Test website responsiveness across viewport widths, detect layout transitions, and report where layouts break.
Works with
Supports three operating modes: Standard Check (8 key breakpoints), Sweep (15 widths at 160px increments), and Targeted Range (user-specified widths at 80px increments)
Runs 8 layout checks per viewport covering horizontal overflow, text overflow, navigation transitions, content stacking, image scaling, touch targets, whitespace balance, and CTA visibility
Detects and report
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionresponsiveness-checkExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches responsiveness-check from jezweb/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate responsiveness-check. Access via /responsiveness-check in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
695
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
695
stars
Test how a website's layout responds to viewport width changes. Resizes through breakpoints in a single browser session, screenshots each width, compares adjacent sizes, and reports where layouts break.
What this tests: Layout responsiveness — overflow, stacking, navigation transitions, content reflow.
What this does NOT test: General accessibility (ARIA, semantic HTML, heading hierarchy, colour contrast). Those don't vary by viewport width — use the ux-audit skill instead.
Before starting, detect available browser tools:
/playwright-cli first to load the full command reference.mcp__plugin_playwright_playwright__*) — browser_resize for viewport changes.mcp__claude-in-chrome__*) — resize_window for viewport changes. Uses the user's logged-in Chrome session.If none are available, inform the user and suggest installing playwright-cli or Playwright MCP.
When: "check responsive", "responsiveness check", "test breakpoints"
Test 8 key breakpoints that cover the device spectrum:
| Width | Device Context |
|---|---|
| 320px | Small phone (iPhone SE) |
| 375px | Standard phone (iPhone 14) |
| 768px | Tablet portrait (iPad) |
| 1024px | Tablet landscape / small laptop |
| 1280px | Laptop |
| 1440px | Desktop |
| 1920px | Full HD |
| 2560px | Ultra-wide / 4K |
Process:
When: "responsive sweep", "sweep all breakpoints", "find where it breaks"
Test every 160px from 320 to 2560 (15 widths total). Same single-session approach as Standard — just more data points. This is the mode for finding the exact width where a layout breaks.
Widths: 320, 480, 640, 800, 960, 1120, 1280, 1440, 1600, 1760, 1920, 2080, 2240, 2400, 2560
Briefly confirm before starting sweep mode (15 screenshots is a meaningful session).
When: "check between 768 and 1024", "test tablet breakpoints", "focus on mobile widths"
Test a user-specified range at 80px increments. Use when a known trouble zone needs detailed investigation.
Example: "check between 768 and 1024" tests: 768, 848, 928, 1008 (plus 1024 as endpoint).
When testing multiple URLs (e.g., "check the homepage, about page, and contact page"):
# Sub-agent pattern (playwright-cli)
playwright-cli -s=page1 open https://example.com/ &
playwright-cli -s=page2 open https://example.com/about &
These 8 checks target issues that actually vary by viewport width:
| # | Check | What to Look For |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Horizontal overflow | Content wider than viewport — horizontal scrollbar appears, elements cut off |
| 2 | Text overflow | Text truncated mid-word, overlapping adjacent elements, font size unreadable (< 12px) |
| 3 | Navigation transition | Hamburger menu appears/disappears at correct width, no "broken" state between modes |
| 4 | Content stacking | Multi-column layouts stack to single column in logical reading order on narrow widths |
| 5 | Image/media scaling | Images overflow container, distorted aspect ratios, missing responsive sizing |
| 6 | Touch targets | Interactive elements < 44px on mobile widths (< 768px) — buttons, links, form inputs |
| 7 | Whitespace balance | Too cramped on mobile (no breathing room), too sparse on wide screens (content lost in space) |
| 8 | CTA visibility | Primary call-to-action visible above the fold at each width without scrolling |
The unique value of this skill is finding where layout transitions happen and whether they're clean.
When comparing screenshots at adjacent widths, flag any width where:
Report the exact width range where each transition occurs:
| Transition | From | To | Width Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nav: hamburger → full | 768px | 1024px | Switches at ~960px |
| Grid: 1-col → 2-col | 640px | 768px | Reflows at ~700px |
| Sidebar appears | 1024px | 1280px | Shows at ~1100px |
This tells the developer exactly where to set (or fix) their CSS breakpoints.
Consistent with ux-audit:
| Severity | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Critical | Layout is broken — content unreadable, navigation inaccessible, page unusable |
| High | Significant layout issue — major overflow, key content hidden, broken transition |
| Medium | Noticeable but usable — awkward spacing, minor overflow, suboptimal stacking order |
| Low | Polish — whitespace tweaks, slight alignment issues, minor touch target shortfalls |
Write report to docs/responsiveness-check-YYYY-MM-DD.md (or inline for single-page quick checks).
See references/report-template.md for the report structure.
| When | Read |
|---|---|
| Looking up breakpoint details and trouble zones | references/breakpoints.md |
| Writing the responsiveness report | references/report-template.md |
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
jezweb/claude-skills
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
We added responsiveness-check from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Keeps context tight: responsiveness-check is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
responsiveness-check has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
responsiveness-check fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Useful defaults in responsiveness-check — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
We added responsiveness-check from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Useful defaults in responsiveness-check — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Useful defaults in responsiveness-check — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: responsiveness-check is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
I recommend responsiveness-check for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 60