gtm-enterprise-onboarding▌
github/awesome-copilot · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Four-phase framework for onboarding enterprise customers from contract to value realization. The goal isn't just go-live — it's sustained adoption that doesn't cliff at Week 12.
Enterprise Onboarding
Four-phase framework for onboarding enterprise customers from contract to value realization. The goal isn't just go-live — it's sustained adoption that doesn't cliff at Week 12.
When to Use
Triggers:
- "How do we onboard this enterprise customer?"
- "Customer went live but adoption is weak"
- "We keep losing customers 3 months after go-live"
- "POC to production transition"
- "How do I prevent Week 4 ghosting?"
- "Customer success onboarding framework"
Context:
- Enterprise or mid-market deals
- Complex technical requirements
- Multiple stakeholders involved
- 30-90 day implementation timelines
- Risk of churn during first year
Core Frameworks
1. The Week 4 Ghosting Problem (And How to Prevent It)
The Pattern:
Week 1: Kickoff call goes great. Everyone's excited. Week 2-3: Technical discovery, requirements gathering. Still good. Week 4: Customer stops responding. Meetings get cancelled. "Too busy."
What Happened?
You started customer onboarding before internal alignment on their side.
Who Owns This Project Internally?
- Sales rep? (Already moved to next deal)
- Technical champion? (Day job took over)
- Executive sponsor? (Delegates, doesn't drive)
- Nobody? (This is why they're ghosting)
The Framework: Internal Owner Validation
Before kickoff call, answer:
Who on customer side will:
- Attend weekly project meetings? (Not "invited" — will actually show up)
- Unblock issues with procurement/legal/security? (Has authority)
- Drive adoption with end users? (Has influence)
- Escalate when things stall? (Has executive access)
If you can't name a specific person for each, you don't have a project owner. You have a signed contract with nobody driving it.
How to Fix It:
During sales → CS handoff (before customer kickoff):
Sales rep must identify:
- Primary project owner (name, not role)
- Their capacity (dedicated or side project?)
- Their authority (can they unblock?)
- Their motivation (what's in it for them?)
If there's no clear owner:
Don't start onboarding yet. Have sales introduce you to economic buyer:
"Before we kick off implementation, we want to make sure we have the right project owner on your side. In our experience, implementations succeed when someone owns driving this forward week-to-week. Who on your team should we partner with?"
Common Mistake:
Assuming someone will own it. Ask explicitly. If they can't name someone, the deal is at risk.
2. The Adoption Cliff (Week 12 Problem)
The Pattern:
Go-live happens Week 6. Usage spikes. You celebrate.
Week 8: Usage plateaus. Week 10: Usage declining. Week 12: Usage down 50% from peak.
Why This Happens:
You treated go-live as the finish line. Go-live is the starting line.
What Drives Sustained Adoption:
Not: Feature completeness, technical integration, training sessions
Yes: Ongoing value demonstration, user success stories, expanding use cases
Framework: Adoption Stages Beyond Go-Live
Week 1-6 (Implementation): Get it working
- Measure: % of technical setup complete
- Owner: Technical lead
Week 6-12 (Initial Adoption): Get people using it
- Measure: # active users, frequency of use
- Owner: Enablement / DevRel
Week 12-26 (Sustained Adoption): Prove ongoing value
- Measure: Use case expansion, team spread
- Owner: Customer success
Week 26+ (Expansion): Grow within account
- Measure: New teams, new use cases, upgrade triggers
- Owner: Account executive + CS
The Handoff That Most Teams Miss:
Week 6 (go-live) → Week 12 (sustained adoption)
Most CS teams celebrate go-live and move to next customer. This is when churn seeds get planted.
What to Do Week 6-12:
Week 7: First value report "Here's what your team accomplished in the first week: [specific metric]. Here's what good looks like at Week 12: [target]."
Week 9: User success story "[User name] on [team name] saved [X hours/reduced Y errors] this week. Here's how they're using it."
Week 11: Use case expansion conversation "You're using us for [primary use case]. Teams like yours also use us for [adjacent use case]. Want to explore?"
Common Mistake:
Measuring "go-live completion" instead of "sustained active usage." Go-live is not success. Week 26 retained adoption is success.
3. Pre-Onboarding: Success Is Built Before First Customer Call
The Pattern:
Most onboarding failures trace back to pre-kickoff gaps.
