extract-my-action-items

casper-studios/casper-marketplace · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/casper-studios/casper-marketplace --skill extract-my-action-items
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Extract action items from a Fireflies transcript using parallel subagents. Catches items automated summaries miss.

skill.md

Extract Action Items

Extract action items from a Fireflies transcript using parallel subagents. Catches items automated summaries miss.

Two modes:

  • All attendees (default): No target specified — extract action items for every participant
  • Single person: Target specified — extract action items for that person only

Phase 1: Determine Mode

Parse the user's invocation:

  • If a target person is specified → single-person mode
  • Otherwise → all-attendees mode

Extract the search criteria (date, keyword, or transcript ID) from the invocation.

Phase 2: Fetch & Preprocess (Subagent)

The transcript API returns a JSON array (or an MCP wrapper containing one). Extract to plain text before chunking.

You should inspect the user's local hooks config and avoid running commands that are blocked by the hooks.

MCP based extraction

mkdir -p .claude/scratchpad
node -e "
  const fs = require('fs');
  let data = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(process.argv[1], 'utf8'));
  // Handle MCP wrapper: if top-level array has a .text field containing the real transcript, parse that
  if (data.length === 1 && typeof data[0]?.text === 'string') {
    // Extract speaker lines from the text content
    const lines = data[0].text.split('\n').filter(l => l.match(/^[A-Za-z].*?:/));
    fs.writeFileSync('.claude/scratchpad/transcript.txt', lines.join('\n'));
    const speakers = [...new Set(lines.map(l => l.split(':')[0].trim()))].sort();
    console.log('Speakers:', JSON.stringify(speakers));
    console.log('Total lines:', lines.length);
  } else {
    // Standard array of {speaker_name, text} objects
    const lines = data.map(e => (e.speaker_name || 'Unknown') + ': ' + (e.text || ''));
    fs.writeFileSync('.claude/scratchpad/transcript.txt', lines.join('\n'));
    const speakers = [...new Set(data.map(e => e.speaker_name).filter(Boolean))].sort();
    console.log('Speakers:', JSON.stringify(speakers));
    console.log('Total lines:', lines.length);
  }
" [TRANSCRIPT_JSON_FILE]

If the transcript JSON was saved to a tool-results file by the MCP client, pass that file path as the argument.

API based extraction

CRITICAL: The orchestrator MUST NOT call any Fireflies MCP tools directly. ALL Fireflies interaction happens inside this subagent.

Launch a single general-purpose subagent with this prompt:

Search Fireflies for a transcript matching: [SEARCH_CRITERIA]

1. Call `mcp__fireflies__fireflies_get_transcripts` to find the transcript (by date, keyword, or ID).
2. Call `mcp__fireflies__fireflies_get_summary` and `mcp__fireflies__fireflies_get_transcript` in parallel for the matched transcript.
3. The transcript API returns a JSON array. Extract to plain text:
   - With jq: jq -r '.[].text' < raw_transcript.json > .claude/scratchpad/transcript.txt
   - Fallback: python3 -c "import json,sys; print('\n'.join(e['text'] for e in json.load(sys.stdin)))" < raw_transcript.json > .claude/scratchpad/transcript.txt
4. Count lines: wc -l < .claude/scratchpad/transcript.txt
5. Extract the distinct speaker list from the transcript JSON:
   python3 -c "import json,sys; data=json.load(sys.stdin); print('\n'.join(sorted(set(e.get('speaker_name','') for e in data if e.get('speaker_name')))))" < raw_transcript.json

Return EXACTLY this (no other text):
- meeting_title: <title>
- meeting_date: <date>
- transcript_id: <id>
- transcript_path: .claude/scratchpad/transcript.txt
- line_count: <number>
- speakers: <comma-separated list>
- summary: <the Fireflies summary text>

Wait for the subagent to finish. Parse its returned values — these are the inputs for the remaining phases.

Phase 3: Parallel Subagent Extraction

Chunk sizing: ceil(total_lines / 5) lines per chunk, minimum 200. Adjust chunk count so no chunk is under 200 lines.

Launch one general-purpose subagent per chunk.

Single-Person Prompt

Read lines [START] to [END] of [FILE_PATH].

Find ALL action items for [TARGET_PERSON]. Return each as:
- **Item**: what they committed to
- **Quote**: exact words from transcript
- **Context**: who else involved, any deadline
- **Discussion depth**: If this item emerged from extended back-and-forth (design decisions, technical debates, multi-speaker deliberation), include: what was proposed, what alternatives were considered, what was decided and WHY, specific technical details (field names, schema choices, API behaviors), open questions or deferred items, and connections to other people's work

Beyond obvious commitments ("I'll do X"), catch these non-obvious patterns:
- Self-notes: "I'll make a note to...", "let me jot down..."
- Admissions implying catch-up: "I dropped the ball on X", "I still haven't read X"
- Conditional offers that became commitments: "If we have time, I'm happy to..."
- Volunteering: "I guess I'll volunteer to..."
- Exploration tasks: "Let me spend a few hours with it"
- Questions/topics for external parties: "I need to ask [person/firm] about X", "thing to discuss with [party]"

All-Attendees Prompt

Read lines [START] to [END] of [FILE_PATH].

