Comprehensive guide to implementing haptic feedback on iOS. Every Apple Design Award winner uses excellent haptic feedback - Camera, Maps, Weather all use haptics masterfully to create delightful, responsive experiences.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionaxiom-hapticsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches axiom-haptics from charleswiltgen/axiom and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate axiom-haptics. Access via /axiom-haptics in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
767
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
767
stars
Comprehensive guide to implementing haptic feedback on iOS. Every Apple Design Award winner uses excellent haptic feedback - Camera, Maps, Weather all use haptics masterfully to create delightful, responsive experiences.
Haptic feedback provides tactile confirmation of user actions and system events. When designed thoughtfully using the Causality-Harmony-Utility framework, axiom-haptics transform interfaces from functional to delightful.
This skill covers both simple haptics (UIFeedbackGenerator) and advanced custom patterns (Core Haptics), with real-world examples and audio-haptic synchronization techniques.
Apple's audio and haptic design teams established three core principles for multimodal feedback:
Problem: User can't tell what triggered the haptic Solution: Haptic timing must match the visual/interaction moment
Example from WWDC:
Code pattern:
// ✅ Immediate feedback on touch
@objc func buttonTapped() {
let generator = UIImpactFeedbackGenerator(style: .medium)
generator.impactOccurred() // Fire immediately
performAction()
}
// ❌ Delayed feedback loses causality
@objc func buttonTapped() {
performAction()
DispatchQueue.main.asyncAfter(deadline: .now() + 0.2) {
let generator = UIImpactFeedbackGenerator(style: .medium)
generator.impactOccurred() // Too late!
}
}
Problem: Visual, audio, and haptic don't match Solution: All three senses should feel like a unified experience
Example from WWDC:
Key insight: A large object should feel heavy, sound low and resonant, and look substantial. All three senses reinforce the same experience.
Problem: Haptics used everywhere "just because we can" Solution: Reserve haptics for significant moments that benefit the user
When to use haptics:
When NOT to use haptics:
For most apps, UIFeedbackGenerator provides 3 simple haptic types without custom patterns.
Physical collision or impact sensation.
Styles (ordered light → heavy):
.light - Small, delicate tap.medium - Standard tap (most common).heavy - Strong, solid impact.rigid - Firm, precise tap.soft - Gentle, cushioned tapUsage pattern:
class MyViewController: UIViewController {
let impactGenerator = UIImpactFeedbackGenerator(style: .medium)
override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()
// Prepare reduces latency for next impact
impactGenerator.prepare()
}
@objc func userDidTap() {
impactGenerator.impactOccurred()
}
}
Intensity variation (iOS 13+):
// intensity: 0.0 (lightest) to 1.0 (strongest)
impactGenerator.impactOccurred(intensity: 0.5)
Common use cases:
.medium).light).heavy).rigid)Discrete selection changes (picker wheels, segmented controls).
Usage:
class PickerViewController: UIViewController {
let selectionGenerator = UISelectionFeedbackGenerator()
func pickerView(_ picker: UIPickerView, didSelectRow row: Int,
inComponent component: Int) {
selectionGenerator.selectionChanged()
}
}
Feels like: Clicking a physical wheel with detents
Common use cases:
System-level success/warning/error feedback.
Types:
.success - Task completed successfully.warning - Attention needed, but not critical.error - Critical error occurredUsage:
let notificationGenerator = UINotificationFeedbackGenerator()
func submitForm() {
// Validate form
if isValid {
notificationGenerator.notificationOccurred(.success)
saveData()
} else {
notificationGenerator.notificationOccurred(.error)
showValidationErrors()
}
}
Best practice: Match haptic type to user outcome
.success.error.warningCall prepare() before the haptic to reduce latency:
// ✅ Good - prepare before user action
@IBAction func buttonTouchDown(_ sender: UIButton) {
impactGenerator.prepare() // User's finger is down
}
@IBAction func buttonTouchUpInside(_ sender: UIButton) {
impactGenerator.impactOccurred() // Immediate haptic
}
// ❌ Bad - unprepared haptic may lag
@IBAction func buttonTapped(_ sender: UIButton) {
let generator = UIImpactFeedbackGenerator()
generator.impactOccurred() // May have 10-20ms delay
}
Prepare timing: System keeps engine ready for ~1 second after prepare().
For apps needing custom patterns, Core Haptics provides full control over haptic waveforms.
CHHapticEngine) - Link to the phone's actuatorCHHapticPatternPlayer) - Playback controlCHHapticPattern) - Collection of events over timeCHHapticEvent) - Building blocks specifying the experienceimport CoreHaptics
class HapticManager {
var engine: CHHapticEngine?
func initializeHaptics() {
// Check device support
guard CHHapticEngine.capabilitiesForHardware().supportsHaptics else {
print("Device doesn't support haptics")
return
}
do {
// Create engine
engine = try CHHapticEngine()
// Handle interruptions (calls, Siri, etc.)
engine?.stoppedHandler = { reason in
print("Engine stopped: \(reason)")
self.restartEngine()
}
// Handle reset (audio session changes)
engine?.resetHandler = {
print("Engine reset")
self.restartEngine()
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
706mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
218parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
164cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
145ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
141pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categorynutritional-specialist
141ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.7★★★★★75 reviews- FFatima Kim★★★★★Dec 28, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-haptics is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- FFatima Mensah★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
axiom-haptics is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- KKabir Thompson★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
axiom-haptics is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 16, 2024
axiom-haptics reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ZZaid Mehta★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
axiom-haptics fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- FFatima Yang★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Keeps context tight: axiom-haptics is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- HHiroshi Iyer★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
I recommend axiom-haptics for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- EEvelyn Okafor★★★★★Dec 4, 2024
axiom-haptics reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- DDev Li★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Keeps context tight: axiom-haptics is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- YYusuf Rahman★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
axiom-haptics has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
showing 1-10 of 75
1 / 8Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.