rails-testing

marckohlbrugge/37signals-skills · updated Jun 11, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills install marckohlbrugge/37signals-skills/rails-testing
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Apply Rails testing standards with Minitest, fixtures, and pragmatic coverage boundaries. Use when creating tests, reviewing test quality, or improving flaky and slow Rails test suites.

skill.md
name
rails-testing
description
Apply Rails testing standards with Minitest, fixtures, and pragmatic coverage boundaries. Use when creating tests, reviewing test quality, or improving flaky and slow Rails test suites.
disable-model-invocation
true

Rails Testing

Use for test-writing and test-review tasks. Patterns from Campfire and Fizzy test suites.

Defaults

  • Minitest + fixtures. No RSpec, no FactoryBot.
  • Test behavior, not implementation details.
  • Keep tests deterministic and fast; parallelize(workers: :number_of_processors).
  • Tests ship in the same commit/PR as the feature — not before, not later. Security fixes always include a regression test.
  • Never add production complexity for testability (no test-induced design damage).

Coverage Budget (where 37signals actually spends)

  • Heavy: model tests (domain invariants, concerns) and controller/integration tests (full request cycle, auth, formats).
  • Light: a few system tests for the critical happy paths (one smoke test can cover signup→use); job tests only for jobs with real logic.
  • None: view tests, JS/Stimulus unit tests, exhaustive channel tests. UI behavior is covered indirectly by system tests.
  • Don't duplicate the same behavior assertion at multiple layers.

Fixtures

  • Express relationships by label, not ID; use ERB for relative timestamps (created_at: <%= 1.hour.ago %>) and shared computed values (one bcrypt digest reused).
  • Mirror app/models structure in test/models: app/models/card/closeable.rbtest/models/card/closeable_test.rb; shared concerns under test/models/concerns/.
  • UUID PKs break fixture ordering: generate deterministic, label-derived UUIDv7s in fixtures so .first/.last are stable and runtime records are always newer.
  • Build rich-content fixtures with production code (ActionText::Attachment.from_attachable(user).to_html), not hand-written markup.

Good Practices

  • Use system/integration tests for user workflows; model tests for domain invariants.
  • travel_to for time-based logic.
  • Mock/stub only at boundaries (external APIs, network, time, SecureRandom); use VCR for external HTTP — auto-name cassettes from class+test name, normalize timestamps in matching.
  • Test async side effects from model tests with perform_enqueued_jobs(only: SpecificJob) and assert_enqueued_with — not by unit-testing trivial job classes.
  • Correlated count changes in one assertion: assert_difference({ -> { card.assignees.count } => -1, -> { Event.count } => +1 }).
  • Test both response formats where controllers serve them: as: :turbo_stream (assert stream targets) and as: :json (status, Location header, body).
  • Turbo/broadcast assertions by layer: assert_turbo_stream_broadcasts in model tests, assert_turbo_stream action:, target: in controller tests, assert_no_turbo_stream_broadcasts for negatives.
  • Authorization tests assert the negative space: cross-tenant/role access returns 403/404, not just that allowed access works.
  • Multi-tenant suites: set Current.account (and Current.session when behavior depends on the actor) in setup; integration/system tests set default_url_options[:script_name]; provide an untenanted { } helper for auth routes. Clear Current in teardown.
  • Test middleware in isolation with Rack::MockRequest.
  • System tests: using_session("Kevin") for multi-user scenarios; wait for cable connection before asserting realtime; auth via a fast session-transfer helper, keeping the full login flow to one smoke test.
  • Suites with non-transactional side effects (FTS tables) opt out per-helper: self.use_transactional_tests = false + explicit cleanup.
  • Reset shared global state per test in parallel suites (thread pools, ActionCable.server.pubsub, Current).

Red Flags

  • Adding production complexity only for testability.
  • Over-mocking internal app code.
  • Duplicate tests for the same behavior at multiple layers.
  • Slow suites caused by unnecessary setup in each test (that's what fixtures are for).
  • Unit tests for one-line job classes or trivial delegations.
  • Hand-rolled HTML strings where production renderers/helpers would stay in sync automatically.
  • Time-dependent assertions without travel_to.
how to use rails-testing

How to use rails-testing on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add rails-testing
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills install marckohlbrugge/37signals-skills/rails-testing

The skills CLI fetches rails-testing from GitHub repository marckohlbrugge/37signals-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/rails-testing

Reload or restart Cursor to activate rails-testing. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /rails-testing) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

Task Automation & Efficiency

Automate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort

Example

Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications

Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks

Knowledge Enhancement

Learn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance

Example

Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources

Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x

Quality Improvement

Enhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements

Example

Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors

Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client with skill support
  • Clear understanding of task or problem to solve
  • Willingness to iterate and refine outputs

Time Estimate

15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install skill using provided installation command
  2. 2.Test with simple use case relevant to your work
  3. 3.Evaluate output quality and relevance
  4. 4.Iterate on prompts to improve results
  5. 5.Integrate into regular workflow if valuable

Common Pitfalls

  • Expecting perfect results without iteration
  • Not providing enough context in prompts
  • Using skill for tasks outside its intended scope
  • Accepting outputs without review and validation

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Start with clear, specific prompts
  • +Provide relevant context and constraints
  • +Review and refine all outputs before using
  • +Iterate to improve output quality
  • +Document successful prompt patterns

✗ Don't

  • Don't use without understanding skill limitations
  • Don't skip validation of outputs
  • Don't share sensitive information in prompts
  • Don't expect skill to replace human judgment

💡 Pro Tips

  • Be specific about desired format and style
  • Ask for multiple options to choose from
  • Request explanations to understand reasoning
  • Combine AI efficiency with human expertise

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion.

Learning Path

  1. 1Familiarize yourself with skill capabilities and limitations
  2. 2Start with low-risk, non-critical tasks
  3. 3Progress to more complex and valuable use cases
  4. 4Build expertise through regular use and experimentation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.652 reviews
  • Yuki Iyer· Dec 28, 2024

    Useful defaults in rails-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Layla Smith· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in rails-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Zara Brown· Dec 20, 2024

    We added rails-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Arya White· Dec 16, 2024

    Keeps context tight: rails-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Yuki Gupta· Dec 4, 2024

    rails-testing has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Yuki Kim· Nov 27, 2024

    I recommend rails-testing for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Evelyn Sanchez· Nov 23, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: rails-testing is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Fatima Desai· Nov 23, 2024

    Keeps context tight: rails-testing is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Zara Smith· Nov 19, 2024

    We added rails-testing from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Layla Abebe· Nov 11, 2024

    Useful defaults in rails-testing — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

showing 1-10 of 52

1 / 6