apify-generate-output-schema▌
apify/agent-skills · updated Apr 8, 2026
MDX-style export adds YAML metadata + attribution linking explainx.ai and this canonical listing URL.
You are generating output schema files for an Apify Actor. The output schema tells Apify Console how to display run results. You will analyze the Actor's source code, create dataset_schema.json, output_schema.json, and key_value_store_schema.json (if the Actor uses key-value store), and update actor.json.
Generate Actor Output Schema
You are generating output schema files for an Apify Actor. The output schema tells Apify Console how to display run results. You will analyze the Actor's source code, create dataset_schema.json, output_schema.json, and key_value_store_schema.json (if the Actor uses key-value store), and update actor.json.
Core Principles
- Analyze code first: Read the Actor's source to understand what data it actually pushes to the dataset — never guess
- Every field is nullable: APIs and websites are unpredictable — always set
"nullable": true - Anonymize examples: Never use real user IDs, usernames, or personal data in examples
- Verify against code: If TypeScript types exist, cross-check the schema against both the type definition AND the code that produces the values
- Reuse existing patterns: Before generating schemas, check if other Actors in the same repository already have output schemas — match their structure, naming conventions, description style, and formatting
- Don't reinvent the wheel: Reuse existing type definitions, interfaces, and utilities from the codebase instead of creating duplicate definitions
Phase 1: Discover Actor Structure
Goal: Locate the Actor and understand its output
Initial request: $ARGUMENTS
Actions:
- Create todo list with all phases
- Find the
.actor/directory containingactor.json - Read
actor.jsonto understand the Actor's configuration - Check if
dataset_schema.json,output_schema.json, andkey_value_store_schema.jsonalready exist - Search for existing schemas in the repository: Look for other
.actor/directories or schema files (e.g.,**/dataset_schema.json,**/output_schema.json,**/key_value_store_schema.json) to learn the repo's conventions — match their description style, field naming, example formatting, and overall structure - Find all places where data is pushed to the dataset:
- JavaScript/TypeScript: Search for
Actor.pushData(,dataset.pushData(,Dataset.pushData( - Python: Search for
Actor.push_data(,dataset.push_data(,Dataset.push_data(
- JavaScript/TypeScript: Search for
- Find all places where data is stored in the key-value store:
- JavaScript/TypeScript: Search for
Actor.setValue(,keyValueStore.setValue(,KeyValueStore.setValue( - Python: Search for
Actor.set_value(,key_value_store.set_value(,KeyValueStore.set_value(
- JavaScript/TypeScript: Search for
- Find output type definitions — reuse them directly instead of recreating from scratch:
- TypeScript: Look for output type interfaces/types (e.g., in
src/types/,src/types/output.ts). If an interface or type already defines the output shape, derive the schema fields from it — do not create a parallel definition - Python: Look for TypedDict, dataclass, or Pydantic model definitions. Use the existing field names, types, and docstrings as the source of truth
- TypeScript: Look for output type interfaces/types (e.g., in
- Check for existing shared schema utilities or helper functions in the codebase that handle schema generation or validation — reuse them rather than creating new logic
- If inline
storages.datasetorstorages.keyValueStoreconfig exists inactor.json, note it for migration
Present findings to user: list all discovered dataset output fields, key-value store keys, their types, and where they come from.
Phase 2: Generate dataset_schema.json
Goal: Create a complete dataset schema with field definitions and display views
File structure
{
"actorSpecification": 1,
"fields": {
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
"type": "object",
"properties": {
// ALL output fields here — every field the Actor can produce,
// not just the ones shown in the overview view
},
"required": [],
"additionalProperties": true
},
"views": {
"overview": {
"title": "Overview",
"description": "Most important fields at a glance",
"transformation": {
"fields": [
// 8-12 most important field names
]
},
"display": {
"component": "table",
"properties": {
// Display config for each overview field
}
}
}
}
}
Consistency with existing schemas
If existing output schemas were found in the repository during Phase 1 (step 5), follow their conventions:
- Match the description writing style (sentence case vs. lowercase, period vs. no period, etc.)
- Match the field naming convention (camelCase vs. snake_case) — this must also match the actual keys produced by the Actor code
- Match the example value style (e.g., date formats, URL patterns, placeholder names)
- Match the view structure (number of fields in overview, display format choices)
- Match the JSON formatting (indentation, property ordering, spacing) — all schemas in the same repository must use identical formatting, including standalone Actors
When the Actor code already has well-defined TypeScript interfaces or Python type classes, derive fields directly from those types rather than re-analyzing pushData/push_data calls from scratch. The type definition is the canonical source.
