If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Works with
AI-first code editor with Composer
Before installing skills in Cursor, ensure your development environment meets these requirements:
node --versiondraft-responseExecute the skills CLI command in your project's root directory to begin installation:
Fetches draft-response from anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins and configures it for Cursor.
The CLI shows a list of agents. Use arrow keys and space to select Cursor:
Confirm successful installation by checking the skill directory location:
Restart Cursor to activate draft-response. Access via /draft-response in your agent's command palette.
We perform automated surface-level scans (Gen AI Scanner, Socket, Snyk) during installation. These checks detect common vulnerabilities but do not guarantee complete security. Always review skill source code and verify the publisher's reputation before production use.
Skills execute code in your environment. Always review source, verify the publisher, and test in isolation before production.
Submit your Claude Code skill and start earning
Create detailed user stories, acceptance criteria, and feature specs
Example
Generate user stories for 'password reset feature' with acceptance criteria, edge cases, and test scenarios
Reduce spec writing time by 50%, ensure comprehensive coverage
Research competitors, compare features, identify gaps
Example
Analyze 5 competitor products, create feature comparison matrix, suggest differentiation opportunities
Complete competitive research in 2 hours instead of 2 days
Evaluate features using frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano) and create prioritized backlogs
Example
Score 20 feature ideas using RICE framework, generate prioritized roadmap with rationale
0
total installs
0
this week
11.0K
GitHub stars
0
upvotes
Run in your terminal
0
installs
0
this week
11.0K
stars
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Draft a professional, customer-facing response tailored to the situation, customer relationship, and communication context.
/draft-response <context about the customer question, issue, or request>
Examples:
/draft-response Acme Corp is asking when the new dashboard feature will ship/draft-response Customer escalation β their integration has been down for 2 days/draft-response Responding to a feature request we won't be building/draft-response Customer hit a billing error and wants a resolution ASAPParse the user's input to determine:
Gather relevant background from available sources:
~~email:
~~chat:
~~CRM (if connected):
~~support platform (if connected):
~~knowledge base:
Produce a response tailored to the situation:
## Draft Response
**To:** [Customer contact name]
**Re:** [Subject/topic]
**Channel:** [Email / Ticket / Chat]
**Tone:** [Empathetic / Professional / Technical / Celebratory / Candid]
---
[Draft response text]
---
### Notes for You (internal β do not send)
- **Why this approach:** [Rationale for tone and content choices]
- **Things to verify:** [Any facts or commitments to confirm before sending]
- **Risk factors:** [Anything sensitive about this response]
- **Follow-up needed:** [Actions to take after sending]
- **Escalation note:** [If this should be reviewed by someone else first]
Before presenting the draft, verify:
After presenting the draft:
For most customer communications, follow this structure:
1. Acknowledgment / Context (1-2 sentences)
- Acknowledge what they said, asked, or are experiencing
- Show you understand their situation
2. Core Message (1-3 paragraphs)
- Deliver the main information, answer, or update
- Be specific and concrete
- Include relevant details they need
3. Next Steps (1-3 bullets)
- What YOU will do and by when
- What THEY need to do (if anything)
- When they'll hear from you next
4. Closing (1 sentence)
- Warm but professional sign-off
- Reinforce you're available if needed
| Situation | Tone | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Good news / wins | Celebratory | Enthusiastic, warm, congratulatory, forward-looking |
| Routine update | Professional | Clear, concise, informative, friendly |
| Technical response | Precise | Accurate, detailed, structured, patient |
| Delayed delivery | Accountable | Honest, apologetic, action-oriented, specific |
| Bad news | Candid | Direct, empathetic, solution-oriented, respectful |
| Issue / outage | Urgent | Immediate, transparent, actionable, reassuring |
| Escalation | Executive | Composed, ownership-taking, plan-presenting, confident |
| Billing / account | Precise | Clear, factual, empathetic, resolution-focused |
New Customer (0-3 months):
Established Customer (3+ months):
Frustrated or Escalated Customer:
DO:
DON'T:
Answering a product question:
Responding to an issue or bug:
Handling an escalation:
Delivering bad news (feature sunset, delay, can't-fix):
Sharing good news (feature launch, milestone, recognition):
Declining a request (feature request, discount, exception):
Hi [Name],
Thank you for reporting this β I can see how [specific impact] would be
frustrating for your team.
I've confirmed the issue and escalated it to our engineering team as a
[priority level]. Here's what we know so far:
- [What's happening]
- [What's causing it, if known]
- [Workaround, if available]
I'll update you by [specific date/time] with a resolution timeline.
In the meantime, [workaround details if applicable].
Let me know if you have any questions or if this is impacting you in
other ways I should know about.