The meeting attendees are: [SPEAKER_LIST]

Find ALL action items for EVERY attendee. Group by person. For each item return:
- **Person**: who owns the action item
- **Item**: what they committed to
- **Quote**: exact words from transcript
- **Context**: who else involved, any deadline
- **Discussion depth**: If this item emerged from extended back-and-forth (design decisions, technical debates, multi-speaker deliberation), include: what was proposed, what alternatives were considered, what was decided and WHY, specific technical details (field names, schema choices, API behaviors), open questions or deferred items, and connections to other people's work

Beyond obvious commitments ("I'll do X"), catch these non-obvious patterns:
- Self-notes: "I'll make a note to...", "let me jot down..."
- Admissions implying catch-up: "I dropped the ball on X", "I still haven't read X"
- Conditional offers that became commitments: "If we have time, I'm happy to..."
- Volunteering: "I guess I'll volunteer to..."
- Exploration tasks: "Let me spend a few hours with it"
- Questions/topics for external parties: "I need to ask [person/firm] about X", "thing to discuss with [party]"
- Delegations: "[Person], can you handle X?", "I'll leave that to [person]"

Phase 4: Synthesize Notes

Merge subagent results, deduplicate, and categorize into a rich synthesized notes file. This is the master working document — all detail lives here. Linear proposals and the final action items checklist are derived from it.

Write to .claude/scratchpad/synthesized-notes-YYYY-MM-DD.md. Only include categories that have items.

Synthesis Depth

Preserve the full Discussion depth returned by subagents. Never flatten discussion-rich items into one-liners.

  • Checkbox title = the deliverable. Body = full context needed to execute it.
  • If a subagent returned multi-paragraph context for an item, keep it. Use bold sub-headers to organize (e.g., "Root cause:", "Agreed approach:", "Open items:").
  • Never collapse N distinct decisions into 1 bullet. List each.
  • Cross-link items that depend on each other (e.g., "dependency for Emerson's fiscal period table work").
  • Simple items (credential sharing, quick investigations) stay as one-liners.
  • Include exact quotes from the transcript for each item.

Categories

  1. High Priority / Technical — Code changes, bug fixes, PR reviews, investigations
  2. Pairing / Collaboration — Scheduled syncs, joint work sessions
  3. Content / Research — Reading, writing, experiments, documentation
  4. Questions for External Parties — Topics to raise with specific people/firms outside the immediate team
  5. Exploration / Tooling — Tool evaluations, setup, environment tasks
  6. Catch-up — Things explicitly acknowledged as dropped or missed

Output Format

Single-person mode:

# [Name] Synthesized Notes — [Meeting Title]

**Date:** [Date]
**Fireflies Link:** https://app.fireflies.ai/view/[TRANSCRIPT_ID]

## [Category Name]

- **Item title**
  - Context, decisions, and full detail
  - > "Exact quote"

All-attendees mode:

# Synthesized Notes — [Meeting Title]

**Date:** [Date]
**Fireflies Link:** https://app.fireflies.ai/view/[TRANSCRIPT_ID]

## [Person Name]

### [Category Name]

- **Item title**
  - Context, decisions, and full detail
  - > "Exact quote"

Phase 5: Linear Ticket Proposals

Derive Linear ticket creates and updates from the synthesized notes. The rich context and quotes from Phase 4 flow into Linear (as comments or ticket descriptions) so it becomes the source of truth. Uses a config file for team defaults and queries active cycle tickets for update candidates.

5a: Config Resolution

Look for team configuration in this order (first match wins):

  1. ~/.agents/configs/extract-my-action-items/config.json (user overrides)
  2. references/config.json (bundled defaults, relative to this skill file)

Use the user config if found. Otherwise fall back to the bundled config.json.

If no user config exists AND the bundled config has an empty team field, stop and prompt the user:

No Linear config found. Create a user config at: ~/.agents/configs/extract-my-action-items/config.json

Copy the bundled references/config.json as a starting point and fill in your team, project, assignee, and labels.

If config resolves successfully, proceed.

5b–5c: Pull Active Tickets and Semantic Match (Single Subagent)

CRITICAL: Run 5b and 5c together inside a single general-purpose subagent. The cycle ticket data is large and should NOT flow through the main context window.

Launch a subagent with this prompt:

## Task: Pull active Linear tickets and match against synthesized meeting notes

### Step 1: Pull active tickets

Config: team=[TEAM], states=[STATES_LIST], attendees=[SPEAKER_LIST]

1. `mcp__linear__list_teams` with query=[TEAM] → get team ID
2. `mcp__linear__list_cycles` with type="current" → get current cycle ID
3. In parallel:
   - `mcp__linear__list_issues` filtered by cycle + team (limit 250)
   - `mcp__linear__list_issues` for each attendee (assignee filter, state="In Progress")
4. Deduplicate and build a lookup table: {identifier, title, assignee, status}

### Step 2: Semantic matching

Read the synthesized notes at [SYNTHESIZED_NOTES_PATH].

