanism, targets, or side effects — look them up. When you're not sure about a fact, your first instinct should be to SEARCH for it using tools, not to reason harder from memory.
Drug Mechanism Reasoning
When investigating a drug's mechanism of action, trace the full causal chain:
- Target engagement - Which protein(s) does the drug bind, and with what affinity/selectivity?
- Molecular effect - Does binding inhibit, activate, or modulate the target's function?
- Pathway consequence - Which signaling or metabolic pathway is altered downstream?
- Cellular phenotype - What changes occur at the cell level (proliferation, apoptosis, secretion)?
- Physiological outcome - How does the cellular effect translate to the therapeutic benefit in the patient?
Workflow Overview
1. Report-First Approach (MANDATORY)
DO NOT show the search process or tool outputs to the user. Instead:
- Create the report file FIRST -
[DRUG]_drug_report.mdwith all 11 section headers and[Researching...]placeholders. See REPORT_TEMPLATE.md for the full template. - Progressively update the report - Replace placeholders with findings as you query each tool.
- Use ALL relevant tools - Query multiple databases for each data type; cross-reference across sources.
2. Citation Requirements (MANDATORY)
Every piece of information MUST include its source. Use inline citations:
*Source: PubChem via `PubChem_get_compound_properties_by_CID` (CID: 4091)*
3. Progressive Writing Workflow
Step 1: Create report file with all section headers
Step 2: Resolve compound identifiers -> Update Section 1
Step 3: Query PubChem/ADMET-AI/DailyMed SPL -> Update Section 2 (Chemistry)
Step 4: Query FDA Label MOA + ChEMBL + DGIdb -> Update Section 3 (Mechanism)
Step 5: Query ADMET-AI tools -> Update Section 4 (ADMET)
Step 6: Query ClinicalTrials.gov -> Update Section 5 (Clinical)
Step 7: Query FAERS/DailyMed -> Update Section 6 (Safety)
Step 8: Query PharmGKB -> Update Section 7 (Pharmacogenomics)
Step 9: Query DailyMed/Orange Book -> Update Section 8 (Regulatory)
Step 10: Query PubMed/literature -> Update Section 9 (Literature)
Step 11: Synthesize findings -> Update Executive Summary & Section 10
Step 12: Document all sources -> Update Section 11 (Data Sources)
Compound Disambiguation (Phase 1)
CRITICAL: Establish compound identity before any research.
Identifier Resolution Chain
1. PubChem_get_CID_by_compound_name(compound_name)
-> Extract: CID, canonical SMILES, formula
2. ChEMBL_search_compounds(query=drug_name)
-> Extract: ChEMBL ID, pref_name
3. DailyMed_search_spls(drug_name)
-> Extract: Set ID, NDC codes (if approved)
4. PharmGKB_search_drugs(query=drug_name)
-> Extract: PharmGKB ID (PA...)
Handle Naming Ambiguity
| Issue | Example | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Salt forms | metformin vs metformin HCl | Note all CIDs; use parent compound |
| Isomers | omeprazole vs esomeprazole | Verify SMILES; separate entries if distinct |
| Prodrugs | enalapril vs enalaprilat | Document both; note conversion |
| Brand confusion | Different products same name | Clarify with user |
Research Paths Summary
Each path has detailed tool chains and output examples in REPORT_GUIDELINES.md.
PATH 1: Chemical Properties & CMC
Tools: PubChem properties -> ADMET-AI physicochemical -> ADMET-AI solubility -> DailyMed chemistry/description Output: Physicochemical table, Lipinski assessment, QED score, salt forms, formulation comparison
PATH 2: Mechanism & Targets
Tools: DailyMed MOA -> ChEMBL activities (NOT ChEMBL_get_molecule_targets) -> ChEMBL target details -> DGIdb -> PubChem bioactivity
Critical: Derive targets from activities filtered to pChEMBL >= 6.0. Avoid ChEMBL_get_molecule_targets.
Output: FDA MOA text, target table with UniProt/potency, selectivity profile
PATH 3: ADMET Properties
Tools: ADMET-AI (bioavailability, BBB, CYP, clearance, toxicity) Fallback: DailyMed clinical_pharmacology + pharmacokinetics + drug_interactions Critical: If ADMET-AI fails, automatically use fallback. Never leave Section 4 empty.
PATH 4: Clinical Trials
Tools: search_clinical_trials -> compute phase counts -> extract outcomes/AEs -> fda_pharmacogenomic_biomarkers Critical: Section 5.2 must show actual counts by phase/status in table format.
PATH 5: Post-Marketing Safety
Tools: FAERS (reactions, seriousness, outcomes, deaths, age) + DailyMed (DDI, dosing, warnings) Critical: Include FAERS date window, seriousness breakdown, and limitations paragraph.
PATH 6: Pharmacogenomics
Tools: PharmGKB (search -> details -> annotations -> guidelines) Fallback: DailyMed pharmacogenomics section + PubMed literature
PATH 7: Regulatory & Patents
Tools: FDA Orange Book (search, approval history, exclusivity, patents, generics) + DailyMed (special populations via LOINC codes) Note: US-only data; document EMA/PMDA limitation.
