pydantic▌
bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
High-performance Python data validation with type hints, Rust-powered core, and seamless FastAPI/Django integration.
- ›Validates data at runtime using Python type hints with automatic type coercion; strict mode available per-field or model-wide
- ›Supports nested models, recursive types, generics, and custom validators (field-level and model-level) for complex validation logic
- ›Includes built-in types for emails, URLs, file paths, secrets, and constrained integers/strings; extensible via c
Pydantic Validation Skill
Summary
Python data validation using type hints and runtime type checking with Pydantic v2's Rust-powered core for high-performance validation.
When to Use
- API request/response validation (FastAPI, Django)
- Settings and configuration management (env variables, config files)
- ORM model validation (SQLAlchemy integration)
- Data parsing and serialization (JSON, dict, custom formats)
- Type-safe data classes with automatic validation
- CLI argument parsing with type safety
Quick Start
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, EmailStr
from datetime import datetime
class User(BaseModel):
id: int
name: str = Field(..., min_length=1, max_length=100)
email: EmailStr
created_at: datetime = Field(default_factory=datetime.now)
is_active: bool = True
# Validate data
user = User(id=1, name="Alice", email="[email protected]")
print(user.model_dump()) # {'id': 1, 'name': 'Alice', ...}
# Automatic type coercion
user2 = User(id="2", name="Bob", email="[email protected]")
assert user2.id == 2 # String "2" coerced to int
# Validation error
try:
User(id=3, name="", email="invalid")
except ValidationError as e:
print(e.errors())
Core Concepts
BaseModel Foundation
from pydantic import BaseModel, ConfigDict
class Product(BaseModel):
model_config = ConfigDict(
str_strip_whitespace=True,
validate_assignment=True,
use_enum_values=True,
arbitrary_types_allowed=False
)
name: str
price: float
quantity: int = 0
# Usage
product = Product(name=" Widget ", price=19.99)
assert product.name == "Widget" # Whitespace stripped
# Validate on assignment
product.price = "29.99" # Auto-converts to float
Field Configuration
from pydantic import Field, field_validator
from typing import Annotated
class Item(BaseModel):
# Field constraints
sku: str = Field(pattern=r'^[A-Z]{3}-\d{4}$')
price: float = Field(gt=0, le=10000)
stock: int = Field(ge=0, default=0)
# Annotated types (Pydantic v2)
quantity: Annotated[int, Field(ge=1, le=100)]
# Descriptions and examples
description: str = Field(
...,
description="Product description",
examples=["High-quality widget"]
)
# Deprecated fields
old_field: str | None = Field(None, deprecated=True)
@field_validator('sku')
@classmethod
def validate_sku(cls, v: str) -> str:
if not v.startswith('ABC'):
raise ValueError('SKU must start with ABC')
return v
Pydantic v2 Improvements
Migration from v1
# Pydantic v1
class OldModel(BaseModel):
class Config:
validate_assignment = True
json_encoders = {datetime: lambda v: v.isoformat()}
# Pydantic v2
class NewModel(BaseModel):
model_config = ConfigDict(
validate_assignment=True,
# json_encoders replaced by serializers
)
@model_serializer
def ser_model(self) -> dict:
return {...}
# Key changes:
# - .dict() → .model_dump()
# - .json() → .model_dump_json()
# - .parse_obj() → .model_validate()
# - .parse_raw() → .model_validate_json()
# - @validator → @field_validator
# - @root_validator → @model_validator
Performance Improvements
# v2 uses Rust core (pydantic-core) for 5-50x speedup
from pydantic import BaseModel
import time
class Data(BaseModel):
values: list[int]
names: list[str]
# Benchmark
data = {'values': list(range(10000)), 'names': ['item'] * 10000}
start = time.perf_counter()
for _ in range(1000):
Data.model_validate(data)
elapsed = time.perf_counter() - start
print(f"Validated 1000 iterations in {elapsed:.2f}s")
Field Types
Built-in Types
from pydantic import (
BaseModel, EmailStr, HttpUrl, UUID4,
FilePath, DirectoryPath, Json, SecretStr,
PositiveInt, NegativeFloat, conint, constr
)
from typing import Literal
from pathlib import Path
class Example(BaseModel):
# Email validation
email: EmailStr
# URL validation
website: HttpUrl
# UUID
id:<How to use pydantic on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add pydantic
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches pydantic from GitHub repository bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate pydantic. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /pydantic) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★46 reviews- ★★★★★Shikha Mishra· Dec 28, 2024
Registry listing for pydantic matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★Aditi Gonzalez· Dec 28, 2024
pydantic is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- ★★★★★Li Singh· Dec 4, 2024
Keeps context tight: pydantic is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Alexander Thomas· Dec 4, 2024
Useful defaults in pydantic — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Chen Smith· Nov 23, 2024
pydantic has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- ★★★★★Alexander Bansal· Nov 23, 2024
I recommend pydantic for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Yash Thakker· Nov 19, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: pydantic is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Camila Gonzalez· Nov 7, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: pydantic is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- ★★★★★Henry Ndlovu· Oct 26, 2024
I recommend pydantic for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Zaid Harris· Oct 14, 2024
pydantic fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 46