Skill by ara.so — Daily 2026 Skills collection.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versionfabro-workflow-factoryExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches fabro-workflow-factory from aradotso/trending-skills and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate fabro-workflow-factory. Access via /fabro-workflow-factory in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
1
total installs
1
this week
22
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
1
installs
1
this week
22
stars
Skill by ara.so — Daily 2026 Skills collection.
Fabro is an open source AI coding workflow orchestrator written in Rust. It lets you define agent pipelines as Graphviz DOT graphs — with branching, loops, human approval gates, multi-model routing, and cloud sandbox execution — then run them as a persistent service. You define the process; agents execute it; you intervene only where it matters.
# Via Claude Code (recommended)
curl -fsSL https://fabro.sh/install.md | claude
# Via Codex
codex "$(curl -fsSL https://fabro.sh/install.md)"
# Via Bash
curl -fsSL https://fabro.sh/install.sh | bash
After installation, run one-time setup and per-project initialization:
fabro install # global one-time setup
cd my-project
fabro init # per-project setup (creates .fabro/ config)
# Workflow management
fabro run <workflow.dot> # execute a workflow
fabro run <workflow.dot> --watch # stream live output
fabro runs # list all runs
fabro runs show <run-id> # inspect a specific run
# Human-in-the-loop
fabro approve <run-id> # approve a pending gate
fabro reject <run-id> # reject / revise a pending gate
# Sandbox access
fabro ssh <run-id> # shell into a running sandbox
fabro preview <run-id> <port> # expose a sandbox port locally
# Retrospectives
fabro retro <run-id> # view run retrospective (cost, duration, narrative)
# Config
fabro config # view current configuration
fabro config set <key> <value> # set a config value
Workflows are .dot files using the Graphviz DOT language with Fabro-specific attributes.
| Shape | Meaning |
|---|---|
Mdiamond |
Start node |
Msquare |
Exit node |
rectangle (default) |
Agent node (LLM turn) |
hexagon |
Human gate (pauses for approval) |
// hello.dot
digraph HelloWorld {
graph [
goal="Say hello and write a greeting file"
model_stylesheet="
* { model: claude-haiku-4-5; }
"
]
start [shape=Mdiamond, label="Start"]
exit [shape=Msquare, label="Exit"]
greet [label="Greet", prompt="Write a friendly greeting to hello.txt"]
start -> greet -> exit
}
fabro run hello.dot
Fabro uses CSS-like model_stylesheet declarations on the graph to route nodes to models. Use classes to target groups of nodes.
digraph PlanImplementReview {
graph [
goal="Plan, implement, and review a feature"
model_stylesheet="
* { model: claude-haiku-4-5; reasoning_effort: low; }
.planning { model: claude-opus-4-5; reasoning_effort: high; }
.coding { model: claude-sonnet-4-5; reasoning_effort: high; }
.review { model: gpt-4o; }
"
]
start [shape=Mdiamond, label="Start"]
exit [shape=Msquare, label="Exit"]
plan [label="Plan", class="planning", prompt="Analyze the codebase and write plan.md"]
implement [label="Implement", class="coding", prompt="Read plan.md and implement every step"]
review [label="Review", class="review", prompt="Cross-review the implementation for bugs and clarity"]
start -> plan -> implement -> review -> exit
}
model: <model-id> # e.g. claude-sonnet-4-5, gpt-4o, gemini-2-flash
reasoning_effort: low|medium|high
provider: anthropic|openai|google
Use shape=hexagon to pause execution for human approval. Transitions are labeled with [A] (approve) and [R] (revise/reject).
digraph PlanApproveImplement {
graph [
goal="Plan and implement with human approval"
model_stylesheet="
* { model: claude-sonnet-4-5; }
"
]
start [shape=Mdiamond, label="Start"]
exit [shape=Msquare, label="Exit"]
plan [label="Plan", prompt="Write a detailed implementation plan to plan.md"]
approve [shape=hexagon, label="Approve Plan"]
implement [label="Implement", prompt="Read plan.md and implement every step exactly"]
start -> plan -> approve
approve -> implement [label="[A] Approve"]
approve -> plan [label="[R] Revise"]
implement -> exit
}
Approve or reject from the CLI:
fabro runs # find the paused run-id
fabro approve <run-id> # continue with implementation
fabro reject <run-id> --note "Add error handling to the plan"
Use labeled transitions to build automatic retry/fix loops:
digraph ImplementAndTest {
graph [
goal="Implement a feature and fix failing tests automatically"
model_stylesheet="
* { model: claude-haiku-4-5; }
.coding { model: claude-sonnet-4-5; reasoning_effort: high; }
"
]
start [shape=Mdiamond, label="Start"]
exit [shape=Msquare, label="Exit"]
implement [label="Implement", class="coding",
prompt="Implement the feature described in TASK.md"]
test [label="Run Tests",
prompt="Run the test suite with `cargo test`. Report pass/fail."]
fix [label="Fix", class="coding",
prompt="Read the test failures and fix the code. Do not change tests."✓Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Stakeholder Communication
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
✓Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Implementation Guide
Prerequisites
- ›Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
- ›Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
- ›Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
- ›Stakeholder contact information and communication channels
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
- 1Install product management skill
- 2Start with user story generation for known feature
- 3Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
- 4Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
- 5Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
- 6Build template library for recurring PM tasks
- 7Share effective prompts with product team
Common Pitfalls
- ⚠Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
- ⚠Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
- ⚠Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
- ⚠Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
- ⚠Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements
Best Practices
✓ Do
- +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
- +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
- +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
- +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
- +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
- +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition
✗ Don't
- −Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
- −Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
- −Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
- −Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
- −Don't ignore company-specific context and culture
💡 Pro Tips
- ★Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
- ★Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
- ★Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
- ★Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs
When to Use This
✓ Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
✗ Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
Learning Path
- 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
- 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
- 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
- 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation
Related Skills
grill-me
667mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categorypremortem
214parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
Productivitysame categorydeslop
159cursor/plugins
Productivitysame categorytravel-planner
138ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
Productivitysame categoryframer-motion
132pproenca/dot-skills
Productivitysame categorywrite-a-prd
128mattpocock/skills
Productivitysame categoryReviews
4.6★★★★★53 reviews- HHiroshi Okafor★★★★★Dec 24, 2024
fabro-workflow-factory reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.
- HHana Flores★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
fabro-workflow-factory has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
- MMin Brown★★★★★Dec 12, 2024
Registry listing for fabro-workflow-factory matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- GGanesh Mohane★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Registry listing for fabro-workflow-factory matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.
- MMin Johnson★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
fabro-workflow-factory is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
- LLiam Farah★★★★★Dec 8, 2024
Useful defaults in fabro-workflow-factory — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
- RRahul Santra★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: fabro-workflow-factory is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
- MMin Sharma★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
Keeps context tight: fabro-workflow-factory is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.
- OOlivia Gill★★★★★Nov 27, 2024
I recommend fabro-workflow-factory for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
- OOlivia Garcia★★★★★Nov 15, 2024
We added fabro-workflow-factory from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
showing 1-10 of 53
1 / 6Discussion
Comments — not star reviews- No comments yet — start the thread.