What Gets Missed:
Sales didn't brief CS properly:
- Deal drivers unknown
- Stakeholder dynamics unclear
- Technical requirements assumed
No internal project owner identified:
- CS reaches out, nobody responds
- Meetings get scheduled with wrong people
- Decisions don't stick
Customer timeline unrealistic:
- They want go-live in 2 weeks
- Technical setup takes 6 weeks minimum
- Expectations misaligned from Day 1
Framework: Pre-Kickoff Checklist
Before scheduling kickoff call, validate:
Account Intelligence:
- Sales handoff completed (deal drivers, stakeholders, technical requirements)
- Past interactions reviewed (demo notes, proposal, emails)
- Organizational structure mapped (team sizes, reporting lines)
- Use cases documented (primary + future)
Internal Setup:
- Internal Slack channel created (#account-[customer-name])
- Account plan updated in CRM
- Project plan template prepared
- Roles assigned (CSM lead, technical lead, exec sponsor)
Customer Readiness:
- Project owner identified by name (not just "their DevRel team")
- Executive sponsor confirmed on both sides
- Timeline realistic (their goals vs your typical timeline)
- Known blockers documented (procurement, security, legal)
Timeline Validation:
- Customer's go-live date is realistic given technical requirements
- Internal capacity available (not overbooked)
- Dependencies identified (SSO, integrations, data migration)
Decision Criteria:
Only schedule kickoff when all four sections validated. If gaps exist, surface to sales or executive sponsor before engaging customer.
Common Mistake:
Starting onboarding without internal clarity. This creates confusion, missed deadlines, and erosion of customer confidence.
4. The Four-Phase Onboarding Flow
Phase 1: Kickoff (Week 1)
Goal: Align on objectives, timeline, success metrics
Attendees: Executive sponsors + project leads + technical leads
Agenda:
- Introductions and roles (5 min)
- Executive alignment on strategic objectives (5 min)
- Success definition: "What does success look like in 3/6/12 months?" (10 min)
- Timeline and milestones (5 min)
- Meeting cadence (weekly project team, monthly exec review) (5 min)
- Next steps (technical discovery call, success plan review) (5 min)
Deliverable: Kickoff recap sent within 24 hours with success metrics, timeline, next meetings
Phase 2: Discovery & Planning (Week 2-3)
Goal: Understand technical landscape, map use cases, plan rollout
Three parallel workstreams:
Workstream 1: Technical Discovery
- Current infrastructure (on-prem, cloud, hybrid)
- Existing tools and integrations
- Security/compliance requirements
- Timeline constraints
Workstream 2: Success Planning
- Use cases prioritized (start with highest-value)
- Success metrics defined (how to measure adoption)
- Training needs identified (who needs what)
Workstream 3: Technical Setup
- SSO/identity configuration
- Integrations required
- Data migration (if applicable)
- Pilot group identified
Deliverable: Customer Success Plan document with use cases, metrics, timeline, milestones
Phase 3: Implementation (Week 4-6)
Goal: Deploy to pilot group, validate use cases, prepare for broader rollout
Three parallel tracks:
Track 1: Administration & Setup
- SSO configuration complete
- Integrations live
- Data migrated (if applicable)
Track 2: User Enablement
- Training sessions for pilot group
- Documentation shared
- Office hours scheduled
Track 3: Pilot & Feedback
- Pilot group using product
- Feedback collected weekly
- Issues triaged and resolved
Deliverable: Go-live readiness checklist completed, pilot group validated
Phase 4: Go-Live & Ongoing Success (Week 6+)
Goal: Roll out broadly, sustain adoption, expand use cases
Week 6-8 (Rollout):
- Broader rollout to all teams
- Training sessions scheduled
- Support available (Slack, email, office hours)
Week 8-12 (Value Demonstration):
- First value report (Week 7)
- User success stories shared (Week 9)
- Use case expansion conversation (Week 11)
Week 12-26 (Sustained Adoption):
- Monthly business reviews
- Adoption tracking (active users, frequency, use cases)
- Expansion opportunities identified
Common Mistake:
Treating go-live as completion. Phase 4 is where retention is won or lost.
5. The Parallel Tracks Anti-Pattern
The Pattern:
Most onboarding teams run workstreams sequentially:
- Technical setup (Weeks 1-2)
- Then training (Weeks 3-4)
- Then pilot (Weeks 5-6)
Total time: 6 weeks
What Works Better: Parallel Tracks
Run technical setup, training, and pilot simultaneously:
- Week 1: Technical discovery + identify pilot group + schedule training
- Week 2: SSO config + pilot group training + pilot starts
- Week 3: Integrations + broader training + pilot feedback
Total time: 3 weeks
Why Parallel Works:
- Shortens time-to-value
- Keeps customer engaged (something happening every week)
- Identifies blockers early (pilot group surfaces issues before broad rollout)
How to Execute:
Assign clear owners to each track:
- Track 1 (Admin): Technical lead
- Track 2 (Enablement): Training/DevRel lead
- Track 3 (Pilot): CSM + pilot group champion
Weekly sync across tracks to surface dependencies and blockers.
