vulnerability-scanner

Think like an attacker, defend like an expert. 2025 threat landscape awareness.

davila7/claude-code-templatesUpdated Apr 8, 2026

Works with

Claude CodeCursorClineWindsurfCodexGooseGitHub CopilotZed

0

total installs

0

this week

24.2K

GitHub stars

0

upvotes

Install Skill

Run in your terminal

$npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill vulnerability-scanner

0

installs

0

this week

24.2K

stars

Installation Guide

How to use vulnerability-scanner on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your machine
  • Node.js 16+ with npm — verify with node --version
  • Active project directory where you want to add vulnerability-scanner
2

Run the install command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill vulnerability-scanner

Fetches vulnerability-scanner from davila7/claude-code-templates and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ────────────────
│ · Cline · Codex · Goose · Windsurf
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ · Cursor · Aider · Continue
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/vulnerability-scanner

Restart Cursor to activate vulnerability-scanner. Access via /vulnerability-scanner in your agent's command palette.

Security Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.

Documentation

Vulnerability Scanner

Think like an attacker, defend like an expert. 2025 threat landscape awareness.

🔧 Runtime Scripts

Execute for automated validation:

Script Purpose Usage
scripts/security_scan.py Validate security principles applied python scripts/security_scan.py <project_path>

📋 Reference Files

File Purpose
checklists.md OWASP Top 10, Auth, API, Data protection checklists

1. Security Expert Mindset

Core Principles

Principle Application
Assume Breach Design as if attacker already inside
Zero Trust Never trust, always verify
Defense in Depth Multiple layers, no single point
Least Privilege Minimum required access only
Fail Secure On error, deny access

Threat Modeling Questions

Before scanning, ask:

  1. What are we protecting? (Assets)
  2. Who would attack? (Threat actors)
  3. How would they attack? (Attack vectors)
  4. What's the impact? (Business risk)

2. OWASP Top 10:2025

Risk Categories

Rank Category Think About
A01 Broken Access Control Who can access what? IDOR, SSRF
A02 Security Misconfiguration Defaults, headers, exposed services
A03 Software Supply Chain 🆕 Dependencies, CI/CD, build integrity
A04 Cryptographic Failures Weak crypto, exposed secrets
A05 Injection User input → system commands
A06 Insecure Design Flawed architecture
A07 Authentication Failures Session, credential management
A08 Integrity Failures Unsigned updates, tampered data
A09 Logging & Alerting Blind spots, no monitoring
A10 Exceptional Conditions 🆕 Error handling, fail-open states

2025 Key Changes

2021 → 2025 Shifts:
├── SSRF merged into A01 (Access Control)
├── A02 elevated (Cloud/Container configs)
├── A03 NEW: Supply Chain (major focus)
├── A10 NEW: Exceptional Conditions
└── Focus shift: Root causes > Symptoms

3. Supply Chain Security (A03)

Attack Surface

Vector Risk Question to Ask
Dependencies Malicious packages Do we audit new deps?
Lock files Integrity attacks Are they committed?
Build pipeline CI/CD compromise Who can modify?
Registry Typosquatting Verified sources?

Defense Principles

  • Verify package integrity (checksums)
  • Pin versions, audit updates
  • Use private registries for critical deps
  • Sign and verify artifacts

4. Attack Surface Mapping

What to Map

Category Elements
Entry Points APIs, forms, file uploads
Data Flows Input → Process → Output
Trust Boundaries Where auth/authz checked
Assets Secrets, PII, business data

Prioritization Matrix

Risk = Likelihood × Impact

High Impact + High Likelihood → CRITICAL
High Impact + Low Likelihood  → HIGH
Low Impact + High Likelihood  → MEDIUM
Low Impact + Low Likelihood   → LOW

5. Risk Prioritization

CVSS + Context

Factor Weight Question
CVSS Score Base severity How severe is the vuln?
EPSS Score Exploit likelihood Is it being exploited?
Asset Value Business context What's at risk?
Exposure Attack surface Internet-facing?

