Archives completed change proposals and merges their spec deltas into the living specification documentation.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionopenspec-archivingExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches openspec-archiving from forztf/open-skilled-sdd and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate openspec-archiving. Access via /openspec-archiving in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
7
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
7
stars
Archives completed change proposals and merges their spec deltas into the living specification documentation.
Archiving involves two main operations:
Critical rule: Verify all tasks are complete before archiving. Archiving signifies deployment and completion.
Copy this checklist and track progress:
Archive Progress:
- [ ] Step 1: Verify implementation is complete
- [ ] Step 2: Review spec deltas to merge
- [ ] Step 3: Create timestamped archive directory
- [ ] Step 4: Merge ADDED requirements into living specs
- [ ] Step 5: Merge MODIFIED requirements into living specs
- [ ] Step 6: Merge REMOVED requirements into living specs
- [ ] Step 7: Move change folder to archive
- [ ] Step 8: Validate living spec structure
Before archiving, confirm all work is done:
# Check for IMPLEMENTED marker
test -f spec/changes/{change-id}/IMPLEMENTED && echo "✓ Implemented" || echo "✗ Not implemented"
# Review tasks
cat spec/changes/{change-id}/tasks.md
# Check git status for uncommitted work
git status
Ask the user:
Are all tasks complete and tested?
Has this change been deployed to production?
Should I proceed with archiving?
Understand what will be merged:
# List all spec delta files
find spec/changes/{change-id}/specs -name "*.md" -type f
# Read each delta
for file in spec/changes/{change-id}/specs/**/*.md; do
echo "=== $file ==="
cat "$file"
done
Identify:
# Create archive with today's date
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
mkdir -p spec/archive/${TIMESTAMP}-{change-id}
Example:
# For change "add-user-auth" archived on Oct 26, 2025
mkdir -p spec/archive/2025-10-26-add-user-auth
For each ## ADDED Requirements section:
Process:
Example:
Source (spec/changes/add-user-auth/specs/authentication/spec-delta.md):
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: User Login
WHEN a user submits valid credentials,
the system SHALL authenticate the user and create a session.
#### Scenario: Successful Login
GIVEN valid credentials
WHEN user submits login form
THEN system creates session
Target (spec/specs/authentication/spec.md):
# Append to living spec
cat >> spec/specs/authentication/spec.md << 'EOF'
### Requirement: User Login
WHEN a user submits valid credentials,
the system SHALL authenticate the user and create a session.
#### Scenario: Successful Login
GIVEN valid credentials
WHEN user submits login form
THEN system creates session
EOF
For each ## MODIFIED Requirements section:
Process:
Example using sed:
# Find and replace requirement block
# This is conceptual - actual implementation depends on structure
# First, identify the line range of the old requirement
START_LINE=$(grep -n "### Requirement: User Login" spec/specs/authentication/spec.md | cut -d: -f1)
# Find the end (next requirement or end of file)
END_LINE=$(tail -n +$((START_LINE + 1)) spec/specs/authentication/spec.md | \
grep -n "^### Requirement:" | head -1 | cut -d: -f1)
# Delete old requirement
sed -i "${START_LINE},${END_LINE}d" spec/specs/authentication/spec.md
# Insert new requirement at same position
# (Extract from delta and insert)
Manual approach (recommended for safety):
1. Open living spec in editor
2. Find the requirement by name
3. Delete entire block (requirement + all scenarios)
4. Paste updated requirement from delta
5. Save
For each ## REMOVED Requirements section:
Process:
Example:
# Option 1: Delete with comment
# Manually edit spec/specs/authentication/spec.md
# Add deprecation comment
echo "<!-- Requirement 'Legacy Password Reset' removed $(date +%Y-%m-%d) -->" >> spec/specs/authentication/spec.md
# Delete the requirement block manually or with sed
Pattern:
<!-- Removed 2025-10-26: User must use email-based password reset -->
~~### Requirement: SMS Password Reset~~
After all deltas are merged:
# Move entire change folder to archive
mv spec/changes/{change-id} spec/archive/${TIMESTAMP}-{change-id}
Verify move succeeded:
# Check archive exists
ls -la spec/archive/${TIMESTAMP}-{change-id}
# Check changes directory is clean
ls spec/changes/ | grep "{change-id}" # Should return nothing
After merging, validate the living specs are well-formed:
# Check requirement format
grep -n "### Requirement:" spec/specs/**/*.md
# Check scenario format
grep -n "#### Scenario:" spec/specs/**/*.md
# Count requirements per spec
for spec in spec/specs/**/spec.md; do
count=$(grep -c "### Requirement:" "$spec")
echo "$spec: $count requirements"
done
Manual review:
Action: Append to living spec
Location: End of file (before any footer/appendix)
Format: Copy requirement + all scenarios exactly as written
Action: Replace existing requirement
Location: Find by requirement name, replace entire block
Format: Use complete updated text from delta (don't merge, replace)
Note: Old version is preserved in archive
Action: Delete requirement, add deprecation comment
Location: Find by requirement name
Format: Delete entire block, optionally add <!-- Removed YYYY-MM-DD: reason -->
Action: Update requirement name, keep content
Location: Find by old name, update to new name
Format: Just change the header: ### Requirement: NewName
Note: Typically use MODIFIED instead
Always verify delta merges before moving to archive:
# After merging, check diff
git diff spec/specs/
# Review changes
git diff spec/specs/authentication/spec.md
# If correct, commit
git add spec/specs/
git commit -m "Merge spec deltas from add-user-auth"
# Then archive
mv spec/changes/add-user-auth spec/archive/2025-10-26-add-user-auth
Archive entire changes, not individual files:
Good:
# Move complete change folder
mv spec/changes/add-user-auth spec/archive/2025-10-26-add-user-auth
Bad:
# Don't cherry-pick files
mv spec/changes/add-user-auth/proposal.md spec/archive/
# (leaves orphaned files)
The archive is a historical record. Never modify archived files:
❌ Don't: Edit files in spec/archive/
✓ Do: Treat archive as read-only history
Recommended commit workflow:
# Commit 1: Merge deltas
git add spec/specs/
git commit -m "Merge spec deltas from add-user-auth
- Added User Login requirement
- Modified Password Policy requirement
- Removed Legacy Auth requirement"
# Commit 2: Archive change
git add spec/archive/ spec/changes/
git commit -m "Archive add-user-auth change"
For complex deltas: See reference/MERGE_LOGIC.md
Conflict resolution: If multiple changes modif
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
openspec-archiving is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
We added openspec-archiving from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Useful defaults in openspec-archiving — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
openspec-archiving has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
openspec-archiving fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: openspec-archiving is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: openspec-archiving is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
openspec-archiving reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
Keeps context tight: openspec-archiving is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
Registry listing for openspec-archiving matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
showing 1-10 of 62