PATH 8: Real-World Evidence
Tools: ClinicalTrials.gov (OBSERVATIONAL studies) + PubMed (real-world, registry, surveillance)
PATH 9: Comparative Analysis
Tools: Abbreviated tool chains for each comparator + head-to-head trial search + PubMed meta-analyses
FDA Label Core Fields
For approved drugs, retrieve these DailyMed sections early (after getting set_id):
| Batch | Sections | Maps to Report |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | mechanism_of_action, pharmacodynamics, chemistry | Sections 2-3 |
| Phase 2 | clinical_pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, drug_interactions | Sections 4, 6.5 |
| Phase 3 | warnings_and_cautions, adverse_reactions, dosage_and_administration | Sections 6, 8.2 |
| Phase 4 | pharmacogenomics, clinical_studies, description, inactive_ingredients | Sections 5, 7 |
Fallback Chains
| Primary Tool | Fallback | Use When |
|---|---|---|
PubChem_get_CID_by_compound_name |
ChEMBL_search_drugs |
Name not in PubChem |
ChEMBL_get_molecule_targets |
Use ChEMBL_search_activities instead |
Always avoid this tool |
ChEMBL_get_activity |
PubChemBioAssay_get_assay_summary |
No ChEMBL ID |
DailyMed_search_spls |
PubChemTox_get_acute_effects |
DailyMed timeout |
PharmGKB_search_drugs |
DailyMed PGx sections + PubMed | PharmGKB unavailable |
PharmGKB_get_dosing_guidelines |
DailyMed pharmacogenomics section | PharmGKB API error |
FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event |
Document "FAERS unavailable" + use label AEs | API error |
ADMETAI_* (all tools) |
DailyMed clinical_pharmacology + pharmacokinetics | Invalid SMILES or API error |
Quick Reference: Tools by Use Case
| Use Case | Primary Tool | Fallback | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Name -> CID | PubChem_get_CID_by_compound_name |
ChEMBL_search_drugs |
T1 |
| Properties | PubChem_get_compound_properties_by_CID |
ADMET-AI physicochemical | T1/T2 |
| FDA MOA | DailyMed_parse_clinical_pharmacology (mechanism_of_action) |
- | T1 |
| Targets | ChEMBL_search_activities -> ChEMBL_get_target |
DGIdb_get_drug_info |
T1 |
| ADMET | ADMETAI_predict_* (5 tools) |
DailyMed PK sections | T2/T1 |
| Trials | search_clinical_trials |
- | T1 |
| Trial outcomes | extract_clinical_trial_outcomes |
- | T1 |
| FAERS | FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event |
Label adverse_reactions | T1 |
| Dose mods | DailyMed_parse_clinical_pharmacology (dosage, warnings) |
- | T1 |
| PGx | PharmGKB_search_drugs |
DailyMed PGx + PubMed | T2/T1 |
| Label | DailyMed_search_spls |
PubChemTox_get_acute_effects |
T1 |
| Literature | PubMed_search_articles |
EuropePMC_search_articles |
Varies |
| Regulatory | FDA_OrangeBook_* tools |
DailyMed label data | T1 |
See TOOLS_REFERENCE.md for the complete tool listing with parameters and input format requirements.
Type Normalization
Many tools require string inputs. Always convert IDs before API calls:
- ChEMBL IDs, PubMed IDs, NCT IDs: convert int -> str
- SMILES for ADMET-AI: pass as list
["SMILES_STRING"] - FAERS drug names: use UPPERCASE (e.g.,
"METFORMIN") - ChEMBL IDs: full format
"CHEMBL1431"not"1431" - PharmGKB IDs: PA prefix
"PA450657"not"450657"
Common Use Cases
| Use Case | Primary Sections | Light Sections |
|---|---|---|
| Approved Drug Profile | All 11 sections | None |
| Investigational Compound | 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 | 5, 6, 7, 8 |
| Safety Review | 1, 5, 6, 7, 9 | 2, 3, 4, 8 |
| ADMET Assessment | 1, 2, 4 | 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
| Clinical Development Landscape | 1, 5, 9 | 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 |
Always maintain all section headers but adjust depth based on query focus and data availability.
When NOT to Use This Skill
- Target research -> Use target-intelligence-gatherer skill
- Disease research -> Use disease-research skill
- Literature-only -> Use literature-deep-research skill
- Single property lookup -> Call tool directly
- Structure similarity search -> Use
PubChem_search_compounds_by_similaritydirectly
Cross-Skill References
For drug interaction checking, run: python3 skills/tooluniverse-drug-drug-interaction/scripts/pharmacology_ref.py --type interaction --drug1 X --drug2 Y
Additional Resources
- Report template: REPORT_TEMPLATE.md - Initial file template, citation format, evidence grading, scorecard, audit template
- Report guidelines: REPORT_GUIDELINES.md - Detailed section-by-section instructions with output examples
- Tool reference: TOOLS_REFERENCE.md - Complete tool listing with parameters and input formats
- Verification checklist: CHECKLIST.md - Section-by-section pre-delivery verification
- Examples: EXAMPLES.md - Detailed workflow examples for different use cases
How to use tooluniverse-drug-research on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add tooluniverse-drug-research
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches tooluniverse-drug-research from GitHub repository mims-harvard/tooluniverse and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate tooluniverse-drug-research. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /tooluniverse-drug-research) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.5★★★★★61 reviews- ★★★★★Michael Desai· Dec 28, 2024
tooluniverse-drug-research fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Harper Rao· Dec 24, 2024
Registry listing for tooluniverse-drug-research matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Camila Zhang· Dec 24, 2024
Useful defaults in tooluniverse-drug-research — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Anderson· Dec 12, 2024
Useful defaults in tooluniverse-drug-research — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Daniel Lopez· Dec 12, 2024
I recommend tooluniverse-drug-research for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Dhruvi Jain· Dec 8, 2024
We added tooluniverse-drug-research from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Kaira Chawla· Dec 8, 2024
tooluniverse-drug-research fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Oshnikdeep· Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in tooluniverse-drug-research — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 19, 2024
tooluniverse-drug-research fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Camila Liu· Nov 19, 2024
tooluniverse-drug-research has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 61