eve-orchestration

incept5/eve-skillpacks · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/incept5/eve-skillpacks --skill eve-orchestration
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

This skill explains how to orchestrate complex work in Eve Horizon by spawning child jobs, managing

  • dependencies, and maximizing parallel execution while respecting depth limits.
skill.md

Eve Orchestration

This skill explains how to orchestrate complex work in Eve Horizon by spawning child jobs, managing dependencies, and maximizing parallel execution while respecting depth limits.

Core Principles

  1. Parent sets a target depth and passes it to children.
  2. Each job decides its own decomposition based on scope and depth.
  3. Parallelize by default when tasks can proceed independently.
  4. Use relations to encode true dependencies, not preference.
  5. Leaf jobs execute; parent jobs orchestrate and wait.
  6. Orchestrators stay lightweight — dispatch work, don't accumulate it.

When to Orchestrate vs Execute Directly

Not every job needs decomposition. Use this heuristic:

  • Execute directly when the work is atomic, self-contained, and fits comfortably in a single agent's context and capability. Examples: fix a single bug, write one document section, run a diagnostic check.
  • Orchestrate when the work has independent sub-parts that benefit from parallelism, when the scope exceeds what a single agent should hold in context at once, or when different parts require different skills or tool access.
  • Default to direct execution. Orchestration has overhead (job creation, waiting, resumption). Only decompose when parallelism or scope genuinely demands it.

Always Start With Context

Fetch the current job context before deciding anything:

eve job current --json
# or explicit
eve job current $EVE_JOB_ID --json

Use the context to confirm:

  • job.depth (current depth)
  • children (existing sub-jobs)
  • relations (dependencies)
  • blocked / waiting / effective_phase

Environment and IDs

Use the environment to avoid guessing identifiers:

  • EVE_JOB_ID: current job
  • EVE_PROJECT_ID: owning project
  • EVE_ATTEMPT_ID: current attempt
  • EVE_REPO_PATH: workspace path
  • EVE_AGENT_ID: agent identifier (optional)

Depth Propagation

The parent decides the target depth and passes it to children (in the child description or data). Each child must read and honor the same target depth.

Example snippet to include in child descriptions:

Target depth: 3 (EPIC). Current depth: 1.
If current depth < target, you may create child jobs and use waits_for relations to parallelize.
If current depth >= target, execute directly.

Default Depth Rules

  • EPIC: target depth = 3

    • Root orchestrates children
    • Children may orchestrate grandchildren
    • Grandchildren execute
  • Story: target depth = 2

    • Root orchestrates children
    • Children execute

If no target depth is provided, default to Story depth (2) unless the scope clearly indicates EPIC.

Context Management

The orchestrator's most precious resource is its context window. Protect it:

  • Do not read large files or datasets in the orchestrator. If analysis is needed, create a child job to do the reading and summarize the results.
  • Keep the orchestrator's role to planning, dispatching, and synthesizing. The orchestrator decides what to do and how to split it, then delegates the actual work.
  • Avoid accumulating child outputs inline. When resuming after children complete, read only the summaries or outcomes you need to verify completion — not the full content of every child's work product.
  • Front-load decomposition thinking. Spend context on planning the breakdown, not on doing partial work that will be redone by children.

A well-run orchestrator should finish with most of its context budget unspent.

Per-Job Orchestration Flow

  1. Fetch context (eve job current --json).
  2. Determine depth:
    • Read inherited target depth.
    • If current_depth >= target_depth, execute directly.
  3. Decide whether to decompose:
    • If the work is sizable or parallelizable, create child jobs.
    • Each child inherits the same target depth.
  4. Write self-contained child descriptions (see template below).
  5. Add relations:
    • Use waits_for for standard gating.
    • Use blocks only for strict ordering constraints.
  6. Return waiting signal after relations exist.
  7. Resume when children complete; read summaries, verify, and continue.

Creating Child Jobs

Create child jobs using eve job create with --parent. Each child description must be fully self-contained — the child agent has no access to the parent's conversation, context, or reasoning. Everything the child needs to act must be in the description itself.

# Create two child jobs in parallel
eve job create --project $EVE_PROJECT_ID \
  --parent $EVE_JOB_ID \
  --description $'Target depth: 3 (EPIC). Current depth: 1.\nScope: Research sources\nDeliverable: Annotated bibliography' \
  --phase ready

eve job create --project $EVE_PROJECT_ID \
  --parent $EVE_JOB_ID \
  --description $'Target depth: 3 (EPIC). Current depth: 1.\nScope: Draft outline\nDeliverable: Structured outline' \
  --phase ready

After creating children, add dependencies so the parent waits on them:

eve job dep add $EVE_JOB_ID $CHILD_A_ID --type waits_for
eve job dep add $EVE_JOB_ID $CHILD_B_ID --type waits_for

Parallel Decomposition Guidance

  • Favor multiple small, independent children over one large child.
  • If tasks can run in parallel, create them and make the parent wait on all.
  • Avoid chaining children unless the output of one is a genuine input to the next.
  • Every child repeats the same decision process and may create grandchildren if depth allows.
  • A good decomposition reduces each child's scope to something a single agent can complete without exhausting its context window.