Prioritization Decision Tree

Is it actively exploited (EPSS >0.5)?
├── YES → CRITICAL: Immediate action
└── NO → Check CVSS
         ├── CVSS ≥9.0 → HIGH
         ├── CVSS 7.0-8.9 → Consider asset value
         └── CVSS <7.0 → Schedule for later

6. Exceptional Conditions (A10 - New)

Fail-Open vs Fail-Closed

Scenario Fail-Open (BAD) Fail-Closed (GOOD)
Auth error Allow access Deny access
Parsing fails Accept input Reject input
Timeout Retry forever Limit + abort

What to Check

  • Exception handlers that catch-all and ignore
  • Missing error handling on security operations
  • Race conditions in auth/authz
  • Resource exhaustion scenarios

7. Scanning Methodology

Phase-Based Approach

1. RECONNAISSANCE
   └── Understand the target
       ├── Technology stack
       ├── Entry points
       └── Data flows

2. DISCOVERY
   └── Identify potential issues
       ├── Configuration review
       ├── Dependency analysis
       └── Code pattern search

3. ANALYSIS
   └── Validate and prioritize
       ├── False positive elimination
       ├── Risk scoring
       └── Attack chain mapping

4. REPORTING
   └── Actionable findings
       ├── Clear reproduction steps
       ├── Business impact
       └── Remediation guidance

8. Code Pattern Analysis

High-Risk Patterns

Pattern Risk Look For
String concat in queries Injection "SELECT * FROM " + user_input
Dynamic code execution RCE eval(), exec(), Function()
Unsafe deserialization RCE pickle.loads(), unserialize()
Path manipulation Traversal User input in file paths
Disabled security Various verify=False, --insecure

Secret Patterns

Type Indicators
API Keys api_key, apikey, high entropy
Tokens token, bearer, jwt
Credentials password, secret, key
Cloud AWS_, AZURE_, GCP_ prefixes

9. Cloud Security Considerations

Shared Responsibility

Layer You Own Provider Owns
Data
Application
OS/Runtime Depends Depends
Infrastructure

Cloud-Specific Checks

  • IAM: Least privilege applied?
  • Storage: Public buckets?
  • Network: Security groups tightened?
  • Secrets: Using secrets manager?

10. Anti-Patterns

❌ Don't ✅ Do
Scan without understanding Map attack surface first
Alert on every CVE Prioritize by exploitability + asset
Ignore false positives Maintain verified baseline
Fix symptoms only Address root causes
Scan once before deploy Continuous scanning
Trust third-party deps blindly Verify integrity, audit code

11. Reporting Principles

Finding Structure

Each finding should answer:

  1. What? - Clear vulnerability description
  2. Where? - Exact location (file, line, endpoint)
  3. Why? - Root cause explanation
  4. Impact? - Business consequence
  5. How to fix? - Specific remediation

Severity Classification

Severity Criteria
Critical RCE, auth bypass, mass data exposure
High Data exposure, privilege escalation
Medium Limited scope, requires conditions
Low Informational, best practice

Remember: Vulnerability scanning finds issues. Expert thinking prioritizes what matters. Always ask: "What would an attacker do with this?"

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

Get started →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Steps

  1. 1Install product management skill
  2. 2Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use when

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid when

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Related Skills

Reviews

4.563 reviews
  • R
    Ren TandonDec 24, 2024

    vulnerability-scanner is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • R
    Ren KhannaDec 20, 2024

    Registry listing for vulnerability-scanner matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • N
    Noah JohnsonDec 16, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: vulnerability-scanner is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • S
    Sophia WangDec 12, 2024

    vulnerability-scanner has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • A
    Ava ChenDec 4, 2024

    vulnerability-scanner reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • S
    Sofia ReddyNov 27, 2024

    vulnerability-scanner reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • L
    Lucas AgarwalNov 15, 2024

    Useful defaults in vulnerability-scanner — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • V
    Valentina RahmanNov 7, 2024

    We added vulnerability-scanner from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • C
    Charlotte RamirezNov 3, 2024

    vulnerability-scanner fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • V
    Valentina TorresOct 26, 2024

    vulnerability-scanner fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

showing 1-10 of 63

1 / 7

Discussion

Comments — not star reviews
  • No comments yet — start the thread.