github-triage▌
code-yeongyu/oh-my-opencode · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Read-only GitHub issue and PR analyzer that spawns parallel background tasks for evidence-backed triage reports.
- ›Fetches all open issues and PRs, classifies each by type (bug, feature, question, etc.), and spawns one quick background subagent per item for parallel analysis
- ›Every factual claim in reports requires a GitHub permalink to specific code lines or commits; unverifiable statements are marked [UNVERIFIED] and carry no weight
- ›Generates individual markdown reports to /tmp/{datet
GitHub Triage - Read-Only Analyzer
Architecture
1 ISSUE/PR = 1 task_create = 1 quick SUBAGENT (background). NO EXCEPTIONS.
| Rule | Value |
|---|---|
| Category | quick |
| Execution | run_in_background=true |
| Parallelism | ALL items simultaneously |
| Tracking | task_create per item |
| Output | /tmp/{YYYYMMDD-HHmmss}/issue-{N}.md or pr-{N}.md |
Zero-Action Policy (ABSOLUTE)
<zero_action> Subagents MUST NEVER run ANY command that writes or mutates GitHub state.
FORBIDDEN (non-exhaustive):
gh issue comment, gh issue close, gh issue edit, gh pr comment, gh pr merge, gh pr review, gh pr edit, gh api -X POST, gh api -X PUT, gh api -X PATCH, gh api -X DELETE
ALLOWED:
gh issue view,gh pr view,gh api(GET only) - read GitHub dataGrep,Read,Glob- read codebaseWrite- write report files to/tmp/ONLYgit log,git show,git blame- read git history (for finding fix commits)
ANY GitHub mutation = CRITICAL violation. </zero_action>
Evidence Rule (MANDATORY)
A permalink is a URL pointing to a specific line/range in a specific commit, e.g.:
https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/blob/{commit_sha}/{path}#L{start}-L{end}
How to generate permalinks
- Find the relevant file and line(s) via Grep/Read.
- Get the current commit SHA:
git rev-parse HEAD - Construct:
https://github.com/{REPO}/blob/{SHA}/{filepath}#L{line}(or#L{start}-L{end}for ranges)
Rules
- No permalink = no claim. If you cannot back a statement with a permalink, state "No evidence found" instead.
- Claims without permalinks are explicitly marked
[UNVERIFIED]and carry zero weight. - Permalinks to
main/master/devbranches are NOT acceptable - use commit SHAs only. - For bug analysis: permalink to the problematic code. For fix verification: permalink to the fixing commit diff.
Phase 0: Setup
REPO=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner)
REPORT_DIR="/tmp/$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)"
mkdir -p "$REPORT_DIR"
COMMIT_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
Pass REPO, REPORT_DIR, and COMMIT_SHA to every subagent.
Phase 1: Fetch All Open Items (CORRECTED)
IMPORTANT: body and comments fields may contain control characters that break jq parsing. Fetch basic metadata first, then fetch full details per-item in subagents.
# Step 1: Fetch basic metadata (without body/comments to avoid JSON parsing issues)
ISSUES_LIST=$(gh issue list --repo $REPO --state open --limit 500 \
--json number,title,labels,author,createdAt)
ISSUE_COUNT=$(echo "$ISSUES_LIST" | jq length)
# Paginate if needed
if [ "$ISSUE_COUNT" -eq 500 ]; then
LAST_DATE=$(echo "$ISSUES_LIST" | jq -r '.[-1].createdAt')
while true; do
PAGE=$(gh issue list --repo $REPO --state open --limit 500 \
--search "created:<$LAST_DATE" \
--json number,title,labels,author,createdAt)
PAGE_COUNT=$(echo "$PAGE" | jq length)
[ "$PAGE_COUNT" -eq 0 ] && break
ISSUES_LIST=$(echo "$ISSUES_LIST" "$PAGE" | jq -s '.[0] + .[1] | unique_by(.number)')
ISSUE_COUNT=$(echo "$ISSUES_LIST" | jq length)
[ "$PAGE_COUNT" -lt 500 ] && break
LAST_DATE=$(echo "$PAGE" | jq -r '.[-1].createdAt')
done
fi
# Same for PRs
PRS_LIST=$(gh pr list --repo $REPO --state open --limit 500 \
--json number,title,labels,author,headRefName,baseRefName,isDraft,createdAt)
PR_COUNT=$(echo "$PRS_LIST" | jq length)
if [ "$PR_COUNT" -eq 500 ]; then
LAST_DATE=$(echo "$PRS_LIST" | jq -r '.[-1].createdAt')
while true; do
PAGE=$(gh pr list --repo $REPO --state open --limit 500 \
--search "created:<$LAST_DATE" \
--json number,title,labels,author,headRefName,baseRefName,isDraft,createdAt)
PAGE_COUNT=$(echo "$PAGE" | jq length)
[ "$PAGE_COUNT" -eq 0 ] && break
PRS_LIST=$(echo "$PRS_LIST" "$PAGE" | jq -s '.[0] + .[1] | unique_by(.number)')
PR_COUNT=$(echo "$PRS_LIST" | jq length)
[ "$PAGE_COUNT" -lt 500 ] && break
LAST_DATE=$(echo "$PAGE" | jq -r '.[-1].createdAt')
done
fi
echo "Total issues: $ISSUE_COUNT, Total PRs: $PR_COUNT"
LARGE REPOSITORY HANDLING: If total items exceeds 50, you MUST process ALL items. Use the pagination code above to fetch every single open issue and PR. DO NOT sample or limit to 50 items - process the entire backlog.
