chaos-engineer▌
jeffallan/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Designs and executes chaos experiments with safety controls, runbooks, and resilience testing frameworks.
- ›Covers full chaos workflow: system analysis, hypothesis-driven experiment design, controlled failure injection, and learning loops with documented improvements
- ›Provides templates and reference guides for infrastructure chaos (servers, networks, zones), Kubernetes-native experiments (Litmus, Chaos Mesh), and game day exercises
- ›Includes concrete examples using Litmus ChaosEngine, t
Chaos Engineer
When to Use This Skill
- Designing and executing chaos experiments
- Implementing failure injection frameworks (Chaos Monkey, Litmus, etc.)
- Planning and conducting game day exercises
- Building blast radius controls and safety mechanisms
- Setting up continuous chaos testing in CI/CD
- Improving system resilience based on experiment findings
Core Workflow
- System Analysis - Map architecture, dependencies, critical paths, and failure modes
- Experiment Design - Define hypothesis, steady state, blast radius, and safety controls
- Execute Chaos - Run controlled experiments with monitoring and quick rollback
- Learn & Improve - Document findings, implement fixes, enhance monitoring
- Automate - Integrate chaos testing into CI/CD for continuous resilience
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|---|---|---|
| Experiments | references/experiment-design.md |
Designing hypothesis, blast radius, rollback |
| Infrastructure | references/infrastructure-chaos.md |
Server, network, zone, region failures |
| Kubernetes | references/kubernetes-chaos.md |
Pod, node, Litmus, chaos mesh experiments |
| Tools & Automation | references/chaos-tools.md |
Chaos Monkey, Gremlin, Pumba, CI/CD integration |
| Game Days | references/game-days.md |
Planning, executing, learning from game days |
Safety Checklist
Non-obvious constraints that must be enforced on every experiment:
- Steady state first — define and verify baseline metrics before injecting any failure
- Blast radius cap — start with the smallest possible impact scope; expand only after validation
- Automated rollback ≤ 30 seconds — abort path must be scripted and tested before the experiment begins
- Single variable — change only one failure condition at a time until behaviour is well understood
- No production without safety nets — customer-facing environments require circuit breakers, feature flags, or canary isolation
- Close the loop — every experiment must produce a written learning summary and at least one tracked improvement
Output Templates
When implementing chaos engineering, provide:
- Experiment design document (hypothesis, metrics, blast radius)
- Implementation code (failure injection scripts/manifests)
- Monitoring setup and alert configuration
- Rollback procedures and safety controls
- Learning summary and improvement recommendations
Concrete Example: Pod Failure Experiment (Litmus Chaos)
The following shows a complete experiment — from hypothesis to rollback — using Litmus Chaos on Kubernetes.
Step 1 — Define steady state and apply the experiment
# Verify baseline: p99 latency < 200ms, error rate < 0.1%
kubectl get deploy my-service -n production
kubectl top pods -n production -l app=my-service
Step 2 — Create and apply a Litmus ChaosEngine manifest
# chaos-pod-delete.yaml
apiVersion: litmuschaos.io/v1alpha1
kind: ChaosEngine
metadata:
name: my-service-pod-delete
namespace: production
spec:
appinfo:
appns: production
applabel: "app=my-service"
appkind: deployment
# Limit blast radius: only 1 replica at a time
engineState: active
chaosServiceAccount: litmus-admin
experiments:
- name: pod-delete
spec:
components:
env:
- name: TOTAL_CHAOS_DURATION
value: "60" # seconds
- name: CHAOS_INTERVAL
value: "20" # delete one pod every 20s
- name: FORCE
value: "false"
- name: PODS_AFFECTED_PERC
value: "33" # max 33% of replicas affected
# Apply the experiment
kubectl apply -f chaos-pod-delete.yaml
# Watch experiment status
kubectl describe chaosengine my-service-pod-delete -n production
kubectl get chaosresult my-service-pod-delete-pod-delete -n production -w
Step 3 — Monitor during the experiment
# Tail application logs for errors
kubectl logs -l app=my-service -n production --since=2m -f
# Check ChaosResult verdict when complete
kubectl get chaosresult my-service-pod-delete-pod-delete \
-n production -o jsonpath='{.status.experimentStatus.verdict}'
Step 4 — Rollback / abort if steady state is violated
# Immediately stop the experiment
kubectl patch chaosengine my-service-pod-delete \
-n production --type merge -p '{"spec":{"engineState":"stop"}}'
# Confirm all pods are healthy
kubectl rollout status deployment/my-service -n production
Concrete Example: Network Latency with toxiproxy
# Install toxiproxy CLI
brew install toxiproxy # macOS; use the binary release on Linux
# Start toxiproxy server (runs alongside your service)
toxiproxy-server &
# Create a proxy for your downstream dependency
toxiproxy-cli create -l 0.0.0.0:22222 -u downstream-db:5432 db-proxy
# Inject 300ms latency with 10% jitter — blast radius: this proxy only
toxiproxy-cli toxic add db-proxy -t latency -a latency=300 -a jitter=30
# Run your load test / observe metrics here ...
# Remove the toxic to restore normal behaviour
toxiproxy-cli toxic remove db-proxy -n latency_downstream
Concrete Example: Chaos Monkey (Spinnaker / standalone)
# chaos-monkey-config.yml — restrict to a single ASG
deployment:
enabled: true
regionIndependence: false
chaos:
enabled: true
meanTimeBetweenKillsInWorkDays: 2
minTimeBetweenKillsInWorkDays: 1
grouping: APP # kill one instance per app, not per cluster
exceptions:
- account: production
region: us-east-1
detail: "*-canary" # never kill canary instances
# Apply and trigger a manual kill for testing
chaos-monkey --app my-service --account staging --dry-run false
How to use chaos-engineer on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add chaos-engineer
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches chaos-engineer from GitHub repository jeffallan/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate chaos-engineer. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /chaos-engineer) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★70 reviews- ★★★★★Isabella Kim· Dec 28, 2024
Keeps context tight: chaos-engineer is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Olivia Agarwal· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for chaos-engineer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 16, 2024
Registry listing for chaos-engineer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Ava Martin· Dec 16, 2024
I recommend chaos-engineer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Emma Flores· Dec 4, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: chaos-engineer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Emma Garcia· Nov 23, 2024
chaos-engineer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Nia Gupta· Nov 23, 2024
chaos-engineer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Omar Robinson· Nov 19, 2024
I recommend chaos-engineer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Advait Gupta· Nov 19, 2024
chaos-engineer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Soo Zhang· Nov 15, 2024
chaos-engineer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 70