axiom-haptics

charleswiltgen/axiom · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/charleswiltgen/axiom --skill axiom-haptics
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Comprehensive guide to implementing haptic feedback on iOS. Every Apple Design Award winner uses excellent haptic feedback - Camera, Maps, Weather all use haptics masterfully to create delightful, responsive experiences.

skill.md

Haptics & Audio Feedback

Comprehensive guide to implementing haptic feedback on iOS. Every Apple Design Award winner uses excellent haptic feedback - Camera, Maps, Weather all use haptics masterfully to create delightful, responsive experiences.

Overview

Haptic feedback provides tactile confirmation of user actions and system events. When designed thoughtfully using the Causality-Harmony-Utility framework, axiom-haptics transform interfaces from functional to delightful.

This skill covers both simple haptics (UIFeedbackGenerator) and advanced custom patterns (Core Haptics), with real-world examples and audio-haptic synchronization techniques.

When to Use This Skill

  • Adding haptic feedback to user interactions
  • Choosing between UIFeedbackGenerator and Core Haptics
  • Designing audio-haptic experiences that feel unified
  • Creating custom haptic patterns with AHAP files
  • Synchronizing haptics with animations and audio
  • Debugging haptic issues (simulator vs device)
  • Optimizing haptic performance and battery impact

System Requirements

  • iOS 10+ for UIFeedbackGenerator
  • iOS 13+ for Core Haptics (CHHapticEngine)
  • iPhone 8+ for Core Haptics hardware support
  • Physical device required - haptics cannot be felt in Simulator

Part 1: Design Principles (WWDC 2021/10278)

Apple's audio and haptic design teams established three core principles for multimodal feedback:

Causality - Make it obvious what caused the feedback

Problem: User can't tell what triggered the haptic Solution: Haptic timing must match the visual/interaction moment

Example from WWDC:

  • ✅ Ball hits wall → haptic fires at collision moment
  • ❌ Ball hits wall → haptic fires 100ms later (confusing)

Code pattern:

// ✅ Immediate feedback on touch
@objc func buttonTapped() {
    let generator = UIImpactFeedbackGenerator(style: .medium)
    generator.impactOccurred()  // Fire immediately
    performAction()
}

// ❌ Delayed feedback loses causality
@objc func buttonTapped() {
    performAction()
    DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 0.2) {
        let generator = UIImpactFeedbackGenerator(style: .medium)
        generator.impactOccurred()  // Too late!
    }
}

Harmony - Senses work best when coherent

Problem: Visual, audio, and haptic don't match Solution: All three senses should feel like a unified experience

Example from WWDC:

  • Small ball → light haptic + high-pitched sound
  • Large ball → heavy haptic + low-pitched sound
  • Shield transformation → continuous haptic + progressive audio

Key insight: A large object should feel heavy, sound low and resonant, and look substantial. All three senses reinforce the same experience.

Utility - Provide clear value

Problem: Haptics used everywhere "just because we can" Solution: Reserve haptics for significant moments that benefit the user

When to use haptics:

  • ✅ Confirming an important action (payment completed)
  • ✅ Alerting to critical events (low battery)
  • ✅ Providing continuous feedback (scrubbing slider)
  • ✅ Enhancing delight (app launch flourish)

When NOT to use haptics:

  • ❌ Every single tap (overwhelming)
  • ❌ Scrolling through long lists (battery drain)
  • ❌ Background events user can't see (confusing)
  • ❌ Decorative animations (no value)

Part 2: UIFeedbackGenerator (Simple Haptics)

For most apps, UIFeedbackGenerator provides 3 simple haptic types without custom patterns.

UIImpactFeedbackGenerator

Physical collision or impact sensation.

Styles (ordered light → heavy):

  • .light - Small, delicate tap
  • .medium - Standard tap (most common)
  • .heavy - Strong, solid impact
  • .rigid - Firm, precise tap
  • .soft - Gentle, cushioned tap

Usage pattern:

class MyViewController: UIViewController {
    let impactGenerator = UIImpactFeedbackGenerator(style: .medium)

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        // Prepare reduces latency for next impact
        impactGenerator.prepare()
    }

    @objc func userDidTap() {
        impactGenerator.impactOccurred()
    }
}

Intensity variation (iOS 13+):

// intensity: 0.0 (lightest) to 1.0 (strongest)
impactGenerator.impactOccurred(intensity: 0.5)

Common use cases:

  • Button taps (.medium)
  • Toggle switches (.light)
  • Deleting items (.heavy)
  • Confirming selections (.rigid)

UISelectionFeedbackGenerator

Discrete selection changes (picker wheels, segmented controls).