Hard rules (no exceptions)
| Rule | Detail |
|---|---|
All fields in properties |
The fields.properties object must contain every field the Actor can output, not just the fields shown in the overview view. The views section selects a subset for display — the properties section must be the complete superset |
"nullable": true |
On every field — APIs are unpredictable |
"additionalProperties": true |
On the top-level fields object AND on every nested object within properties. This is the most commonly missed rule — it must appear at both levels |
"required": [] |
Always empty array — on the top-level fields object AND on every nested object within properties |
| Anonymized examples | No real user IDs, usernames, or content |
"type" required with "nullable" |
AJV rejects nullable without a type on the same field |
Warning — most common mistakes:
- Only including fields that appear in the overview view. The
fields.propertiesmust list ALL output fields, even if they are not in theviewssection.- Only adding
"required": []and"additionalProperties": trueon nested object-type properties but forgetting them on the top-levelfieldsobject. Both levels need them.
Note:
nullableis an Apify-specific extension to JSON Schema draft-07. It is intentional and correct.
Field type patterns
String field:
"title": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Title of the scraped item",
"nullable": true,
"example": "Example Item Title"
}
Number field:
"viewCount": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Number of views",
"nullable": true,
"example": 15000
}
Boolean field:
"isVerified": {
"type": "boolean",
"description": "Whether the account is verified",
"nullable": true,
"example": true
}
Array field:
"hashtags": {
"type": "array",
"description": "Hashtags associated with the item",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"nullable": true,
"example": ["#example", "#demo"]
}
Nested object field:
"authorInfo": {
"type": "object",
"description": "Information about the author",
"properties": {
"name": { "type": "string", "nullable": true },
"url": { "type": "string", "nullable": true }
},
"required": [],
"additionalProperties": true,
"nullable": true,
"example": { "name": "Example Author", "url": "https://example.com/author" }
}
Enum field:
"contentType": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Type of content",
"enum": ["article", "video", "image"],
"nullable": true,
"example": "article"
}
Union type (e.g., TypeScript ObjectType | string):
"metadata": {
"type": ["object", "string"],
"description": "Structured metadata object, or error string if unavailable",
"nullable": true,
"example": { "key": "value" }
}
Anonymized example values
Use realistic but generic values. Follow platform ID format conventions:
| Field type | Example approach |
|---|---|
| IDs | Match platform format and length (e.g., 11 chars for YouTube video IDs) |
| Usernames | "exampleuser", "sampleuser123" |
| Display names | "Example Channel", "Sample Author" |
| URLs | Use platform's standard URL for how to use apify-generate-output-schema How to use apify-generate-output-schema on CursorAI-first code editor with Composer 1 PrerequisitesBefore installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
2 Execute installation commandExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation: $npx skills add https://github.com/apify/agent-skills --skill apify-generate-output-schema The skills CLI fetches 3 Select Cursor when promptedThe CLI will show a list of available agents. Use arrow keys to navigate and space to select Cursor: ◆ Which agents do you want to install to? │ │ ── Universal (.agents/skills) ── always included ──── │ • Amp │ • Antigravity │ • Cline │ • Codex │ ●Cursor(selected) │ • Cursor │ • Windsurf 4 Verify installationConfirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location: .cursor/skills/apify-generate-output-schema Reload or restart Cursor to activate apify-generate-output-schema. Access the skill through slash commands (e.g., ⚠ Security & Verification NoticeWe perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use. Skills execute code in your development environment. Always verify the publisher's identity, review recent commits, and test in isolated environments before production deployment. List & Monetize Your SkillSubmit your Claude Code skill and start earning Use Cases▌Task Automation & EfficiencyAutomate repetitive workflows and reduce manual effort Example Generate reports, summarize documents, draft communications ✓ Save 3-5 hours per week on routine tasks Knowledge EnhancementLearn new skills, understand complex topics, get expert guidance Example Explain concepts, provide examples, suggest learning resources ✓ Accelerate learning and skill development by 2x Quality ImprovementEnhance output quality through reviews, suggestions, and refinements Example Review drafts, suggest improvements, catch errors ✓ Improve work quality by 30-40% with less effort Implementation Guide▌Prerequisites
Time Estimate15-45 minutes depending on use case complexity Installation Steps
Common Pitfalls
Best Practices▌✓ Do
✗ Don't
💡 Pro Tips
When to Use This▌✓ Use WhenUse when skill capabilities match your task, clear ROI on time saved, and you can validate outputs. Best for repetitive tasks, learning, and quality improvement. ✗ Avoid WhenAvoid when task requires deep expertise you can't validate, involves sensitive decisions, or when learning process is more valuable than speed of completion. Learning Path▌
DiscussionProduct Hunt–style comments (not star reviews)
general reviews Ratings4.4★★★★★34 reviews
showing 1-10 of 34 1 / 4 |