sf-integration▌
jaganpro/sf-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Use this skill when the user needs integration architecture and runtime plumbing: Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, CDC, and event-driven integration design.
sf-integration: Salesforce Integration Patterns Expert
Use this skill when the user needs integration architecture and runtime plumbing: Named Credentials, External Credentials, External Services, REST/SOAP callout patterns, Platform Events, CDC, and event-driven integration design.
When This Skill Owns the Task
Use sf-integration when the work involves:
.namedCredential-meta.xmlor External Credential metadata- outbound REST/SOAP callouts
- External Service registration from OpenAPI specs
- Platform Events, CDC, and event-driven architecture
- choosing sync vs async integration patterns
Delegate elsewhere when the user is:
- configuring the OAuth app itself → sf-connected-apps
- writing Apex-only business logic → sf-apex
- deploying metadata → sf-deploy
- importing/exporting data → sf-data
Required Context to Gather First
Ask for or infer:
- integration style: outbound callout, inbound event, External Service, CDC, platform event
- auth method
- sync vs async requirement
- system endpoint / spec details
- rate limits, retry expectations, and failure tolerance
- whether this is net-new design or repair of an existing integration
Recommended Workflow
1. Choose the integration pattern
| Need | Default pattern |
|---|---|
| authenticated outbound API call | Named Credential / External Credential + Apex or Flow |
| spec-driven API client | External Service |
| trigger-originated callout | async callout pattern |
| decoupled event publishing | Platform Events |
| change-stream consumption | CDC |
2. Choose the auth model
Prefer secure runtime-managed auth:
- Named Credentials / External Credentials
- OAuth or JWT via the right credential model
- no hardcoded secrets in code
3. Generate from the right templates
Use the provided assets under:
assets/named-credentials/assets/external-credentials/assets/external-services/assets/callouts/assets/platform-events/assets/cdc/assets/soap/
4. Validate operational safety
Check:
- timeout and retry handling
- async strategy for trigger-originated work
- logging / observability
- event retention and subscriber implications
5. Hand off deployment or implementation details
Use:
- sf-deploy for deployment
- sf-apex for deeper service / retry code
- sf-flow for declarative HTTP callout orchestration
High-Signal Rules
- never hardcode credentials
- do not do synchronous callouts from triggers
- define timeout behavior explicitly
- plan retries for transient failures
- use middleware / event-driven patterns when outbound volume is high
- prefer External Credentials architecture for new development when supported
Common anti-patterns:
- sync trigger callouts
- no retry or dead-letter strategy
- no request/response logging
- mixing auth setup responsibilities with runtime integration design
Output Format
When finishing, report in this order:
- Integration pattern chosen
- Auth model chosen
- Files created or updated
- Operational safeguards
- Deployment / testing next step
Suggested shape:
Integration: <summary>
Pattern: <named credential / external service / event / cdc / callout>
Files: <paths>
Safety: <timeouts, retries, async, logging>
Next step: <deploy, register, test, or implement>
Cross-Skill Integration
| Need | Delegate to | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| OAuth app setup | sf-connected-apps | consumer key / cert / app config |
| advanced callout service code | sf-apex | Apex implementation |
| declarative HTTP callout / Flow wrapper | sf-flow | Flow orchestration |
| deploy integration metadata | sf-deploy | validation and rollout |
| use integration from Agentforce | sf-ai-agentscript | agent action composition |
Reference Map
Start here
- references/named-credentials-guide.md
- references/external-services-guide.md
- references/callout-patterns.md
- references/security-best-practices.md
Event-driven / platform patterns
- references/event-patterns.md
- references/platform-events-guide.md
- references/cdc-guide.md
- references/event-driven-architecture-guide.md
- references/messaging-api-v2.md
CLI / automation / scoring
- references/cli-reference.md
- references/named-credentials-automation.md
- references/scoring-rubric.md
- assets/
Score Guide
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 108+ | strong production-ready integration design |
| 90–107 | good design with some hardening left |
| 72–89 | workable but needs architectural review |
| < 72 | unsafe / incomplete for deployment |
How to use sf-integration on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add sf-integration
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches sf-integration from GitHub repository jaganpro/sf-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate sf-integration. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /sf-integration) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★33 reviews- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 24, 2024
sf-integration has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Carlos Srinivasan· Dec 16, 2024
I recommend sf-integration for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Maya Thomas· Dec 16, 2024
sf-integration reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Kofi Menon· Dec 12, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sf-integration is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★William Verma· Dec 12, 2024
We added sf-integration from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 23, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: sf-integration is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 15, 2024
Keeps context tight: sf-integration is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Maya Iyer· Nov 7, 2024
Registry listing for sf-integration matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Carlos Liu· Nov 3, 2024
sf-integration fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Nia Lopez· Oct 26, 2024
Useful defaults in sf-integration — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 33