analyze-logs

hugorcd/evlog · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/hugorcd/evlog --skill analyze-logs
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Read and analyze structured wide-event logs from the local .evlog/logs/ directory to debug errors, investigate performance issues, and understand application behavior.

skill.md

Analyze application logs

Read and analyze structured wide-event logs from the local .evlog/logs/ directory to debug errors, investigate performance issues, and understand application behavior.

When to Use

  • User asks to debug an error, investigate a bug, or understand why something failed
  • User asks about request patterns, slow endpoints, or error rates
  • User asks "what happened" or "what's going on" with their application
  • User asks to analyze logs, check recent errors, or review application behavior
  • User mentions a specific error message or status code they're seeing

Finding the logs

Logs are written by evlog's file system drain as .jsonl files, organized by date.

Format detection: The drain supports two modes:

  • NDJSON (default, pretty: false): One compact JSON object per line. Parse line-by-line.
  • Pretty (pretty: true): Multi-line indented JSON per event. Parse by reading the entire file and splitting on top-level objects (e.g. JSON.parse('[' + content.replace(/\}\n\{/g, '},{') + ']')) or use a streaming JSON parser.

Always check the first few bytes of the file to detect the format: if the second character is a newline or ", it's NDJSON; if it's a space or newline followed by spaces, it's pretty-printed.

Search order — check these locations relative to the project root:

  1. .evlog/logs/ (default)
  2. Any .evlog/logs/ inside app directories (monorepos: apps/*/.evlog/logs/)

Use glob to find log files:

.evlog/logs/*.jsonl
*/.evlog/logs/*.jsonl
apps/*/.evlog/logs/*.jsonl

Files are named by date: 2026-03-14.jsonl. Start with the most recent file.

If no logs are found

The file system drain may not be enabled. Guide the user to set it up:

import { createFsDrain } from 'evlog/fs'

// Nuxt / Nitro: server/plugins/evlog-drain.ts
export default defineNitroPlugin((nitroApp) => {
  nitroApp.hooks.hook('evlog:drain', createFsDrain())
})

// Hono / Express / Elysia: pass in middleware options
app.use(evlog({ drain: createFsDrain() }))

// Fastify: pass in plugin options
await app.register(evlog, { drain: createFsDrain() })

// NestJS: pass in module options
EvlogModule.forRoot({ drain: createFsDrain() })

// Standalone: pass to initLogger
initLogger({ drain: createFsDrain() })

After setup, the user needs to trigger some requests to generate logs, then re-analyze.

Log format

Each line is a self-contained JSON object (wide event). Key fields:

Field Type Description
timestamp string ISO 8601 timestamp
level string info, warn, error, debug
service string Service name
environment string development, production, etc.
method string HTTP method (GET, POST, etc.)
path string Request path (/api/checkout)
status number HTTP response status code
duration string Request duration ("234ms")
requestId string Unique request identifier
error object Error details: name, message, stack, statusCode, data
error.data.why string Human-readable explanation of what went wrong
error.data.fix string Suggested fix for the error
source string client for browser logs, absent for server logs
userAgent object Parsed browser/OS/device info

All other fields are application-specific context added via log.set() (e.g. user, cart, payment).

How to analyze

Step 1: Read the most recent log file

Read the latest .jsonl file. Each line is one JSON event. Parse each line independently.

Step 2: Identify the relevant events

Filter based on the user's question:

  • Errors: look for "level":"error" or status >= 400
  • Specific endpoint: match on path
  • Slow requests: parse duration (e.g. "706ms") and filter high values
  • Specific user/action: match on application-specific fields
  • Client-side issues: filter by "source":"client"
  • Time range: compare timestamp values

Step 3: Analyze and explain

For each relevant event:

  1. What happened: summarize the path, method, status, level
  2. Why it failed (errors): read error.message, error.data.why, and the stack trace
  3. How to fix: check error.data.fix for suggested remediation
  4. Context: examine application-specific fields for business context (user info, payment details, etc.)
  5. Patterns: look for recurring errors, degrading performance, or correlated failures

Analysis patterns

Find all errors

Filter: level === "error"
Group by: error.message or path
Look for: recurring patterns, common failure modes

Find slow requests

Filter: parse duration string, compare > threshold (e.g. 1000ms)
Sort by: duration descending
Look for: specific endpoints, time-of-day patterns

Trace a specific request

Filter: requestId === "the-request-id"
Result: single wide event with all context for that request

Error rate by endpoint

Group events by: path
Count: total events vs error events per path
Look for: endpoints with high error ratios

Client vs server errors

Split by: source === "client" vs no source field
Compare: error patterns between client and server
Look for: client errors that don't have corresponding server errors (network issues)

Important notes

  • Each line is a complete, self-contained event. Unlike traditional logs, you don't need to correlate multiple lines — one line has all the context for one request.
  • The error.data.why and error.data.fix fields are evlog-specific structured error fields. When present, they provide the most actionable information.
  • Duration values are strings with units (e.g. "706ms"). Parse the numeric part for comparisons.
  • Events with "source":"client" originated from browser-side logging and were sent to the server via the transport endpoint.
  • Log files are .gitignore'd automatically — they exist only on the local machine or server where the app runs.
how to use analyze-logs

How to use analyze-logs on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add analyze-logs
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/hugorcd/evlog --skill analyze-logs

The skills CLI fetches analyze-logs from GitHub repository hugorcd/evlog and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/analyze-logs

Reload or restart Cursor to activate analyze-logs. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /analyze-logs) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.856 reviews
  • Noah Lopez· Dec 24, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyze-logs is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Mei Chawla· Dec 16, 2024

    analyze-logs has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Soo Reddy· Dec 16, 2024

    analyze-logs fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Yusuf Lopez· Nov 15, 2024

    We added analyze-logs from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Diya Chen· Nov 15, 2024

    analyze-logs fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Kiara Verma· Nov 11, 2024

    I recommend analyze-logs for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Sophia Iyer· Nov 7, 2024

    analyze-logs fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Noah Gupta· Nov 7, 2024

    analyze-logs has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Amelia Abebe· Oct 26, 2024

    We added analyze-logs from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Mateo Bhatia· Oct 26, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: analyze-logs is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 56

1 / 6