Example: If there are 500 open issues, spawn 500 subagents. If there are 1000 open PRs, spawn 1000 subagents.
Note: Background task system will queue excess tasks automatically.
Phase 2: Classify
| Type | Detection |
|---|---|
ISSUE_QUESTION |
[Question], [Discussion], ?, "how to" / "why does" / "is it possible" |
ISSUE_BUG |
[Bug], Bug:, error messages, stack traces, unexpected behavior |
ISSUE_FEATURE |
[Feature], [RFE], [Enhancement], Feature Request, Proposal |
ISSUE_OTHER |
Anything else |
PR_BUGFIX |
Title starts with fix, branch contains fix//bugfix/, label bug |
PR_OTHER |
Everything else |
Phase 3: Spawn Subagents (Individual Tool Calls)
CRITICAL: Create tasks ONE BY ONE using individual task_create tool calls. NEVER batch or script.
For each item, execute these steps sequentially:
Step 3.1: Create Task Record
task_create(
subject="Triage: #{number} {title}",
description="GitHub {issue|PR} triage analysis - {type}",
metadata={"type": "{ISSUE_QUESTION|ISSUE_BUG|ISSUE_FEATURE|ISSUE_OTHER|PR_BUGFIX|PR_OTHER}", "number": {number}}
)
Step 3.2: Spawn Analysis Subagent (Background)
task(
category="quick",
run_in_background=true,
load_skills=[],
prompt=SUBAGENT_PROMPT
)
ABSOLUTE RULES for Subagents:
- ONLY ANALYZE - Never take action on GitHub (no comments, merges, closes)
- READ-ONLY - Use tools only for reading code/GitHub data
- WRITE REPORT ONLY - Output goes to
{REPORT_DIR}/{issue|pr}-{number}.mdvia Write tool - EVIDENCE REQUIRED - Every claim must have GitHub permalink as proof
For each item:
1. task_create(subject="Triage: #{number} {title}")
2. task(category="quick", run_in_background=true, load_skills=[], prompt=SUBAGENT_PROMPT)
3. Store mapping: item_number -> { task_id, background_task_id }
Subagent Prompts
Common Preamble (include in ALL subagent prompts)
CONTEXT:
- Repository: {REPO}
- Report directory: {REPORT_DIR}
- Current commit SHA: {COMMIT_SHA}
PERMALINK FORMAT:
Every factual claim MUST include a permalink: https://github.com/{REPO}/blob/{COMMIT_SHA}/{filepath}#L{start}-L{end}
No permalink = no claim. Mark unverifiable claims as [UNVERIFIED].
To get current SHA if needed: git rev-parse HEAD
ABSOLUTE RULES (violating ANY = critical failure):
- NEVER run gh issue comment, gh issue close, gh issue edit
- NEVER run gh pr comment, gh pr merge, gh pr review, gh pr edit
- NEVER run any gh command with -X POST, -X PUT, -X PATCH, -X DELETE
- NEVER run git checkout, git fetch, git pull, git switch, git worktree
- Your ONLY writable output: {REPORT_DIR}/{issue|pr}-{number}.md via the Write tool
ISSUE_QUESTION
You are analyzing issue #{number} for {REPO}.
ITEM:
How to use github-triage on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add github-triage
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches github-triage from GitHub repository code-yeongyu/oh-my-opencode and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate github-triage. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /github-triage) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★70 reviews- ★★★★★Mei Kim· Dec 28, 2024
github-triage is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Mei Shah· Dec 24, 2024
github-triage reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Luis Dixit· Dec 4, 2024
github-triage fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Neel Tandon· Dec 4, 2024
github-triage has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Rahul Santra· Nov 23, 2024
Useful defaults in github-triage — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ava Brown· Nov 23, 2024
I recommend github-triage for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Carlos Mensah· Nov 23, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: github-triage is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Hassan White· Nov 19, 2024
Keeps context tight: github-triage is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Ishan Thomas· Nov 19, 2024
Registry listing for github-triage matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Nia Robinson· Nov 15, 2024
We added github-triage from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 70