meeting-minutes

github/awesome-copilot · updated May 26, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill meeting-minutes
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Generates concise, actionable meeting minutes for internal meetings under 60 minutes with standardized metadata, decisions, and assigned action items.

  • Captures attendees, agenda, decisions with rationale, and action items with owner and due date for immediate task tracking
  • Follows a strict schema covering metadata, decisions, action items, notes by agenda item, parking lot, risks, and follow-ups
  • Accepts multiple input formats: transcripts, recordings, slides, raw notes, or live meeti
skill.md

Meeting Minutes Skill — Short Internal Meetings

Purpose / Overview

This Skill produces high-quality, consistent meeting minutes for internal meetings that are 60 minutes or shorter. Output is designed to be clear, actionable, and easy to convert into task trackers (e.g., GitHub Issues, Jira). The generated minutes prioritize decisions and action items so teams can move quickly from discussion to execution.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Internal syncs, standups, design reviews, triage, planning or ad-hoc meetings with short duration
  • Situations that require a concise record of decisions, assigned action items, and follow-ups
  • Creating a standardized minutes document from a live meeting, transcript, recording, or notes

Operational Workflow

Phase 1: Intake (before drafting)

  • Obtain meeting metadata: title, date, start/end time (or duration), organizer, and intended audience.
  • Confirm available inputs: agenda, slides, recording, transcript, or raw notes.
  • If key details are missing, ask up to 3 clarifying questions before producing minutes (see "Discovery" below).

Phase 2: Capture (during / immediately after meeting)

  • Record attendees and absentees.
  • Capture brief notes per agenda item with time markers if available.
  • Record explicit decisions, rationale summary (1–2 sentences), and action items (owner + due date).

Phase 3: Drafting

  • Generate minutes following the Strict Minutes Schema (below).
  • Ensure every action item includes owner, due date (or timeframe), and acceptance criteria when applicable.
  • Mark unresolved issues or items requiring follow-up in the Parking Lot.

Phase 4: Review & Publish

  • If possible, send draft to meeting organizer or a designated reviewer for quick verification (within 24 hours).
  • Publish final minutes to the agreed channel (shared drive, repo, ticket, or email) and optionally create tasks in the team's tracker.

Discovery (required clarifying questions)

Before generating minutes, the agent MUST ask up to three clarifying questions if any of these are missing:

  • What is the meeting title, date, start time (or duration), and organizer?
  • Is there an agenda or transcript/recording to reference? If yes, please provide.
  • Who should be assigned as the reviewer or approver for the minutes?

If the user responds "no transcript" or "no agenda," proceed but mark source material as "ad-hoc notes" and flag potential gaps.


Strict Minutes Schema (Output Structure)

You MUST produce meeting minutes following this exact structure. If information is unavailable, use TBD or Unknown and explain how to obtain it.

1. Metadata

  • Title:
  • Date (YYYY-MM-DD):
  • Start Time (UTC):
  • End Time (UTC) or Duration:
  • Organizer:
  • Location / Virtual Link:
  • Minutes Author (agent or person):
  • Distribution List (who receives the minutes):

2. Attendance

  • Present: [list of names + roles]
  • Regrets / Absent: [list]
  • Notetaker / Recorder: [name or "agent"]

3. Agenda

Bullet list of agenda items, in order:

  • Item 1: short title
  • Item 2: short title
  • ...

4. Summary

A concise one-paragraph summary (1–3 sentences) of the meeting's objective and high-level outcome.

5. Decisions Made

Each as a separate bullet:

  • Decision 1: statement of decision.
    • Who decided / approved: [name(s) or group]
    • Rationale (1–2 sentences): brief reason.
    • Effective date (if applicable): YYYY-MM-DD
  • Decision 2: ...

6. Action Items

Table-style bullets; must include owner and due date:

  • [ID] Action: short description
    • Owner: Name (team)
    • Due: YYYY-MM-DD or "ASAP" / timeframe
    • Acceptance Criteria: (what completes this action)
    • Linked artifacts / tickets: (optional URL or ticket id)

Example:

  • [A1] Draft deployment runbook for feature X

7. Notes by Agenda Item

Brief, factual, timestamp optional:

  • Agenda Item 1: title
    • Key points:
      • Point A (timestamp 00:05)
      • Point B (timestamp 00:12)
    • Open issues / questions:
      • Q1: question text (owner if assigned)
  • Agenda Item 2: ...

