codex-autoresearch-loop

aradotso/trending-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026

MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.

$npx skills add https://github.com/aradotso/trending-skills --skill codex-autoresearch-loop
0 commentsdiscussion
summary

Skill by ara.so — Daily 2026 Skills collection.

skill.md

Codex Autoresearch

Skill by ara.so — Daily 2026 Skills collection.

Codex Autoresearch is a Codex skill that runs an autonomous modify→verify→keep/revert loop on your codebase. You describe a measurable goal in one sentence; Codex confirms the plan, then iterates unattended — every improvement stacks in git, every failure reverts automatically — until interrupted or a cap is reached. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch concept, generalized beyond ML training to any software metric.


Installation

Option A — manual copy into your project:

git clone https://github.com/leo-lilinxiao/codex-autoresearch.git
cp -r codex-autoresearch your-project/.agents/skills/codex-autoresearch

Option B — Codex skill installer:

$skill-installer install https://github.com/leo-lilinxiao/codex-autoresearch

The skill lives at .agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/ inside your project. No config file is required before first use.


How to Activate

Open Codex in your project directory and prefix your goal with $codex-autoresearch:

$codex-autoresearch
I want to get rid of all `any` types in my TypeScript code

Codex will:

  1. Scan the repo and infer scope, metric, verify command, and guard command.
  2. Present a confirmation summary — reply go (or correct anything).
  3. Run the loop unattended until you interrupt it or the goal is met.

You never write config. Codex infers everything.


Confirmation Flow

Before the loop starts Codex always shows what it found and asks you to confirm. Example exchange:

Codex: I found 47 `any` occurrences across src/**/*.ts.

       Confirmed:
       - Target: eliminate `any` types in src/**/*.ts
       - Metric: `any` count (current: 47), direction: lower
       - Verify: grep + tsc --noEmit as guard

       Need to confirm:
       - Run until all gone, or cap at N iterations?

       Reply "go" to start, or tell me what to change.

You:   Go, run overnight.

Codex: Starting — baseline: 47. Iterating until interrupted.

Up to five confirmation rounds are possible. After that, Codex proceeds.


The Loop (internals)

PHASE 0: Probe environment (CPU/GPU/RAM/toolchains), check for session resume
PHASE 1: Read context + lessons file from prior run (if any)

LOOP (forever or N times):
  1. Review current state, git history, results log, lessons
  2. Pick ONE hypothesis (apply perspectives, filter by environment)
     -- or N hypotheses if parallel mode is active
  3. Make ONE atomic change
  4. git commit (before verification)
  5. Run verify command  →  did the target metric improve?
     Run guard command   →  did anything else break?
  6. Improved → keep (extract lesson)
     Worse    → approved rollback strategy (git revert)
     Crashed  → fix or skip
  7. Log the result to results log
  8. Health check (disk, git, verify health)
  9. If 3+ discards → REFINE; 5+ → PIVOT; 2 PIVOTs → web search
 10. Repeat. Never stop. Never ask.

The loop runs unbounded unless you say Iterations: N during confirmation.


Dual-Gate Verification

Two commands serve distinct purposes:

Gate Purpose Fails means
Verify Did the target metric improve? Change discarded, reverted
Guard Did anything else break? Change reworked (up to 2 attempts), then reverted

Guard files are never modified by the loop.

Example verify + guard pair for a Python coverage run:

Verify: pytest --cov=src --cov-report=term 2>&1 | grep TOTAL | awk '{print $NF}'
Guard:  python -m mypy src --ignore-missing-imports

Example for TypeScript type cleanup:

Verify: grep -r "any" src --include="*.ts" | wc -l
Guard:  npx tsc --noEmit

Modes

Codex maps your sentence to one of seven modes automatically — you never pick a mode explicitly.

loop — iterate toward a measurable target (default)

$codex-autoresearch
Improve test coverage in src/ to at least 80%
$codex-autoresearch
Reduce bundle size — it's currently 2.3 MB, get it under 1 MB

plan — turn a vague goal into a validated loop config

$codex-autoresearch
I want to make our API faster but I don't know where to start

Codex will interview you (p95 latency vs throughput? which endpoint?) and produce a ready-to-run loop config.

fix — repair errors until count reaches zero

$codex-autoresearch
pytest is failing, 12 tests broken after the refactor — fix them all

debug — evidence-driven root-cause hunting

$codex-autoresearch
Our API returns 503 randomly under load, no idea why

Each iteration tests one falsifiable hypothesis. Codex presents evidence, not guesses.

security — read-only STRIDE + OWASP audit

$codex-autoresearch
Is this code secure?

ship — readiness verification and release gating

$codex-autoresearch
Ship it

exec — one-shot execution with no loop

$codex-autoresearch
Run the benchmark suite and summarize results

Inline Configuration (optional)

You can override defaults inline during the confirmation step — no file edits needed:

Phrase Effect
Iterations: 20 Cap the loop at 20 iterations
Parallel: 3 Test 3 hypotheses concurrently per round
Guard: npm test Override the inferred guard command
Verify: <command> Override the inferred verify command
Scope: src/api/ Restrict changes to a subdirectory

Example during confirmation:

You:   Go. Iterations: 30, Guard: npm test, Scope: src/api/

Cross-Run Learning

At the end of each iteration Codex writes a structured lesson to .agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/lessons.md:

Iteration 7 — KEPT
Hypothesis: replace explicit `any` with inferred generic in src/utils/mapper.ts
Change: added <T extends Record<string, unknown>> to mapKeys()
Result: any count 31 → 29
Lesson: Generic constraints on utility functions eliminate clusters of `any` downstream.

