authoring-dags▌
astronomer/agents · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
Guided workflow for creating Apache Airflow DAGs with validation and testing integration.
- ›Structured six-phase approach: discover environment and existing patterns, plan DAG structure, implement following best practices, validate with af CLI commands, test with user consent, and iterate on fixes
- ›CLI commands for discovery ( af config connections , af config providers , af dags list ) and validation ( af dags errors , af dags get , af dags explore ) provide immediate feedback on DAG corr
DAG Authoring Skill
This skill guides you through creating and validating Airflow DAGs using best practices and af CLI commands.
For testing and debugging DAGs, see the testing-dags skill which covers the full test -> debug -> fix -> retest workflow.
Running the CLI
Run all af commands using uvx (no installation required):
uvx --from astro-airflow-mcp af <command>
Throughout this document, af is shorthand for uvx --from astro-airflow-mcp af.
Workflow Overview
+-----------------------------------------+
| 1. DISCOVER |
| Understand codebase & environment |
+-----------------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------------+
| 2. PLAN |
| Propose structure, get approval |
+-----------------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------------+
| 3. IMPLEMENT |
| Write DAG following patterns |
+-----------------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------------+
| 4. VALIDATE |
| Check import errors, warnings |
+-----------------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------------+
| 5. TEST (with user consent) |
| Trigger, monitor, check logs |
+-----------------------------------------+
|
+-----------------------------------------+
| 6. ITERATE |
| Fix issues, re-validate |
+-----------------------------------------+
Phase 1: Discover
Before writing code, understand the context.
Explore the Codebase
Use file tools to find existing patterns:
Globfor**/dags/**/*.pyto find existing DAGsReadsimilar DAGs to understand conventions- Check
requirements.txtfor available packages
Query the Airflow Environment
Use af CLI commands to understand what's available:
| Command | Purpose |
|---|---|
af config connections |
What external systems are configured |
af config variables |
What configuration values exist |
af config providers |
What operator packages are installed |
af config version |
Version constraints and features |
af dags list |
Existing DAGs and naming conventions |
af config pools |
Resource pools for concurrency |
Example discovery questions:
- "Is there a Snowflake connection?" ->
af config connections - "What Airflow version?" ->
af config version - "Are S3 operators available?" ->
af config providers
Phase 2: Plan
Based on discovery, propose:
- DAG structure - Tasks, dependencies, schedule
- Operators to use - Based on available providers
- Connections needed - Existing or to be created
- Variables needed - Existing or to be created
- Packages needed - Additions to requirements.txt
Get user approval before implementing.
Phase 3: Implement
Write the DAG following best practices (see below). Key steps:
- Create DAG file in appropriate location
- Update
requirements.txtif needed - Save the file
Phase 4: Validate
Use af CLI as a feedback loop to validate your DAG.
Step 1: Check Import Errors
After saving, check for parse errors (Airflow will have already parsed the file):
af dags errors
- If your file appears -> fix and retry
- If no errors -> continue
Common causes: missing imports, syntax errors, missing packages.
Step 2: Verify DAG Exists
af dags get <dag_id>
Check: DAG exists, schedule correct, tags set, paused status.
Step 3: Check Warnings
af dags warnings
Look for deprecation warnings or configuration issues.
Step 4: Explore DAG Structure
af dags explore <dag_id>
Returns in one call: metadata, tasks, dependencies, source code.
On Astro
If you're running on Astro, you can also validate locally before deploying:
- Parse check: Run
astro dev parseto catch import errors and DAG-level issues without starting a full Airflow environment - DAG-only deploy: Once validated, use
astro deploy --dagsfor fast DAG-only deploys that skip the Docker image build — ideal for iterating on DAG code
Phase 5: Test
See the testing-dags skill for comprehensive testing guidance.
Once validation passes, test the DAG using the workflow in the testing-dags skill:
- Get user consent -- Always ask before triggering
- Trigger and wait --
af runs trigger-wait <dag_id> --timeout 300 - Analyze results -- Check success/failure status
- Debug if needed --
af runs diagnose <dag_id> <run_id>andaf tasks logs <dag_id> <run_id> <task_id>
Quick Test (Minimal)
# Ask user first, then:
af runs trigger-wait <dag_id> --timeout 300
For the full test -> debug -> fix -> retest loop, see testing-dags.
Phase 6: Iterate
If issues found:
- Fix the code
- Check for import errors:
af dags errors - Re-validate (Phase 4)
- Re-test using the testing-dags skill workflow (Phase 5)
CLI Quick Reference
| Phase | Command | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Discover | af config connections |
Available connections |
| Discover | af config variables |
Configuration values |
| Discover | af config providers |
Installed operators |
| Discover | af config version |
Version info |
| Validate | af dags errors |
Parse errors (check first!) |
| Validate | af dags get <dag_id> |
Verify DAG config |
| Validate | af dags warnings |
Configuration warnings |
| Validate | af dags explore <dag_id> |
Full DAG inspection |
Testing commands -- See the testing-dags skill for
af runs trigger-wait,af runs diagnose,af tasks logs, etc.
Best Practices & Anti-Patterns
For code patterns and anti-patterns, see reference/best-practices.md.
Read this reference when writing new DAGs or reviewing existing ones. It covers what patterns are correct (including Airflow 3-specific behavior) and what to avoid.
Related Skills
- testing-dags: For testing DAGs, debugging failures, and the test -> fix -> retest loop
- debugging-dags: For troubleshooting failed DAGs
- deploying-airflow: For deploying DAGs to production (Astro or open-source)
- migrating-airflow-2-to-3: For migrating DAGs to Airflow 3
How to use authoring-dags on Cursor
AI-first code editor with Composer
Prerequisites
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
- ›Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
- ›Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with
node --version) - ›Active project directory or workspace where you want to add authoring-dags
Execute installation command
Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
The skills CLI fetches authoring-dags from GitHub repository astronomer/agents and configures it for Cursor.
Select Cursor when prompted
The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:
Verify installation
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Reload or restart Cursor to activate authoring-dags. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /authoring-dags) or your agent's skill management interface.
Security & Verification Notice
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.
List & Monetize Your Skill
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Use Cases▌
User Story & Requirements Generation
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Competitive Analysis
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Roadmap Prioritization
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide▌
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Installation Steps
- 1.Install product management skill
- 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7.Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices▌
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This▌
✓ Use When
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid When
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path▌
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Discussion
Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)- No comments yet — start the thread.
Ratings
4.7★★★★★62 reviews- ★★★★★Evelyn Farah· Dec 8, 2024
I recommend authoring-dags for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Layla Bhatia· Dec 8, 2024
authoring-dags reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- ★★★★★Nikhil Mehta· Nov 27, 2024
Registry listing for authoring-dags matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★James Mehta· Oct 18, 2024
Useful defaults in authoring-dags — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- ★★★★★Ren Farah· Sep 25, 2024
Keeps context tight: authoring-dags is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- ★★★★★Piyush G· Sep 21, 2024
authoring-dags fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
- ★★★★★Yuki Mensah· Sep 17, 2024
Registry listing for authoring-dags matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- ★★★★★James Menon· Sep 13, 2024
We added authoring-dags from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
- ★★★★★Layla White· Sep 9, 2024
I recommend authoring-dags for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- ★★★★★Diego Desai· Sep 5, 2024
authoring-dags fits our agent workflows well — practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
showing 1-10 of 62