Common Mistake:
Waiting for "perfect technical setup" before starting pilot. Get pilot group using it early, even if setup isn't perfect. Their feedback makes the broad rollout better.
Decision Trees
Should I Start Customer Onboarding?
Has sales identified a project owner by name?
├─ No → Get project owner identified before kickoff
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Is their timeline realistic given typical deployment?
├─ No → Reset expectations before kickoff
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Do you have internal capacity?
├─ No → Delay kickoff or get more resources
└─ Yes → Proceed to kickoff
Is This Onboarding At Risk?
Is customer responding to meeting invites?
├─ No → Week 4 ghosting, escalate to exec sponsor
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Are they completing their action items?
├─ No → No project owner, identify who drives this
└─ Yes → Continue...
│
Is pilot group using the product?
├─ No → Pilot group wrong or product not solving pain
└─ Yes → On track
Is Adoption Sustained Post-Go-Live?
Are active users growing Week 6 → Week 12?
├─ Yes → Healthy adoption
└─ No → Continue...
│
Are active users declining?
├─ Yes → Adoption cliff, intervene immediately
└─ No (plateau) → At risk, start value demonstration
Common Mistakes
1. Starting customer onboarding before internal alignment
- Wastes first 2-3 weeks, creates confusion, kills credibility
2. Not identifying real project owner upfront
- Discovers it Week 4, has to restart or deal stalls
3. Overcommitting on timeline without technical requirements
- Discovers blockers mid-implementation, misses deadline
4. No internal communication hub
- Decisions don't propagate across teams, rework happens
5. Treating go-live as project complete
- Adoption cliff at Week 12, account at risk
6. Sequential tracks instead of parallel
- Implementation takes twice as long, customer loses momentum
7. No ongoing metrics post go-live
- Discovers adoption issues too late to save account
Quick Reference
Pre-Kickoff Validation:
- Sales handoff complete (deal drivers, stakeholders, requirements)
- Project owner identified by name on customer side
- Timeline realistic (their goals vs typical deployment)
- Internal roles assigned (CSM, technical, exec sponsor)
Kickoff Agenda (30-45 min):
- Introductions (5 min)
- Executive alignment (5 min)
- Success definition (10 min)
- Timeline and milestones (5 min)
- Meeting cadence (5 min)
- Next steps (5 min)
Adoption Tracking (Week 6-26):
- Week 7: First value report
- Week 9: User success story
- Week 11: Use case expansion conversation
- Week 13: First monthly business review
- Week 26: Expansion readiness assessment
Four Phases:
- Kickoff (Week 1): Align
- Discovery (Week 2-3): Plan
- Implementation (Week 4-6): Deploy to pilot
- Go-Live & Sustained (Week 6+): Rollout, value demonstration, expansion
Red Flags:
- Customer not responding Week 4 → No project owner
- Pilot group not using product Week 5 → Wrong group or wrong use case
- Active users declining Week 8-12 → Adoption cliff forming
Related Skills
- enterprise-account-planning: Pre-sale deal planning and stakeholder mapping
- operating-cadence: Onboarding review cadence and health metrics
- product-led-growth: Self-serve onboarding patterns
Based on enterprise onboarding across multiple platform companies — designing partner onboarding directly and collaborating closely with CS on customer onboarding. Not theory — lessons from seeing Week 4 ghosting happen repeatedly and learning that go-live ≠ success, and understanding the adoption cliff that kills 30% of deals in first year.
How to use gtm-enterprise-onboarding on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add gtm-enterprise-onboarding
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches gtm-enterprise-onboarding from GitHub repository github/awesome-copilot and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate gtm-enterprise-onboarding. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /gtm-enterprise-onboarding) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★64 reviews- ★★★★★Amina Smith· Dec 28, 2024
gtm-enterprise-onboarding is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Aanya Khan· Dec 20, 2024
Useful defaults in gtm-enterprise-onboarding — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ganesh Mohane· Dec 16, 2024
gtm-enterprise-onboarding fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Yuki Abbas· Dec 16, 2024
gtm-enterprise-onboarding fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Haddad· Dec 12, 2024
We added gtm-enterprise-onboarding from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Amina Rahman· Nov 19, 2024
gtm-enterprise-onboarding fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Aanya Martinez· Nov 11, 2024
gtm-enterprise-onboarding has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 7, 2024
gtm-enterprise-onboarding is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Nia Anderson· Nov 7, 2024
gtm-enterprise-onboarding is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Maya Wang· Nov 3, 2024
Keeps context tight: gtm-enterprise-onboarding is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
showing 1-10 of 64