On session resume Codex reads this file first. Each new run benefits from prior runs.

To resume an interrupted run:

$codex-autoresearch
Resume

Codex re-reads the lessons file, checks git state, re-establishes the baseline, and continues.


Parallel Experiments

Request parallel mode during confirmation or at any time:

You:   Go, parallel 4

Codex runs four hypotheses concurrently, keeps the best result, discards the rest. Useful when hypothesis space is large.


Pivot Protocol

If the loop stalls, escalation happens automatically:

Consecutive discards Action
3 REFINE — narrow hypothesis, try smaller atomic changes
5 PIVOT — change strategy entirely
2 PIVOTs Web search — Codex fetches external references to unstick itself

You are never asked for permission during escalation. The loop continues.


Real Code Examples

Example 1 — TypeScript any elimination (Python verify script)

If you want a custom verify script instead of a one-liner:

# scripts/count_any.py
import subprocess, sys

result = subprocess.run(
    ["grep", "-r", "--include=*.ts", r"\bany\b", "src/"],
    capture_output=True, text=True
)
count = len(result.stdout.strip().splitlines())
print(count)
sys.exit(0)  # always exit 0; the number is what matters

Tell Codex during confirmation:

Verify: python scripts/count_any.py
Guard:  npx tsc --noEmit

Example 2 — pytest coverage loop (Python)

# scripts/coverage_pct.py
import subprocess, re, sys

out = subprocess.check_output(
    ["pytest", "--cov=src", "--cov-report=term", "-q"],
    stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, text=True
)
match = re.search(r"TOTAL\s+\d+\s+\d+\s+(\d+)%", out)
if match:
    print(int(match.group(1)))
    sys.exit(0)
print(0)
sys.exit(0)
$codex-autoresearch
Improve test coverage — target 85%

Verify: python scripts/coverage_pct.py
Guard:  python -m mypy src
Direction: higher
Target: 85
Iterations: 50

Example 3 — bundle size loop (Node.js project)

# scripts/bundle_size.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
npm run build --silent 2>/dev/null
du -k dist/bundle.js | awk '{print $1}'
$codex-autoresearch
Reduce our JS bundle size, currently ~2300 KB, target under 900 KB

Verify: bash scripts/bundle_size.sh
Guard:  npm test
Direction: lower
Target: 900

Example 4 — lint warning count (any language)

# scripts/lint_count.sh
#!/usr/bin/env bash
npx eslint src/ --format json 2>/dev/null \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(sum(len(f['messages']) for f in d))"
$codex-autoresearch
Get our ESLint warning count to zero

Verify: bash scripts/lint_count.sh
Direction: lower
Target: 0

Unattended Runs

For overnight or long runs, ensure Codex CLI approval settings do not interrupt git commit or git revert commands. The simplest option is to run in a disposable or sandboxed repo clone:

git clone . /tmp/autoresearch-sandbox
cd /tmp/autoresearch-sandbox
# launch Codex here with full permissions

Results accumulate in git history. Pull the winning commits back to your main repo when done:

# in your main repo
git fetch /tmp/autoresearch-sandbox main
git cherry-pick <winning-commit-sha>

Session Artifacts

File Contents
.agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/lessons.md Structured lessons from every iteration
.agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/results.log Full per-iteration log (metric value, kept/reverted, elapsed)
.agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/session.json Current session state for resume

These files persist across Codex sessions. Delete them to start fresh.


Troubleshooting

Loop reverts every change:

  • Verify command may be returning a non-numeric value. Test it manually: bash -c "<your verify command>" should print a single number.
  • Metric direction may be wrong. Confirm Direction: lower or Direction: higher during setup.

Guard fires on unrelated files:

  • Narrow scope: Scope: src/specific-module/
  • Or tell Codex explicitly: Do not touch tests/ during confirmation.

Session resume picks up wrong baseline:

  • Delete session.json to force a fresh baseline: rm .agents/skills/codex-autoresearch/session.json

Parallel mode produces merge conflicts:

  • Codex handles this internally via the pivot protocol, but if it gets stuck, reduce parallelism: Parallel: 2

Codex asks questions mid-loop:

  • This means a guard crash produced ambiguous output. Pre-empt it by specifying Guard: <command> || true if guard failures should be non-fatal, or by giving Codex fuller sandbox permissions so it can run git commands freely.

Loop hits PIVOT but makes no progress:

  • Supply a seed hypothesis during confirmation: Hint: try tree-shaking unused imports first
  • Or run plan mode first to produce a richer hypothesis list before switching to loop.