For each item, classify as:
- **UPDATE [TICKET-ID]** — maps to an existing ticket. Explain what new info to append.
- **NEW TICKET** — distinct deliverable not covered. Suggest title, assignee, priority.
- **IDEA** — process improvement, behavioral commitment, or exploratory thought.

Group output by classification. For UPDATE items include ticket ID. For NEW TICKET items include suggested title, assignee, and priority.

5d: Draft Proposals to Scratchpad

Write to .claude/scratchpad/linear-proposals-YYYY-MM-DD.md using the template from references/ticket-template.md.

  • Proposed Updates: For each UPDATE match, draft a comment body with the new feedback (dated section with context and quotes from the synthesized notes). Do NOT modify the issue description — updates are posted as comments.
  • Proposed New Tickets: Use send-to-linear description format (User Story, Requirements, Acceptance Criteria) with concrete examples and exact quotes from the synthesized notes.
  • Ideas / Needs More Thought: List with person, context, and exact quote. These are not skipped — they appear in the proposals file but do not become full tickets.

5e: User Review Gate

STOP. Tell the user the proposals file is ready at .claude/scratchpad/linear-proposals-YYYY-MM-DD.md and wait for explicit instruction.

Use AskUserQuestion: "Linear ticket proposals are ready. Review the file, then choose:"

  • "Create/update tickets in Linear" — proceed to execute
  • "Skip — just do Slack DMs" — skip to Phase 7

The user may edit the scratchpad file before approving. On approval:

  1. Resolve team ID, label IDs, project ID, and current cycle via Linear MCP (same pattern as send-to-linear Phase 6):
    • mcp__linear__list_teams → team ID
    • mcp__linear__list_issue_labels → label IDs
    • mcp__linear__list_projects → project ID (if configured)
    • mcp__linear__list_cycles with type: "current" → current cycle
  2. For updates: mcp__linear__create_comment with issueId and the drafted comment body. Do NOT use mcp__linear__save_issue to modify the description.
  3. For new tickets: mcp__linear__save_issue with all fields from config + proposal (team, project, assignee, cycle, state, labels, title, description)
  4. Ideas — no Linear action (they stay in the proposals file for reference only)
  5. Report results with clickable links so the user can verify:
    • Updated tickets: https://linear.app/[WORKSPACE]/issue/[TICKET-ID] for each commented ticket
    • Created tickets: https://linear.app/[WORKSPACE]/issue/[TICKET-ID] for each new ticket (use the identifier returned by save_issue)
    • Derive [WORKSPACE] from the team's organization key, or from the config if available

Phase 6: Action Items Checklist

Generate a terse action items checklist derived from the synthesized notes. Linear is the source of truth for detail — the checklist is just a scannable index with links.

Where an item maps to a Linear ticket (updated or created in Phase 5), include the Linear link inline. Items not sent to Linear get a one-line description only.

Output

Single-person mode — Write to .claude/scratchpad/[name]-action-items-YYYY-MM-DD.md:

# [Name] Action Items — [Meeting Title]

**Date:** [Date]
**Fireflies Link:** https://app.fireflies.ai/view/[TRANSCRIPT_ID]

## [Category Name]

- [ ] **Item title**[TICKET-ID](https://linear.app/[WORKSPACE]/issue/[TICKET-ID])
- [ ] **Item without ticket** — brief context

All-attendees mode — Write to .claude/scratchpad/action-items-YYYY-MM-DD.md:

# Action Items — [Meeting Title]

how to use extract-my-action-items

How to use extract-my-action-items on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add extract-my-action-items
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/casper-studios/casper-marketplace --skill extract-my-action-items

The skills CLI fetches extract-my-action-items from GitHub repository casper-studios/casper-marketplace and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/extract-my-action-items

Reload or restart Cursor to activate extract-my-action-items. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /extract-my-action-items) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.846 reviews
  • Ganesh Mohane· Dec 28, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: extract-my-action-items is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Aisha Li· Dec 28, 2024

    extract-my-action-items reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Mei Ndlovu· Dec 24, 2024

    I recommend extract-my-action-items for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Nia Bhatia· Dec 16, 2024

    extract-my-action-items is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Fatima Chawla· Nov 27, 2024

    extract-my-action-items has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 19, 2024

    We added extract-my-action-items from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.

  • Li Gupta· Nov 15, 2024

    Keeps context tight: extract-my-action-items is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Kofi Singh· Nov 7, 2024

    Useful defaults in extract-my-action-items — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Hassan Malhotra· Oct 26, 2024

    I recommend extract-my-action-items for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.

  • Fatima Malhotra· Oct 18, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: extract-my-action-items is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

showing 1-10 of 46

1 / 5