Best,
[Your name]
Hi [Name],
Thank you for reaching out about this β I understand billing issues
need prompt attention, and I want to make sure this gets resolved
quickly.
I've looked into your account and here's what I'm seeing:
- [What happened β clear factual explanation]
- [Impact on their account β charges, access, etc.]
Here's what I'm doing to fix this:
- [Action 1 β with timeline]
- [Action 2 β if applicable]
[If resolution is immediate: "This has been corrected and you should
see the change reflected within [timeframe]."]
[If needs investigation: "I'm escalating this to our billing team
and will have an update for you by [specific date]."]
I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Let me know if you have any
questions about your account.
Best,
[Your name]
Hi [Name],
Thank you for sharing this request β I can see why [capability] would
be valuable for [their use case].
I discussed this with our product team, and this isn't something we're
planning to build in the near term. The primary reason is [honest,
respectful explanation β e.g., it serves a narrow use case, it conflicts
with our architecture direction, etc.].
That said, I want to make sure you can accomplish your goal. Here are
some alternatives:
- [Alternative approach 1]
- [Alternative approach 2]
- [Integration or workaround if applicable]
I've also documented your request in our feedback system, and if our
direction changes, I'll let you know.
Would any of these alternatives work for your team? Happy to dig
deeper into any of them.
Best,
[Your name]
Hi [Name],
I wanted to reach out directly to let you know about an issue affecting
[service/feature] that I know your team relies on.
**What happened:** [Clear, non-technical explanation]
**Impact:** [How it affects them specifically]
**Status:** [Current status β investigating / identified / fixing / resolved]
**ETA for resolution:** [Specific time if known, or "we'll update every X hours"]
[If applicable: "In the meantime, you can [workaround]."]
I'm personally tracking this and will update you as soon as we have a
resolution. You can also check [status page URL] for real-time updates.
I'm sorry for the disruption to your team's work. We take this seriously
and [what you're doing to prevent recurrence if known].
[Your name]
Hi [Name],
I wanted to check in β I sent over [what you sent] on [date] and
wanted to make sure it didn't get lost in the shuffle.
[Brief reminder of what you need from them or what you're offering]
If now isn't a good time, no worries β just let me know when would be
better, and I'm happy to reconnect then.
Best,
[Your name]
| Situation | Follow-up Timing |
|---|---|
| Unanswered question | 2-3 business days |
| Open support issue | Daily until resolved for critical, 2-3 days for standard |
| Post-meeting action items | Within 24 hours (send notes), then check at deadline |
| General check-in | As needed for ongoing issues |
| After delivering bad news | 1 week to check on impact and sentiment |
Escalate to your manager when:
Escalate to product/engineering when:
Escalation format:
ESCALATION: [Customer Name] β [One-line summary]
Urgency: [Critical / High / Medium]
Customer impact: [What's broken for them]
History: [Brief background β 2-3 sentences]
What I've tried: [Actions taken so far]
What I need: [Specific help or decision needed]
Deadline: [When this needs to be resolved by]
Make data-driven prioritization decisions faster
Draft PRDs, status updates, and stakeholder presentations
Example
Create executive summary of Q3 roadmap, monthly progress report, feature launch announcement
Save 3-5 hours/week on communication overhead
Prerequisites
Time Estimate
30-60 minutes to see productivity improvements
Steps
Common Pitfalls
β Do
β Don't
π‘ Pro Tips
β Use when
Use for user story writing, competitive research, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder communication, and PRD drafting. Best for reducing repetitive documentation and research work.
β Avoid when
Avoid for strategic product vision (requires deep customer empathy), pricing decisions (needs market and financial expertise), or when face-to-face customer discovery is more valuable than speed.
mattpocock/skills
parcadei/continuous-claude-v3
cursor/plugins
pproenca/dot-skills
ailabs-393/ai-labs-claude-skills
jezweb/claude-skills
Solid pick for teams standardizing on skills: draft-response is focused, and the summary matches what you get after install.
draft-response is among the better-maintained entries we tried; worth keeping pinned for repeat workflows.
Useful defaults in draft-response β fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
I recommend draft-response for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
We added draft-response from the explainx registry; install was straightforward and the SKILL.md answered most questions upfront.
Useful defaults in draft-response β fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
Useful defaults in draft-response β fewer surprises than typical one-off scripts, and it plays nicely with `npx skills` flows.
draft-response has been reliable in day-to-day use. Documentation quality is above average for community skills.
draft-response fits our agent workflows well β practical, well scoped, and easy to wire into existing repos.
I recommend draft-response for anyone iterating fast on agent tooling; clear intent and a small, reviewable surface area.
showing 1-10 of 67