Usage:

class PickerViewController: UIViewController {
    let selectionGenerator = UISelectionFeedbackGenerator()

    func pickerView(_ picker: UIPickerView, didSelectRow row: Int,
                    inComponent component: Int) {
        selectionGenerator.selectionChanged()
    }
}

Feels like: Clicking a physical wheel with detents

Common use cases:

  • Picker wheels
  • Segmented controls
  • Page indicators
  • Step-through interfaces

UINotificationFeedbackGenerator

System-level success/warning/error feedback.

Types:

  • .success - Task completed successfully
  • .warning - Attention needed, but not critical
  • .error - Critical error occurred

Usage:

let notificationGenerator = UINotificationFeedbackGenerator()

func submitForm() {
    // Validate form
    if isValid {
        notificationGenerator.notificationOccurred(.success)
        saveData()
    } else {
        notificationGenerator.notificationOccurred(.error)
        showValidationErrors()
    }
}

Best practice: Match haptic type to user outcome

  • ✅ Payment succeeds → .success
  • ✅ Form validation fails → .error
  • ✅ Approaching storage limit → .warning

Performance: prepare()

Call prepare() before the haptic to reduce latency:

// ✅ Good - prepare before user action
@IBAction func buttonTouchDown(_ sender: UIButton) {
    impactGenerator.prepare()  // User's finger is down
}

@IBAction func buttonTouchUpInside(_ sender: UIButton) {
    impactGenerator.impactOccurred()  // Immediate haptic
}

// ❌ Bad - unprepared haptic may lag
@IBAction func buttonTapped(_ sender: UIButton) {
    let generator = UIImpactFeedbackGenerator()
    generator.impactOccurred()  // May have 10-20ms delay
}

Prepare timing: System keeps engine ready for ~1 second after prepare().


Part 3: Core Haptics (Custom Haptics)

For apps needing custom patterns, Core Haptics provides full control over haptic waveforms.

Four Fundamental Elements

  1. Engine (CHHapticEngine) - Link to the phone's actuator
  2. Player (CHHapticPatternPlayer) - Playback control
  3. Pattern (CHHapticPattern) - Collection of events over time
  4. Events (CHHapticEvent) - Building blocks specifying the experience

CHHapticEngine Lifecycle

import CoreHaptics

class HapticManager {
    var engine: CHHapticEngine?

    func initializeHaptics() {
        // Check device support
        guard CHHapticEngine.capabilitiesForHardware().supportsHaptics else {
            print("Device doesn't support haptics")
            return
        }

        do {
            // Create engine
            engine = try CHHapticEngine()

            // Handle interruptions (calls, Siri, etc.)
            engine?.stoppedHandler = { reason in
                print("Engine stopped: \(reason)")
                self.restartEngine()
            }

            // Handle reset (audio session changes)
            engine?.resetHandler = {
                print("Engine reset")
                self.restartEngine()
            
how to use axiom-haptics

How to use axiom-haptics on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add axiom-haptics
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/charleswiltgen/axiom --skill axiom-haptics

The skills CLI fetches axiom-haptics from GitHub repository charleswiltgen/axiom and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/axiom-haptics

Reload or restart Cursor to activate axiom-haptics. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /axiom-haptics) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.775 reviews
  • Fatima Kim· Dec 28, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-haptics is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Fatima Mensah· Dec 24, 2024

    axiom-haptics is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Kabir Thompson· Dec 20, 2024

    axiom-haptics is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 16, 2024

    axiom-haptics reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Zaid Mehta· Dec 8, 2024

    axiom-haptics fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.

  • Fatima Yang· Dec 8, 2024

    Keeps context tight: axiom-haptics is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Hiroshi Iyer· Dec 4, 2024

    I recommend axiom-haptics for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Evelyn Okafor· Dec 4, 2024

    axiom-haptics reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Dev Li· Nov 27, 2024

    Keeps context tight: axiom-haptics is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Yusuf Rahman· Nov 27, 2024

    axiom-haptics has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

showing 1-10 of 75

1 / 8