8. Parking Lot / Unresolved Items

  • Item: short description
    • Why parked / next step:
    • Suggested owner or next meeting to resolve

9. Risks / Blockers (if any)

  • Risk 1: short description, impact, mitigation owner
  • Risk 2: ...

10. Next Meeting / Follow-up

  • Proposed date/time (if any)
  • Objectives for next meeting

11. Attachments / References

  • Agenda document: URL
  • Slides: URL
  • Transcript / Recording: URL
  • Related tickets: list of URLs or IDs

12. Version & Change Log

  • Version: 1.0
  • Last updated: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ
  • Changes: short notes on edits and who made them

Style & Quality Rules

  • Keep minutes concise: total length should typically be under 1 A4 page for meetings <= 30 minutes and under 2 pages for meetings close to 60 minutes.
  • Use plain language and bullet lists for readability.
  • Prioritize decisions and action items at the top of the document.
  • Do NOT include speculative language or unverified claims. If something is uncertain, label it TBD and note the missing info source.
  • Use consistent timestamps and ISO 8601 dates (YYYY-MM-DD or full UTC timestamp).

DO / DON'T

DO:

  • Include owner and due date for every action item.
  • Provide acceptance criteria for action items when possible.
  • Link to artifacts (tickets, slides, recordings) for traceability.
  • Send draft for quick review if minutes contain significant decisions.

DON'T:

  • Omit decisions or action items — these are the primary value of minutes.
  • Mix personal opinions with facts. Keep commentary clearly marked as "Opinion" or exclude it.
  • Publish raw PII gathered during discussion unless required and authorized.

Example Prompts (for Copilot / Agent)

Prompt to generate minutes from transcript:

"Generate meeting minutes from the following meeting transcript. Meeting title: 'Platform Weekly Sync'. Date: 2026-02-10. Duration: 45 minutes. Organizer: Priya (Platform Lead). Transcript: . Follow the Strict Minutes Schema. Highlight decisions and create action items with owners and due dates where implied."

Prompt to generate minutes from notes:

"I have raw notes from a 30-minute design review. Title: 'Feature Y Design Review'. Date: 2026-02-11. Notes: . Produce concise minutes following the Strict Minutes Schema. Ask up to 3 clarifying questions if critical fields are missing."


Quick Templates (copyable)

Concise minutes template (short):

- Title:
- Date:
- Organizer:
- Present:
- Summary:
- Decisions:
  - Decision 1 — Who — Effective:
- Action Items:
  - [A1] Action — Owner — Due — Acceptance Criteria
- Next Steps / Next Meeting:

Detailed minutes template (full schema):

Use the Strict Minutes Schema above.


Verification & Acceptance Criteria for Generated Minutes

A generated minutes document is acceptable if:

  • It contains Metadata, Attendance, Decisions, and Action Items sections.
  • Every action item has an assigned owner and a due date or a clear timeframe.
  • All significant decisions are captured with at least 1-line rationale.
  • Attachments or references are listed or explicitly marked None.
  • The document is factual; uncertain items are labeled TBD.
how to use meeting-minutes

How to use meeting-minutes on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add meeting-minutes
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill meeting-minutes

The skills CLI fetches meeting-minutes from GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/meeting-minutes

Reload or restart Cursor to activate meeting-minutes. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /meeting-minutes) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.439 reviews
  • Chinedu Mensah· Dec 24, 2024

    Useful defaults in meeting-minutes — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Chinedu Abebe· Dec 24, 2024

    Keeps context tight: meeting-minutes is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Emma Nasser· Dec 16, 2024

    meeting-minutes fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Chaitanya Patil· Dec 8, 2024

    meeting-minutes has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Luis Taylor· Dec 8, 2024

    We added meeting-minutes from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Pratham Ware· Dec 4, 2024

    Registry listing for meeting-minutes matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Piyush G· Nov 27, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: meeting-minutes is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Emma Chawla· Nov 27, 2024

    Keeps context tight: meeting-minutes is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Ishan Farah· Nov 15, 2024

    I recommend meeting-minutes for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Emma Tandon· Nov 15, 2024

    We added meeting-minutes from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

showing 1-10 of 39

1 / 4