Quick Reference

# Start a loop
$codex-autoresearch
how to use codex-autoresearch-loop

How to use codex-autoresearch-loop on Cursor

AI-first code editor with Composer

1

Prerequisites

Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:

  • Cursor installed and configured on your development machine
  • Node.js version 16.0+ with npm package manager (verify with node --version)
  • Active project directory or workspace where you want to add codex-autoresearch-loop
2

Execute installation command

Execute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:

$npx skills add https://github.com/aradotso/trending-skills --skill codex-autoresearch-loop

The skills CLI fetches codex-autoresearch-loop from GitHub repository aradotso/trending-skills and configures it for Cursor.

3

Select Cursor when prompted

The CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor:

◆ Which agents do you want to install to?
│ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ────
│ • Amp
│ • Antigravity
│ • Cline
│ • Codex
│ ●Cursor(selected)
│ • Cursor
│ • Windsurf
4

Verify installation

Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:

.cursor/skills/codex-autoresearch-loop

Reload or restart Cursor to activate codex-autoresearch-loop. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., /codex-autoresearch-loop) or your agent's skill management interface.

Security & Verification Notice

We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.

Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment.

List & Monetize Your Skill

Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning

GET_STARTED →

Use Cases

User Story & Requirements Generation

Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs

Example

Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios

Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage

Competitive Analysis

Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps

Example

Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities

Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days

Roadmap Prioritization

Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs

Example

Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale

Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster

Stakeholder Communication

Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations

Example

Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement

Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead

Implementation Guide

Prerequisites

  • Claude Desktop or compatible AI client
  • Access to product documentation and roadmap tools (Jira, Notion, etc.)
  • Understanding of product management frameworks (RICE, Jobs-to-be-Done, etc.)
  • Stakeholder contact information and communication channels

Time Estimate

30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements

Installation Steps

  1. 1.Install product management skill
  2. 2.Start with user story generation for known feature
  3. 3.Progress to competitive analysis: research 2-3 competitors
  4. 4.Use for roadmap prioritization: apply RICE/ICE scoring
  5. 5.Draft stakeholder communications and refine based on feedback
  6. 6.Build template library for recurring PM tasks
  7. 7.Share effective prompts with product team

Common Pitfalls

  • Not validating competitive research—verify facts before sharing
  • Accepting user stories without involving engineering team
  • Over-relying on frameworks without qualitative judgment
  • Not customizing outputs to company culture and communication style
  • Skipping stakeholder validation of generated requirements

Best Practices

✓ Do

  • +Validate research and competitive analysis with real data
  • +Collaborate with engineering when generating technical requirements
  • +Customize frameworks and templates to your company context
  • +Use skill for first drafts, refine with stakeholder input
  • +Document successful prompt patterns for PM tasks
  • +Combine AI efficiency with human judgment and intuition

✗ Don't

  • Don't publish competitive analysis without fact-checking
  • Don't finalize user stories without engineering review
  • Don't make prioritization decisions solely on AI scoring
  • Don't skip customer validation of generated requirements
  • Don't ignore company-specific context and culture

💡 Pro Tips

  • Provide context: company goals, constraints, customer feedback
  • Ask for alternatives: 'Show 3 ways to prioritize this roadmap'
  • Request stakeholder-specific formatting: 'Executive summary vs. engineering spec'
  • Use skill for 70% generation + 30% customization to company needs

When to Use This

✓ Use When

Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.

✗ Avoid When

Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.

Learning Path

  1. 1Basic: user stories, feature specs, status updates
  2. 2Intermediate: competitive analysis, prioritization frameworks, PRDs
  3. 3Advanced: product strategy, go-to-market planning, OKR setting
  4. 4Expert: product vision, market positioning, business model innovation

Discussion

Product Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
  • No comments yet — start the thread.
general reviews

Ratings

4.563 reviews
  • Benjamin Jain· Dec 28, 2024

    Keeps context tight: codex-autoresearch-loop is the kind of skill you can hand to a new teammate without a long onboarding doc.

  • Evelyn Flores· Dec 28, 2024

    Useful defaults in codex-autoresearch-loop — fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.

  • Benjamin Perez· Dec 16, 2024

    codex-autoresearch-loop reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Shikha Mishra· Dec 12, 2024

    codex-autoresearch-loop has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Dev White· Dec 4, 2024

    Registry listing for codex-autoresearch-loop matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

  • Hiroshi Haddad· Nov 23, 2024

    codex-autoresearch-loop reduced setup friction for our internal harness; good balance of opinion and flexibility.

  • Mia Robinson· Nov 19, 2024

    codex-autoresearch-loop has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.

  • Benjamin Khanna· Nov 19, 2024

    codex-autoresearch-loop is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.

  • Sakshi Patil· Nov 11, 2024

    Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: codex-autoresearch-loop is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.

  • Evelyn Torres· Nov 7, 2024

    Registry listing for codex-autoresearch-loop matched our evaluation — installs cleanly and behaves as described in the markdown.

showing 1-10 of 63

1 / 7