Energy issues manifest as battery drain, hot devices, and poor App Store reviews. Core principle: Measure before optimizing. Use Power Profiler to identify the dominant subsystem (CPU/GPU/Network/Location/Display), then apply targeted fixes.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionaxiom-energyExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches axiom-energy from charleswiltgen/axiom and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate axiom-energy. Access via /axiom-energy in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
767
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
767
stars
Energy issues manifest as battery drain, hot devices, and poor App Store reviews. Core principle: Measure before optimizing. Use Power Profiler to identify the dominant subsystem (CPU/GPU/Network/Location/Display), then apply targeted fixes.
Key insight: Developers often don't know where to START auditing. This skill provides systematic diagnosis, not guesswork.
Requirements: iOS 26+, Xcode 26+, Power Profiler in Instruments
Real questions developers ask that this skill answers:
→ The skill covers Power Profiler workflow to identify dominant subsystem and targeted fixes
→ The skill provides decision tree: CPU vs GPU vs Network diagnosis with specific patterns
→ The skill covers timer tolerance, location accuracy trade-offs, and audit checklists
→ The skill covers background execution patterns, BGTasks, and EMRCA principles
→ The skill demonstrates before/after Power Profiler comparison workflow
If you see ANY of these, suspect energy inefficiency:
ALWAYS run Power Profiler FIRST before optimizing code:
1. Connect iPhone wirelessly to Xcode (wireless debugging)
2. Xcode → Product → Profile (Cmd+I)
3. Select Blank template
4. Click "+" → Add "Power Profiler" instrument
5. Optional: Add "CPU Profiler" for correlation
6. Click Record
7. Use your app normally for 2-3 minutes
8. Click Stop
Why wireless: When device is charging via cable, power metrics show 0. Use wireless debugging for accurate readings.
Expand the Power Profiler track and examine per-app metrics:
| Lane | Meaning | High Value Indicates |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Power Impact | Processor activity | Computation, timers, parsing |
| GPU Power Impact | Graphics rendering | Animations, blur, Metal |
| Display Power Impact | Screen usage | Brightness, always-on content |
| Network Power Impact | Radio activity | Requests, downloads, polling |
Look for: Which subsystem shows highest sustained values during your app's usage.
Once you identify the dominant subsystem, use the decision trees below.
User reports energy issue?
│
├─ CPU Power Impact dominant?
│ ├─ Continuous high impact?
│ │ ├─ Timers running? → Pattern 1: Timer Efficiency
│ │ ├─ Polling data? → Pattern 2: Push vs Poll
│ │ └─ Processing in loop? → Pattern 3: Lazy Loading
│ ├─ Spikes during specific actions?
│ │ ├─ JSON parsing? → Cache parsed results
│ │ ├─ Image processing? → Move to background, cache
│ │ └─ Database queries? → Index, batch, prefetch
│ └─ High background CPU?
│ ├─ Location updates? → Pattern 4: Location Efficiency
│ ├─ BGTasks running too long? → Pattern 5: Background Execution
│ └─ Audio session active? → Stop when not playing
│
├─ Network Power Impact dominant?
│ ├─ Many small requests?
│ │ └─ Batch into fewer large requests
│ ├─ Polling pattern detected?
│ │ └─ Convert to push notifications → Pattern 2
│ ├─ Downloads in foreground?
│ │ └─ Use discretionary background URLSession
│ └─ High cellular usage?
│ └─ Defer to WiFi when possible
│
├─ GPU Power Impact dominant?
│ ├─ Continuous animations?
│ │ └─ Stop when view not visible
│ ├─ Blur effects (UIVisualEffectView)?
│ │ └─ Reduce or remove, use solid colors
│ ├─ High frame rate animations?
│ │ └─ Audit secondary frame rates → Pattern 6
│ └─ Metal rendering?
│ └─ Implement frame limiting
│
├─ Display Power Impact dominant?
│ ├─ Light backgrounds on OLED?
│ │ └─ Implement Dark Mode (up to 70% savings)
│ ├─ High brightness content?
│ │ └─ Use darker UI elements
│ └─ Screen always on?
│ └─ Allow screen to sleep when appropriate
│
└─ Location causing drain? (check CPU lane + location icon)
├─ Continuous updates?
│ └─ Switch to significant-change monitoring
├─ High accuracy (kCLLocationAccuracyBest)?
│ └─ Reduce to kCLLocationAccuracyHundredMeters
└─ Background location?
└─ Evaluate if truly needed → Pattern 4
Problem: Timers wake the CPU from idle states, consuming significant energy.
// BAD: Timer fires exactly every 1.0 seconds
// Prevents system from batching with other timers
Timer.scheduledTimer(withTimeInterval: 1.0, repeats: true) { _ in
self.updateUI()
}
// GOOD: 10% tolerance allows system to batch timers
let timer = Timer.scheduledTimer(withTimeInterval: 1.0, repeats: true) { _ in
self.updateUI()
}
timer.tolerance = 0.1 // 10% tolerance minimum
// BETTER: Use Combine Timer with tolerance
Timer.publish(every: 1.0, tolerance: 0.1, on: .main, in: .default)
.autoconnect()
.sink { [weak self] _ in
self?.updateUI()
}
.store(in: &cancellables)
// BEST: Don't use timer at all — react to events
NotificationCenter.default.publisher(for: .dataDidUpdate)
.sink { [weak self] _ in
self?.updateUI()
}
.store(in: &cancellables)
Key points:
Problem: Polling (checking server every N seconds) keeps radios active and drains battery.
// BAD: Polls server every 5 seconds
// Radio stays active, massive battery drain
Timer.scheduledTimer(withTimeInterval: 5.0, repeats: true) { [weak self] _ in
self?.fetchLatestData() // Network request every 5 seconds
}
// GOOD: Server pushes when data changes
// Radio only active when there's actual new data
// 1. Register for remote notifications
UIApplication.shared.registerForRemoteNotifications()
// 2. Handle background notification
func application(_ application: UIApplication,
didReceiveRemoteNotification userInfo: [AnyHashable: Any],
fetchCompletionHandler completionHandler: @escaping (UIBackgroundFetchResult) -> Void) {
guard let _ = userInfo["content-available"] else {
completionHandler(.noData)
return
}
Task {
do {
let hasNewData = try await fetchLatestData()
completionHandler(hasNewData ? .newData : .noData)
} catch {
completionHandler(.failed)
}
}
}
Server payload for background push:
{
"aps": {
"content-available": 1
},
"custom-data": "your-payload"
}
Key points:
apns-priority: 5 for non-urgent updates (energy efficient)apns-priority: 10 only for time-sensitive alertsProblem: Loading all data upfront causes CPU spikes and memory pressure.
// BAD: Creates and renders ALL views upfront
// From WWDC25-226: This caused CPU spike and hang
VStack {
✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
648mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
214parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
159cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
136ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
131pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categorywrite-a-prd
128mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.4★★★★★49 reviews- VValentina Kapoor★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
We added axiom-energy from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- SShikha Mishra★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-energy is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- LLuis Choi★★★★★Dec 20, 2024
axiom-energy fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- AArjun Iyer★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-energy is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- FFatima Robinson★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
We added axiom-energy from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- BBenjamin Martin★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: axiom-energy is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- YYash Thakker★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
We added axiom-energy from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- SSophia Nasser★★★★★Nov 11, 2024
axiom-energy has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- AAnika Zhang★★★★★Nov 7, 2024
Keeps context tight: axiom-energy is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- MMichael Anderson★★★★★Oct 26, 2024
axiom-energy is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
showing 1-10 of 49
1 / 5Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.