provider-actions▌
hashicorp/agent-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Implement imperative Terraform Provider actions at resource lifecycle events using the Plugin Framework.
- ›Supports before/after create and before/after update lifecycle triggers (destroy events not available in Terraform 1.14.0)
- ›Requires proper schema definition with correct framework types, ElementType for collections, and validators for input validation
- ›Includes progress reporting, timeout management, and comprehensive error handling for long-running operations
- ›Implements polling
Terraform Provider Actions Implementation Guide
Overview
Terraform Actions enable imperative operations during the Terraform lifecycle. Actions are experimental features that allow performing provider operations at specific lifecycle events (before/after create, update, destroy).
References:
File Structure
Actions follow the standard service package structure:
internal/service/<service>/
├── <action_name>_action.go # Action implementation
├── <action_name>_action_test.go # Action tests
└── service_package_gen.go # Auto-generated service registration
Documentation structure:
website/docs/actions/
└── <service>_<action_name>.html.markdown # User-facing documentation
Changelog entry:
.changelog/
└── <pr_number_or_description>.txt # Release note entry
Action Schema Definition
Actions use the Terraform Plugin Framework with a standard schema pattern:
func (a *actionType) Schema(ctx context.Context, req action.SchemaRequest, resp *action.SchemaResponse) {
resp.Schema = schema.Schema{
Attributes: map[string]schema.Attribute{
// Required configuration parameters
"resource_id": schema.StringAttribute{
Required: true,
Description: "ID of the resource to operate on",
},
// Optional parameters with defaults
"timeout": schema.Int64Attribute{
Optional: true,
Description: "Operation timeout in seconds",
Default: int64default.StaticInt64(1800),
Computed: true,
},
},
}
}
Common Schema Issues
Pay special attention to the schema definition - common issues after a first draft:
-
Type Mismatches
- Using
types.Stringinstead offwtypes.Stringin model structs - Using
types.StringTypeinstead offwtypes.StringTypein schema - Mixing framework types with plugin-framework types
- Using
-
List/Map Element Types
// WRONG - missing ElementType "items": schema.ListAttribute{ Optional: true, } // CORRECT "items": schema.ListAttribute{ Optional: true, ElementType: fwtypes.StringType, } -
Computed vs Optional
- Attributes with defaults must be both
Optional: trueandComputed: true - Don't mark action inputs as
Computedunless they have defaults
- Attributes with defaults must be both
-
Validator Imports
// Ensure proper imports "github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validators/int64validator" "github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-framework-validators/stringvalidator" -
Region/Provider Attribute
- Use framework-provided region handling when available
- Don't manually define provider-specific config in schema if framework handles it
-
Nested Attributes
- Use appropriate nested object types for complex structures
- Ensure nested types are properly defined
Schema Validation Checklist
Before submitting, verify:
- All attributes have descriptions
- List/Map attributes have ElementType defined
- Validators are imported and applied correctly
- Model struct uses correct framework types
- Optional attributes with defaults are marked Computed
- Code compiles without type errors
- Run
go buildto catch type mismatches
Action Invoke Method
The Invoke method contains the action logic:
func (a *actionType) Invoke(ctx context.Context, req action.InvokeRequest, resp *action.InvokeResponse) {
var data actionModel
resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.Config.Get(ctx, &data)...)
// Create provider client
conn := a.Meta().Client(ctx)
// Progress updates for long-running operations
resp.Progress.Set(ctx, "Starting operation...")
// Implement action logic with error handling
// Use context for timeout management
// Poll for completion if async operation
resp.Progress.Set(ctx, "Operation completed")
}
Key Implementation Requirements
1. Progress Reporting
- Use
resp.SendProgress(action.InvokeProgressEvent{...})for real-time updates - Provide meaningful progress messages during long operations
- Update progress at key milestones
- Include elapsed time for long operations
2. Timeout Management
- Always include configurable timeout parameter (default: 1800s)
- Use
context.WithTimeout()for API calls - Handle timeout errors gracefully
- Validate timeout ranges (typically 60-7200 seconds)
3. Error Handling
- Add diagnostics with
resp.Diagnostics.AddError() - Provide clear error messages with context
- Include API error details when relevant
- Map provider error types to user-friendly messages
- Document all possible error cases
Example error handling:
// Handle specific errors
var notFound *types.ResourceNotFoundException
if errors.As(err, ¬Found) {
resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
"Resource Not Found",
fmt.Sprintf("Resource %s was not found", resourceID),
)
return
}
// Generic error handling
resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
"Operation Failed",
fmt.Sprintf("Could not complete operation for %s: %s", resourceID, err),
)
4. Provider SDK Integration
- Use provider SDK clients from
a.Meta().<Service>Client(ctx) - Handle pagination for list operations
- Implement retry logic for transient failures
- Use appropriate error types
5. Parameter Validation
- Use framework validators for input validation
- Validate resource existence before operations
- Check for conflicting parameters
- Validate against provider naming requirements
6. Polling and Waiting
For operations that require waiting for completion:
result, err := wait.WaitForStatus(ctx,
func(ctx context.Context) (wait.FetchResult[*ResourceType], error) {
// Fetch current status
resource, err := findResource(ctx, conn, id)
if err != nil {
return wait.FetchResult[*ResourceType]{}, err
}
return wait.FetchResult[*ResourceType]{
Status: wait.Status(resource.Status),
Value: resource,
}, nil
},
wait.Options[*ResourceType]{
Timeout: timeout,
Interval: wait.FixedInterval(5 * time.Second),
SuccessStates: []wait.Status{"AVAILABLE", "COMPLETED"},
TransitionalStates: []wait.Status{"CREATING", "PENDING"},
ProgressInterval: 30 * time.Second,
ProgressSink: func(fr wait.FetchResult[any], meta wait.ProgressMeta) {
resp.SendProgress(action.InvokeProgressEvent{
Message: fmt.Sprintf("Status: %s, Elapsed: %v", fr.Status, meta.Elapsed.Round(time.Second)),
}how to use provider-actionsHow to use provider-actions on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
1Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add provider-actions
2Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
$npx skills add https://github.com/hashicorp/agent-skills --skill provider-actionsThe skills CLI fetches provider-actions from GitHub repository hashicorp/agent-skills and configures it for Cursor.
3Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
◆ Which agents do you want to install to?││ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────│ • Amp│ • Antigravity│ • Cline│ • Codex│ ●Cursor(selected)│ • Cursor│ • Windsurf4Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
.cursor/skills/provider-actionsReload or restart Cursor to activate provider-actions. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /provider-actions) or your agent's skill management interface.
⚠Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
Additional Resources
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
GET_STARTED →Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
✓Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
✓Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviewsRatings
4.8★★★★★74 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 28, 2024
I recommend provider-actions for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Mateo Liu· Dec 28, 2024
Useful defaults in provider-actions — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ama Malhotra· Dec 24, 2024
provider-actions fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Alexander Abebe· Dec 24, 2024
provider-actions is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Anika Abebe· Dec 24, 2024
provider-actions has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Mateo Nasser· Dec 20, 2024
provider-actions reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Kwame Thompson· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in provider-actions — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 19, 2024
provider-actions fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Kwame Thomas· Nov 15, 2024
I recommend provider-actions for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Arjun Dixit· Nov 15, 2024
Keeps context tight: provider-actions is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 74
1 / 8