Use when:
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionaxiom-foundation-modelsExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches axiom-foundation-models from charleswiltgen/axiom and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate axiom-foundation-models. Access via /axiom-foundation-models in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
767
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
767
stars
Use when:
axiom-foundation-models-diag for systematic troubleshooting (context exceeded, guardrail violations, availability problems)axiom-foundation-models-ref for complete API reference with all WWDC code examplesWhy it fails: The on-device model is 3 billion parameters, optimized for summarization, extraction, classification — NOT world knowledge or complex reasoning.
Example of wrong use:
// ❌ BAD - Asking for world knowledge
let session = LanguageModelSession()
let response = try await session.respond(to: "What's the capital of France?")
Why: Model will hallucinate or give low-quality answers. It's trained for content generation, not encyclopedic knowledge.
Correct approach: Use server LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude) for world knowledge, or provide factual data through Tool calling.
Why it fails: session.respond() is async but if called synchronously on main thread, freezes UI for seconds.
Example of wrong use:
// ❌ BAD - Blocking main thread
Button("Generate") {
let response = try await session.respond(to: prompt) // UI frozen!
}
Why: Generation takes 1-5 seconds. User sees frozen app, bad reviews follow.
Correct approach:
// ✅ GOOD - Async on background
Button("Generate") {
Task {
let response = try await session.respond(to: prompt)
// Update UI with response
}
}
Why it fails: Prompting for JSON and parsing with JSONDecoder leads to hallucinated keys, invalid JSON, no type safety.
Example of wrong use:
// ❌ BAD - Manual JSON parsing
let prompt = "Generate a person with name and age as JSON"
let response = try await session.respond(to: prompt)
let data = response.content.data(using: .utf8)!
let person = try JSONDecoder().decode(Person.self, from: data) // CRASHES!
Why: Model might output {firstName: "John"} when you expect {name: "John"}. Or invalid JSON entirely.
Correct approach:
// ✅ GOOD - @Generable guarantees structure
@Generable
struct Person {
let name: String
let age: Int
}
let response = try await session.respond(
to: "Generate a person",
generating: Person.self
)
// response.content is type-safe Person instance
Why it fails: Foundation Models only runs on Apple Intelligence devices in supported regions. App crashes or shows errors without check.
Example of wrong use:
// ❌ BAD - No availability check
let session = LanguageModelSession() // Might fail!
Correct approach:
// ✅ GOOD - Check first
switch SystemLanguageModel.default.availability {
case .available:
let session = LanguageModelSession()
// proceed
case .unavailable(let reason):
// Show graceful UI: "AI features require Apple Intelligence"
}
Why it fails: 4096 token context window (input + output). One massive prompt hits limit, gives poor results.
Example of wrong use:
// ❌ BAD - Everything in one prompt
let prompt = """
Generate a 7-day itinerary for Tokyo including hotels, restaurants,
activities for each day, transportation details, budget breakdown...
"""
// Exceeds context, poor quality
Correct approach: Break into smaller tasks, use tools for external data, multi-turn conversation.
Why it fails: Three errors MUST be handled or your app will crash in production.
do {
let response = try await session.respond(to: prompt)
} catch LanguageModelSession.GenerationError.exceededContextWindowSize {
// Multi-turn transcript grew beyond 4096 tokens
// → Condense transcript and create new session (see Pattern 5)
} catch LanguageModelSession.GenerationError.guardrailViolation {
// Content policy triggered
// → Show graceful message: "I can't help with that request"
} catch LanguageModelSession.GenerationError.unsupportedLanguageOrLocale {
// User input in unsupported language
// → Show disclaimer, check SystemLanguageModel.default.supportedLanguages
}
Before writing any Foundation Models code, complete these steps:
See "Ignoring Availability Check" in Red Flags above for the required pattern. Foundation Models requires Apple Intelligence-enabled device, supported region, and user opt-in.
Ask yourself: What is my primary goal?
| Use Case | Foundation Models? | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Summarization | ✅ YES | |
| Extraction (key info from text) | ✅ YES | |
| Classification (categorize content) | ✅ YES | |
| Content tagging | ✅ YES (built-in adapter!) | |
| World knowledge | ❌ NO | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini |
| Complex reasoning | ❌ NO | Server LLMs |
| Mathematical computation | ❌ NO | Calculator, symbolic math |
Critical: If your use case requires world knowledge or advanced reasoning, stop. Foundation Models is the wrong tool.
If you need structured output (not just plain text):
Bad approach: Prompt for "JSON" and parse manually Good approach: Define @Generable type
@Generable
struct SearchSuggestions {
@Guide(description: "Suggested search terms", .count(4))
var searchTerms: [String]
}
Why: Constrained decoding guarantees structure. No parsing errors, no hallucinated keys.
If your feature needs external information:
Don't try to get this information from the model (it will hallucinate). Do define Tool protocol implementations.
If generation takes >1 second, use streaming:
let stream = session.streamResponse(
to: prompt,
generating: Itinerary.self
)
for try await partial in stream {
// Update UI incrementally
self.itinerary = partial
}
Why: Users see progress immediately, perceived latency drops dramatically.
Need on-device AI?
│
├─ World knowledge/reasoning?
│ └─ ❌ NOT Foundation Models
│ → Use ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.
│ → Reason: 3B parameter model, not trained for encyclopedic knowledge
│
├─ Summarization?
│ └─ ✅ YES → Pattern 1 (Basic Session)
│ → Example: Summarize article, condense email
│ → Time: 10-15 minutes
│
├─ Structured extraction?
│ └─ ✅ YES → Pattern 2 (@Generable)
│ → Example: Extract name, date, amount from invoice
│ → Time: 15-20 minutes
│
├─ Content tagging?
│ └─ ✅ YES → Pattern 3 (contentTagging use case)
│ → Example: Tag article topics, extract entities
│ → Time: 10 minutes
│
├─ Need external data?
│ └─ ✅ YES → Pattern 4 (Tool calling)
│ → Example: Fetch weather, query contacts, get locations
│ → Time: 20-30 minutes
│
├─ Long generation?
│ └─ ✅ YES → Pattern 5 (Streaming)
│ → Example: Generate itinerary, create story
│ → Time: 15-20 minutes
│
└─ Dynamic schemas (runtime-defined structure)?
└─ ✅ YES → Pattern 6 (DynamicGenerationSchema)
→ Example: Level creator, user-defined forms
→ Time: 30-40 minutes
Use when: Simple text generation, summarization, or content analysis.
LanguageModelSession:
import FoundationModels
func respond(userInput: String) async throws Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
pproenca/dot-skills
mattpocock/skills
axiom-foundation-models reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
I recommend axiom-foundation-models for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
axiom-foundation-models is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
axiom-foundation-models is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
We added axiom-foundation-models from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-foundation-models is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
axiom-foundation-models fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
axiom-foundation-models has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
Useful defaults in axiom-foundation-models — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
axiom-foundation-models fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 48