Dependencies and Relations

Use the CLI dependency commands to express relationships:

eve job dep add $PARENT_JOB_ID $CHILD_JOB_ID --type waits_for
eve job dep add $CHILD_JOB_ID $OTHER_JOB_ID --type blocks
eve job dep list $JOB_ID

Relation guidance:

  • waits_for: standard parent waits for child completion
  • blocks: strict ordering constraint
  • conditional_blocks: use only when the dependency is conditional

Add relations before returning a waiting control signal.

Control Signals (json-result)

When you spawn children and set relations, pause the parent with a waiting signal:

{
  "eve": {
    "status": "waiting",
    "summary": "Spawned 3 parallel child jobs; waiting on waits_for relations"
  }
}

Rules:

  • Only return waiting after dependencies exist.
  • waiting requeues the job to ready while it stays blocked by relations.
  • Returning waiting without blockers triggers a short backoff; avoid it.
  • Use success when the work is complete.
  • Use failed only for unrecoverable outcomes.

Review Mechanics (Optional)

Default: no review unless explicitly required by the parent or project settings.

If review is required:

  • Apply at the specified level (top only, all levels, or none).
  • Do not submit for review when returning waiting.
  • Submit for review only when the job is complete.
eve job submit $EVE_JOB_ID --summary "Completed work and ready for review"

Parent Review of Child Work

When a parent resumes after children complete:

  • Read child summaries and outcomes — not their full work products. Protect context.
  • Verify that child outputs collectively satisfy the parent's scope.
  • If review is required, submit the parent for review after verification.
  • If no review is required, synthesize child outcomes into a parent summary and complete.

Failure Handling

If a child fails:

  • Re-check context and determine whether to retry, replace, or stop.
  • Remove or adjust relations if the plan changes.
  • Do not leave the parent waiting on a permanently failed child.

Child Job Description Template

Every child description must be self-contained. The child agent starts cold — no access to the parent's conversation, files read, or reasoning. Include everything it needs:

Target depth: 3 (EPIC). Current depth: 1.
If current depth < target, you may create child jobs and use waits_for relations to parallelize.
If current depth >= target, execute directly.

Context: <why this work exists — enough background for the child to act without asking>
Scope: <concise child objective — what to do>
Inputs: <specific file paths, data references, or prior outputs the child needs>
Deliverable: <clear, verifiable outcome — what "done" looks like>
Constraints: <boundaries, standards, or requirements to honor>

Key rules for child descriptions:

  • Name specific files and paths. "Update the auth module" is ambiguous; "Update /src/auth/handler.ts to add token refresh logic" is actionable.
  • Include relevant decisions already made. If the parent chose an approach, tell the child — don't make it re-derive the decision.
  • State the deliverable as a verifiable condition. "Tests pass" or "File exists at path X" beats "implement feature Y."
  • Never assume the child can read the parent's mind. If in doubt, over-specify.

Knowledge-Work Examples (Non-SWE)

  • Research: parallel literature review, data gathering, synthesis
  • Writing: outline, draft sections in parallel, consolidate
  • Ops: parallel checks (metrics, logs, status), then summary
  • Strategy: parallel SWOT, stakeholder analysis, risk assessment

Quick Checklist

  • Read context and depth
  • Determine target depth and level
  • Decide: execute directly or orchestrate? (default to direct if work is atomic)
  • If orchestrating: plan the decomposition, then create children with self-contained descriptions
  • Favor parallel children over sequential chains
  • Add relations before signaling
  • Return json-result waiting (if children exist)
  • On resume: read child summaries (not full outputs), verify, and complete
how to use eve-orchestration

How to use eve-orchestration on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add eve-orchestration
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/incept5/eve-skillpacks --skill eve-orchestration

The skills CLI fetches eve-orchestration from GitHub repository incept5/eve-skillpacks and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/eve-orchestration

Reload or restart Cursor to activate eve-orchestration. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /eve-orchestration) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.551 reviews
  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: eve-orchestration is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Evelyn Srinivasan· Dec 24, 2024

    eve-orchestration is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Mia Chawla· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: eve-orchestration is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Ira Taylor· Dec 20, 2024

    eve-orchestration fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Aanya Thomas· Dec 4, 2024

    Registry listing for eve-orchestration matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Maya Okafor· Nov 23, 2024

    I recommend eve-orchestration for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Chinedu Menon· Nov 23, 2024

    Keeps context tight: eve-orchestration is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Piyush G· Nov 15, 2024

    We added eve-orchestration from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Michael Martin· Nov 15, 2024

    eve-orchestration reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Diego Rao· Nov 15, 2024

    We added eve-orchestration from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 51

1 / 6