chaos-engineer

jeffallan/claude-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/jeffallan/claude-skills --skill chaos-engineer
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Designs and executes chaos experiments with safety controls, runbooks, and resilience testing frameworks.

  • Covers full chaos workflow: system analysis, hypothesis-driven experiment design, controlled failure injection, and learning loops with documented improvements
  • Provides templates and reference guides for infrastructure chaos (servers, networks, zones), Kubernetes-native experiments (Litmus, Chaos Mesh), and game day exercises
  • Includes concrete examples using Litmus ChaosEngine, t
skill.md

Chaos Engineer

When to Use This Skill

  • Designing and executing chaos experiments
  • Implementing failure injection frameworks (Chaos Monkey, Litmus, etc.)
  • Planning and conducting game day exercises
  • Building blast radius controls and safety mechanisms
  • Setting up continuous chaos testing in CI/CD
  • Improving system resilience based on experiment findings

Core Workflow

  1. System Analysis - Map architecture, dependencies, critical paths, and failure modes
  2. Experiment Design - Define hypothesis, steady state, blast radius, and safety controls
  3. Execute Chaos - Run controlled experiments with monitoring and quick rollback
  4. Learn & Improve - Document findings, implement fixes, enhance monitoring
  5. Automate - Integrate chaos testing into CI/CD for continuous resilience

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

Topic Reference Load When
Experiments references/experiment-design.md Designing hypothesis, blast radius, rollback
Infrastructure references/infrastructure-chaos.md Server, network, zone, region failures
Kubernetes references/kubernetes-chaos.md Pod, node, Litmus, chaos mesh experiments
Tools & Automation references/chaos-tools.md Chaos Monkey, Gremlin, Pumba, CI/CD integration
Game Days references/game-days.md Planning, executing, learning from game days

Safety Checklist

Non-obvious constraints that must be enforced on every experiment:

  • Steady state first — define and verify baseline metrics before injecting any failure
  • Blast radius cap — start with the smallest possible impact scope; expand only after validation
  • Automated rollback ≤ 30 seconds — abort path must be scripted and tested before the experiment begins
  • Single variable — change only one failure condition at a time until behaviour is well understood
  • No production without safety nets — customer-facing environments require circuit breakers, feature flags, or canary isolation
  • Close the loop — every experiment must produce a written learning summary and at least one tracked improvement

Output Templates

When implementing chaos engineering, provide:

  1. Experiment design document (hypothesis, metrics, blast radius)
  2. Implementation code (failure injection scripts/manifests)
  3. Monitoring setup and alert configuration
  4. Rollback procedures and safety controls
  5. Learning summary and improvement recommendations

Concrete Example: Pod Failure Experiment (Litmus Chaos)

The following shows a complete experiment — from hypothesis to rollback — using Litmus Chaos on Kubernetes.

Step 1 — Define steady state and apply the experiment

# Verify baseline: p99 latency < 200ms, error rate < 0.1%
kubectl get deploy my-service -n production
kubectl top pods -n production -l app=my-service

Step 2 — Create and apply a Litmus ChaosEngine manifest

# chaos-pod-delete.yaml
apiVersion: litmuschaos.io/v1alpha1
kind: ChaosEngine
metadata:
  name: my-service-pod-delete
  namespace: production
spec:
  appinfo:
    appns: production
    applabel: "app=my-service"
    appkind: deployment
  # Limit blast radius: only 1 replica at a time
  engineState: active
  chaosServiceAccount: litmus-admin
  experiments:
    - name: pod-delete
      spec:
        components:
          env:
            - name: TOTAL_CHAOS_DURATION
              value: "60"          # seconds
            - name: CHAOS_INTERVAL
              value: "20"          # delete one pod every 20s
            - name: FORCE
              value: "false"
            - name: PODS_AFFECTED_PERC
              value: "33"          # max 33% of replicas affected
# Apply the experiment
kubectl apply -f chaos-pod-delete.yaml

# Watch experiment status
kubectl describe chaosengine my-service-pod-delete -n production
kubectl get chaosresult my-service-pod-delete-pod-delete -n production -w

Step 3 — Monitor during the experiment

# Tail application logs for errors
kubectl logs -l app=my-service -n production --since=2m -f

# Check ChaosResult verdict when complete
kubectl get chaosresult my-service-pod-delete-pod-delete \
  -n production -o jsonpath='{.status.experimentStatus.verdict}'

Step 4 — Rollback / abort if steady state is violated

# Immediately stop the experiment
kubectl patch chaosengine my-service-pod-delete \
  -n production --type merge -p '{"spec":{"engineState":"stop"}}'

# Confirm all pods are healthy
kubectl rollout status deployment/my-service -n production

Concrete Example: Network Latency with toxiproxy

# Install toxiproxy CLI
brew install toxiproxy   # macOS; use the binary release on Linux

# Start toxiproxy server (runs alongside your service)
toxiproxy-server &

# Create a proxy for your downstream dependency
toxiproxy-cli create -l 0.0.0.0:22222 -u downstream-db:5432 db-proxy

# Inject 300ms latency with 10% jitter — blast radius: this proxy only
toxiproxy-cli toxic add db-proxy -t latency -a latency=300 -a jitter=30

# Run your load test / observe metrics here ...

# Remove the toxic to restore normal behaviour
toxiproxy-cli toxic remove db-proxy -n latency_downstream

Concrete Example: Chaos Monkey (Spinnaker / standalone)

# chaos-monkey-config.yml — restrict to a single ASG
deployment:
  enabled: true
  regionIndependence: false
chaos:
  enabled: true
  meanTimeBetweenKillsInWorkDays: 2
  minTimeBetweenKillsInWorkDays: 1
  grouping: APP           # kill one instance per app, not per cluster
  exceptions:
    - account: production
      region: us-east-1
      detail: "*-canary"  # never kill canary instances

# Apply and trigger a manual kill for testing
chaos-monkey --app my-service --account staging --dry-run false
how to use chaos-engineer

How to use chaos-engineer on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add chaos-engineer
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/jeffallan/claude-skills --skill chaos-engineer

The skills CLI fetches chaos-engineer from GitHub repository jeffallan/claude-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/chaos-engineer

Reload or restart Cursor to activate chaos-engineer. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /chaos-engineer) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.770 reviews
  • Isabella Kim· Dec 28, 2024

    Keeps context tight: chaos-engineer is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Olivia Agarwal· Dec 28, 2024

    Registry listing for chaos-engineer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 16, 2024

    Registry listing for chaos-engineer matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Ava Martin· Dec 16, 2024

    I recommend chaos-engineer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Emma Flores· Dec 4, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: chaos-engineer is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Emma Garcia· Nov 23, 2024

    chaos-engineer has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Nia Gupta· Nov 23, 2024

    chaos-engineer fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Omar Robinson· Nov 19, 2024

    I recommend chaos-engineer for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Advait Gupta· Nov 19, 2024

    chaos-engineer reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Soo Zhang· Nov 15, 2024

    chaos-engineer is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

showing 1-10 of 70

1 / 7