sre-engineer

jeffallan/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/jeffallan/claude-skills --skill sre-engineer
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

SRE practices for defining SLOs, managing error budgets, automating toil, and building resilient production systems.

  • Defines quantitative SLOs with SLI measurements, calculates error budgets, and enforces burn-rate policies to balance reliability with feature velocity
  • Provides golden signal monitoring (latency, traffic, errors, saturation) with multiwindow burn-rate alerting rules and PromQL query templates
  • Includes automation patterns for toil reduction, chaos engineering test desig
skill.md

SRE Engineer

Core Workflow

  1. Assess reliability - Review architecture, SLOs, incidents, toil levels
  2. Define SLOs - Identify meaningful SLIs and set appropriate targets
  3. Verify alignment - Confirm SLO targets reflect user expectations before proceeding
  4. Implement monitoring - Build golden signal dashboards and alerting
  5. Automate toil - Identify repetitive tasks and build automation
  6. Test resilience - Design and execute chaos experiments; verify recovery meets RTO/RPO targets before marking the experiment complete; validate recovery behavior end-to-end

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

Topic Reference Load When
SLO/SLI references/slo-sli-management.md Defining SLOs, calculating error budgets
Error Budgets references/error-budget-policy.md Managing budgets, burn rates, policies
Monitoring references/monitoring-alerting.md Golden signals, alert design, dashboards
Automation references/automation-toil.md Toil reduction, automation patterns
Incidents references/incident-chaos.md Incident response, chaos engineering

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Define quantitative SLOs (e.g., 99.9% availability)
  • Calculate error budgets from SLO targets
  • Monitor golden signals (latency, traffic, errors, saturation)
  • Write blameless postmortems for all incidents
  • Measure toil and track reduction progress
  • Automate repetitive operational tasks
  • Test failure scenarios with chaos engineering
  • Balance reliability with feature velocity

MUST NOT DO

  • Set SLOs without user impact justification
  • Alert on symptoms without actionable runbooks
  • Tolerate >50% toil without automation plan
  • Skip postmortems or assign blame
  • Implement manual processes for recurring tasks
  • Deploy without capacity planning
  • Ignore error budget exhaustion
  • Build systems that can't degrade gracefully

Output Templates

When implementing SRE practices, provide:

  1. SLO definitions with SLI measurements and targets
  2. Monitoring/alerting configuration (Prometheus, etc.)
  3. Automation scripts (Python, Go, Terraform)
  4. Runbooks with clear remediation steps
  5. Brief explanation of reliability impact

Concrete Examples

SLO Definition & Error Budget Calculation

# 99.9% availability SLO over a 30-day window
# Allowed downtime: (1 - 0.999) * 30 * 24 * 60 = 43.2 minutes/month
# Error budget (request-based): 0.001 * total_requests

# Example: 10M requests/month → 10,000 error budget requests
# If 5,000 errors consumed in week 1 → 50% budget burned in 25% of window
# → Trigger error budget policy: freeze non-critical releases

Prometheus SLO Alerting Rule (Multiwindow Burn Rate)

groups:
  - name: slo_availability
    rules:
      # Fast burn: 2% budget in 1h (14.4x burn rate)
      - alert: HighErrorBudgetBurn
        expr: |
          (
            sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[1h]))
            /
            sum(rate(http_requests_total[1h]))
          ) > 0.014400
          and
          (
            sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]))
            /
            sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
          ) > 0.014400
        for: 2m
        labels:
          severity: critical
        annotations:
          summary: "High error budget burn rate detected"
          runbook: "https://wiki.internal/runbooks/high-error-burn"

      # Slow burn: 5% budget in 6h (1x burn rate sustained)
      - alert: SlowErrorBudgetBurn
        expr: |
          (
            sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[6h]))
            /
            sum(rate(http_requests_total[6h]))
          ) > 0.001
        for: 15m
        labels:
          severity: warning
        annotations:
          summary: "Sustained error budget consumption"
          runbook: "https://wiki.internal/runbooks/slow-error-burn"

PromQL Golden Signal Queries

# Latency — 99th percentile request duration
histogram_quantile(0.99, sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])) by (le, service))

# Traffic — requests per second by service
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) by (service)

# Errors — error rate ratio
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m])) by (service)
  /
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) by (service)

# Saturation — CPU throttling ratio
sum(rate(container_cpu_cfs_throttled_seconds_total[5m])) by (pod)
  /
sum(rate(container_cpu_cfs_periods_total[5m])) by (pod)

Toil Automation Script (Python)

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Auto-remediation: restart pods exceeding error threshold."""
import subprocess, sys, json

ERROR_THRESHOLD = 0.05  # 5% error rate triggers restart

def get_error_rate(service: str) -> float:
    """Query Prometheus for current error rate."""
    import urllib.request
    query = f'sum(rate(http_requests_total{{status=~"5..",service="{service}"}}[5m])) / sum(rate(http_requests_total{{service="{service}"}}[5m]))'
    url = f"http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query?query={urllib.request.quote(query)}"
    with urllib.request.urlopen(url) as resp:
        data = json.load(resp)
    results = data["data"]["result"]
    return float(results[0]["value"][1]) if results else 0.0

def restart_deployment(namespace: str, deployment: str) -> None:
    subprocess.run(
        ["kubectl", "rollout", "restart", f"deployment/{deployment}", "-n", namespace],
        check=True
    )
    print(f"Restarted {namespace}/{deployment}")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    service, namespace, deployment = sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2], sys.argv[3]
    rate = get_error_rate(service)
    print(f"Error rate for {service}: {rate:.2%}")
    if rate > ERROR_THRESHOLD:
        restart_deployment(namespace, deployment)
    else:
        print("Within SLO threshold — no action required")
how to use sre-engineer

How to use sre-engineer on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add sre-engineer
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/jeffallan/claude-skills --skill sre-engineer

The skills CLI fetches sre-engineer from GitHub repository jeffallan/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/sre-engineer

Reload or restart Cursor to activate sre-engineer. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /sre-engineer) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.656 reviews
  • Yuki Martin· Dec 24, 2024

    sre-engineer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Emma Rahman· Dec 20, 2024

    Useful defaults in sre-engineer — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Yuki Chen· Dec 20, 2024

    sre-engineer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Zara Dixit· Nov 15, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sre-engineer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Kiara Reddy· Nov 11, 2024

    sre-engineer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Arjun Agarwal· Nov 11, 2024

    I recommend sre-engineer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Hana Srinivasan· Oct 6, 2024

    I recommend sre-engineer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Fatima Rahman· Oct 2, 2024

    sre-engineer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Hana Singh· Oct 2, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sre-engineer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • James Ramirez· Sep 25, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sre-engineer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 56

1 / 6