responsiveness-check▌
jezweb/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Test website responsiveness across viewport widths, detect layout transitions, and report where layouts break.
- ›Supports three operating modes: Standard Check (8 key breakpoints), Sweep (15 widths at 160px increments), and Targeted Range (user-specified widths at 80px increments)
- ›Runs 8 layout checks per viewport covering horizontal overflow, text overflow, navigation transitions, content stacking, image scaling, touch targets, whitespace balance, and CTA visibility
- ›Detects and report
Responsiveness Check
Test how a website's layout responds to viewport width changes. Resizes through breakpoints in a single browser session, screenshots each width, compares adjacent sizes, and reports where layouts break.
What this tests: Layout responsiveness — overflow, stacking, navigation transitions, content reflow.
What this does NOT test: General accessibility (ARIA, semantic HTML, heading hierarchy, colour contrast). Those don't vary by viewport width — use the ux-audit skill instead.
Browser Tool Priority
Before starting, detect available browser tools:
- playwright-cli (preferred) — supports resize, named sessions, and sub-agent parallelism. If installed, run
/playwright-clifirst to load the full command reference. - Playwright MCP (
mcp__plugin_playwright_playwright__*) —browser_resizefor viewport changes. - Chrome MCP (
mcp__claude-in-chrome__*) —resize_windowfor viewport changes. Uses the user's logged-in Chrome session.
If none are available, inform the user and suggest installing playwright-cli or Playwright MCP.
Operating Modes
Mode 1: Standard Check
When: "check responsive", "responsiveness check", "test breakpoints"
Test 8 key breakpoints that cover the device spectrum:
| Width | Device Context |
|---|---|
| 320px | Small phone (iPhone SE) |
| 375px | Standard phone (iPhone 14) |
| 768px | Tablet portrait (iPad) |
| 1024px | Tablet landscape / small laptop |
| 1280px | Laptop |
| 1440px | Desktop |
| 1920px | Full HD |
| 2560px | Ultra-wide / 4K |
Process:
- Open the URL in a single browser session (height: 900px)
- Start at 320px. For each breakpoint width: a. Resize the viewport b. Wait briefly for CSS reflow (layout transition) c. Screenshot the above-fold area d. If the page has significant below-fold content, scroll and screenshot e. Run the 8 layout checks (see matrix below) f. Note any issues with severity
- Compare adjacent widths — identify where layout transitions occur
- Write the report
Mode 2: Sweep
When: "responsive sweep", "sweep all breakpoints", "find where it breaks"
Test every 160px from 320 to 2560 (15 widths total). Same single-session approach as Standard — just more data points. This is the mode for finding the exact width where a layout breaks.
Widths: 320, 480, 640, 800, 960, 1120, 1280, 1440, 1600, 1760, 1920, 2080, 2240, 2400, 2560
Briefly confirm before starting sweep mode (15 screenshots is a meaningful session).
Mode 3: Targeted Range
When: "check between 768 and 1024", "test tablet breakpoints", "focus on mobile widths"
Test a user-specified range at 80px increments. Use when a known trouble zone needs detailed investigation.
Example: "check between 768 and 1024" tests: 768, 848, 928, 1008 (plus 1024 as endpoint).
Multi-URL
When testing multiple URLs (e.g., "check the homepage, about page, and contact page"):
- Launch parallel sub-agents, one per URL (not per breakpoint)
- Each sub-agent runs a standard check on its URL in its own named session
- Combine results into a single report
# Sub-agent pattern (playwright-cli)
playwright-cli -s=page1 open https://example.com/ &
playwright-cli -s=page2 open https://example.com/about &
Layout Check Matrix
These 8 checks target issues that actually vary by viewport width:
| # | Check | What to Look For |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Horizontal overflow | Content wider than viewport — horizontal scrollbar appears, elements cut off |
| 2 | Text overflow | Text truncated mid-word, overlapping adjacent elements, font size unreadable (< 12px) |
| 3 | Navigation transition | Hamburger menu appears/disappears at correct width, no "broken" state between modes |
| 4 | Content stacking | Multi-column layouts stack to single column in logical reading order on narrow widths |
| 5 | Image/media scaling | Images overflow container, distorted aspect ratios, missing responsive sizing |
| 6 | Touch targets | Interactive elements < 44px on mobile widths (< 768px) — buttons, links, form inputs |
| 7 | Whitespace balance | Too cramped on mobile (no breathing room), too sparse on wide screens (content lost in space) |
| 8 | CTA visibility | Primary call-to-action visible above the fold at each width without scrolling |
Transition Detection
The unique value of this skill is finding where layout transitions happen and whether they're clean.
When comparing screenshots at adjacent widths, flag any width where:
- Column count changes (3-col → 2-col → 1-col grid)
- Navigation mode switches (full nav → hamburger, or vice versa)
- Sidebar appears/disappears (content width jumps)
- Grid reflows (cards wrap to next row)
Report the exact width range where each transition occurs:
| Transition | From | To | Width Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nav: hamburger → full | 768px | 1024px | Switches at ~960px |
| Grid: 1-col → 2-col | 640px | 768px | Reflows at ~700px |
| Sidebar appears | 1024px | 1280px | Shows at ~1100px |
This tells the developer exactly where to set (or fix) their CSS breakpoints.
Severity Levels
Consistent with ux-audit:
| Severity | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Critical | Layout is broken — content unreadable, navigation inaccessible, page unusable |
| High | Significant layout issue — major overflow, key content hidden, broken transition |
| Medium | Noticeable but usable — awkward spacing, minor overflow, suboptimal stacking order |
| Low | Polish — whitespace tweaks, slight alignment issues, minor touch target shortfalls |
Autonomy Rules
- Just do it: Resize viewport, take screenshots, analyse layout, compare widths
- Brief confirmation: Before sweep mode (15 viewports), before testing 4+ URLs in parallel
- Ask first: Before interacting with forms or clicking through authentication flows
Report Output
Write report to docs/responsiveness-check-YYYY-MM-DD.md (or inline for single-page quick checks).
See references/report-template.md for the report structure.
Reference Files
| When | Read |
|---|---|
| Looking up breakpoint details and trouble zones | references/breakpoints.md |
| Writing the responsiveness report | references/report-template.md |
How to use responsiveness-check on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add responsiveness-check
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches responsiveness-check from GitHub repository jezweb/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate responsiveness-check. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /responsiveness-check) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★60 reviews- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 28, 2024
We added responsiveness-check from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Luis Ndlovu· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: responsiveness-check is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Kabir Torres· Dec 20, 2024
responsiveness-check has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Kaira Iyer· Dec 20, 2024
responsiveness-check fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Kaira Garcia· Dec 16, 2024
Useful defaults in responsiveness-check — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Mateo Ghosh· Dec 8, 2024
We added responsiveness-check from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Noor Reddy· Nov 27, 2024
Useful defaults in responsiveness-check — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 19, 2024
Useful defaults in responsiveness-check — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Kaira Jain· Nov 11, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: responsiveness-check is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Kaira Thompson· Nov 11, 2024
I recommend responsiveness-check for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 60