pr-plan▌
boshu2/agentops · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Strategic planning for open source contributions.
PR Plan Skill
Strategic planning for open source contributions.
Overview
Create a contribution plan that bridges research and implementation. Takes
$pr-research output and produces an actionable plan.
Output: .agents/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-pr-plan-{repo-slug}.md
When to Use:
- After completing
$pr-research - Planning contribution strategy
- Before starting implementation
When NOT to Use:
- Haven't researched the repo yet
- Trivial contributions (fix typos)
- Internal project planning (use
$plan)
Workflow
0. Input Discovery -> Find/load pr-research artifact
1. Scope Definition -> What exactly to contribute
2. Target Selection -> Which issues/areas to address
3. Criteria Definition -> Acceptance criteria from research
4. Risk Assessment -> What could go wrong
5. Strategy Formation -> Implementation approach
6. Output -> Write plan artifact
Phase 1: Scope Definition
Scope Questions
| Question | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| What specific functionality? | Clear deliverable |
| Which files/packages? | Limits impact surface |
| What's explicitly out of scope? | Prevents scope creep |
| Single PR or series? | Sets expectations |
Scope Template
## Scope
**Contribution**: [1-2 sentences describing the change]
**Affected Areas**:
- `path/to/file.go` - [what changes]
**Out of Scope**:
- [Related but excluded work]
Phase 3: Acceptance Criteria
Define success from maintainer perspective:
## Acceptance Criteria
### Code Quality
- [ ] Follows project coding style
- [ ] Passes existing tests
- [ ] Adds tests for new functionality
- [ ] No linting warnings
### PR Requirements
- [ ] Title follows convention
- [ ] Body uses project template
- [ ] Size within acceptable range
- [ ] Single logical change
### Project-Specific
- [ ] [Any project-specific requirements from research]
Phase 4: Risk Assessment
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| PR review takes > 2 weeks | Medium | Medium | Start small, be responsive |
| Scope expands during review | Medium | High | Define scope clearly upfront |
| Breaking change discovered | Low | High | Test against multiple versions |
Phase 5: Implementation Strategy
## Implementation Strategy
### Approach
1. **Setup**: Fork repo, configure dev environment
2. **Understand**: Read existing code in affected area
3. **Implement**: Make changes following project patterns
4. **Test**: Run existing tests + add new tests
5. **Document**: Update any affected documentation
6. **Submit**: Create PR following project conventions
### Pre-Implementation Checklist
- [ ] Fork created and up-to-date with upstream
- [ ] Dev environment working
- [ ] Issue claimed or comment posted
- [ ] Recent repo activity reviewed
Output Template
Write to .agents/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-pr-plan-{repo-slug}.md
# PR Plan: {repo-name}
## Executive Summary
{2-3 sentences: what you're contributing, why, expected outcome}
## Scope
**Contribution**: {description}
**Affected Areas**: [list]
**Out of Scope**: [list]
## Target
**Primary Issue**: #{N} - {title}
## Acceptance Criteria
[checklist]
## Risk Assessment
[table]
## Implementation Strategy
[numbered steps]
## Next Steps
1. Claim/comment on target issue
2. Fork and set up development environment
3. Implement following strategy
4. Run `$pr-prep` when ready
Workflow Integration
$pr-research <repo> -> $pr-plan <research> -> implement -> $pr-prep
Examples
Plan a Focused External Contribution
User says: "Create a contribution plan from my PR research artifact."
What happens:
- Extract accepted conventions and constraints.
- Define scope boundaries and acceptance criteria.
- Produce an implementation strategy with risks.
Tighten Scope Before Coding
User says: "Check if this PR plan is too large for one submission."
What happens:
- Compare proposed changes to historical PR size patterns.
- Split oversized scope into phased contributions.
- Emit a revised plan and next-step checklist.
Troubleshooting
| Problem | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Plan has vague acceptance criteria | Criteria not measurable | Convert criteria to concrete behavioral checks |
| Scope too broad | Multiple concerns mixed | Split by user-visible change or subsystem boundary |
| Risk section is weak | Missing failure-mode analysis | Add integration, review, and rollback risks explicitly |
| Plan conflicts with repo norms | Research artifact incomplete | Re-run $pr-research and refresh constraints |
How to use pr-plan on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add pr-plan
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches pr-plan from GitHub repository boshu2/agentops and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate pr-plan. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /pr-plan) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.6★★★★★30 reviews- ★★★★★Chaitanya Patil· Dec 28, 2024
pr-plan reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Pratham Ware· Dec 24, 2024
Keeps context tight: pr-plan is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Martinez· Dec 20, 2024
Registry listing for pr-plan matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Lucas Garcia· Dec 16, 2024
pr-plan is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Michael Sharma· Dec 12, 2024
pr-plan reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Nov 19, 2024
I recommend pr-plan for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Amina Sharma· Nov 11, 2024
Useful defaults in pr-plan — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Yusuf Robinson· Nov 3, 2024
I recommend pr-plan for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Evelyn Kim· Oct 22, 2024
Useful defaults in pr-plan — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Oct 10, 2024
Useful defaults in pr-plan — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
showing 1-10 of 30